[Wmlbrowser] Poor Rendering of some sites

[Matthew Wilson]

Colin J. Williams wrote:
> 
> 
> Matthew Wilson wrote:
>> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>>> This page passes the W3C Validator but is poorly rendered by Firefox 
>>> 2.0.0.4: 
>>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070609.COWENTE09/TPStory/?query=wente 
>>>
>>>
>>> This page is for the W3C Validator: http://validator.w3.org/
>>>
>>> It also is poorly rendered.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Firstly, I don't see any rendering problems with these pages. What 
>> exactly do you mean?
>>
>> Secondly, these pages don't seem to be WML.
> Many thanks for your speedy response.  If you agree, I would be glad to 
> email you pictures of the two pages.
> 
> I am not familiar with WML 
> <http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=3&url=http%3A%2F%2Fthewml.org%2F&ei=fu5vRvfrIY6GgATHhvnuAg&usg=AFQjCNGQHxgo8eheQoE43fSXXBCyn0p-lQ&sig2=FNxpxlGShPSzKFr6Hbyr2A>, 
> I use Windows XP.
> 
> I had assumed that the two pages referenced above were intended to be 
> HTML compatible.
> 
> Incidentally, my display is set for 1280 X 1024.  Is that possibly a 
> source of problems?
> 
> Looking more closely, I see that the list is wmlbrowser.  Is it possible 
> that I have posted my message to the wrong list?

I think so. This list is for the wmlbrowser extension, which renders 
Wireless Markup Language pages.

Which list were you looking for? A general Firefox list perhaps?

Matthew