From stubenschrott at gmx.net Mon Sep 1 09:50:53 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:50:53 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Some janitor patches In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0808311906g1dabb152t9067aef21ce8cb06@mail.gmail.com> References: <75153FFC-6447-4D0C-BC4A-AD22663CF388@mac.com> <644fc65e0808311906g1dabb152t9067aef21ce8cb06@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48BC1D6D.1010806@gmx.net> Doug Kearns wrote: > CheckForEofInHereDocument - Vim's behaviour is to actually execute the > heredoc in this situation. Hmm... I don't have a strong opinion here, so let's rather stick to Vim's behavior. > AllowingWhitespaceBeforeHereDocumentDelimiterInVimperatorrc - applied, > thanks. Thanks Daniel. > AddBeepTogiWhenNoLastInput - the current behaviour is actually correct. > If there is no "last input field" then the first is focused (or beep if > there's no input fields). Right, good catch and great review. Also thanks to Daniel, hope you are not angry that just one of the 3 patches was applied, but honestly we are very happy about each patch, and it's nice that you contribute to Vimperator. -- Martin From daniel.schaffrath at mac.com Mon Sep 1 11:52:58 2008 From: daniel.schaffrath at mac.com (Daniel Schaffrath) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:52:58 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Some janitor patches In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0808311906g1dabb152t9067aef21ce8cb06@mail.gmail.com> References: <75153FFC-6447-4D0C-BC4A-AD22663CF388@mac.com> <644fc65e0808311906g1dabb152t9067aef21ce8cb06@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2008/09/01 , at 04:06, Doug Kearns wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Schaffrath > wrote: >> Dear Community, >> >> attached you find some janitor patches against the current cvs. >> Please >> consider reviewing and applying if applicable. > > CheckForEofInHereDocument - Vim's behaviour is to actually execute the > heredoc in this situation. Hmm... Ok... at least something happens :) Although I don't think that's a very "natural" choice. > AllowingWhitespaceBeforeHereDocumentDelimiterInVimperatorrc - applied, > thanks. > > AddBeepTogiWhenNoLastInput - the current behaviour is actually > correct. > If there is no "last input field" then the first is focused (or beep > if > there's no input fields). Oh. That is very true. Sorry for the confusion! > Thanks, > Doug Thank you, Daniel From vimperator at vanhoecke.org Wed Sep 3 00:06:10 2008 From: vimperator at vanhoecke.org (Guido Van Hoecke) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:06:10 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? Message-ID: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> Hi, I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google Chrome, but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all studying the available info on the new kid in town. Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could ever be supported on GC? My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... Very eager to read your comments! Guido. -- Remember, Grasshopper, falling down 1000 stairs begins by tripping over the first one. -- Confusion http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places! From mahefa.randimbisoa at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 00:25:10 2008 From: mahefa.randimbisoa at gmail.com (mahefa randimbisoa) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:25:10 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> Message-ID: <2ba1fac40809030025w26d5e983g7b9f409690d5545f@mail.gmail.com> Same thoughts here. -- Mahefa http://identi.ca/notice/456199 From dpb at driftaway.org Wed Sep 3 00:33:52 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:33:52 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> Message-ID: 2008/9/3 Guido Van Hoecke : > Hi, > > I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google Chrome, > but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all studying > the available info on the new kid in town. > > Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could > ever be supported on GC? > > My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not > possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... > > Very eager to read your comments! > > Guido. There's been a little bit talk about it on the IRC channel, but not that much. I don't think Vimperator as such will ever be supported with it, it probably needs to be done from scratch pretty much, as GC doesn't use XUL. I'm interested in trying out GC, but I have to wait for them to get out the Linux and Mac versions before doing that.. I've been interested in making a Vimperator clone that uses Webkit for quite a while now. If GC has atleast as simple extension api as Firefox/Gecko, then it's quite possible that I'd do it with that instead of making a browser from scratch... But we'll see. -- Daniel From chm.duquesne at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 05:17:20 2008 From: chm.duquesne at gmail.com (Christophe-Marie Duquesne) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:17:20 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> Message-ID: <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> See also the epiphany thread : http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/vimperator/2008-April/001303.html On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Bainton wrote: > 2008/9/3 Guido Van Hoecke : > > Hi, > > > > I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google Chrome, > > but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all studying > > the available info on the new kid in town. > > > > Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could > > ever be supported on GC? > > > > My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not > > possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... > > > > Very eager to read your comments! > > > > Guido. > > There's been a little bit talk about it on the IRC channel, but not that > much. > > I don't think Vimperator as such will ever be supported with it, it > probably needs to be done from scratch pretty much, as GC doesn't use > XUL. > > I'm interested in trying out GC, but I have to wait for them to get > out the Linux and Mac versions before doing that.. I've been > interested in making a Vimperator clone that uses Webkit for quite a > while now. If GC has atleast as simple extension api as Firefox/Gecko, > then it's quite possible that I'd do it with that instead of making a > browser from scratch... But we'll see. > > -- > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -- Christophe-Marie Duquesne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dpb at driftaway.org Wed Sep 3 05:43:34 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:43:34 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Epiphany? That's a Seamonkey thread. It's quite a different thing to port Vimperator to Seamonkey compared to Chrome. Seamonkey uses Gecko and XUL, just like Firefox, Chrome doesn't. -- Daniel 2008/9/3 Christophe-Marie Duquesne : > See also the epiphany thread : > http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/vimperator/2008-April/001303.html > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Bainton wrote: >> >> 2008/9/3 Guido Van Hoecke : >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google Chrome, >> > but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all studying >> > the available info on the new kid in town. >> > >> > Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could >> > ever be supported on GC? >> > >> > My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not >> > possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... >> > >> > Very eager to read your comments! >> > >> > Guido. >> >> There's been a little bit talk about it on the IRC channel, but not that >> much. >> >> I don't think Vimperator as such will ever be supported with it, it >> probably needs to be done from scratch pretty much, as GC doesn't use >> XUL. >> >> I'm interested in trying out GC, but I have to wait for them to get >> out the Linux and Mac versions before doing that.. I've been >> interested in making a Vimperator clone that uses Webkit for quite a >> while now. If GC has atleast as simple extension api as Firefox/Gecko, >> then it's quite possible that I'd do it with that instead of making a >> browser from scratch... But we'll see. >> >> -- >> Daniel >> _______________________________________________ >> Vimperator mailing list >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > -- > Christophe-Marie Duquesne > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > From chm.duquesne at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 05:58:06 2008 From: chm.duquesne at gmail.com (Christophe-Marie Duquesne) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:58:06 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> Yes, I was thinking about seamonkey, and I typed epiphany (-_- I need sleep...) Anyway, I was thinking having a look on this thread could be usefull, since you learn that even on a browser very similar to firefox, porting vimperator can be tricky since there are parts of the code that are firefox-dependant. On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Bainton wrote: > Epiphany? That's a Seamonkey thread. It's quite a different thing to > port Vimperator to Seamonkey compared to Chrome. Seamonkey uses Gecko > and XUL, just like Firefox, Chrome doesn't. > > -- > Daniel > > 2008/9/3 Christophe-Marie Duquesne : > > See also the epiphany thread : > > http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/vimperator/2008-April/001303.html > > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Bainton > wrote: > >> > >> 2008/9/3 Guido Van Hoecke : > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google > Chrome, > >> > but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all > studying > >> > the available info on the new kid in town. > >> > > >> > Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could > >> > ever be supported on GC? > >> > > >> > My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not > >> > possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... > >> > > >> > Very eager to read your comments! > >> > > >> > Guido. > >> > >> There's been a little bit talk about it on the IRC channel, but not that > >> much. > >> > >> I don't think Vimperator as such will ever be supported with it, it > >> probably needs to be done from scratch pretty much, as GC doesn't use > >> XUL. > >> > >> I'm interested in trying out GC, but I have to wait for them to get > >> out the Linux and Mac versions before doing that.. I've been > >> interested in making a Vimperator clone that uses Webkit for quite a > >> while now. If GC has atleast as simple extension api as Firefox/Gecko, > >> then it's quite possible that I'd do it with that instead of making a > >> browser from scratch... But we'll see. > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Vimperator mailing list > >> Vimperator at mozdev.org > >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > > > > > -- > > Christophe-Marie Duquesne > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vimperator mailing list > > Vimperator at mozdev.org > > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -- Christophe-Marie Duquesne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dpb at driftaway.org Wed Sep 3 06:02:48 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:02:48 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Yeah, but that's still quite possible to be done. Porting Vimperator to Chrome probably requires you to start nearly from scratch. -- Daniel 2008/9/3 Christophe-Marie Duquesne : > Yes, I was thinking about seamonkey, and I typed epiphany (-_- I need > sleep...) > > Anyway, I was thinking having a look on this thread could be usefull, since > you learn that even on a browser very similar to firefox, porting vimperator > can be tricky since there are parts of the code that are firefox-dependant. > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Bainton wrote: >> >> Epiphany? That's a Seamonkey thread. It's quite a different thing to >> port Vimperator to Seamonkey compared to Chrome. Seamonkey uses Gecko >> and XUL, just like Firefox, Chrome doesn't. >> >> -- >> Daniel >> >> 2008/9/3 Christophe-Marie Duquesne : >> > See also the epiphany thread : >> > http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/vimperator/2008-April/001303.html >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Bainton >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> 2008/9/3 Guido Van Hoecke : >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I was expecting lots of vimperator-addict comments about Google >> >> > Chrome, >> >> > but to my surprise, I have seen none yet. I suppose you're all >> >> > studying >> >> > the available info on the new kid in town. >> >> > >> >> > Let me throw in the big one: is it foreseeable that vimperator could >> >> > ever be supported on GC? >> >> > >> >> > My first impressions of GC are rather positive, but it's just not >> >> > possible to seriously consider it without vimperator... >> >> > >> >> > Very eager to read your comments! >> >> > >> >> > Guido. >> >> >> >> There's been a little bit talk about it on the IRC channel, but not >> >> that >> >> much. >> >> >> >> I don't think Vimperator as such will ever be supported with it, it >> >> probably needs to be done from scratch pretty much, as GC doesn't use >> >> XUL. >> >> >> >> I'm interested in trying out GC, but I have to wait for them to get >> >> out the Linux and Mac versions before doing that.. I've been >> >> interested in making a Vimperator clone that uses Webkit for quite a >> >> while now. If GC has atleast as simple extension api as Firefox/Gecko, >> >> then it's quite possible that I'd do it with that instead of making a >> >> browser from scratch... But we'll see. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Daniel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Vimperator mailing list >> >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Christophe-Marie Duquesne >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Vimperator mailing list >> > Vimperator at mozdev.org >> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Vimperator mailing list >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > -- > Christophe-Marie Duquesne > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > From milezv at yandex.ru Thu Sep 4 02:53:09 2008 From: milezv at yandex.ru (Konstantin) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:53:09 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] plugins updated Message-ID: <48BFB005.50407@yandex.ru> FYI: colortab.js & cssrules.js plugins updated in CVS: colortab.js - added workaround for Fx3 default theme, cssrules.js - updated to 0.2pre version. For cssrules.js plugin it's a major update, as there're a lot of new features (among them is improved stylesheets handling) and bugs fixed. See docs at top of cssrules.js source for details. It's not 0.2 as there're still a couple of TODO's but it's stable as I use it for my main work in this state for quite a long time and haven't found any serious issues. If you find any bugs in my plugins feel free to email me. -- Konstantin Stepanov Web Developer From stubenschrott at gmx.net Thu Sep 4 11:17:03 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:17:03 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48C0261F.7080105@gmx.net> I tried GC, and it really seems nice in many regards, but as long as it doesn't have a Linux version and an extension api, i am not even thinking about it. Also one disadvantage is, that i'd like the vimperator metaphor in more programs, and the mozilla platform also provides music player, calendar, mail, etc. which could be vimperatorized. If i switched vimperator to use GC only, only the web browser would be able to benefit. As a side note, i'd REALLY like to integrate the url suggestions when you type something in the omni box also in vimperator, maybe it's possible when i study GC's source. -- Martin From ted at tedpavlic.com Thu Sep 4 12:33:35 2008 From: ted at tedpavlic.com (Ted Pavlic) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <48C0261F.7080105@gmx.net> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> <48C0261F.7080105@gmx.net> Message-ID: <48C0380F.4050100@tedpavlic.com> > Also one disadvantage is, that i'd like the vimperator metaphor in more > programs, and the mozilla platform also provides music player, calendar, > mail, etc. which could be vimperatorized. If