From notes at mozdev.org Sun Apr 15 05:22:11 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Kibi Message-ID: <20070415122211.5DB9784544@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c81 Hi - can't get your extension to work on TB2 (RC1) :-( any chance of fixing up - it's my favourite extension. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From notes at mozdev.org Thu Apr 19 03:56:55 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Kibi Message-ID: <20070419105655.D6B7E845A7@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c82 Hi Anyone there? TB2 is now released, but I still can't get Signature to work - it's a shame since I love this extension Please fix Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From notes at mozdev.org Thu Apr 19 04:29:19 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from miek Message-ID: <20070419112919.CAB51844B6@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c83 the extension is now in the review process on addons.mozilla.org, and hopefully will be approved soon Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20060601 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-edgy) From notes at mozdev.org Thu Apr 19 06:07:31 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Matt Message-ID: <20070419130731.B0DA4844B6@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c84 I really like this extension. It is incredibly useful. I was wondering if there were plans to add the ability to use advanced formating, like Italics / Bold text within the signature. My company generally italicizes the company slogan, and it would be great if I could do this in the Signature Extension. Thanks for a great extension. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From notes at mozdev.org Thu Apr 19 07:39:45 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from miek Message-ID: <20070419143945.9D90F844D7@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c85 there have been for about 2 years, as you can tell my progress is pathetic. try using signature switch extension for this https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/611 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20060601 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-edgy) From cate at shaw.ca Thu Apr 19 21:43:23 2007 From: cate at shaw.ca (Cate Eales) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:43:23 -0700 Subject: [Signature] Where are signatures stored? Message-ID: <462844EB.3080700@shaw.ca> Hello, I love this extension. I am hooked. I upgraded to TB 2.0 and it broke Signatures, and it didn't even give me the chance to change my mind about the upgrade. I saw the post that says the extension is under review and might be approved. I hope soon! In the meantime, are the actual signatures stored somewhere I can recover them? I have a backup of TB 1.5 from just before the upgrade. At least I can copy and paste into messages until the extension starts working again. Thanks for the help. Cate <~~~ This is where the sig file would be. From courriel at lucenay.com Fri Apr 20 01:41:05 2007 From: courriel at lucenay.com (Georges de Lucenay) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:41:05 +0200 Subject: [Signature] Signature update for TB2 Message-ID: <46287CA1.3030506@lucenay.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070420/bc13d471/attachment.html From jaccopippel at solcon.nl Thu Apr 5 13:28:10 2007 From: jaccopippel at solcon.nl (Jacco) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:28:10 +0200 Subject: [Signature] HTML in signature Message-ID: <46155BDA.6090809@solcon.nl> This may not be the right place for this question and it may have been asked before, but is it possible to use html in the signature? If it is, how can I do it? Greetings, Jacco Pippel. From jack at carpenterleasing.com Tue Apr 10 18:38:06 2007 From: jack at carpenterleasing.com (Jack Carpenter) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:38:06 -0700 Subject: [Signature] Signature Message-ID: <461C3BFE.3020800@carpenterleasing.com> I have a hard time understanding the add-ons sometime. I want to add a sig at the bottom of my emails like you can do with outlook. I installed the add on but I can't seem to know how to make it work and I called myself reading and looking at the info that the programmer has to offer. Can you please help me insert a sig in my email such as the one below without typing it each time. *Carpenter & Associates, Inc. Hard Money lenders, Equipment financing, Sale leasebacks Scottsdale, AZ 85259 480-219-3712 - Fax 480-219-3714* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070410/ed7a2b6c/attachment.html From notes at mozdev.org Sun Apr 22 07:15:13 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Kibi Message-ID: <20070422141513.0BE8F84538@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c86 "The extension is now in the review process on addons.mozilla.org, and hopefully will be approved soon" Thanks! Looking forward. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From Pschiffe at aol.com Fri Apr 20 20:27:41 2007 From: Pschiffe at aol.com (Peter P. Schifferli) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Signature] Signature Add-on for Thunderbird 2.0 Message-ID: <462984AD.5040704@aol.com> Anxiously awaiting release of /Signature/ for use with Tb 2.0. Tried /Signature Switch/ but can't get it to format properly. Any idea when this will be approved and released? It is possible to get an advance copy prior to official approval? Many thanks. Pete Schifferli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070420/02da4c79/attachment.html From danilo123 at infinito.it Sun Apr 22 03:41:13 2007 From: danilo123 at infinito.it (Danilo Pierantoni) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:41:13 +0200 Subject: [Signature] Signature for Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 Message-ID: <462B3BC9.8070507@infinito.it> I have appreciated very much your extension with previous versions of Thunderbird. Now, with Thunderbird 2.0.0.0, the extension does not work any more. When will the new version be ready? Thank You. From notes at mozdev.org Wed Apr 25 00:30:19 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Coert Message-ID: <20070425073019.73ABF8450A@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c87 "Let the record show" that I can't wait to start using signature.xpi with TB2. Hope to see it soon on addons.mozilla.org. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From notes at mozdev.org Wed Apr 25 05:06:23 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from julien Message-ID: <20070425120623.9AD12844B5@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c88 great extention! Looking forward to TB2 compatibility. Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; MyIE2; AIRF; Maxthon; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) From cate at shaw.ca Sun Apr 29 11:00:42 2007 From: cate at shaw.ca (Cate Eales) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:00:42 -0700 Subject: [Signature] Can we speed up approval at all? Message-ID: <4634DD4A.5040708@shaw.ca> Hello, I'm just hating not having this extension available in Thunderbird 2.0. Is there any way we can speed up the approval process? For example, on bugzilla, you can vote on which bugs are more important to be fixed. Is there a similar process for extensions? Is there any process at all? Cate <~~ where the .sig files used to be From notes at mozdev.org Mon Apr 30 01:47:14 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from Nicolas Message-ID: <20070430084714.F1F1D84507@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c89 >the extension is now in the review process on >addons.mozilla.org, and hopefully will be approved soon Are you sure that you have correctly added it ? As I don't see it in the sandbox nor in the "public" area... Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 From eric.gruter at epfl.ch Wed Apr 25 04:25:00 2007 From: eric.gruter at epfl.ch (Eric Gruter) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:25:00 +0200 Subject: [Signature] Plugin Signature Message-ID: <462F3A8C.10802@epfl.ch> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070425/2c6f44f7/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: compat_win.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1200 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070425/2c6f44f7/attachment.gif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: EPFL-logo.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1993 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070425/2c6f44f7/attachment-0001.gif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: compat_mac.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1152 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/signature/attachments/20070425/2c6f44f7/attachment-0002.gif From notes at mozdev.org Mon Apr 30 15:12:54 2007 From: notes at mozdev.org (notes at mozdev.org) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Signature] Signature: feedback from miek Message-ID: <20070430221254.6E750844CB@mozdev.mozdev.org> http://signature.mozdev.org/notes.html#c90 as it failed verification (due to an old bug, not a new regression) the interim build is availble here, until i fix the old bug as well http://downloads.mozdev.org/signature/signature-0.4.20070428.xpi Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3