From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Fri Aug 1 01:11:46 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:41:46 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Get the location of an image in a HTML page Message-ID: Hi Friends, I need to get the location (URL) of an image in a HTML page when I right clicked on that image. I still don't know how to do it. Can you tell me how to do it? thanks & regards, -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Fri Aug 1 01:51:49 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:21:49 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Get the location of an image in a HTML page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi friends, I could found a way to do my work. this is the sample code if(gContextMenu.onImage){ alert(" gContextMenu.imageURL = " +gContextMenu.imageURL); } thanks & regards, SS On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Silver Surfer wrote: > > Hi Friends, > > I need to get the location (URL) of an image in a HTML page when I right > clicked on that image. I still don't know how to do it. Can you tell me how > to do it? > > thanks & regards, > -- > ~Silver Surfer~ > Surfing through time & space > http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ > -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Fri Aug 1 07:03:10 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:33:10 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] how to use global js variable use in two XUL files Message-ID: Hi friends, I have one javascript variable which get the value in one XUL (overlay.xul) and I need to get that changed value in another XUL file. The relevant javascript variable has defined in a js file which is included in previous two XUL files. It is not functioning as I expect. Can you give me any ideas for solving it? thanks & regards, -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eric.jung at yahoo.com Fri Aug 1 10:24:04 2008 From: eric.jung at yahoo.com (Eric H. Jung) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Project_owners] how to use global js variable use in two XUL files Message-ID: <795729.20012.qm@web30306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Consider using javascript modules for global singleton variables. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_JavaScript_code_modules and http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript_modules ----- Original Message ---- From: Silver Surfer To: Mozdev Project Owners List Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 7:03:10 AM Subject: [Project_owners] how to use global js variable use in two XUL files Hi friends, I have one javascript variable which get the value in one XUL (overlay.xul) and I need to get that changed value in another XUL file. The relevant javascript variable has defined in a js file which is included in previous two XUL files. It is not functioning as I expect. Can you give me any ideas for solving it? thanks & regards, -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Fri Aug 1 10:32:11 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:32:11 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] log script errors committing to the downloads directory In-Reply-To: <4891D07D.80207@roub.net> References: <4891D07D.80207@roub.net> Message-ID: <200808011032.11260.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Thursday 31 July 2008 07:47:25 Paul Roub wrote: > Wondering if this will hose mirroring, or if these are merely failed > metadata updates. This should just be metadata, so if you're not using the file release system you shouldn't be affected. I'll try to take a look at it soon, though. > Committing (via CVS, haven't switched over to hg yet) to the ieview > downloads directory, I got this: Downloads and www still commit via CVS even if you are using hg for your source. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Sat Aug 2 03:45:55 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:15:55 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] how to use global js variable use in two XUL files In-Reply-To: <795729.20012.qm@web30306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <795729.20012.qm@web30306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Eric, thanks for your reply. I found another way to solve my problem. I set the value for my variable in overlay.xul using this method, > Application.storage.set("myobj", value); and then I get the same value using this method in other xul file, > var mydata= Application.storage.get("myobj", false); thanks & regards, SS On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Eric H. Jung wrote: > Consider using javascript modules for global singleton variables. > > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_JavaScript_code_modules > and > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript_modules > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Silver Surfer > To: Mozdev Project Owners List > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 7:03:10 AM > Subject: [Project_owners] how to use global js variable use in two XUL > files > > Hi friends, > I have one javascript variable which get the value in one XUL (overlay.xul) > and I need to get that changed value in another XUL file. The relevant > javascript variable has defined in a js file which is included in previous > two XUL files. It is not functioning as I expect. Can you give me any ideas > for solving it? > > thanks & regards, > -- > ~Silver Surfer~ > Surfing through time & space > http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > > -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From priyadarsan.v at gmail.com Mon Aug 4 03:45:38 2008 From: priyadarsan.v at gmail.com (Priyadarsan Venugopalan) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:45:38 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] Get the location of an image in a HTML page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Great!. Thanks for sharing Priyan http://www.freebookzone.com On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Silver Surfer wrote: > Hi friends, > I could found a way to do my work. > this is the sample code > > if(gContextMenu.onImage){ > alert(" gContextMenu.imageURL = " +gContextMenu.imageURL); > } > thanks & regards, > SS > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Silver Surfer wrote: > >> >> Hi Friends, >> >> I need to get the location (URL) of an image in a HTML page when I right >> clicked on that image. I still don't know how to do it. Can you tell me how >> to do it? >> >> thanks & regards, >> -- >> ~Silver Surfer~ >> Surfing through time & space >> http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > ~Silver Surfer~ > Surfing through time & space > http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Mon Aug 4 08:10:46 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] log script errors committing to the downloads directory In-Reply-To: <200808011032.11260.silfreed@silfreed.net> References: <4891D07D.80207@roub.net> <200808011032.11260.silfreed@silfreed.net> Message-ID: <200808041110.47217.