i switched vimperator to > use GC only, only the web browser would be able to benefit. Note: I think Google brought out Chrome in an attempt to make all of those applications a product of the browser (rather than independent components running in parallel). So maybe in a perfect Google world, the only thing you need to Vimperatorize (liberate? vimperate?) is the browser. (I notice that hitting Cntrl+Shift+N in GC brings up a history-less browser. I don't really have a need for such a thing, but I can see how being able to bring up a stealth browser at a keystroke might be nice. I also like that GC doesn't have many menus -- it makes me think that it's designed to be keyboard friendly, and so maybe something like a GCVimperator wouldn't be difficult to come by) -- Ted Pavlic From stubenschrott at gmx.net Thu Sep 4 12:43:30 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:43:30 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] No comment about Google Chrome? In-Reply-To: <48C0380F.4050100@tedpavlic.com> References: <48BE3762.4060604@vanhoecke.org> <8ccc3510809030517g12d516cfrb7e60e1789c62547@mail.gmail.com> <8ccc3510809030558w68bf59c8y9e24ebe16e1b2974@mail.gmail.com> <48C0261F.7080105@gmx.net> <48C0380F.4050100@tedpavlic.com> Message-ID: <48C03A62.6060509@gmx.net> Ted Pavlic wrote: >> Also one disadvantage is, that i'd like the vimperator metaphor in more >> programs, and the mozilla platform also provides music player, calendar, >> mail, etc. which could be vimperatorized. If i switched vimperator to >> use GC only, only the web browser would be able to benefit. > > Note: I think Google brought out Chrome in an attempt to make all of > those applications a product of the browser (rather than independent > components running in parallel). Sure, that's their plan. > So maybe in a perfect Google world, the only thing you need to > Vimperatorize (liberate? vimperate?) is the browser. I am not a fan of web based applications for things which i do daily (like mail, music, organizer,...) because it's interfaces are usually slower (that became better with AJAX), but the main reason is, they take longer to get there (since you usually need to enter a password or something) and can't be customized as much (in terms of keybindings). -- Martin From schlachthausfunf at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 04:01:37 2008 From: schlachthausfunf at gmail.com (Jan Snyder) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] d destroy Message-ID: Quick question: been trying to get rid of the mapping from the "d" key. I generally don't hit it, but sometimes when surfing I do and it kills the page. I would at least feel safer if it were changed to a capital "D" instead. at least then one has to hit shift. -jan From fb at intoxicatedmind.net Fri Sep 5 04:32:13 2008 From: fb at intoxicatedmind.net (Frank Blendinger) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:32:13 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] d destroy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080905113213.GB10742@intoxicatedmind.net> Hi. Jan Snyder enlightened the world by writing these words of wisdom: > Quick question: been trying to get rid of the mapping from the "d" > key. I generally don't hit it, but sometimes when surfing I do and it > kills the page. I would at least feel safer if it were changed to a > capital "D" instead. at least then one has to hit shift. Just put these mappings in your vimperatorrc: map d map D :tabclose Btw, do you know the 'u' key? You can undo an accidental tabclose action with it. Greetings, Frank -- Frank Blendinger | fb(at)intoxicatedmind.net | GPG: 0x0BF2FE7A Fingerprint: BB64 F2B8 DFD8 BF90 0F2E 892B 72CF 7A41 0BF2 FE7A "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." (Homer Simpson) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ivan.wills at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 06:46:17 2008 From: ivan.wills at gmail.com (Ivan Wills) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 23:46:17 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] Memory Leak Message-ID: <5d857fbe0809050646y3b2680f2l4960e33fbeb2b265@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I have recently upgraded to vimperator 1.2 and there appears to be a significant memory leak (~1MB per 10 minutes while leaving the browser alone). Disabling vimperator fixes the problem which is why I think the memory leak is with vimperator. Also I have noticed a problem with Gmail when vimperator is running in that I cannot actually get into Gmail standard view. Are these problems know or are there any work-a-rounds? Ivan Wills -- email/jabber: ivan.wills at gmail.com / / _ _ / \ / | | | | / \/ \_| | | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.schaffrath at mac.com Fri Sep 5 07:14:38 2008 From: daniel.schaffrath at mac.com (Daniel Schaffrath) Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:14:38 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] d destroy In-Reply-To: <20080905113213.GB10742@intoxicatedmind.net> References: <20080905113213.GB10742@intoxicatedmind.net> Message-ID: <061B9011-387B-45D4-A151-53C0049EF88B@mac.com> On 2008/09/05 , at 13:32, Frank Blendinger wrote: > Jan Snyder enlightened the world by > writing > these words of wisdom: >> Quick question: been trying to get rid of the mapping from the "d" >> key. I generally don't hit it, but sometimes when surfing I do and it >> kills the page. I would at least feel safer if it were changed to a >> capital "D" instead. at least then one has to hit shift. > > Just put these mappings in your vimperatorrc: > > map d > map D :tabclose Jan, btw2: 'D' has the default mapping to destroy the current tab and focus the next tab left to the closed one (as opposed to 'd' which focuses to the right). For me, that's a very useful feature. > Btw, do you know the 'u' key? You can undo an accidental tabclose > action > with it. And btw3: it even undos changes you did to HTML forms, so you don't need to be afraid of anything. Your, Daniel From schlachthausfunf at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 15:50:09 2008 From: schlachthausfunf at gmail.com (Jan Snyder) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] d Destoy U Message-ID: > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:14:38 +0200 > From: Daniel Schaffrath > Subject: Re: [Vimperator] d destroy > To: vimperator at mozdev.org > Message-ID: <061B9011-387B-45D4-A151-53C0049EF88B at mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > On 2008/09/05 , at 13:32, Frank Blendinger wrote: >> Jan Snyder enlightened the world by >> writing >> these words of wisdom: >>> Quick question: been trying to get rid of the mapping from the "d" >>> key. I generally don't hit it, but sometimes when surfing I do and it >>> kills the page. I would at least feel safer if it were changed to a >>> capital "D" instead. at least then one has to hit shift. >> >> Just put these mappings in your vimperatorrc: >> >> map d >> map D :tabclose > > Jan, btw2: 'D' has the default mapping to destroy the current tab and > focus the next tab left to the closed one (as opposed to 'd' which > focuses to the right). For me, that's a very useful feature. > >> Btw, do you know the 'u' key? You can undo an accidental tabclose >> action >> with it. > > And btw3: it even undos changes you did to HTML forms, so you don't > need to be afraid of anything. > > > Your, > Daniel Nice. Didn't know tabclose could be undone with 'u', so that solves it. I went through all the mapping help trying unmap that 'd' key. It apparently isn't unmapped easily. -jan From fb at intoxicatedmind.net Fri Sep 5 16:01:26 2008 From: fb at intoxicatedmind.net (Frank Blendinger) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 01:01:26 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] d Destoy U In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080905230126.GC10742@intoxicatedmind.net> Hi. Jan Snyder enlightened the world by writing these words of wisdom: > >>> Quick question: been trying to get rid of the mapping from the "d" > >>> key. I generally don't hit it, but sometimes when surfing I do and it > >>> kills the page. I would at least feel safer if it were changed to a > >>> capital "D" instead. at least then one has to hit shift. > >> > >> Just put these mappings in your vimperatorrc: > >> > >> map d > > Nice. Didn't know tabclose could be undone with 'u', so that solves > it. I went through all the mapping help trying unmap that 'd' key. It > apparently isn't unmapped easily. is right on top in the key mapping help, and it can be mapped just fine to `d', as I have written before. Didn't that work for you? Greetings, Frank -- Frank Blendinger | fb(at)intoxicatedmind.net | GPG: 0x0BF2FE7A Fingerprint: BB64 F2B8 DFD8 BF90 0F2E 892B 72CF 7A41 0BF2 FE7A "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." (Homer Simpson) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From dotancohen at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 23:36:29 2008 From: dotancohen at gmail.com (Dotan Cohen) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 09:36:29 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] Undo 'u' command for forms? Message-ID: <880dece00809052336r585c0320u6be9ccec44ab88de@mail.gmail.com> I know enough Russian to hold a short conversation, but I really don't know enough to say "Submit" or "Reset". So when I was confronted with this form I randomly selected the incorrect button: http://www.rapget.com/contact.html It turns out that while the undo command 'u' will undo _some_ changes to forms, it will not undo a Reset action. Can this functionality be added to Vimperator? Thanks! -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-? ?-?-?-?-?-?-? From dotancohen at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 23:59:59 2008 From: dotancohen at gmail.com (Dotan Cohen) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 09:59:59 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] Undo 'u' command for forms? In-Reply-To: <880dece00809052336r585c0320u6be9ccec44ab88de@mail.gmail.com> References: <880dece00809052336r585c0320u6be9ccec44ab88de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <880dece00809052359w4af1a699xaf904bb518bf9d8b@mail.gmail.com> I found another creative solution to the problem, I put this in userContent: input[type=reset] {display: none;} However, I would still like to know if undo for reset buttons can be implemented. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-? ?-?-?-?-?-?-? From stubenschrott at gmx.net Sat Sep 6 14:49:27 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:49:27 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] d destroy In-Reply-To: <061B9011-387B-45D4-A151-53C0049EF88B@mac.com> References: <20080905113213.GB10742@intoxicatedmind.net> <061B9011-387B-45D4-A151-53C0049EF88B@mac.com> Message-ID: <48C2FAE7.20403@gmx.net> Daniel Schaffrath wrote: > Jan, btw2: 'D' has the default mapping to destroy the current tab and > focus the next tab left to the closed one (as opposed to 'd' which > focuses to the right). For me, that's a very useful feature. Yeah, although I should fix it that it switches to the correct tab before destroying the current one to make the display smoother and not showing a wrong tab for a short time - my day needed 48 hours for all the things i want to do :( -- Martin From stubenschrott at gmx.net Sat Sep 6 14:51:03 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:51:03 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Undo 'u' command for forms? In-Reply-To: <880dece00809052359w4af1a699xaf904bb518bf9d8b@mail.gmail.com> References: <880dece00809052336r585c0320u6be9ccec44ab88de@mail.gmail.com> <880dece00809052359w4af1a699xaf904bb518bf9d8b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48C2FB47.5040500@gmx.net> Dotan Cohen wrote: > I found another creative solution to the problem, I put this in userContent: > input[type=reset] {display: none;} > > However, I would still like to know if undo for reset buttons can be > implemented. Thanks. Not really. It just uses the firefox undo last tab close functionality. Extending "u" to also other things like adding bookmarks, etc. would be fine, but a lot of work. From schlachthausfunf at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 16:11:34 2008 From: schlachthausfunf at gmail.com (Jan Snyder) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] back and forward Message-ID: I found it somewhat disconcerting because I use the 'shift+h' and 'shift+l' for going back and forward heavily. I don't have the graphical direction buttons visible. And I'm on a Colemak keyboard layout. 'D' and 'H' are next to each other, so sometimes I want to go back and find I hit 'd' so the page is empty. But 'u' for undo is okay for me really. On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > Send Vimperator mailing list submissions to > vimperator at mozdev.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > vimperator-request at mozdev.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > vimperator-owner at mozdev.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Vimperator digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: d destroy (Martin Stubenschrott) > 2. Re: Undo 'u' command for forms? (Martin Stubenschrott) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:49:27 +0200 > From: Martin Stubenschrott > Subject: Re: [Vimperator] d destroy > To: vimperator at mozdev.org > Message-ID: <48C2FAE7.20403 at gmx.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Daniel Schaffrath wrote: >> Jan, btw2: 'D' has the default mapping to destroy the current tab and >> focus the next tab left to the closed one (as opposed to 'd' which >> focuses to the right). For me, that's a very useful feature. > > Yeah, although I should fix it that it switches to the correct tab before > destroying the current one to make the display smoother and not showing > a wrong tab for a short time - my day needed 48 hours for all the things > i want to do :( > > -- > Martin > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:51:03 +0200 > From: Martin Stubenschrott > Subject: Re: [Vimperator] Undo 'u' command for forms? > To: vimperator at mozdev.org > Message-ID: <48C2FB47.5040500 at gmx.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Dotan Cohen wrote: > >> I found another creative solution to the problem, I put this in userContent: >> input[type=reset] {display: none;} >> >> However, I would still like to know if undo for reset buttons can be >> implemented. Thanks. > > Not really. It just uses the firefox undo last tab close functionality. > Extending "u" to also other things like adding bookmarks, etc. would be > fine, but a lot of work. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > End of Vimperator Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7 > ***************************************** > From dotancohen at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 01:22:37 2008 From: dotancohen at gmail.com (Dotan Cohen) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:22:37 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] Undo 'u' command for forms? In-Reply-To: <48C2FB47.5040500@gmx.net> References: <880dece00809052336r585c0320u6be9ccec44ab88de@mail.gmail.com> <880dece00809052359w4af1a699xaf904bb518bf9d8b@mail.gmail.com> <48C2FB47.5040500@gmx.net> Message-ID: <880dece00809080122u2978b43cl6787ba294fa71e1@mail.gmail.com> 2008/9/7 Martin Stubenschrott : >> I found another creative solution to the problem, I put this in userContent: >> input[type=reset] {display: none;} >> >> However, I would still like to know if undo for reset buttons can be >> implemented. Thanks. > > Not really. It just uses the firefox undo last tab close functionality. > Extending "u" to also other things like adding bookmarks, etc. would be > fine, but a lot of work. Thanks, Martin. If 'u' is just "reopen last tab" then it really shouldn't be analogous to VIM's 'u' function. I'll not be stubborn about it, but 'u' in VIM really does undo almost anything that the user does. In Vimperator, it only undoes one of hundreds of possible user actions. In any case, it is something to consider. I'll file it bugzilla. Thanks! -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-? ?-?-?-?-?-?-? From dotancohen at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 08:23:43 2008 From: dotancohen at gmail.com (Dotan Cohen) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:23:43 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] Ubiquity? VImperator? Message-ID: <880dece00809080823n43fc9d3bse3eb3e0b712a5893@mail.gmail.com> There is a lot of buzz regarding the Ubiquity extension, calling it a "browser command line". This sounds like it basically does what Vimperator does, plus a few features but minus many more. It might be good to ride on Ubiquity's fame a bit and start promoting Vimperator. I also find it funny that Windows has taught the world to fear the CLI, and now people are falling in love with these Quicksilver, Ubiquity, and other pseudo-CLIs. