[Project_owners] Question about Extension

Jesper Staun Hansen jesper at heroes-addon.dk
Fri Oct 2 21:04:37 PDT 2009


Didn't even get to complete my mail writing before you wrote it.
But yea, that's pretty much the question.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Eric Jung <eric.jung at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Philip Chee <philip at aleytys.pc.my> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:58:24 -0400, Eric Jung wrote:
>>
>> > The policy is here:
>> > http://www.mozdev.org/projects/adoption.html
>>
>
> Jesper Hansen mentioned an important point which we should consider. Some
> projects on mozdev only release their source code with an open-source
> license. Their website, documentation, graphics, name, logo, etc. aren't
> freely redistributable. Does this mean those projects don't apply to the
> adoption policy?
>
>
>> > Note this is only for the mozdev side of things. It doesn't handle
>> adoption
>> > of the AMO side of things. I don't think AMO has an adoption policy
>> > currently. I'll look into that for you.
>>
>> I recently asked hijax about this (there is an open bug actually[1]) but
>> the answer seems to be "it's still up in the air".
>>
>> By the way, will AMO recognize a mozdev project takeover/adoption if the
>> extension is a mozdev project but also hosted on AMO? It would be silly
>> if two different people took over an extension, one on AMO and another
>> one on mozdev.
>>
>>
> There is no such recognition, and yes, that would be silly. Could you raise
> it in the bug you mention?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Project_owners mailing list
> Project_owners at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/project_owners/attachments/20091003/6f5983d9/attachment.html>


More information about the Project_owners mailing list