[Project_owners] some notes about file management

[alta88[nntp]]

---On 2008.Jun.03 05:03 AM, Neil wrote:
> alta88[nntp] wrote:
> 
>> so AMO is hardcoded as the only such update source within Fx?
> 
> No, it only hardcodes itself as the update.rdf source for all its 
> downloads.

i'm still not clear.  when Fx ckecks the update.rdf from 
mozdev, can it update-in-place the min/max versions if they 
change, like for AMO extensions?