[Project_owners] last day to vote
cmelhorn at verizon.net
Tue Nov 27 12:52:30 PST 2007
> For me, Subversion was the system I checked. TurtoiseSVN is the windows
> client I learned to love :D In my opinion WinCVS is harder to use, too.
I concur. Some of the reasons I like the Subversion/TortoiseSVN combination:
* Subversion uses a conceptually very simple scheme for branching and
tagging - branches and tags are created by copying a snapshot to a new
directory. Not as efficient as other schemes, perhaps, but in these days
of 250 GB disk drives, that's not much of a concern for me.
* Directories, as well as files, are version controlled with Subversion,
which is a significant improvement over CVS.
* Each commit into an Subversion repository creates a new revision for
the entire project, not just for one file. This can be good or bad
depending on your perspective, but I've come to prefer it.
* Text and binary files are treated the same, so no need to identify a
file as binary when you add it.
* TortoiseSVN is implemented as a windows shell extension, so it's
integrated into the Windows Explorer file manager which is extremely
More information about the Project_owners