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Friday 01 August 2008 13:32:11 Douglas E. Warner wrote: > > Wondering if this will hose mirroring, or if these are merely failed > > metadata updates. > > This should just be metadata, so if you're not using the file release > system you shouldn't be affected. > > I'll try to take a look at it soon, though. FYI, someone filed a bug for this as well. You can track progress here on bug 19667 [1]. -Doug [1] https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19667 -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From o.e.ekker at gmail.com Mon Aug 4 13:44:34 2008 From: o.e.ekker at gmail.com (Onno Ekker) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:44:34 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] Transfering project ownership for unreachable project owners In-Reply-To: <200807221255.48042.silfreed@silfreed.net> References: <200807221255.48042.silfreed@silfreed.net> Message-ID: <48976A32.1040200@gmail.com> Douglas E. Warner wrote: > We're trying to update our project adoption policy [1] to take into > consideration when we can't reach the current project owner. > I am subscribed to a mailing list which sends out a periodic "probe" mail to check if the subscribed addresses are still valid. This won't help you if the e-mail address gets invalid and you have no other way to contact the project owner, but it might help to detect problem addresses. Maybe you could also add the option to specify alternate e-mail addresses besides the primary address, just like LinkedIn does, for example. This won't help you with current inacive processes either, but might help you in the future to get back in touch with project owners that loose their e-mail address. Onno From silfreed at silfreed.net Mon Aug 4 14:12:04 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] log script errors committing to the downloads directory In-Reply-To: <200808041110.47217.silfreed@silfreed.net> References: <4891D07D.80207@roub.net> <200808011032.11260.silfreed@silfreed.net> <200808041110.47217.silfreed@silfreed.net> Message-ID: <200808041712.05104.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Monday 04 August 2008 11:10:46 Douglas E. Warner wrote: > FYI, someone filed a bug for this as well. ?You can track progress here on > bug 19667 [1]. This problem shoudl be fixed and files affected by it (since 2008.07.28) have been updated as well (they should show up properly in the file management tool and in downloads.mozdev.org). -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From o.e.ekker at gmail.com Mon Aug 4 14:36:30 2008 From: o.e.ekker at gmail.com (Onno Ekker) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:36:30 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] Projects overview page In-Reply-To: <4890CB10.1050907@stlouis-shopper.com> References: <488F838D.9000307@stlouis-shopper.com> <200807291500.28722.silfreed@silfreed.net> <48905D14.7010204@stlouis-shopper.com> <200807301000.43973.silfreed@silfreed.net> <4890CB10.1050907@stlouis-shopper.com> Message-ID: <4897765E.6020605@gmail.com> massey wrote: > Douglas E. Warner wrote: >> The first link on the page is a link to the project home page (the >> "Home" link with the icon). Perhaps this isn't prominent or clear >> enough? I'm not sure how it could be improved, feel free to give us >> your ideas. > I though I did give my idea(s) in the above quote - if nothing has > been 'released' via the file management UI why should that page even > be shown? Apparently it is confusing to the surfer just looking for > something. They get to that page and see 'Downloads' and when clicked > they are told there are none - which may not be true, as is the case > for a large number of projects that have not used the file management > interface. Now having been told there are no downloads available why > would they continue trying other links? > > So my suggestions for improvment are: > A) If there are no downloads 'released' then just take people to the > project home page instead. The downloads from the overview page was only the first step for the total project mockup, which would also show some statistics and other project info... http://www.mozdev.org/drupal/blog/Project-overview-page I'm not sure though when the statistics and graphs will be added though... Onno From myk at mozilla.org Tue Aug 5 14:26:24 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:26:24 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page Message-ID: <4898C580.4000403@mozilla.org> The default Drupal forum topic submission page is overcomplicated. Brief uses a simplified version . Does anyone know how they do it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eric.jung at yahoo.com Tue Aug 5 16:51:05 2008 From: eric.jung at yahoo.com (Eric H. Jung) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page Message-ID: <486091.10098.qm@web30303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> opensourcery to the rescue? ----- Original Message ---- From: Myk Melez To: Mozdev Project Owners List Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 5:26:24 PM Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page The default Drupal forum topic submission page is overcomplicated. Brief uses a simplified version. Does anyone know how they do it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From myk at mozilla.org Tue Aug 5 17:33:12 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:33:12 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: <486091.10098.qm@web30303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <486091.10098.qm@web30303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4898F148.4010300@mozilla.org> Eric H. Jung wrote: > opensourcery to the rescue? Hmm, perhaps. But I don't necessarily need it done for me (not yet, anyway). At this point I don't even see how it could be done in theory. There doesn't appear to be anything applicable in the voluminous Drupal administration interface, nor is there any obvious way to hack the templates/scripts that build that interface by hand. Before I know whether this is something I can do myself or something I need someone to do for me, I would need to know how one does it. -myk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Tue Aug 5 18:40:19 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: <4898C580.4000403@mozilla.org> References: <4898C580.4000403@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <200808052140.19454.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 17:26:24 Myk Melez wrote: > The default Drupal forum topic submission page is overcomplicated.? Brief > uses a simplified version.? Does anyone know how they do it? I'm pretty sure it has to do with what rights the different users have. As an admin for your project you get tons of options when you try to post a message. You may want to register a new user in Drupal that only has "authenticated" access. In fact, I just checked the forum entry page on snowl and it looks very similar to brief's with only a few options. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From philip.chee at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 21:11:45 2008 From: philip.chee at gmail.com (Philip Chee) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:11:45 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:26:24 -0700, Myk Melez wrote: > The default Drupal forum topic submission page > is overcomplicated. > Brief uses a simplified version > . Does anyone know how > they do it? They are both very simple. They both say: Access denied You are not authorized to access this page. Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]It is better to be brief than boring. * TagZilla 0.066.6 From o.e.ekker at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 22:33:16 2008 From: o.e.ekker at gmail.com (Onno Ekker) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:33:16 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <767de81b0808052233m44df8d87tfd0b1fd1b8486729@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Philip Chee wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:26:24 -0700, Myk Melez wrote: > > The default Drupal forum topic submission page > > is overcomplicated. > > Brief uses a simplified version > > . Does anyone know how > > they do it? > > They are both very simple. They both say: > > Access denied > You are not authorized to access this page. Yes, that's what I get too... Maybe a little off-topic, but my forum topic submission pageis a little too simple. I would like anonymous users to be able to post, but also give them the option to leave their contact information. I haven't been able to find this option, so I've filed a bug for it in drupal: http://drupal.org/node/291600 Way more off-topic: when going to the drupal website, I noticed they have released version 5.9 with security updates some time ago. Any plans on upgrading (to this version or to 6.3)? Onno -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Wed Aug 6 06:37:55 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: <767de81b0808052233m44df8d87tfd0b1fd1b8486729@mail.gmail.com> References: <767de81b0808052233m44df8d87tfd0b1fd1b8486729@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200808060938.01692.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:33:16 Onno Ekker wrote: > Way more off-topic: when going to the drupal website, I noticed they have > released version 5.9 with security updates some time ago. Any plans on > upgrading (to this version or to 6.3)? Yes, we do plan on upgrading to Drupal 5.9; since Drupal 5.8 the authentication mechanism changed and I need to update our Mozdev auth module to work with the changes. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From myk at mozilla.org Wed Aug 6 11:34:57 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:34:57 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4899EED1.6020600@mozilla.org> Philip Chee wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:26:24 -0700, Myk Melez wrote: > >> The default Drupal forum topic submission page >> is overcomplicated. >> Brief uses a simplified version >> . Does anyone know how >> they do it? >> > > They are both very simple. They both say: > > Access denied > You are not authorized to access this page. > Hmm, strange. I don't see that, but I do see "Access denied" messages for the initial wiki page and forum topic I have created when I am logged in as a regular user or not logged in at all: http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/welcome-snowl-discussion-forum http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/main-page -myk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From myk at mozilla.org Wed Aug 6 11:35:09 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:35:09 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4899EEDD.7090605@mozilla.org> Philip Chee wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:26:24 -0700, Myk Melez wrote: > >> The default Drupal forum topic submission page >> is overcomplicated. >> Brief uses a simplified version >> . Does anyone know how >> they do it? >> > > They are both very simple. They both say: > > Access denied > You are not authorized to access this page. > Hmm, strange. I don't see that, but I do see "Access denied" messages for the initial wiki page and forum topic I have created when I am logged in as a regular user or not logged in at all: http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/main-page http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/welcome-snowl-discussion-forum -myk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Wed Aug 6 11:45:58 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: <4899EEDD.7090605@mozilla.org> References: <4899EEDD.7090605@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <200808061445.58997.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 14:35:09 Myk Melez wrote: > Hmm, strange.? I don't see that, but I do see "Access denied" messages for > the initial wiki page and forum topic I have created when I am logged in as > a regular user or not logged in at all: > > http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/main-page > http://snowl.mozdev.org/drupal/content/welcome-snowl-discussion-forum I think this is a bug in my Drupal setup process; I've rebuilt permissions for your site and the pages should show up properly now. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From myk at mozilla.org Wed Aug 6 11:48:06 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:48:06 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] simplifying Drupal forum topic submission page In-Reply-To: <200808061445.58997.silfreed@silfreed.net> References: <4899EEDD.7090605@mozilla.org> <200808061445.58997.silfreed@silfreed.net> Message-ID: <4899F1E6.9070301@mozilla.org> Douglas E. Warner wrote: > I think this is a bug in my Drupal setup process; I've rebuilt permissions for > your site and the pages should show up properly now. > Yup, they show up just fine. Thanks Doug! -myk From inb.cor at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 00:16:25 2008 From: inb.cor at gmail.com (InBasic) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:46:25 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity Message-ID: Hi there, I am interested if any body can suggest a way to find out how much time Firefox is inactive from last use ? (maybe track mouse & keyboard move,..) P.S: I want to add feature to "Auto shutdown" extension to shutdown,hibernate,.. PC after specific time of inactivity of Firefox (suggested by a user) Regards, InBasic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eric.jung at yahoo.com Sun Aug 10 09:40:38 2008 From: eric.jung at yahoo.com (Eric H. Jung) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity Message-ID: <697249.41028.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> You could addEventListeners for mouseMove and keypress events, resetting a timer in the event handler for those events. Perform the shutdown/hibernate in the timer callback. If the timer ever expires, the shutdown/hibernate will occur. However, why bother with this at all? Every modern OS already has exactly this feature built-in. Eric ----- Original Message ---- From: InBasic To: Mozdev Project Owners List Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 3:16:25 AM Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity Hi there, I am interested if any body can suggest a way to find out how much time Firefox is inactive from last use ? (maybe track mouse & keyboard move,..) P.S: I want to add feature to "Auto shutdown" extension to shutdown,hibernate,.. PC after specific time of inactivity of Firefox (suggested by a user) Regards, InBasic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jesper at heroes-addon.dk Sun Aug 10 09:51:23 2008 From: jesper at heroes-addon.dk (Jesper Staun Hansen) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:51:23 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity In-Reply-To: <697249.41028.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <697249.41028.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <489F1C8B.4040309@heroes-addon.dk> A suggestion: Have you implemented an option to "Shutdown/standby/whatever when download finishes"? Eric H. Jung wrote: > You could addEventListeners for mouseMove and keypress events, > resetting a timer in the event handler for those events. Perform the > shutdown/hibernate in the timer callback. If the timer ever expires, > the shutdown/hibernate will occur. However, why bother with this at > all? Every modern OS already has exactly this feature built-in. > > Eric > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: InBasic > To: Mozdev Project Owners List > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 3:16:25 AM > Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity > > Hi there, > > I am interested if any body can suggest a way to find out how much > time Firefox is inactive from last use ? (maybe track mouse & > keyboard move,..) > > P.S: I want to add feature to "Auto shutdown" extension to > shutdown,hibernate,.. PC after specific time of inactivity of Firefox > (suggested by a user) > > Regards, > InBasic > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > From amin.eft at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 09:58:44 2008 From: amin.eft at gmail.com (Amin Eft...) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:28:44 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity In-Reply-To: <489F1C8B.4040309@heroes-addon.dk> References: <697249.41028.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <489F1C8B.4040309@heroes-addon.dk> Message-ID: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 20:21, Jesper Staun Hansen wrote: > A suggestion: > Have you implemented an option to "Shutdown/standby/whatever when download > finishes"? > > Eric H. Jung wrote: > >> You could addEventListeners for mouseMove and keypress events, resetting a >> timer in the event handler for those events. Perform the shutdown/hibernate >> in the timer callback. If the timer ever expires, the shutdown/hibernate >> will occur. >> > Good idea but I should implement it in XPCOM, is there any why to listen for mouse and keyboard globally (from XPCOM) ?! > However, why bother with this at all? Every modern OS already has exactly >> this feature built-in. >> > Auto shutdown can do more than shutdown,hibernate,.. so maybe someone want to run some js code, close Firefox only ,.. when time out! Thanks for your suggestion InBasic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amin.eft at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 09:59:56 2008 From: amin.eft at gmail.com (Amin Eft...) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:29:56 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity In-Reply-To: <489F1C8B.4040309@heroes-addon.dk> References: <697249.41028.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <489F1C8B.4040309@heroes-addon.dk> Message-ID: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 20:21, Jesper Staun Hansen wrote: > A suggestion: > Have you implemented an option to "Shutdown/standby/whatever when download > finishes"? > Yes , this is what Auto-shutdownextension do :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From enndeakin at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 14:07:58 2008 From: enndeakin at gmail.com (Neil Deakin) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <489F58AE.6070507@gmail.com> InBasic wrote: > Hi there, > > I am interested if any body can suggest a way to find out how much > time Firefox is inactive from last use ? (maybe track mouse & > keyboard move,..) > > P.S: I want to add feature to "Auto shutdown" extension to > shutdown,hibernate,.. PC after specific time of inactivity of Firefox > (suggested by a user) > You can do this with nsIIdleService, but I don't think there's a way to shutdown or ask for a shutdown of the system. You could shut down Firefox though. From inb.cor at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 21:12:28 2008 From: inb.cor at gmail.com (InBasic) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:42:28 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Find time duration of Firefox-inactivity In-Reply-To: <489F58AE.6070507@gmail.com> References: <489F58AE.6070507@gmail.com> Message-ID: Thanks Neil, this is exactly what I am looking for On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 00:37, Neil Deakin wrote: > InBasic wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I am interested if any body can suggest a way to find out how much time >> Firefox is inactive from last use ? (maybe track mouse & keyboard move,..) >> >> P.S: I want to add feature to "Auto shutdown" extension to >> shutdown,hibernate,.. PC after specific time of inactivity of Firefox >> (suggested by a user) >> >> > You can do this with nsIIdleService, but I don't think there's a way to > shutdown or ask for a shutdown of the system. You could shut down Firefox > though. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From inb.cor at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 23:38:34 2008 From: inb.cor at gmail.com (InBasic) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:08:34 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Download observer Message-ID: Hi In FF2 download observerworks well but It has some problem in FF3, for example "dl-cancel" or "dl-failed" not works well, I think its because Mozilla change this part for there new resume method,.. I cant find source code of observer in Mozilla chrome folder ! even http://mxr.mozilla.org/firefox/ address to wrong location (FF2 not FF3) So if anybody know the source location of download observer in FF3 please let me know! Regards, InBasic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From inb.cor at gmail.com Mon Aug 11 00:17:58 2008 From: inb.cor at gmail.com (InBasic) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:47:58 +0330 Subject: [Project_owners] Download observer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I find it! http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Monitoring_downloads On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:08, InBasic wrote: > Hi > > In FF2 download observerworks well but It has some problem in FF3, for example "dl-cancel" or > "dl-failed" not works well, I think its because Mozilla change this part for > there new resume method,.. > > I cant find source code of observer in Mozilla chrome folder ! even > http://mxr.mozilla.org/firefox/ address to wrong location (FF2 not FF3) > > So if anybody know the source location of download observer in FF3 please > let me know! > > > Regards, > InBasic > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Mon Aug 11 23:25:42 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:55:42 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Redirect to a web page after installing and extension Message-ID: Hi Friends, When an extension installed to FF browser and in the next time the browser start, how can I set to load a predefined page to the browser? thanks & regards, -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From varun21 at gmail.com Mon Aug 11 23:27:53 2008 From: varun21 at gmail.com (Shivanand Sharma / Varun) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:57:53 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Redirect to a web page after installing and extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1a9fd9700808112327o6a42241fld7014231f75676ae@mail.gmail.com> Hi, take a look at firefox showcase extension. re, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Silver Surfer wrote: > Hi Friends, > When an extension installed to FF browser and in the next time the browser > start, how can I set to load a predefined page to the browser? > thanks & regards, > -- > ~Silver Surfer~ > Surfing through time & space > http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > > -- Cheers! Shivanand Sharma Editor: http://binaryturf.com Technology, Design, Monetization -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silver.surfer444 at gmail.com Tue Aug 12 01:55:21 2008 From: silver.surfer444 at gmail.com (Silver Surfer) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:21 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Redirect to a web page after installing and extension In-Reply-To: <1a9fd9700808112327o6a42241fld7014231f75676ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <1a9fd9700808112327o6a42241fld7014231f75676ae@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I would be pleased if you can give some code snippets or any method to do that. It is little hard to find the place where FF Showcase do the redirecting in first time use. thx & rgrds, SS On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Shivanand Sharma / Varun < varun21 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > take a look at firefox showcase extension. > > re, > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Silver Surfer < > silver.surfer444 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Friends, >> When an extension installed to FF browser and in the next time the browser >> start, how can I set to load a predefined page to the browser? >> thanks & regards, >> -- >> ~Silver Surfer~ >> Surfing through time & space >> http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Project_owners mailing list >> Project_owners at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners >> >> > > > -- > Cheers! > Shivanand Sharma > Editor: http://binaryturf.com > Technology, Design, Monetization > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > > -- ~Silver Surfer~ Surfing through time & space http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From varun21 at gmail.com Tue Aug 12 02:01:07 2008 From: varun21 at gmail.com (Shivanand Sharma / Varun) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:31:07 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Redirect to a web page after installing and extension In-Reply-To: References: <1a9fd9700808112327o6a42241fld7014231f75676ae@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1a9fd9700808120201i1369bdffj3a97d5dcaebeaf82@mail.gmail.com> Hi, sorry, I learnt most of the stuff cutting and pasting code (and unfortunately most of the time that's how things work :) - You'll have to set a boolean preference to know whether you have already opened this runonce URL or not. Initially set it to false - You need to add an event listener to window.open (or possibly after the session has been restored) to run this function that opens the URL - Finally in this function you set the preference to true else you'll end up triggering the runonce routine everytime firefox starts. Sorry I don't have code. Because the best place to find it is at http://developer.mozilla.org re, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Silver Surfer wrote: > I would be pleased if you can give some code snippets or any method to do > that. It is little hard to find the place where FF Showcase do the > redirecting in first time use. > > thx & rgrds, > SS > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Shivanand Sharma / Varun < > varun21 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> take a look at firefox showcase extension. >> >> re, >> >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Silver Surfer < >> silver.surfer444 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Friends, >>> When an extension installed to FF browser and in the next time the >>> browser start, how can I set to load a predefined page to the browser? >>> thanks & regards, >>> -- >>> ~Silver Surfer~ >>> Surfing through time & space >>> http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Project_owners mailing list >>> Project_owners at mozdev.org >>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers! >> Shivanand Sharma >> Editor: http://binaryturf.com >> Technology, Design, Monetization >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Project_owners mailing list >> Project_owners at mozdev.org >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners >> >> > > > -- > ~Silver Surfer~ > Surfing through time & space > http://risingofsilversurfer.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > > -- Cheers! Shivanand Sharma Editor: http://binaryturf.com Technology, Design, Monetization -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip.chee at gmail.com Fri Aug 15 21:00:44 2008 From: philip.chee at gmail.com (Philip Chee) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:00:44 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file Message-ID: Aug 15 20:56:24 [warning] unlink(/usr/local/sandbox/site_public_data/www/updates/xsidebar/{3ed8cc52-86fc-4613-9026-c1ef969da4c3}/update.rdf): Permission denied (/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ExtensionUpdateRdf.php at line 80) ====backtrace ==== #0 unlink() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ExtensionUpdateRdf.php:80] args{/usr/local/sandbox/site_public_data/www/updates/xsidebar/{3ed8cc52-86fc-4613-9026-c1ef969da4c3}/update.rdf} #1 MD_ExtensionUpdateRdf::generate() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/Extension.php:196] args{MD_Extension} #2 MD_Extension->generateUpdateRdf() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:883] #3 MD_ProjectDownloadFile->setPublicReleased() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:841] args{} #4 MD_ProjectDownloadFile->setAvailable() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/include/download_file_info_update.php:74] args{} Aug 15 20:56:24 [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file (/usr/local/sandbox/site_public_data/www/updates/xsidebar/{3ed8cc52-86fc-4613-9026-c1ef969da4c3}/update.rdf) (/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ExtensionUpdateRdf.php at line 82) ====backtrace ==== #0 MD_Extension->generateUpdateRdf() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:883] #1 MD_ProjectDownloadFile->setPublicReleased() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:841] args{} #2 MD_ProjectDownloadFile->setAvailable() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/include/download_file_info_update.php:74] args{} Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Open mouth, insert foot, echo internationally. * TagZilla 0.066.6 From jesper at heroes-addon.dk Sat Aug 16 01:20:14 2008 From: jesper at heroes-addon.dk (Jesper Staun Hansen) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:20:14 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48A68DBE.6040203@heroes-addon.dk> Philip Chee wrote: > > Phil > > Something we should take note of Phil :-)? From philip at aleytys.pc.my Sat Aug 16 05:06:41 2008 From: philip at aleytys.pc.my (Philip Chee) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:06:41 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:20:14 +0200, Jesper Staun Hansen wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> >> Phil > Something we should take note of Phil :-)? Only if you are a mozdev sysadmin. Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]We don't really understand it, so we'll give it to the programmers. * TagZilla 0.066.6 From silfreed at silfreed.net Sun Aug 17 18:06:58 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808172107.03978.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Saturday 16 August 2008 08:06:41 Philip Chee wrote: > > Philip Chee wrote: > >> > >> Phil > > > > Something we should take note of Phil :-)? > > Only if you are a mozdev sysadmin. It's probably better to file these as bugs so that people that don't care about the warnings don't have to deal with the mail, but thanks for the notification. The easiest way to file bugs is from the links at the bottom of the feedback page [1]. -Doug [1] http://www.mozdev.org/feedback.html -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Mon Aug 18 11:57:24 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] [error] Uncaught Exception: Failed to unlink existing file In-Reply-To: <200808172107.03978.silfreed@silfreed.net> References: <200808172107.03978.silfreed@silfreed.net> Message-ID: <200808181457.24350.silfreed@silfreed.net> On Sunday 17 August 2008 21:06:58 Douglas E. Warner wrote: > It's probably better to file these as bugs so that people that don't care > about the warnings don't have to deal with the mail, but thanks for the > notification. > > The easiest way to file bugs is from the links at the bottom of the > feedback page [1]. The bug should be fixed; this should only have affected CVS deletions from the downloads folder. These files might still show up on downloads.mozdev.org due to an invalid cache but should be missing from the mirrors. I'll be looking into fixing the cache next. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From o.e.ekker at gmail.com Fri Aug 22 00:43:25 2008 From: o.e.ekker at gmail.com (Onno Ekker) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:43:25 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia Message-ID: <48AE6E1D.9030008@gmail.com> Hi, Just after releasing an update for my adopted ThreadKey extension on AMO I got this "100% CLEAN award granted by Softpedia" mail. It looks genuine enough, but I wonder what I should do with it. Maybe the only thing it will do, is get some more links to the extension page, so a bit higher ranking on google when people search on the name? Not harmful, but it doesn't strike me as very useful either. And I wonder what I have done to get this listing. ThreadKey is an adopted extension, so maybe the creator did add it to Softpedia? Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with them? Also last week I stumbled upon Add-ons Mirror, or AMI. I'd seen that site before, but never paid too much attention to it. Do other project owners use it to publish there extension? Does it help? Onno From philip.chee at gmail.com Fri Aug 22 03:44:09 2008 From: philip.chee at gmail.com (Philip Chee) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:44:09 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:43:25 +0200, Onno Ekker wrote: > Just after releasing an update for my adopted ThreadKey extension on AMO > I got this "100% CLEAN award granted by Softpedia" mail. It looks > genuine enough, but I wonder what I should do with it. Maybe the only > thing it will do, is get some more links to the extension page, so a bit > higher ranking on google when people search on the name? Not harmful, > but it doesn't strike me as very useful either. I just ignore them. Basically they are just a link farm to drive eyeballs and sell advertising space. > And I wonder what I have done to get this listing. ThreadKey is an > adopted extension, so maybe the creator did add it to Softpedia? As far as I can tell they just pick extensions at random. I also think they look at recent updates to AMO because I got one just after updating a very obscure SeaMonkey only extension. > Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with > them? I just file them in some obscure corner of gmail. > Also last week I stumbled upon Add-ons Mirror, or AMI. I'd seen that > site before, but never paid too much attention to it. Do other project > owners use it to publish there extension? Does it help? Yeah, The Extensions Mirror predates AMO. Recently they changed their name to The Addons Mirror International (due to a change of ownership) and isn't getting as much traffic since it dropped off most people's bookmarks. It's useful for those extensions stuck in sandbox hell and for those looking for older more obscure extensions. Some extension developers deliberately avoid AMO and host their extensions on AMI for ideological reasons (which I've never managed to understand) And yes it does help get your extensions noticed. Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Thesaurus: ancient reptile with an excellent vocabulary. * TagZilla 0.066.6 From eric.jung at yahoo.com Fri Aug 22 10:26:37 2008 From: eric.jung at yahoo.com (Eric H. Jung) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia Message-ID: <899842.26171.qm@web30302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Just after releasing an update for my adopted ThreadKey extension on AMO > I got this "100% CLEAN award granted by Softpedia" mail. It looks > genuine enough, but I wonder what I should do with it. Maybe the only > thing it will do, is get some more links to the extension page, so a bit > higher ranking on google when people search on the name? Not harmful, > but it doesn't strike me as very useful either. > > And I wonder what I have done to get this listing. ThreadKey is an > adopted extension, so maybe the creator did add it to Softpedia? > > Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with > them? I think you'll find this article very interesting: http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/08/16/the-software-awards-scam/ The article was slashdott'd, dugg, and reddit'd last year. Bottom line: these "awards" are complete nonsense. I delete every one I get and don't contribute to the site's traffic by posting their "award" graphic. Eric From myk at mozilla.org Fri Aug 22 13:17:28 2008 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:17:28 -0700 Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia In-Reply-To: <48AE6E1D.9030008@gmail.com> References: <48AE6E1D.9030008@gmail.com> Message-ID: <48AF1ED8.1000500@mozilla.org> Onno Ekker wrote: > Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with > them? > I get them too, although I've never solicited them. I ignore them. > Also last week I stumbled upon Add-ons Mirror, or AMI. I'd seen that > site before, but never paid too much attention to it. Do other project > owners use it to publish there extension? Does it help? > I published there in the distant past when I couldn't get something onto AMO for some reason (don't recall now why), but I don't do so anymore. -myk From varun21 at gmail.com Fri Aug 22 22:28:17 2008 From: varun21 at gmail.com (Shivanand Sharma / Varun) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:58:17 +0530 Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia In-Reply-To: <48AF1ED8.1000500@mozilla.org> References: <48AE6E1D.9030008@gmail.com> <48AF1ED8.1000500@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <1a9fd9700808222228y35d9bee5lc4185f866d4d9d52@mail.gmail.com> I got them once for both of my extensions. and I've been getting them on most updates ever since. The first time I flaunted it and my not so tech savvy friends believed I was a famous guy on the net. Now since I get too many of those I steer clear of them else my personal blog looks ugly. re, On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Myk Melez wrote: > Onno Ekker wrote: > >> Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with >> them? >> >> > I get them too, although I've never solicited them. I ignore them. > > Also last week I stumbled upon Add-ons Mirror, or AMI. I'd seen that >> site before, but never paid too much attention to it. Do other project >> owners use it to publish there extension? Does it help? >> >> > I published there in the distant past when I couldn't get something onto > AMO for some reason (don't recall now why), but I don't do so anymore. > > -myk > > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > -- Cheers! Shivanand Sharma Editor: http://binaryturf.com Technology, Design, Monetization -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Mon Aug 25 09:17:13 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:17:13 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux Message-ID: Hi, I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found a workaround for this bug? Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong color, as if it isn't really focused. Thanks, Michael From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Mon Aug 25 09:44:15 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:44:15 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] Softpedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Onno Ekker wrote: > Hi, > > Just after releasing an update for my adopted ThreadKey extension on AMO > I got this "100% CLEAN award granted by Softpedia" mail. It looks > genuine enough, but I wonder what I should do with it. Maybe the only > thing it will do, is get some more links to the extension page, so a bit > higher ranking on google when people search on the name? Not harmful, > but it doesn't strike me as very useful either. > > And I wonder what I have done to get this listing. ThreadKey is an > adopted extension, so maybe the creator did add it to Softpedia? All it needs is someone who installs your extension, an independent source who took the time to give some feedback to Softpedia (as a reference for other/future interested parties). > Do other project owners also get these "awards"? And what do you do with > them? We did yes. We decided to use it, simply because what good is it to ignore your users? You might not like it, but it might as well help you. > Also last week I stumbled upon Add-ons Mirror, or AMI. I'd seen that > site before, but never paid too much attention to it. Do other project > owners use it to publish there extension? Does it help? > > Onno We don't use it. However, if AMO is really that bad i.e. people keep have difficulties getting their work out of the sandbox, this might be another way out to get their work public. Or at least faster. Michael -- To Herodotus, the old moral ?pride comes before a fall? was a matter of common observation and had been proved true by the greatest historical event of his time. From philip at aleytys.pc.my Mon Aug 25 12:05:10 2008 From: philip at aleytys.pc.my (Philip Chee) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:05:10 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:17:13 +0200, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > Hi, > > I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be > limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found a > workaround for this bug? > > Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the window > in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong color, > as if it isn't really focused. SeaMonkey Version? Firefox Version? IceApe/IceWeasel of official mozilla.org releases? Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]We're off to see the wizard.... * TagZilla 0.066.6 From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Mon Aug 25 14:28:42 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:28:42 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Philip Chee wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:17:13 +0200, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, > MultiZilla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be >> limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found a >> workaround for this bug? >> >> Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the window >> in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong color, >> as if it isn't really focused. > > SeaMonkey Version? Firefox Version? IceApe/IceWeasel of official > mozilla.org releases? The latest and official releases, of both browsers. Note that I went back to SeaMonkey v1.1.9 for testing, but so far nothing except running Windows works (XP/SP3 in VirtualBox). Thanks, Michael From philip at aleytys.pc.my Mon Aug 25 17:55:57 2008 From: philip at aleytys.pc.my (Philip Chee) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:55:57 +0800 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:28:42 +0200, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> SeaMonkey Version? Firefox Version? IceApe/IceWeasel of official >> mozilla.org releases? > The latest and official releases, of both browsers. > Note that I went back to SeaMonkey v1.1.9 for testing, but so far > nothing except running Windows works (XP/SP3 in VirtualBox). In that case you are comparing a Gecko 1.8.1 browser (SeaMonkey 1.1.11) with a Gecko 1.9 browser (Firefox 3.0). Do you have the same problem with the latest Firefox 2.0.0.16? (eq SM 1.1.11) Is this problem fixed in the current SeaMonkey 2.0a nightlies? (eq Shiretoko) Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Shell to DOS...come in, DOS...do you read...over? * TagZilla 0.066.6 From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Mon Aug 25 22:14:24 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:14:24 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Philip Chee wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:28:42 +0200, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, > MultiZilla wrote: > >> Philip Chee wrote: >>> SeaMonkey Version? Firefox Version? IceApe/IceWeasel of official >>> mozilla.org releases? > >> The latest and official releases, of both browsers. > >> Note that I went back to SeaMonkey v1.1.9 for testing, but so far >> nothing except running Windows works (XP/SP3 in VirtualBox). > > In that case you are comparing a Gecko 1.8.1 browser (SeaMonkey 1.1.11) > with a Gecko 1.9 browser (Firefox 3.0). > > Do you have the same problem with the latest Firefox 2.0.0.16? (eq SM > 1.1.11) SeaMonkey 1.1.9 and 1.1.11 are basically the same (I have both install, on two Ubuntu computers) except for the security patches. As for Mozilla Firefox; I don't want to install any older version on Ubuntu anymore (can end in a nightmare). > Is this problem fixed in the current SeaMonkey 2.0a nightlies? (eq > Shiretoko) I haven't tried; because I don't have v2a installed on my Ubuntu systems. However, this might be a good time to give it another go. Thanks, Michael From neil at parkwaycc.co.uk Tue Aug 26 02:17:50 2008 From: neil at parkwaycc.co.uk (Neil) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:17:50 +0100 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be > limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found > a workaround for this bug? > > Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the > window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong > color, as if it isn't really focused. This is normal behaviour for window.focus() on Linux, and we use identical widget code; maybe your window manager special-cases Firefox? From jesper at heroes-addon.dk Tue Aug 26 02:28:58 2008 From: jesper at heroes-addon.dk (Jesper Staun Hansen) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:28:58 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48B3CCDA.4000609@heroes-addon.dk> Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > Hi, > > I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be > limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found > a workaround for this bug? > > Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the > window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong > color, as if it isn't really focused. > > Thanks, > Michael Are you using "window focus follows mouse"? From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Tue Aug 26 09:26:05 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:26:05 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Neil wrote: > Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > >> I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be >> limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found >> a workaround for this bug? >> >> Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the >> window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong >> color, as if it isn't really focused. > > This is normal behaviour for window.focus() on Linux, and we use > identical widget code; maybe your window manager special-cases Firefox? You mean that I have to call window.focus() a couple of time for it works, or that when that works that the title bar isn't focused? I use a pretty standard installation of Ubuntu, but other people are reported the same bug(?) with other distro's ever since people expect thing to refocus when they try to open an already opened error console or preference window (just two examples that fail). Thanks, Michael From mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com Tue Aug 26 09:32:49 2008 From: mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com (Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:32:49 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Jesper Staun Hansen wrote: > Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to be >> limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone found >> a workaround for this bug? >> >> Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the >> window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong >> color, as if it isn't really focused. >> >> Thanks, >> Michael > > Are you using "window focus follows mouse"? Nope. Just a standard Ubuntu installation (I would not have asked for help here if I did - I'm already comparing apples to oranges e.g. Mozilla Firefox v.s. SeaMonkey but that's about it). Thanks, Michael From neil at parkwaycc.co.uk Wed Aug 27 02:07:04 2008 From: neil at parkwaycc.co.uk (Neil) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:07:04 +0100 Subject: [Project_owners] window.focus() failing on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: > Neil wrote: > >> Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: >> >>> I can't get window.focus() to work on Ubuntu Linux. It appears to >>> be limited to SeaMonkey because it works in Mozilla Firefox. Anyone >>> found a workaround for this bug? >>> >>> Note that calling window.focus() a number of times will bring the >>> window in the foreground, but the title bar at the top has the wrong >>> color, as if it isn't really focused. >> >> This is normal behaviour for window.focus() on Linux, and we use >> identical widget code; maybe your window manager special-cases Firefox? > > You mean that I have to call window.focus() a couple of time for it > works, or that when that works that the title bar isn't focused? Ah, sorry for not reading your message carefully enough, but I meant that my understanding is that it should raise the window without activating it. If you know your gtk programming (I don't), feel free to read widget/src/gtk2/nsWindow.cpp's nsWindow::SetFocus method. From buanzo at buanzo.com.ar Thu Aug 28 05:43:45 2008 From: buanzo at buanzo.com.ar (Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:43:45 -0300 Subject: [Project_owners] [ADMIN] Write acces to another user Message-ID: <48B69D81.30504@buanzo.com.ar> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi! I need to provide cvs write access to Jacob "ioerror" Appelbaum (CCed in this mail), who joined the Enigform team yesterday. How should be arrange for that? He's not a mozdev.org project owner. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica *ESTE SABADO 18/Ago* SHOW DE FUTURABANDA (Punk Libre)- Sarmiento 1679 CapFed Entradas anticipadas a traves de www.futurabanda.com.ar - Punk Rock Melodico -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFItp2BAlpOsGhXcE0RCi8YAJ9x6sYt4KU5ljMO6cjI2mWRYkD+JQCfalT5 3BN0T92pucBFH7mygxXa3XI= =F4TK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ocramius at gmail.com Thu Aug 28 06:01:37 2008 From: ocramius at gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:01:37 +0200 Subject: [Project_owners] [ADMIN] Write acces to another user In-Reply-To: <48B69D81.30504@buanzo.com.ar> References: <48B69D81.30504@buanzo.com.ar> Message-ID: Just write an email to feedback at mozdev.org ;) 2008/8/28 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi! > > I need to provide cvs write access to Jacob "ioerror" Appelbaum (CCed in > this mail), who joined the > Enigform team yesterday. > > How should be arrange for that? He's not a mozdev.org project owner. > > - -- > Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad > Informatica > *ESTE SABADO 18/Ago* SHOW DE FUTURABANDA (Punk Libre)- Sarmiento 1679 > CapFed > Entradas anticipadas a traves de www.futurabanda.com.ar - Punk Rock > Melodico > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFItp2BAlpOsGhXcE0RCi8YAJ9x6sYt4KU5ljMO6cjI2mWRYkD+JQCfalT5 > 3BN0T92pucBFH7mygxXa3XI= > =F4TK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > Project_owners at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > -- Standard Ogame Project - StOgame http://www.stogame.net Making Ogame a better place... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silfreed at silfreed.net Thu Aug 28 06:14:00 2008 From: silfreed at silfreed.net (Douglas E. Warner) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Project_owners] [ADMIN] Write acces to another user In-Reply-To: References: <48B69D81.30504@buanzo.com.ar> Message-ID: <200808280914.05313.silfreed@silfreed.net> Yep; like Marco said, you can email us at feedback at mozdev.org or file a bug from one of the links on the feedback page [1]. We can get an account setup for him with commit access. -Doug [1] http://www.mozdev.org/feedback.html On Thursday 28 August 2008 09:01:37 Marco Pivetta wrote: > Just write an email to feedback at mozdev.org ;) > > 2008/8/28 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman > I need to provide cvs write access to Jacob "ioerror" Appelbaum (CCed in > this mail), who joined the Enigform team yesterday. > > How should be arrange for that? He's not a mozdev.org project owner. -- Douglas E. Warner Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From matthew at mjwilson.demon.co.uk Sat Aug 30 00:39:35 2008 From: matthew at mjwilson.demon.co.uk (Matthew Wilson) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:39:35 +0100 Subject: [Project_owners] Errors when updating an XPI Message-ID: <48B8F937.7060407@mjwilson.demon.co.uk> Just checked in an updated version of an XPI and got: Checking in annotations-0.4.0.a.5.xpi; /cvs/annozilla/downloads/annotations-0.4.0.a.5.xpi,v <-- annotations-0.4.0.a.5.xpi new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done Processing log script arguments... Aug 30 00:35:12 [warning] mkdir(): Permission denied (/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ExtensionUpdateRdf.php at line 54) ====backtrace ==== #0 mkdir() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ExtensionUpdateRdf.php:54] args{/usr/local/sandbox/site_public_data/www/updates/annozilla/{1a78ab42-f996-4c90-a649-4e7a2dcad5c0}, 509, 1} #1 MD_ExtensionUpdateRdf::generate() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/Extension.php:196] args{MD_Extension} #2 MD_Extension->generateUpdateRdf() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:883] #3 MD_ProjectDownloadFile->setPublicReleased() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/lib/ProjectDownloadFile.php:139] args{} #4 MD_ProjectDownloadFile::add() called at [/mozdev/sandbox/php/include/download_file_info_update.php:85] args{annozilla, ., annotations-0.4.0.a.5.xpi} Name "main::SCRIPT_URI" used only once: possible typo at /usr/local/sbin/sendmail_logger line 18. Name "main::REMOTE_ADDR" used only once: possible typo at /usr/local/sbin/sendmail_logger line 18. Failed to open file ::Permission denied at /usr/local/sbin/sendmail_logger line 11. Success, CVS operation completed Matthew