[Sage] Is sage still alive?

[Ari El]

Thanks, Brief looks really good. I also was wary of the "live bookmarks".
Anyways I converted all to live bookmarks.

  I have a lot (about a 100 perhaps) of rss subscriptions, but I don't
notice that firefox takes a lot to start though, looks the same as before.

  The problem I found is that the "doesn't play well with bookmark
synchronizers" is there Brief too. After downloading bookmarks, the next
time firefox is restarted, brief will ask for the folder, like sage before
the patch. Hopefully they will fix it, the developer seems to be very
responsive. we'll see i guess






Matt Nordhoff-2 wrote:
> 
> Court Sansom wrote:
>> I switched from Sage to Brief a few weeks back and I've been very happy 
>> so far.  It uses the built-in Live Bookmarks functionality, so it has a 
>> pretty small footprint and can sync well across browsers...
> 
> I consider (only) using live bookmarks a major downside. If one has 200
> live bookmarks, Firefox spends 10 minutes after starting downloading
> them all. Ugh.
> 
> (Ok, so having 200 live bookmarks is insane, but still.)
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Sage mailing list
> Sage at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/sage
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-sage-still-alive--tp14582075p14601200.html
Sent from the MozDev - sage mailing list archive at Nabble.com.