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-? ?-?-?-?-?-?-? From rupa at lrrr.us Mon Sep 8 08:53:20 2008 From: rupa at lrrr.us (rupa) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] Ubiquity? VImperator? In-Reply-To: <880dece00809080823n43fc9d3bse3eb3e0b712a5893@mail.gmail.com> References: <880dece00809080823n43fc9d3bse3eb3e0b712a5893@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9a20967a0809080853j47e46189o233fc4e8e7859e3e@mail.gmail.com> I'd personally love to see a plugin that could pull/translate ubiquity commands into vimperators namespace so they could be accessed from : or even :! I have no idea how feasible that is though ... On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > There is a lot of buzz regarding the Ubiquity extension, calling it a > "browser command line". This sounds like it basically does what > Vimperator does, plus a few features but minus many more. It might be > good to ride on Ubiquity's fame a bit and start promoting Vimperator. > > I also find it funny that Windows has taught the world to fear the > CLI, and now people are falling in love with these Quicksilver, > Ubiquity, and other pseudo-CLIs. > > -- > Dotan Cohen > > http://what-is-what.com > http://gibberish.co.il > ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-?-? > > ?-?-?-?-?-?-? > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > From stubenschrott at gmx.net Mon Sep 8 10:50:13 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:50:13 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] back and forward In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48C565D5.9000301@gmx.net> Jan Snyder wrote: > I found it somewhat disconcerting because I use the 'shift+h' and > 'shift+l' for going back and forward heavily. I don't have the > graphical direction buttons visible. And I'm on a Colemak keyboard > layout. 'D' and 'H' are next to each other, so sometimes I want to go > back and find I hit 'd' so the page is empty. But 'u' for undo is > okay for me really. Since 'd' is my proably most often used key in vimperator (next to 'j'), pressing 'D' is ceratinly too much. Also since it's an 'u'ndoable action, i think the non-shifted version is good enough. From tpikonen at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 09:26:56 2008 From: tpikonen at gmail.com (Teemu Ikonen) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:26:56 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] key binding by unicode value Message-ID: <97fdf2d70809030926q4236b56ahcac1fb01dd1a5c67@mail.gmail.com> Hi, A newbie question: Can I bind a key by its unicode value in vimperator? In vim this can be done with the notation , but this does not seem to work in vimperator. I'm specifically interested in codepoint 0xa0, i.e. non-breakable space. Thanks, Teemu From chris at mretc.net Tue Sep 9 22:31:53 2008 From: chris at mretc.net (Chris Burkhardt) Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:31:53 -0600 Subject: [Vimperator] [SPAM] how can i startup vim to edit google doc in vimoperator? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: moneylcj wrote: > hello: > I want to startup vim to edit my google docs by press ctrl+i,but i > am failed,How can do it ? Thank you ! > vimoperator is a good work ,thank you! Hi - Sorry, this is a digression, but I just learned about the ctrl-i in insert mode to open an external editor from your post. That's fantastic! (And I guess I can remove the "It's All Text!" add-on now). Is this documented anywhere besides the 'editor' option? Thanks, - Chris From jpboodhoo at gmail.com Wed Sep 10 07:23:48 2008 From: jpboodhoo at gmail.com (Jean-Paul Boodhoo) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:23:48 +0100 Subject: [Vimperator] Pass through mode and gmail (sites with frames) Message-ID: <8c0cf4110809100723w2114cd27wc074b19baf2c5785@mail.gmail.com> Does anyone know if the issue has been resolved that causes vimperator to not refocus the active window when using web pages with frames (G-Mail)? Thanks, JP -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dpb at driftaway.org Wed Sep 10 07:24:22 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:24:22 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] [SPAM] how can i startup vim to edit google doc in vimoperator? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2008/9/10 Chris Burkhardt : > moneylcj wrote: >> hello: >> I want to startup vim to edit my google docs by press ctrl+i,but i >> am failed,How can do it ? Thank you ! >> vimoperator is a good work ,thank you! > > Hi - > > Sorry, this is a digression, but I just learned about the ctrl-i in insert mode > to open an external editor from your post. That's fantastic! (And I guess I can > remove the "It's All Text!" add-on now). Is this documented anywhere besides the > 'editor' option? "External editor support" -> http://vimperator.mozdev.org/ -- Daniel From chris at mretc.net Wed Sep 10 09:36:04 2008 From: chris at mretc.net (Chris Burkhardt) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:36:04 -0600 Subject: [Vimperator] [SPAM] how can i startup vim to edit google doc in vimoperator? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Daniel Bainton wrote: > 2008/9/10 Chris Burkhardt : >> moneylcj wrote: >>> hello: >>> I want to startup vim to edit my google docs by press ctrl+i,but i >>> am failed,How can do it ? Thank you ! >>> vimoperator is a good work ,thank you! >> Hi - >> >> Sorry, this is a digression, but I just learned about the ctrl-i in insert mode >> to open an external editor from your post. That's fantastic! (And I guess I can >> remove the "It's All Text!" add-on now). Is this documented anywhere besides the >> 'editor' option? > > "External editor support" -> http://vimperator.mozdev.org/ Ah. For some reason it's not in the list of features when I do ':h intro'. I'm using: :version Vimperator 1.2 (created: 2008/08/16 18:51:52) running on: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008071618 Iceweasel/3.0.1 (Debian-3.0.1-1) Anyway, a help tag like i_CRTL-i might be nice for the folks like me who are slow at figuring out features... Thanks for everything, - Chris From chris at mretc.net Wed Sep 10 09:40:39 2008 From: chris at mretc.net (Chris Burkhardt) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:40:39 -0600 Subject: [Vimperator] bhow can i startup vim to edit google doc in vimoperator? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Chris Burkhardt wrote: > Daniel Bainton wrote: >> 2008/9/10 Chris Burkhardt : >>> moneylcj wrote: >>>> hello: >>>> I want to startup vim to edit my google docs by press ctrl+i,but i >>>> am failed,How can do it ? Thank you ! >>>> vimoperator is a good work ,thank you! >>> Hi - >>> >>> Sorry, this is a digression, but I just learned about the ctrl-i in insert mode >>> to open an external editor from your post. That's fantastic! (And I guess I can >>> remove the "It's All Text!" add-on now). Is this documented anywhere besides the >>> 'editor' option? >> "External editor support" -> http://vimperator.mozdev.org/ > > Ah. For some reason it's not in the list of features when I do ':h intro'. I'm > using: Nevermind. Browsing the CVS repository I see it wasn't added to intro.txt until revision 1.23. It looks like Vimperator is so actively developed that it is worth running and keeping up with the CVS version. - Chris From stubenschrott at gmx.net Wed Sep 10 10:33:53 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:33:53 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] bhow can i startup vim to edit google doc in vimoperator? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48C80501.7020401@gmx.net> Chris Burkhardt wrote: > It looks like Vimperator is so actively developed that it is worth running and > keeping up with the CVS version. Yeah, it's quite active currently, mainly thanks to Doug! It would be even more active if you also contributed to it with some patches :) -- Martin From jehan.marmottard at gmail.com Wed Sep 10 10:51:01 2008 From: jehan.marmottard at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jehan_Pag=E8s?=) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:51:01 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Is autocompletion in Vimperator what Firefox calls the "awesome bar"? Message-ID: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> Hello all, I hope I don't ask a question already asked but after some search, I didn't find my answer. The fact is that I updated Firefox the same time I installed Vimperator, which is really great. Then I never had to know this new feature the Mozilla foundation calls the "awesome bar". But through vimperator, I use autocompletion (on a :open or :tabopen) a lot, and I think it is really bad. So I was wondering: for the proposition of completion, are you simply calling the results which would occures in the navigation bar (so the famous "awesome" one), in displaying them in the same order? Or did you implement your own system? Because in the first case, then this bar is... not awesome at all (in my opinion), because I often get for first choices some very long url, I never typed by myself (just got to browse there once, days ago!), and that I am not interested in keeping so long at top of the propositions (maybe at the bottom at worst... but for this, I can use navigation history also!). But I don't have at top propositions all the websites I often visit, some several times a day! Even the old address bar from Firefox 2 (which they did not call "awesome") was doing it better. In the latter case, then I would think it would deserved to be improved if you are the one coding these completion results... Does anyone agree with my opinion here about this completion feature and the propositions (and especially their order)? Thanks! Jehan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Wed Sep 10 11:35:56 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:35:56 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] Is autocompletion in Vimperator what Firefox calls the "awesome bar"? In-Reply-To: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> References: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809101135w4bbd862bsf87143d9b379a274@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Jehan Pag?s wrote: > In the latter case, then I would think it would deserved to be improved if > you are the one coding these completion results... Does anyone agree with my > opinion here about this completion feature and the propositions (and > especially their order)? > Thanks! Martin has just assured me that there is an even more awesome completion system on the way. Doug From chris at mretc.net Wed Sep 10 12:09:43 2008 From: chris at mretc.net (Chris Burkhardt) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:09:43 -0600 Subject: [Vimperator] Is autocompletion in Vimperator what Firefox calls the "awesome bar"? In-Reply-To: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> References: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Jehan Pag?s wrote: > Hello all, > > I hope I don't ask a question already asked but after some search, I > didn't find my answer. The fact is that I updated Firefox the same time > I installed Vimperator, which is really great. Then I never had to know > this new feature the Mozilla foundation calls the "awesome bar". But > through vimperator, I use autocompletion (on a :open or :tabopen) a lot, > and I think it is really bad. So I was wondering: for the proposition of > completion, are you simply calling the results which would occures in > the navigation bar (so the famous "awesome" one), in displaying them in > the same order? Or did you implement your own system? I don't know how it's implemented, but with ":set complete=sfbhl" and ":set wildoptions=auto" I do, indeed, get the same results in vimperator's auto-complete as I do with the awesome bar. And I like it that way. I think items in the awesome bar that you access more frequently (or recently?) get sorted earlier in the list, so you have to spend some time 'training' it at first, but then it works well. For me, at least. - Chris Burkhardt From dougkearns at gmail.com Wed Sep 10 13:51:35 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:51:35 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] Is autocompletion in Vimperator what Firefox calls the "awesome bar"? In-Reply-To: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> References: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809101351w5b508f22r4cd4d68bc2c02e65@mail.gmail.com> Try :set wildoptions=auto and :set cpt=l Doug From jehan.marmottard at gmail.com Thu Sep 11 02:45:45 2008 From: jehan.marmottard at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jehan_Pag=E8s?=) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:45:45 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Is autocompletion in Vimperator what Firefox calls the "awesome bar"? In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809101351w5b508f22r4cd4d68bc2c02e65@mail.gmail.com> References: <75a410780809101051u395abbb4g6bf950dbe663599f@mail.gmail.com> <644fc65e0809101351w5b508f22r4cd4d68bc2c02e65@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <75a410780809110245w130bf76fw1cc3bf72b76ff692@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Thank you very much. These completion options are just the perfect one. According to the vimperator's help, they are apparently the ones corresponding to the normal location (awesome) bar of Fx. If I compare to what it was before, the default value of "complete" is "sfbh". Of course, as I had many bookmarks which I keep for storing useful information for later use (that's what it's for, at least for me! But I don't need to go there every day!), they were in priority (over base url of websites I go everyday) in the completion proposition... As well as stuff in my history I went just once, days ago! This is far better now. Thanks. Shouldn't this option be set like this as a default? I would think this is better... at least until you make your super improved and customized completion system (which I am really looking forward to test as soon as it will be out :p). Thanks again. Good bye. Jehan On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Doug Kearns wrote: > Try :set wildoptions=auto and :set cpt=l > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rjmolesa at consoltec.net Thu Sep 11 12:27:12 2008 From: rjmolesa at consoltec.net (Jon Molesa) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window Message-ID: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> I just started playing with some of the features of vimperator on the mac. I open :dialog bookmarks and have yet to discover how to close that window. There is no x on the title bar, no close button on the interface, and when I click a bookmark to load it remains open. Is this a bug specific to my os? Or am I missing something? -- Jon Molesa GPG ID: DAA35239 Owner - Consoltec 336.844.4104 866.433.0835 rjmolesa at consoltec.net http://www.consoltec.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From daniel.schaffrath at mac.com Fri Sep 12 01:05:20 2008 From: daniel.schaffrath at mac.com (Daniel Schaffrath) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:05:20 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Access keys to have priority over vimperator mappings? Message-ID: Hello everybody, It seems in the default config FF gives precedences to site specific access keys (like C/A-h for history on wikimedia sites for instance). This is very annoying on OSs where FF chose the control key as the access key modifier because then quite some vimperator mappings may be stolen from such sites. For my local vimperator I added the following patch. It helps but is obviously somewhat crappy because even for pass through mode access keys won't work any more. Moreover, it should be reset when vimperator is not active. But I dont see how to accomplish that. Any ideas how to fix that? Thank you, Daniel diff --git a/src/content/options.js b/src/content/options.js --- a/src/content/options.js +++ b/src/content/options.js @@ -233,16 +233,17 @@ liberator.Options = function () //{{{ if (!/keypress/.test(popupAllowedEvents)) storePreference("dom.popup_allowed_events", popupAllowedEvents + " keypress"); // TODO: maybe reset in .destroy()? // TODO: move to vim.js or buffer.js // we have our own typeahead find implementation storePreference("accessibility.typeaheadfind.autostart", false); storePreference("accessibility.typeaheadfind", false); // actually the above setting should do it, but has no effect in firefox + storePreference("ui.key.generalAccessKey", 0); // don't allow site specific access keys to steal vimperator mappings // start with saved session storePreference("browser.startup.page", 3); /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////}}} ////////////////////// COMMANDS //////////////////////////////////////////////// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////{{{ From stubenschrott at gmx.net Fri Sep 12 07:50:11 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:50:11 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Memory Leak In-Reply-To: <5d857fbe0809050646y3b2680f2l4960e33fbeb2b265@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d857fbe0809050646y3b2680f2l4960e33fbeb2b265@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48CA81A3.6050904@gmx.net> Ivan Wills wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently upgraded to vimperator 1.2 and there appears to be a > significant memory leak (~1MB per 10 minutes while leaving the browser > alone). Disabling vimperator fixes the problem which is why I think the > memory leak is with vimperator. > > Also I have noticed a problem with Gmail when vimperator is running in > that I cannot actually get into Gmail standard view. > > Are these problems know or are there any work-a-rounds? @memleak: Problem is not known but i wouldn't be surprised. We should really check the whole code base for mem leaks, but so much other things to do :( -- martin PS: If you open/close many firefox windows (not tabs), it is quite certain that vimperator leaks memory. From benisty.e at gmail.com Fri Sep 12 22:00:52 2008 From: benisty.e at gmail.com (Emmanuel Benisty) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:00:52 +0700 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp Message-ID: Hi List, This will sound very newbish as I have not a single clue of what is going on. OS: Linux Firefox: 3.1b1pre (build from mozilla-central-d7c555ce0fc7) Vimp: 2.0pre (pulled from hg few minutes ago) Since /something/ happened, vimp is half dead for me. Installation is ok, Firefox won't complain, the command line is here but unusable and menu/bookmarks/whatever bars won't be hidden (here's a screenshot, FWIW, http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/3406/wantmyvimpbackxj0.png ) Until now, I tried: Older builds of Firefox, known (to me) to work with older versions of vimp, still fails (used to work on the same machine). Deleting ~/.mozilla for a fresh start, still no luck. If anyone has any idea, I would highly appreciate. It's close to torture to go back to Firefox now... Thanks in advance. From dougkearns at gmail.com Fri Sep 12 22:27:11 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:27:11 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> On 9/13/08, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > Hi List, > > This will sound very newbish as I have not a single clue of what is going > on. It's obviously failed to properly initialize and the answer should be in your Error Console. Look for the "Loading module foo..." log messages, there should be an error after one of them. The Console2 extension can make investigating a little easier. Doug From benisty.e at gmail.com Fri Sep 12 23:13:15 2008 From: benisty.e at gmail.com (Emmanuel Benisty) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:13:15 +0700 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Doug Kearns wrote: > On 9/13/08, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> This will sound very newbish as I have not a single clue of what is going >> on. > > It's obviously failed to properly initialize and the answer should be > in your Error Console. Look for the "Loading module foo..." log > messages, there should be an error after one of them. Thanks for your reply Doug. Here's what I have (Fresh start with a blank page): vimperator: Initializing liberator object... And that's all, no error. (Console2 won't work at all with this Firefox build.) From benisty.e at gmail.com Sat Sep 13 02:29:47 2008 From: benisty.e at gmail.com (Emmanuel Benisty) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:29:47 +0700 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: So I managed to kill another Vimp, on my office machine this time. This one was running Firefox3.1a2 (Release). I just installed the latest build (Sept 13th, from Driftaway) and that's it, game over, whatever tweaks I try. Really strange... One more thing I noticed, if I run the current stable Firefox version (must be 3.0.1 IIRC) from my distro's repos (Archlinux), I can install Vimp until sept 10th build (from Driftaway), installing Sept 11th build will give me the same problem. However, with this Firefox version, going back to a former Vimp version will solve everything. I'm kind of lost here. Does Vimperator install anything outside of ~/.mozilla ? From daniel.schaffrath at mac.com Sat Sep 13 02:41:33 2008 From: daniel.schaffrath at mac.com (Daniel Schaffrath) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:41:33 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> On 2008/09/13 , at 08:13, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Doug Kearns > wrote: >> On 9/13/08, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >>> Hi List, >>> >>> This will sound very newbish as I have not a single clue of what >>> is going >>> on. >> >> It's obviously failed to properly initialize and the answer should be >> in your Error Console. Look for the "Loading module foo..." log >> messages, there should be an error after one of them. > > Thanks for your reply Doug. Here's what I have (Fresh start with a > blank page): > > vimperator: Initializing liberator object... > > And that's all, no error. Yes. The problem seems that the storage.jsm is not included in the jar. I added the following patch to my Makefile: diff --git a/src/Makefile.common b/src/Makefile.common --- a/src/Makefile.common +++ b/src/Makefile.common @@ -8,16 +8,17 @@ DOC_FILES = ${DOC_SRC_FILES:%.txt=%. DOC_FILES = ${DOC_SRC_FILES:%.txt=%.html} # TODO: specify source files manually? JAR_TXT_FILES = ${shell find -L content skin locale \ -type f \ -a ! -path '*CVS*' \ -a \( \ -path '*.js' \ + -o -path '*.jsm' \ -o -path '*.css' \ -o -path '*.xul' \ -o -path '*.html' \ \) \ } JAR_DIRS = $(foreach f,${JAR_FILES},$(dir $f)) JAR_BIN_FILES = ${shell find content skin \ -type f \ Still, FF refuses to load the module... although there is an appropriate resource alias in the chrome.manifest. Anyone any hints?? btw: while looking at this I found some floating appName properties which I thought were gone...? diff --git a/src/content/tabs.js b/src/content/tabs.js --- a/src/content/tabs.js +++ b/src/content/tabs.js @@ -465,17 +465,17 @@ liberator.Tabs = function () //{{{ "Show a list of all buffers", function (args, special) { liberator.tabs.list(special); }, { argCount: "0" }); liberator.commands.add(["quita[ll]", "qa[ll]"], - "Quit " + liberator.config.appName, + "Quit " + liberator.config.name, function () { liberator.quit(false); }, { argCount: "0" }); liberator.commands.add(["reloada[ll]"], "Reload all tab pages", diff --git a/src/content/liberator.js b/src/content/liberator.js --- a/src/content/liberator.js +++ b/src/content/liberator.js @@ -152,17 +152,17 @@ const liberator = (function () //{{{ "Play a system beep", function () { liberator.beep(); }, { argCount: "0" }); liberator.commands.add(["dia[log]"], - "Open a " + liberator.config.appName + " dialog", + "Open a " + liberator.config.name + " dialog", function (args, special) { try { var dialogs = liberator.config.dialogs || []; for (let i = 0; i < dialogs.length; i++) { if (dialogs[i][0] == args) @@ -349,17 +349,17 @@ const liberator = (function () //{{{ if (liberator.has("tabs")) liberator.tabs.remove(getBrowser().mCurrentTab, 1, false, 1); else liberator.quit(false); }, { argCount: "0" }); liberator.commands.add(["res[tart]"], - "Force " + liberator.config.appName + " to restart", + "Force " + liberator.config.name + " to restart", function () { liberator.restart(); }, { argCount: "0" }); liberator.commands.add(["time"], "Profile a piece of code or run a command multiple times", From rjmolesa at consoltec.net Sat Sep 13 16:34:46 2008 From: rjmolesa at consoltec.net (Jon Molesa) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Am I being ignored due to not being clear, being new, being stupid, or does no one know how to close a :dialog opened window on a mac. -- Jon Molesa GPG ID: DAA35239 From k at bijna.net Sat Sep 13 21:28:51 2008 From: k at bijna.net (Kipling Inscore) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:28:51 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Jon Molesa wrote: > Am I being ignored due to not being clear, being new, being stupid, or > does no one know how to close a :dialog opened window on a mac. I'm guessing nobody has an answer yet. I tested on Windows and did get a close button on the title bar. The window manager I use on Linux doesn't display close buttons anyway (anyone with Gnome, KDE, etc. not getting a close button?) but the window does respond to a "request" (as opposed to "order") to close. It seems this is specific to the Mac...but the question remains: is the problem Vimperator, Firefox, the GUI toolkit...? I don't know how many Mac vimperator users there are; that's likely why you haven't seen a reply yet. Hopefully, if nobody else replies, I'll remember to test this on Monday (I have a Mac at work but don't browse the web on it so haven't installed Firefox and Vimperator). If you disable Vimperator and open the bookmark dialog (in a window rather than sidebar) do you get a close button? Or, to someone who knows the ":dialog" code, might the command be opening a "sidebar" version of the dialog or something a bit odd to get the dialog? From rjmolesa at consoltec.net Sat Sep 13 21:48:44 2008 From: rjmolesa at consoltec.net (Jon Molesa) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Thanks Kipling, It actually appears to be a javascript type dialog box. For the record, I'd rather not use a Mac at all, but work makes me use it. Vimperator improves the experience a bit. I've been using vimp for over a year now. But I just discovered the :dialog feature. If i open bookmarks I surely do get a options to close the window. I tried issuing a :q to close it but it doesn't appear to actually receive focus. *On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 09:28:51PM -0700 Kipling Inscore wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:28:51 -0700 > From: Kipling Inscore > Subject: Re: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window > To: vimperator at mozdev.org > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Jon Molesa wrote: > > Am I being ignored due to not being clear, being new, being stupid, or > > does no one know how to close a :dialog opened window on a mac. > > I'm guessing nobody has an answer yet. I tested on Windows and did get > a close button on the title bar. The window manager I use on Linux > doesn't display close buttons anyway (anyone with Gnome, KDE, etc. not > getting a close button?) but the window does respond to a "request" > (as opposed to "order") to close. It seems this is specific to the > Mac...but the question remains: is the problem Vimperator, Firefox, > the GUI toolkit...? > I don't know how many Mac vimperator users there are; that's likely > why you haven't seen a reply yet. Hopefully, if nobody else replies, > I'll remember to test this on Monday (I have a Mac at work but don't > browse the web on it so haven't installed Firefox and Vimperator). > If you disable Vimperator and open the bookmark dialog (in a window > rather than sidebar) do you get a close button? > Or, to someone who knows the ":dialog" code, might the command be > opening a "sidebar" version of the dialog or something a bit odd to > get the dialog? > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator -- Jon Molesa rjmolesa at consoltec.net if you're bored or curious http://rjmolesa.com From k at bijna.net Sat Sep 13 23:37:30 2008 From: k at bijna.net (Kipling Inscore) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:37:30 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <53f7fc100809132337q1baa3d4dqa0bb4b57a153c815@mail.gmail.com> To give some context for those who don't want to read the whole thread: Jon Molesa: > I open :dialog bookmarks and have yet to discover how to close > that window. There is no x on the title bar, no close button on the > interface, and when I click a bookmark to load it remains open. For now, a workaround would be ":tabopen chrome://browser/content/bookmarks/bookmarksPanel.xul". I've investigated what happens when one types ":dialog" and found that though some of the dialogs call special dialog-launching commands, most call window.openDialog with a "chrome://..." URI. It seems there's a bug in Firefox for Mac as window.openDialog isn't supposed to allow a dialog to have no close button. Do you get a close button when a webpage opens a dialog through javascript? This investigation has also led me to see some inconsistancies in vimperator features (as of version 1.2, not sure yet of current CVS) which, if fixed, would also provide a better workaround to this bug. In line with a previous change that allowed ":tab help" and soforth, I think all chrome-based dialogs should be available in-browser. This could be by ":dialog bookmarks", ":tab dialog bookmarks", etc.; ":bookmarks", ":tab bookmarks", etc., though ":bookmarks" is already taken; ":chrome bookmarks", ":tab chrome bookmarks", etc. It also seems that ":window" and perhaps ":dialog" or ":dialogwindow" could become commands like ":tab", causing any command operating on a tab/buffer to operate in a new browser or dialog window. From dpb at driftaway.org Sun Sep 14 02:19:50 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:19:50 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> Message-ID: 2008/9/13 Daniel Schaffrath : > On 2008/09/13 , at 08:13, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Doug Kearns >> wrote: >>> >>> On 9/13/08, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi List, >>>> >>>> This will sound very newbish as I have not a single clue of what is >>>> going >>>> on. >>> >>> It's obviously failed to properly initialize and the answer should be >>> in your Error Console. Look for the "Loading module foo..." log >>> messages, there should be an error after one of them. >> >> Thanks for your reply Doug. Here's what I have (Fresh start with a blank >> page): >> >> vimperator: Initializing liberator object... >> >> And that's all, no error. > > Yes. The problem seems that the storage.jsm is not included in the jar. I > added the following patch to my Makefile: > > diff --git a/src/Makefile.common b/src/Makefile.common > --- a/src/Makefile.common > +++ b/src/Makefile.common > @@ -8,16 +8,17 @@ DOC_FILES = ${DOC_SRC_FILES:%.txt=%. > DOC_FILES = ${DOC_SRC_FILES:%.txt=%.html} > > # TODO: specify source files manually? > JAR_TXT_FILES = ${shell find -L content skin locale \ > -type f \ > -a ! -path '*CVS*' \ > -a \( \ > -path '*.js' \ > + -o -path '*.jsm' \ > -o -path '*.css' \ > -o -path '*.xul' \ > -o -path '*.html' \ > \) \ > } > JAR_DIRS = $(foreach f,${JAR_FILES},$(dir $f)) > JAR_BIN_FILES = ${shell find content skin \ > -type f \ > > > Still, FF refuses to load the module... although there is an appropriate > resource alias in the chrome.manifest. Anyone any hints?? > > > > btw: while looking at this I found some floating appName properties which I > thought were gone...? > > diff --git a/src/content/tabs.js b/src/content/tabs.js > --- a/src/content/tabs.js > +++ b/src/content/tabs.js > @@ -465,17 +465,17 @@ liberator.Tabs = function () //{{{ > "Show a list of all buffers", > function (args, special) > { > liberator.tabs.list(special); > }, > { argCount: "0" }); > > liberator.commands.add(["quita[ll]", "qa[ll]"], > - "Quit " + liberator.config.appName, > + "Quit " + liberator.config.name, > function () > { > liberator.quit(false); > }, > { argCount: "0" }); > > liberator.commands.add(["reloada[ll]"], > "Reload all tab pages", > > diff --git a/src/content/liberator.js b/src/content/liberator.js > --- a/src/content/liberator.js > +++ b/src/content/liberator.js > @@ -152,17 +152,17 @@ const liberator = (function () //{{{ > "Play a system beep", > function () > { > liberator.beep(); > }, > { argCount: "0" }); > > liberator.commands.add(["dia[log]"], > - "Open a " + liberator.config.appName + " dialog", > + "Open a " + liberator.config.name + " dialog", > function (args, special) > { > try > { > var dialogs = liberator.config.dialogs || []; > for (let i = 0; i < dialogs.length; i++) > { > if (dialogs[i][0] == args) > @@ -349,17 +349,17 @@ const liberator = (function () //{{{ > if (liberator.has("tabs")) > liberator.tabs.remove(getBrowser().mCurrentTab, 1, > false, 1); > else > liberator.quit(false); > }, > { argCount: "0" }); > > liberator.commands.add(["res[tart]"], > - "Force " + liberator.config.appName + " to restart", > + "Force " + liberator.config.name + " to restart", > function () > { > liberator.restart(); > }, > { argCount: "0" }); > > liberator.commands.add(["time"], > "Profile a piece of code or run a command multiple times", > Hi, I added your appName -> name fix to cvs. I haven't been following the development of Vimperator much for some days, especially what our latest developer has done. But looking at the CVS now, I really don't get the point of the modules/ dir. There's only one module, storage, which Vimperator highly depends on too. So why is it in modules/ instead of content/? Seems to add much unneeded complexity to Vimperator (not to mention it hasn't even seemed to be tested on xpi builds, and fails it). I wont even try to fix it before I get an explanation that I can accept. -- Daniel From daniel.schaffrath at mac.com Sun Sep 14 03:08:30 2008 From: daniel.schaffrath at mac.com (Daniel Schaffrath) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:08:30 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> Message-ID: <1F1A3DA7-7E5F-4716-B54D-4449EE3911BA@mac.com> On 2008/09/14 , at 11:19, Daniel Bainton wrote: [...] > I haven't been following the development of Vimperator much for some > days, especially what our latest developer has done. > > But looking at the CVS now, I really don't get the point of the > modules/ dir. There's only one module, storage, which Vimperator > highly depends on too. So why is it in modules/ instead of content/? One reason might be to indicate which source is being loaded on a per window basis and which on a per session basis. This makes perfectly sense for me -- especially against the potential background that vimperator is developing towards a more session centric design. [...] Yours, Daniel From benisty.e at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 05:37:37 2008 From: benisty.e at gmail.com (Emmanuel Benisty) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:37:37 +0700 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: <1F1A3DA7-7E5F-4716-B54D-4449EE3911BA@mac.com> References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> <1F1A3DA7-7E5F-4716-B54D-4449EE3911BA@mac.com> Message-ID: FTR, just pulled from hg few minutes ago, problem is solved. Thank you ALL. From dougkearns at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 09:05:46 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:05:46 +0100 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809140905l732106d0o9d76cf2c72393e20@mail.gmail.com> Emmanuel, Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, I'm away at the moment. On 9/13/08, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > Thanks for your reply Doug. Here's what I have (Fresh start with a blank > page): > > vimperator: Initializing liberator object... > > And that's all, no error. I think you need Console2 for those errors - it indicated the error on the next line. :) > (Console2 won't work at all with this Firefox build.) It seems to work fine for me. You can bypass these compatibility restrictions by setting the preference extensions.checkCompatibility to false. You'll probably have to create it. Doug From penryu at gmail.com Mon Sep 15 12:03:45 2008 From: penryu at gmail.com (Tim Hammerquist) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:03:45 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <53f7fc100809132337q1baa3d4dqa0bb4b57a153c815@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132337q1baa3d4dqa0bb4b57a153c815@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080915190345.GA29941@darcia.saiyix> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:37:30PM -0700, Kipling Inscore wrote: > To give some context for those who don't want to read the whole thread: > Jon Molesa: > > I open :dialog bookmarks and have yet to discover how to close > > that window. There is no x on the title bar, no close button on the > > interface, and when I click a bookmark to load it remains open. > > For now, a workaround would be ":tabopen > chrome://browser/content/bookmarks/bookmarksPanel.xul". If a separate window is desired, you can also use: :emenu Bookmarks.Organize Bookmarks... or just :emenu Bookmarks.O ... or simply select it from the Bookmarks menu, as there's currently no way to actually hide the menubar on OSX. Thanks for the heads-up, Jon, as I haven't tried ":dialog bookmarks" on OSX since 0.5 vimp and never saw this. Tim From rjmolesa at consoltec.net Mon Sep 15 12:21:18 2008 From: rjmolesa at consoltec.net (Jon Molesa) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <20080915190345.GA29941@darcia.saiyix> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132337q1baa3d4dqa0bb4b57a153c815@mail.gmail.com> <20080915190345.GA29941@darcia.saiyix> Message-ID: <20080915192118.GD24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> > Thanks for the heads-up, Jon, as I haven't tried ":dialog bookmarks" > on OSX since 0.5 vimp and never saw this. The problem though is closing the existing window. Now that I have it open, I have a plug-in called session-saver that opens all windows and tabs inbetween sessions, and it remains. -- Jon Molesa rjmolesa at consoltec.net if you're bored or curious http://rjmolesa.com From k at bijna.net Mon Sep 15 13:59:26 2008 From: k at bijna.net (Kipling Inscore) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:59:26 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] MacOSX: Closing the dialog window In-Reply-To: <20080915192118.GD24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> References: <20080911192712.GA25523@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <20080913233446.GB17607@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132128m14c5c819x2da9b8516c4fd4c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080914044844.GA24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> <53f7fc100809132337q1baa3d4dqa0bb4b57a153c815@mail.gmail.com> <20080915190345.GA29941@darcia.saiyix> <20080915192118.GD24543@jenna.rjmolesa.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <53f7fc100809151359hec1688brc3770d8c57d8fece@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jon Molesa wrote: >> Thanks for the heads-up, Jon, as I haven't tried ":dialog bookmarks" >> on OSX since 0.5 vimp and never saw this. > > The problem though is closing the existing window. Now that I have it > open, I have a plug-in called session-saver that opens all windows and > tabs inbetween sessions, and it remains. Disable or uninstall session-saver (":tab addons"), make sure Firefox has its internal session restore turned off (":preferences" > Main > When Firefox starts), and restart Firefox. After that when you re-enable or re-install session-saver and it should save the new session. From fb at intoxicatedmind.net Thu Sep 18 13:21:46 2008 From: fb at intoxicatedmind.net (Frank Blendinger) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:21:46 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Problem with wildoptions and mappings Message-ID: <20080918202146.GF18980@intoxicatedmind.net> Hi, I have recently changed to wildoptions=auto and complete=l which gives me quite nice completion, but I have problems with a lot of old mappings I have. They look like this one: map u :set usermode! which gets very slow since it just puts the ":set usermode!" string into the commandline char by char and triggers the autocompletion. I tried putting :set wop=""...:set wop=auto around the rhs of the mapping, without success. What can I do? Greetings, Frank -- Frank Blendinger | fb(at)intoxicatedmind.net | GPG: 0x0BF2FE7A Fingerprint: BB64 F2B8 DFD8 BF90 0F2E 892B 72CF 7A41 0BF2 FE7A "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." (Homer Simpson) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From fb at intoxicatedmind.net Thu Sep 18 13:25:20 2008 From: fb at intoxicatedmind.net (Frank Blendinger) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:20 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Y produces UNIX newlines under Windows Message-ID: <20080918202520.GG18980@intoxicatedmind.net> Hi, I discovered that marking text and pressing `Y' to copy it puts Unix style newlines in the copied text under Windows. Using the ``copy'' entry of the Firefox context menu does the right thing. It would be nice if this could be fixed. Greetings, Frank -- Frank Blendinger | fb(at)intoxicatedmind.net | GPG: 0x0BF2FE7A Fingerprint: BB64 F2B8 DFD8 BF90 0F2E 892B 72CF 7A41 0BF2 FE7A "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." (Homer Simpson) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Thu Sep 18 20:36:34 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:36:34 +0100 Subject: [Vimperator] Y produces UNIX newlines under Windows In-Reply-To: <20080918202520.GG18980@intoxicatedmind.net> References: <20080918202520.GG18980@intoxicatedmind.net> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809182036t7261404frbf6a0ec675aba4ce@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Frank Blendinger wrote: > Hi, > > I discovered that marking text and pressing `Y' to copy it puts Unix > style newlines in the copied text under Windows. Using the ``copy'' > entry of the Firefox context menu does the right thing. It would be nice > if this could be fixed. Thanks for the report. Perhaps you could add a comment to https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19303 I don't see this behaviour on Windows, only that described in the bug report above. Doug From fb at intoxicatedmind.net Fri Sep 19 02:14:18 2008 From: fb at intoxicatedmind.net (Frank Blendinger) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:14:18 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Y produces UNIX newlines under Windows In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809182036t7261404frbf6a0ec675aba4ce@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080918202520.GG18980@intoxicatedmind.net> <644fc65e0809182036t7261404frbf6a0ec675aba4ce@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080919091418.GA4859@intoxicatedmind.net> Hi. Doug Kearns enlightened the world by writing these words of wisdom: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Frank Blendinger > wrote: > > I discovered that marking text and pressing `Y' to copy it puts Unix > > style newlines in the copied text under Windows. Using the ``copy'' > > entry of the Firefox context menu does the right thing. It would be nice > > if this could be fixed. > Thanks for the report. Perhaps you could add a comment to > https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19303 > I don't see this behaviour on Windows, only that described in the bug > report above. It might be that the line breaks are missing completely. Somehow I was assuming they were Unix style - those won't show up in Windows applications either. I will take a closer look at this again next week at work and add a comment, I don't have Windows available at home. Greetings, Frank -- Frank Blendinger | fb(at)intoxicatedmind.net | GPG: 0x0BF2FE7A Fingerprint: BB64 F2B8 DFD8 BF90 0F2E 892B 72CF 7A41 0BF2 FE7A "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand." (Homer Simpson) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov Fri Sep 19 12:13:08 2008 From: Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov (Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] Missing file in Intro - Help Topic "search" Message-ID: In: chrome://vimperator/locale/intro.html Try clicking on the "Search" help topic and get the 404ish: Firefox can't find the file at jar:file:///home/andy/.mozilla/firefox/t775wd49.default/extensions/vimperator at mozdev.org/chrome/vimperator.jar!/locale/en-US/pattern.html Really cool. thanks. a ------------------- Andy Bach Systems Mangler Internet: andy_bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov Voice: (608) 261-5738 Fax: 264-5932 AMAZING BUT TRUE: There is so much sand in northern Africa that if it were spread out it would completely cover the Sahara Desert! From w.l.fischer at googlemail.com Sat Sep 20 14:03:51 2008 From: w.l.fischer at googlemail.com (W) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:03:51 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Feature Requests Message-ID: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> First of all, thanks for vimperator! I've been looking for something like this for a while but somehow didn't stumble over it until today. It changes my browsing day! Do you think there is a need for the following features? - : Goes to line number ; I always use :1 instead of gg because it works in vi, too - :syntax off To get rid of the pink text on the help page ;-) Seriously, this could turn off style sheets (like the menu View->Page style->No style) Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stubenschrott at gmx.net Sat Sep 20 14:39:38 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:39:38 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> W wrote: > First of all, thanks for vimperator! I've been looking for something > like this for a while but somehow didn't stumble over it until today. It > changes my browsing day! > > Do you think there is a need for the following features? > > - : Goes to line number ; I always use :1 instead > of gg because it works in vi, too Impossible to really work for line numbers, and i don't see the reason for :30cr> to go to 30% of the page. Also i really hate pure vi and still wonder, why Bram ever implemented 'compatible' in vim ;) > - :syntax off To get rid of the pink text on the help page ;-) > Seriously, this could turn off style sheets (like the menu View->Page > style->No style) There is a :pagestyle command (at least in CVS, no idea about 1.2) You could make a :command syntax .... -- Martin From martinsteer at maxi.net.au Sat Sep 20 17:37:18 2008 From: martinsteer at maxi.net.au (Martin Steer) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:37:18 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] site problem with vimp's search Message-ID: <878wtmcp1d.fsf@maxi.net.au> I don't know whether this has been noted before, but I've just come across a site where vimp's search (or find) mechanism fails. On the page above, for example, vimp won't store a new search term, i.e. can't do a repeat search on a new term. Firefox search appears to work normally. vimp 2.0pre 2008-09-15 on linux. -- martin From w.l.fischer at googlemail.com Sat Sep 20 20:04:52 2008 From: w.l.fischer at googlemail.com (W) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:04:52 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> References: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> Message-ID: <4b5d137a0809202004s3904dbbcg36de82e17497fab7@mail.gmail.com> > > > Also i really hate pure vi and still wonder, why Bram ever implemented > 'compatible' in vim ;) > It doesn't help, I'm stuck with plain vi at work... And once I got used to it, it worked better than I ever thought. For instance, since I can't use macros any more, I'm using regexp now and it's faster in most cases. > > > - :syntax off To get rid of the pink text on the help page ;-) > > Seriously, this could turn off style sheets (like the menu View->Page > > style->No style) > > There is a :pagestyle command (at least in CVS, no idea about 1.2) > You could make a :command syntax .... Thanks! That does what I want (:set usermode) and both pagestyle and usermode are available in 1.2. Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stubenschrott at gmx.net Sun Sep 21 00:18:28 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] site problem with vimp's search In-Reply-To: <878wtmcp1d.fsf@maxi.net.au> References: <878wtmcp1d.fsf@maxi.net.au> Message-ID: <48D5F544.6060302@gmx.net> Martin Steer wrote: > I don't know whether this has been noted before, but I've just come > across a site where vimp's search (or find) mechanism fails. > > > > On the page above, for example, vimp won't store a new search term, i.e. > can't do a repeat search on a new term. Firefox search appears to work > normally. > > vimp 2.0pre 2008-09-15 on linux. Works here with the latest vimperator, please try to upgrade. -- Martin From dpb at driftaway.org Sun Sep 21 01:20:37 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:20:37 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> References: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> Message-ID: 2008/9/21 Martin Stubenschrott : > W wrote: > >> First of all, thanks for vimperator! I've been looking for something >> like this for a while but somehow didn't stumble over it until today. It >> changes my browsing day! >> >> Do you think there is a need for the following features? >> >> - : Goes to line number ; I always use :1 instead >> of gg because it works in vi, too > > Impossible to really work for line numbers, and i don't see the reason for :30cr> to go to 30% of the page. > > Also i really hate pure vi and still wonder, why Bram ever implemented 'compatible' in vim ;) It works with nocompatible Vim too, not just plain vi. -- Daniel From martinsteer at maxi.net.au Sun Sep 21 01:15:11 2008 From: martinsteer at maxi.net.au (Martin Steer) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:15:11 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] site problem with vimp's search In-Reply-To: <48D5F544.6060302@gmx.net> (Martin Stubenschrott's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +0200") References: <878wtmcp1d.fsf@maxi.net.au> <48D5F544.6060302@gmx.net> Message-ID: <87zlm1c3u8.fsf@maxi.net.au> Martin Stubenschrott writes: > > Works here with the latest vimperator, please try to upgrade. Thanks Martin, works fine after upgrading. Sorry for the noise. -- Martin From anekos at snca.net Sun Sep 21 03:32:33 2008 From: anekos at snca.net (anekos) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:32:33 +0900 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] savePref bug found (storage.jsm) Message-ID: Hi. Vimperator throw a exception while next starting up Firefox, If liberator.storage['history-command'] has multi-byte character. Please review and consider applying the attached patch. -- anekos http://snca.net/ http://d.hatena.ne.jp/nokturnalmortum/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: storage.jsm.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1234 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Sun Sep 21 05:05:17 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:05:17 +0100 Subject: [Vimperator] living dead vimp In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809122227teed1225v83f15a0355c5ea50@mail.gmail.com> <4B31A884-5886-4DD7-92D3-2C42043C407B@mac.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809210505j202d44fboa5e8d56178c5521a@mail.gmail.com> Daniel, Sorry this was in my drafts folder... On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Bainton wrote: > But looking at the CVS now, I really don't get the point of the > modules/ dir. There's only one module, storage, which Vimperator > highly depends on too. So why is it in modules/ instead of content/? > Seems to add much unneeded complexity to Vimperator (not to mention it > hasn't even seemed to be tested on xpi builds, and fails it). I wont > even try to fix it before I get an explanation that I can accept. Modules can't be loaded from the chrome.jar. You'll notice in your FF directory that modules is actually the 'standard' location. Doug From stubenschrott at gmx.net Sun Sep 21 09:03:19 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:03:19 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Feature Requests In-Reply-To: References: <4b5d137a0809201403w236f40deo83a5b66b8884ebf4@mail.gmail.com> <48D56D9A.1060408@gmx.net> Message-ID: <48D67047.6030903@gmx.net> Daniel Bainton wrote: >> Also i really hate pure vi and still wonder, why Bram ever implemented 'compatible' in vim ;) > > It works with nocompatible Vim too, not just plain vi. I know, i just found "i am used it because of vi" stupid, never thought still somebody (has) to use pure vi today, but as it seems i was wrong. I am not entirely against a :44 feature, but i am certainly not coding it myself. -- Martin From sitaramc at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 01:49:10 2008 From: sitaramc at gmail.com (Sitaram Chamarty) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:19:10 +0530 Subject: [Vimperator] how do I switch between custom and default colors Message-ID: <2e24e5b90809220149i17d8c912id48b7cb6825763a@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, I'm looking for a way to use a keystroke sequence (say, "\c", like the "\s" used for the NoScript plugin) to do a 3-way toggle of some of the color settings. Shamelessly copying from "noscript.js", I tried this: ----- begin ----- liberator.mappings.addUserMap([liberator.modes.NORMAL], ["c"], "switch colors", function() { var bg=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.background_color", "#FFFFFF"); var fg=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.foreground_color", "#000000"); var udc=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.use_document_colors", true); if (fg == "#000000" && udc) { fg = "#FFFFFF"; bg = "#000000"; udc = false; } else if (bg == "#000000" && !udc) { udc = true; } else { fg = "#000000"; bg = "#FFFFFF"; udc = true; } liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.background_color", bg); liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.foreground_color", fg); liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.use_document_colors", udc); }); ----- end ----- But it doesn't work. I'm willing to play with the logic and the sequence, but hitting \c doesn't seem to have **any** affect at all :-( Any ideas for me? Thanks, Sitaram From sitaramc at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 01:52:59 2008 From: sitaramc at gmail.com (Sitaram Chamarty) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:22:59 +0530 Subject: [Vimperator] how do I switch between custom and default colors In-Reply-To: <2e24e5b90809220149i17d8c912id48b7cb6825763a@mail.gmail.com> References: <2e24e5b90809220149i17d8c912id48b7cb6825763a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2e24e5b90809220152h71ba5713t6d3872d84d204ee5@mail.gmail.com> aaaargh!!! Cut-paste error... (used "getPref" all through; the second set should be "setPref"!) Apologies for the noise! On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a way to use a keystroke sequence (say, "\c", like the > "\s" used for the NoScript plugin) to do a 3-way toggle of some of the > color settings. Shamelessly copying from "noscript.js", I tried this: > > ----- begin ----- > liberator.mappings.addUserMap([liberator.modes.NORMAL], ["c"], > "switch colors", > function() { > var > bg=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.background_color", > "#FFFFFF"); > var > fg=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.foreground_color", > "#000000"); > var > udc=liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.use_document_colors", > true); > if (fg == "#000000" && udc) { > fg = "#FFFFFF"; > bg = "#000000"; > udc = false; > } else if (bg == "#000000" && !udc) { > udc = true; > } else { > fg = "#000000"; > bg = "#FFFFFF"; > udc = true; > } > liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.background_color", bg); > liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.foreground_color", fg); > liberator.options.getPref("browser.display.use_document_colors", > udc); > > }); > > ----- end ----- > > But it doesn't work. I'm willing to play with the logic and the > sequence, but hitting \c doesn't seem to have **any** affect at all > :-( > > Any ideas for me? > > Thanks, > > Sitaram > From stubenschrott at gmx.net Mon Sep 22 18:24:38 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:24:38 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] savePref bug found (storage.jsm) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48D84556.9040300@gmx.net> anekos wrote: > Hi. > > Vimperator throw a exception while next starting up Firefox, If > liberator.storage['history-command'] has multi-byte character. > Please review and consider applying the attached patch. To be honest, i did not really test it, but believe you that it solves your problem. Commited. Thanks, martin From snappca at gmail.com Tue Sep 23 18:31:03 2008 From: snappca at gmail.com (Christopher Snapp) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Vimperator] :tabopen using keyword.URL preference? Message-ID: <7d0bbdb50809231831u6e4a7842le7cc0ea64c737d41@mail.gmail.com> I have asked in the IRC channel and searched the wiki, but I'm not seeing anyone referencing the use of Firefox's keyword.URL preference. Basically I have modified the keyword.URL to post to my home server for allowing something similar to Yahoo's Shortcuts feature. I rely on this functionality, but now that I am trying to use vimperator it will only work if I hit and type the shortcut (ie. !gr for google reader). I was hoping to set vimperator so that I could type "t" to perform a :tabopen and simply type my shortcut (ie. !gr) and have it post to my home server like normal. Is this possible? btw, thanks for the great product! -- - Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Wed Sep 24 06:11:54 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:11:54 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] :tabopen using keyword.URL preference? In-Reply-To: <7d0bbdb50809231831u6e4a7842le7cc0ea64c737d41@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d0bbdb50809231831u6e4a7842le7cc0ea64c737d41@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809240611i5307cca1kd994f9e5c53e9251@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Christopher Snapp wrote: > I have asked in the IRC channel and searched the wiki, but I'm not seeing > anyone referencing the use of Firefox's keyword.URL preference. Basically I > have modified the keyword.URL to post to my home server for allowing > something similar to Yahoo's Shortcuts feature. I rely on this > functionality, but now that I am trying to use vimperator it will only work > if I hit and type the shortcut (ie. !gr for google reader). I was > hoping to set vimperator so that I could type "t" to perform a :tabopen and > simply type my shortcut (ie. !gr) and have it post to my home server like > normal. Is this possible? I understand correctly, you're looking for 'defsearch'. Regards, Doug From dougkearns at gmail.com Wed Sep 24 06:13:04 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:13:04 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] :tabopen using keyword.URL preference? In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809240611i5307cca1kd994f9e5c53e9251@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d0bbdb50809231831u6e4a7842le7cc0ea64c737d41@mail.gmail.com> <644fc65e0809240611i5307cca1kd994f9e5c53e9251@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809240613s3a2d465au6cc59aaa43c21e2c@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Doug Kearns wrote: > I understand correctly, you're looking for 'defsearch'. If I understand correctly. Doug From thomas.constans at opendoor.fr Wed Sep 24 08:29:59 2008 From: thomas.constans at opendoor.fr (Thomas Constans) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:29:59 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Printing problems Message-ID: <1222270199.3640.9.camel@workine.opendoor.fr> Hello I can't print when vimperator is enabled. :harcopy gives me access to the print dialog box, but when i select one of my printers (available from cups), the "print" button is greyed out. All i can do is "print to file". If i disable vimperator addon, printing works as expected. firefox 3.0.1 from debian sid vimperator 1.2 Thanks for your attention keep up the good work -- Thomas Constans openDoor 06 23 37 87 85 09 71 73 91 75 From eyolf at oestrem.com Wed Sep 24 09:59:47 2008 From: eyolf at oestrem.com (Eyolf =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8strem?=) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:59:47 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Scrolling keys not working on page with @media screen { position: fixed } Message-ID: <20080924165947.GA28882@eyo> On the page http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/ the scrolling keys (hjkl) don't work. I've narrowed it down to the css setting: @media screen { body>div#tocframe { position: fixed } } I suppose I can make a hook to disable the stylesheets for pages on this site, but it would have been nice to get it to work. Eyolf -- Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been. -- Mark Twain From stubenschrott at gmx.net Wed Sep 24 10:10:31 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:10:31 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Scrolling keys not working on page with @media screen { position: fixed } In-Reply-To: <20080924165947.GA28882@eyo> References: <20080924165947.GA28882@eyo> Message-ID: <48DA7487.4080301@gmx.net> Hi, > On the page http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/ > the scrolling keys (hjkl) don't work. I've narrowed it down to the css > setting: > > @media screen { > body>div#tocframe { > position: fixed > } > } Thanks for the investigation, now we have at least a little more information. I noticed the same problem on: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms535258.aspx (it's even written in the TODO), but have no idea how i could fix it :( You can resort back to using up/down for these sites, but that's still not a very good solution. Doug, do you have an idea how to fix that? -- Martin From eyolf at oestrem.com Wed Sep 24 10:31:26 2008 From: eyolf at oestrem.com (Eyolf =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8strem?=) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:31:26 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] Scrolling keys not working on page with @media screen { position: fixed } In-Reply-To: <48DA7487.4080301@gmx.net> References: <20080924165947.GA28882@eyo> <48DA7487.4080301@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20080924173126.GB28882@eyo> On 24.09.2008 (19:10), Martin Stubenschrott wrote: > You can resort back to using up/down for these sites, but that's still > not a very good solution. Heh, that shows how second nature Vimperator has become: it never even occured to me to try the arrow keys :) e -- sillema sillema nika su From stubenschrott at gmx.net Wed Sep 24 10:40:57 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:40:57 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] key binding by unicode value In-Reply-To: <97fdf2d70809030926q4236b56ahcac1fb01dd1a5c67@mail.gmail.com> References: <97fdf2d70809030926q4236b56ahcac1fb01dd1a5c67@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48DA7BA9.2010207@gmx.net> On 2008-09-03 18:26, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > A newbie question: Can I bind a key by its unicode value in vimperator? Impossible for now, sorry. From pbrugier at easter-eggs.com Thu Sep 25 02:05:09 2008 From: pbrugier at easter-eggs.com (Pascal Brugier) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:05:09 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] editor vim and urxvt Message-ID: <20080925090506.GA31498@easter-eggs.com> Hello, thanks for your work, vimperator is really useful. I'find a little bug when I set the editor. When using :set editor=gvim -f -> it works. :set editor=urxvt -e vim -f -> it works :set editor=urxvtc -e vim -f it does-nt work :set editor=urxvtcd -e vim -f it does-nt work In fact for urxvtc and urxvtcd vim open /tmp/vimperator.tmp in edition mode but the file is empty. As urxvtc and urxvtcd connect to a deamon "urxvtd" to start faster perharps they open before the tmp file is populate... I'm on Debian Lenny and use Debian packages. Sorry for my bad english. Pascal. From scott.soderborg at gmail.com Thu Sep 25 11:39:28 2008 From: scott.soderborg at gmail.com (Scott Soderborg) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] QMarks Export Message-ID: <5e3f64990809251139q36e29e73gc88621db3f55a3fd@mail.gmail.com> Hello All, I am new to Vimperator. I have been using it now for a few months. I like it very much. It offers functionality that is very cool and improves my efficiency at my desk. I have a lot more, so I suppose you could say I am a novice, if not beginner. In any case, I recently upgraded my machine at my place of work (Windows Vista Business) and I migrated all of my settings. Unfortunately the Vimperator settings did not copy. I did not want to have to recreate all of my QMarks. I have searched high and low for a means of migrating these settings from one computer to another, and I have found very little information to help in my delemna. Without digging into the source code, could somebody offer a resource that I may use or some insight as to how I may achieve my goal. Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Sep 26 07:30:35 2008 From: stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de (stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:30:35 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] wordstartswith, separating WordWordWord Message-ID: <20080926143035.GA14040@bruja.cs.tu-berlin.de> Helo, of course first, again, thanks a lot for Vimperator. I use wordstartswith matching and I like it very much. The only limitation is that I cannot match links like CPlusPlusFunctionInDoxygenDocumentation by typing 'cppfidd' I can't figure out how to achieve this by modifying the regexp in wordseparators, and don't think it's possible. I just want to ask if there is a way to do this. Thanks for your suggestions. -- cheers stanio_ From Daniel.Trstenjak at online.de Fri Sep 26 11:02:01 2008 From: Daniel.Trstenjak at online.de (Daniel Trstenjak) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:02:01 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] wordstartswith, separating WordWordWord In-Reply-To: <20080926143035.GA14040@bruja.cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <20080926143035.GA14040@bruja.cs.tu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20080926180201.GA6138@laptop> Hi stanio, > I just want to ask if there is a way to do this. With the current hintmatcher that's not possible. What about writing a 'camelcasestartswith' hintmatcher? :) Have a look at the 'hintmatching' option. You can use you're own custom hintmatcher. To get some inspiration for it's implementation, have a look at the source 'vimperator/src/content/hints.js' and search for 'containsMatcher'. Greetings, Daniel From stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Sep 27 05:17:45 2008 From: stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de (stanio at cs.tu-berlin.de) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:17:45 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] wordstartswith, separating WordWordWord In-Reply-To: <20080926180201.GA6138@laptop> References: <20080926143035.GA14040@bruja.cs.tu-berlin.de> <20080926180201.GA6138@laptop> Message-ID: <20080927121745.GA4614@fiesta.cs.tu-berlin.de> Helo Daniel, * Daniel Trstenjak [2008-09-26 20:02]: > > I just want to ask if there is a way to do this. > > What about writing a 'camelcasestartswith' hintmatcher? :) Might be an option. I just have to have some free time to get used to JavaScript and to do the programming. > To get some inspiration for it's implementation, have a look > at the source 'vimperator/src/content/hints.js' and search for > 'containsMatcher'. Thanks a lot for the hint. -- cheers stanio_ From cbill.lam at gmail.com Sat Sep 27 17:33:00 2008 From: cbill.lam at gmail.com (bill lam) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:33:00 +0800 Subject: [Vimperator] user commands Message-ID: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> Sorry for this newbie question. Often I need to type commands such as, open http://192.168.1.1 or sidebar Bookmarks How to make them user-defined commands and bind them to shortcut keys. TIA -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 From scott.soderborg at gmail.com Sat Sep 27 20:44:04 2008 From: scott.soderborg at gmail.com (Scott Soderborg) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] user commands In-Reply-To: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> References: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> Message-ID: <5e3f64990809272044v68e88d49ga7fdd73681c8f4c3@mail.gmail.com> Hello Bill, I am new to Vimperator myself and learning more and more each day. My initial thought is to create a Quick Mark, I use them extensively and it seems to do the trick for me. See the following URL (Help) using Vimperator for details: chrome://vimperator/locale/marks.html Scott On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:33 PM, bill lam wrote: > Sorry for this newbie question. Often I need to type commands such as, > open http://192.168.1.1 or sidebar Bookmarks > > How to make them user-defined commands and bind them to shortcut > keys. > > TIA > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fduddx at gmail.com Sat Sep 27 20:51:15 2008 From: fduddx at gmail.com (Darren Duan) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:51:15 +0800 Subject: [Vimperator] user commands In-Reply-To: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> References: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> Message-ID: Hi Bill, You can add a the bookmark with a self-defined keyword. Then you can use :open "Keyword" to open it. And you can use :map to bind a hot key to the command. Darren On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:33 AM, bill lam wrote: > Sorry for this newbie question. Often I need to type commands such as, > open http://192.168.1.1 or sidebar Bookmarks > > How to make them user-defined commands and bind them to shortcut > keys. > > TIA > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Sat Sep 27 23:11:46 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:11:46 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] user commands In-Reply-To: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> References: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809272311m764450ctc62fbaec58792180@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM, bill lam wrote: > Sorry for this newbie question. Often I need to type commands such as, > open http://192.168.1.1 or sidebar Bookmarks > > How to make them user-defined commands and bind them to shortcut > keys. :command sbbm sidebar Bookmarks :map bm :sbbm :help :command :help :map Doug From cbill.lam at gmail.com Sun Sep 28 06:53:16 2008 From: cbill.lam at gmail.com (bill lam) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:53:16 +0800 Subject: [Vimperator] user commands In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809272311m764450ctc62fbaec58792180@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080928003300.GA7782@b2j> <644fc65e0809272311m764450ctc62fbaec58792180@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080928135316.GB7776@b2j> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Doug Kearns wrote: > :command sbbm sidebar Bookmarks > :map bm :sbbm > > :help :command > :help :map Thanks to Doug, Darren, Scott! I'll try all these suggestions. -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 From anekos at snca.net Sun Sep 28 07:19:17 2008 From: anekos at snca.net (anekos) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:19:17 +0900 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] Completion list scrolling stops midmay Message-ID: Hi. Completion list scrolling ( or ) stops midmay. Please review and consider applying the attached patch (s/ElementChild/Child/). -- anekos http://snca.net/ http://d.hatena.ne.jp/nokturnalmortum/ From dougkearns at gmail.com Sun Sep 28 10:34:18 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:34:18 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] Completion list scrolling stops midmay In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <644fc65e0809281034lfd2e334o53abc21626107eb8@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:19 AM, anekos wrote: > Hi. > > Completion list scrolling ( or ) stops midmay. > Please review and consider applying the attached patch (s/ElementChild/Child/). It looks like you forgot to attach the patch. ;-) Doug From anekos at snca.net Sun Sep 28 10:45:31 2008 From: anekos at snca.net (anekos) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:45:31 +0900 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] Completion list scrolling stops midmay In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809281034lfd2e334o53abc21626107eb8@mail.gmail.com> References: <644fc65e0809281034lfd2e334o53abc21626107eb8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > It looks like you forgot to attach the patch. ;-) Sorry.. -- anekos http://snca.net/ http://d.hatena.ne.jp/nokturnalmortum/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ui.js.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1434 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Sun Sep 28 23:53:05 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:53:05 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] [patch] Completion list scrolling stops midmay In-Reply-To: References: <644fc65e0809281034lfd2e334o53abc21626107eb8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809282353p4ba71892o78db13739bfafa62@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:45 AM, anekos wrote: >> It looks like you forgot to attach the patch. ;-) > Sorry.. Applied. Thanks very much. Doug From robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com Mon Sep 29 03:48:30 2008 From: robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com (robert hickman) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:48:30 +0000 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc Message-ID: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix websites(see http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command bar; bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how to change this to gery? thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From grbzks at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 04:01:46 2008 From: grbzks at gmail.com (Grigorios Bouzakis) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:01:46 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080929110146.GA5518@dark.grbzks.net> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:48:30AM +0000, robert hickman wrote: > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > websites(see [1]http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command > bar; bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how > to change this to gery? thanks. I remember Martin asking on the irc channel about this. Even though i use a dark gtk theme too i find easier having a white background there. By the way i advise you to use plain text when you send emails at least to mailing lists. Some people, most AFAIK use ncurses MUA's and html are not that readable. Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ghibulo at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 04:25:02 2008 From: ghibulo at gmail.com (Jirka Hrbek) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:02 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] letter x number - labels Message-ID: <7215af6a0809290425j9a22db8n2daee301df0cd24@mail.gmail.com> I would like to have letter-labels in QuickHint mode (like in the Vimperator before FF3.0). I hate to write numbers on my keyboard because I must do it throug shift :/ Can anybody help me? Thx for every answer. Jirka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com Mon Sep 29 08:43:30 2008 From: robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com (robert hickman) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:43:30 +0000 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <20080929110146.GA5518@dark.grbzks.net> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> <20080929110146.GA5518@dark.grbzks.net> Message-ID: <63a039270809290843u61c5efachcd5692871d512518@mail.gmail.com> whenever there is a sharp contrast between black and white, I find that the white always glares around the black, making the edge blurry, including around text. As a result its hard to read and gives me a headache if I try to read like this for anything longer than a few minutes. Its not too much of a problem having the command bar at the bottom of the screen white, as its not in my main field of view most of the time. however bookmarks and other full-screen modes are a problem. I can program(C, C++). Howeaver Im terrible at working out how someone else's code works. mostly what I want to know is where the code that sets the background colour is located. sorry about the HTML email, GMail defaults to HTML Thanks. 2008/9/29 Grigorios Bouzakis > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:48:30AM +0000, robert hickman wrote: > > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > > websites(see [1]http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command > > bar; bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how > > to change this to gery? thanks. > > I remember Martin asking on the irc channel about this. Even though i > use a dark gtk theme too i find easier having a white background there. > By the way i advise you to use plain text when you send emails at least > to mailing lists. Some people, most AFAIK use ncurses MUA's and html are > not that readable. > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > 2324 From robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com Mon Sep 29 08:44:28 2008 From: robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com (robert hickman) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:44:28 +0000 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <20080929110146.GA5518@dark.grbzks.net> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> <20080929110146.GA5518@dark.grbzks.net> Message-ID: <63a039270809290844t73d1a554r92d51bcb5fd84ef5@mail.gmail.com> whenever there is a sharp contrast between black and white, I find that the white always glares around the black, making the edge blurry, including around text. As a result its hard to read and gives me a headache if I try to read like this for anything longer than a few minutes. Its not too much of a problem having the command bar at the bottom of the screen white, as its not in my main field of view most of the time. however bookmarks and other full-screen modes are a problem. I can program(C, C++). Howeaver Im terrible at working out how someone else's code works. mostly what I want to know is where the code that sets the background colour is located. sorry about the HTML email, GMail defaults to HTML Thanks. 2008/9/29 Grigorios Bouzakis > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:48:30AM +0000, robert hickman wrote: > > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > > websites(see [1]http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command > > bar; bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how > > to change this to gery? thanks. > > I remember Martin asking on the irc channel about this. Even though i > use a dark gtk theme too i find easier having a white background there. > By the way i advise you to use plain text when you send emails at least > to mailing lists. Some people, most AFAIK use ncurses MUA's and html are > not that readable. > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > 2324 From christian.glindkamp at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 10:03:57 2008 From: christian.glindkamp at gmail.com (Christian Glindkamp) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:03:57 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080929190357.7826b6df@gmail.com> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:48:30 +0000 "robert hickman" wrote: > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > websites(see http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command bar; > bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how to > change this to gery? thanks. I have the following in my userChrome.css to get a black command bar: #liberator-commandline { background-color: black !important; color: white !important; } I think it should work with stylish to, but I never used this extension. You can look into vimperator.css contained in the extension for further hints on how to style vimperator (bookmarks etc.). From christian.glindkamp at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 10:01:43 2008 From: christian.glindkamp at gmail.com (Christian Glindkamp) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:01:43 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080929190143.30466129@gmail.com> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:48:30 +0000 "robert hickman" wrote: > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > websites(see http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command bar; > bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how to > change this to gery? thanks. I have the following in my userChrome.css to get a black command bar: #liberator-commandline { background-color: black !important; color: white !important; } I think it should work with stylish to, but I never used this extension. You can look into vimperator.css contained in the extension for further hints on how to style vimperator (bookmarks etc.). From frioux at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 07:26:18 2008 From: frioux at gmail.com (fREW Schmidt) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all Message-ID: So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked great. So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, restarted firefox, and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the bars at the top are still visible. The only difference is that the bar at the bottom is black and white, but I can't type any :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem could be? -fREW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacobchappelle at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 07:55:43 2008 From: jacobchappelle at gmail.com (Jacob) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:55:43 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> What OS are you running? and which browser + version? Jake On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt wrote: > So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked great. So > I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, restarted firefox, and > then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the bars at the top are still visible. > The only difference is that the bar at the bottom is black and white, but I > can't type any :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem could be? > > -fREW > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frioux at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 08:02:54 2008 From: frioux at gmail.com (fREW Schmidt) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: At home (where it worked) Ubuntu and Firefox 3.0.3, and here at work Windows XP SP3 with Firefox 3.0.3. Here are my extensions if that might matter: AdBlock Plus 0.7.5.5 All-in-One Gestures 0.19.1 Better Gmail 2 0.6.1 ChromaTabs Plus 2.1 CSRF Protector 0.1 Delicious Bookmarks 2.0.104 DownThemAll! 1.0.3 Fast Dial 2.11 FaviconizeTab 0.9.8.2 Firebug 1.2.1 Forcastfox 0.9.7.7 Gmail Notifier 0.6.3.8 Googe Notebook 1.0.0.22 Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 keyconfig 20080929 Pencil 1.0.3 Rainbow for Firebug 0.7 Read it Later 0.9821 Tab Mix Plus 0.3.7pre.080728 Ubuquity 0.1.1 Vimperator 1.2 YSlow 0.9.5b2 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Jacob wrote: > What OS are you running? and which browser + version? > > > Jake > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt wrote: > >> So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked great. >> So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, restarted firefox, >> and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the bars at the top are still >> visible. The only difference is that the bar at the bottom is black and >> white, but I can't type any :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem >> could be? >> >> -fREW >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Vimperator mailing list >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stubenschrott at gmx.net Tue Sep 30 10:08:42 2008 From: stubenschrott at gmx.net (Martin Stubenschrott) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:08:42 +0200 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> I think, rainbow has/had some issues with vimperator iirc. On 2008-09-30 17:02, fREW Schmidt wrote: > At home (where it worked) Ubuntu and Firefox 3.0.3, and here at work > Windows XP SP3 with Firefox 3.0.3. Here are my > extensions if that might matter: > > AdBlock Plus 0.7.5.5 > All-in-One Gestures 0.19.1 > Better Gmail 2 0.6.1 > ChromaTabs Plus 2.1 > CSRF Protector 0.1 > Delicious Bookmarks 2.0.104 > DownThemAll! 1.0.3 > Fast Dial 2.11 > FaviconizeTab 0.9.8.2 > Firebug 1.2.1 > Forcastfox 0.9.7.7 > Gmail Notifier 0.6.3.8 > Googe Notebook 1.0.0.22 > Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 > keyconfig 20080929 > Pencil 1.0.3 > Rainbow for Firebug 0.7 > Read it Later 0.9821 > Tab Mix Plus 0.3.7pre.080728 > Ubuquity 0.1.1 > Vimperator 1.2 > YSlow 0.9.5b2 > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Jacob > wrote: > > What OS are you running? and which browser + version? > > > Jake > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt > wrote: > > So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked > great. So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, > restarted firefox, and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the > bars at the top are still visible. The only difference is that > the bar at the bottom is black and white, but I can't type any > :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem could be? > > -fREW > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator From frioux at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 10:31:40 2008 From: frioux at gmail.com (fREW Schmidt) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:31:40 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> Message-ID: That did indeed fix the issue. Also: I don't know if this is a standard problem, but I tend to leave a lot of tabs open in firefox and then just close them when I finish deal with them. Vimperator seems *extremely* sluggish when loading all of these "background tabs" on startup. Is this just how it is? -fREW On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Martin Stubenschrott < stubenschrott at gmx.net> wrote: > I think, rainbow has/had some issues with vimperator iirc. > > On 2008-09-30 17:02, fREW Schmidt wrote: > > > At home (where it worked) Ubuntu and Firefox 3.0.3, and here at work > > Windows XP SP3 with Firefox 3.0.3. Here are my > > extensions if that might matter: > > > > AdBlock Plus 0.7.5.5 > > All-in-One Gestures 0.19.1 > > Better Gmail 2 0.6.1 > > ChromaTabs Plus 2.1 > > CSRF Protector 0.1 > > Delicious Bookmarks 2.0.104 > > DownThemAll! 1.0.3 > > Fast Dial 2.11 > > FaviconizeTab 0.9.8.2 > > Firebug 1.2.1 > > Forcastfox 0.9.7.7 > > Gmail Notifier 0.6.3.8 > > Googe Notebook 1.0.0.22 > > Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 > > keyconfig 20080929 > > Pencil 1.0.3 > > Rainbow for Firebug 0.7 > > Read it Later 0.9821 > > Tab Mix Plus 0.3.7pre.080728 > > Ubuquity 0.1.1 > > Vimperator 1.2 > > YSlow 0.9.5b2 > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Jacob > > wrote: > > > > What OS are you running? and which browser + version? > > > > > > Jake > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt > > wrote: > > > > So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked > > great. So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, > > restarted firefox, and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the > > bars at the top are still visible. The only difference is that > > the bar at the bottom is black and white, but I can't type any > > :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem could be? > > > > -fREW > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vimperator mailing list > > Vimperator at mozdev.org > > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vimperator mailing list > > Vimperator at mozdev.org > > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vimperator mailing list > > Vimperator at mozdev.org > > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frioux at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 10:39:34 2008 From: frioux at gmail.com (fREW Schmidt) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> Message-ID: Alright, one more thing, I know that the menubar and toolbar are disabled by default, but I didn't think that the tab bar could even be disabled and I don't see it and I think I should. -fREW On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:31 PM, fREW Schmidt wrote: > That did indeed fix the issue. > > Also: I don't know if this is a standard problem, but I tend to leave a lot > of tabs open in firefox and then just close them when I finish deal with > them. Vimperator seems *extremely* sluggish when loading all of these > "background tabs" on startup. Is this just how it is? > > -fREW > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Martin Stubenschrott < > stubenschrott at gmx.net> wrote: > >> I think, rainbow has/had some issues with vimperator iirc. >> >> On 2008-09-30 17:02, fREW Schmidt wrote: >> >> > At home (where it worked) Ubuntu and Firefox 3.0.3, and here at work >> > Windows XP SP3 with Firefox 3.0.3. Here are my >> > extensions if that might matter: >> > >> > AdBlock Plus 0.7.5.5 >> > All-in-One Gestures 0.19.1 >> > Better Gmail 2 0.6.1 >> > ChromaTabs Plus 2.1 >> > CSRF Protector 0.1 >> > Delicious Bookmarks 2.0.104 >> > DownThemAll! 1.0.3 >> > Fast Dial 2.11 >> > FaviconizeTab 0.9.8.2 >> > Firebug 1.2.1 >> > Forcastfox 0.9.7.7 >> > Gmail Notifier 0.6.3.8 >> > Googe Notebook 1.0.0.22 >> > Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 >> > keyconfig 20080929 >> > Pencil 1.0.3 >> > Rainbow for Firebug 0.7 >> > Read it Later 0.9821 >> > Tab Mix Plus 0.3.7pre.080728 >> > Ubuquity 0.1.1 >> > Vimperator 1.2 >> > YSlow 0.9.5b2 >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Jacob > > > wrote: >> > >> > What OS are you running? and which browser + version? >> > >> > >> > Jake >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt > > > wrote: >> > >> > So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked >> > great. So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, >> > restarted firefox, and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the >> > bars at the top are still visible. The only difference is that >> > the bar at the bottom is black and white, but I can't type any >> > :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem could be? >> > >> > -fREW >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Vimperator mailing list >> > Vimperator at mozdev.org >> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Vimperator mailing list >> > Vimperator at mozdev.org >> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Vimperator mailing list >> > Vimperator at mozdev.org >> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Vimperator mailing list >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jacobchappelle at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 18:58:42 2008 From: jacobchappelle at gmail.com (Jacob) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:58:42 -0700 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3ec81ae0809301858s64dcdb3cn1114f080d65c6b56@mail.gmail.com> I have one Ubuntu 8.04 with Vimperator installed on a Toshiba a100 laptop which gets this same problem with Firefox 3.0.3 and version 2.0.17. I have not been able to narrow down the issue yet, but no commands work whatsoever. Vimperator seems to be stuck in insert mode. I have no other plugins installed. However on an AMD64 desktop machine running Ubuntu 8.04 and Firefox 2.0.17 and Firefox 3.0.3 with Vimperator installed on both it works just fine. Also no other plugins installed except Firebug. Has anyone overcome this issue before? I really want to use Vimperator. Jake On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:02 AM, fREW Schmidt wrote: > At home (where it worked) Ubuntu and Firefox 3.0.3, and here at work > Windows XP SP3 with Firefox 3.0.3. Here are my extensions if that might > matter: > > AdBlock Plus 0.7.5.5 > All-in-One Gestures 0.19.1 > Better Gmail 2 0.6.1 > ChromaTabs Plus 2.1 > CSRF Protector 0.1 > Delicious Bookmarks 2.0.104 > DownThemAll! 1.0.3 > Fast Dial 2.11 > FaviconizeTab 0.9.8.2 > Firebug 1.2.1 > Forcastfox 0.9.7.7 > Gmail Notifier 0.6.3.8 > Googe Notebook 1.0.0.22 > Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 > keyconfig 20080929 > Pencil 1.0.3 > Rainbow for Firebug 0.7 > Read it Later 0.9821 > Tab Mix Plus 0.3.7pre.080728 > Ubuquity 0.1.1 > Vimperator 1.2 > YSlow 0.9.5b2 > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Jacob wrote: > >> What OS are you running? and which browser + version? >> >> >> Jake >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, fREW Schmidt wrote: >> >>> So I installed vimperator at home and I had no issues; it worked >>> great. So I came to work this morning and installed the plugin, restarted >>> firefox, and then h/j and gt/gT don't work. Also the bars at the top are >>> still visible. The only difference is that the bar at the bottom is black >>> and white, but I can't type any :commands. Any thoughts on what the problem >>> could be? >>> >>> -fREW >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Vimperator mailing list >>> Vimperator at mozdev.org >>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Vimperator mailing list >> Vimperator at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dougkearns at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 19:45:53 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:45:53 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] letter x number - labels In-Reply-To: <7215af6a0809290425j9a22db8n2daee301df0cd24@mail.gmail.com> References: <7215af6a0809290425j9a22db8n2daee301df0cd24@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809301945t64b154cma4748d27723536ec@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Jirka Hrbek wrote: > I would like to have letter-labels in QuickHint mode (like in the Vimperator > before FF3.0). I hate to write numbers on my keyboard because I must do it > throug shift :/ Can anybody help me? Thx for every answer. http://vimperator.cutup.org/index.php?title=FAQ ...very first one. ;-) Doug From dougkearns at gmail.com Tue Sep 30 20:28:50 2008 From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:28:50 +1000 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <644fc65e0809302028sf1f43c0yae7fcb9e083438aa@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:48 PM, robert hickman wrote: > I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, > because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix > websites(see http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). > Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command bar; > bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how to > change this to gery? thanks. http://vimperator.cutup.org/index.php?title=Configuration#Customizing_the_Appearance_of_Vimperator Doug From dpb at driftaway.org Tue Sep 30 22:39:41 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:39:41 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> Message-ID: 2008/9/30 fREW Schmidt : > Alright, one more thing, I know that the menubar and toolbar are disabled by > default, but I didn't think that the tab bar could even be disabled and I > don't see it and I think I should. :help 'showtabline' Sure it can be disabled. :) -- Daniel From dpb at driftaway.org Tue Sep 30 22:41:44 2008 From: dpb at driftaway.org (Daniel Bainton) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:41:44 +0300 Subject: [Vimperator] For some reason vimperator doesn't work at all In-Reply-To: References: <3ec81ae0809300755m3dbf552bq421b4d0e44d070f@mail.gmail.com> <48E25D1A.8080709@gmx.net> Message-ID: 2008/9/30 fREW Schmidt : > That did indeed fix the issue. > > Also: I don't know if this is a standard problem, but I tend to leave a lot > of tabs open in firefox and then just close them when I finish deal with > them. Vimperator seems extremely sluggish when loading all of these > "background tabs" on startup. Is this just how it is? > > -fREW That's Firefox for you. Of course it's sluggy when it's loading all the tabs. It's doing a lot of work. Just wait for them all to load before trying to use the browser. -- Daniel From robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com Tue Sep 30 22:50:15 2008 From: robert.e.hickman at googlemail.com (robert hickman) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:50:15 +0000 Subject: [Vimperator] get rid of white background in command bar etc In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0809302028sf1f43c0yae7fcb9e083438aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <63a039270809290348i7d645ac7of920ff7abd2a2339@mail.gmail.com> <644fc65e0809302028sf1f43c0yae7fcb9e083438aa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <63a039270809302250q57c99238t5222de628eaa1584@mail.gmail.com> Thanks, Ive got it to look how I want :) 2008/10/1 Doug Kearns : > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:48 PM, robert hickman > wrote: >> I find black text on a white background to be very difficult to read, >> because of this I have changed the GTK theme and yse stylish to fix >> websites(see http://www.hessiess.dyndns.org/files/vimperator.png). >> Vimperator is good, exept that it has a white background on the command bar; >> bookmarks display etc, can you point me in the right direction on how to >> change this to gery? thanks. > > http://vimperator.cutup.org/index.php?title=Configuration#Customizing_the_Appearance_of_Vimperator > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > Vimperator mailing list > Vimperator at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/vimperator >