[Project_owners] You are all wasting your time on mozdev.org...
johnrw at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 00:44:07 PST 2007
Release early, release often...
AMO, and UMO before it, were really only fit for old stable versions
of an extension.
Just so you all know... whenever i wanted an approval, I had to get on
#firefox and do some begging... which stinks. It was either that or it
sits in a cue for a month.
Mozdev was always great... where a dev or group could get enthusiastic
about the development and be sure if a bug was introduced... it could be
fixed and re released quickly. Amo and Umo took all that out of the process.
If they have put it back by now...then my apologies in advance.
I don't look very often anymore.
If mozdev had not been around... nobody would have looked at Firefox.
They wouldn't have had a reason to. It was the extensions that
Netscape/Mozilla had all along that were interesting... and creating a
UI and it's
methods to remove unwanted extensions... could just have easily been done to
mozilla suite and the years spent on a more productive endeavor.
Actually, Firefox is still bloated but I do like the crash recovery.
Wasn't that an extension first? Was it hosted here too?
On Nov 18, 2007 9:07 PM, Marco Pivetta <ocramius at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mozdev gives great web support to developers, I do not think that free
> space, mailman, backup server and support is a waste of time :S
> 2007/11/19, John Woods < johnrw at gmail.com>:
> > Where did Robert write that?
> > AMO is for less skilled users... but as for every useful extension
> > being on AMO, really?
> > I would debate that.
> > If by "normal users" he means the kind that don't know anything... I
> > say too bad for them.
> > AMO is already for them...
> > If by "normal users" he means people who know their way around, and
> > can figure out things when they need to... well if they are having a
> > hard time navigating around... then maybe there is an issue. I must be
> > in the really really advanced group... cause I could find the top 50
> > projects and our own project in a few clicks. Seemed to be straight
> > forward enough. I think there is nothing to the argument.
> > jmo
> > On Nov 18, 2007 6:40 PM, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla
> > < mv_van_rantwijk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Getting feedback is fine, but...
> > >
> > > Robert Kaiser wrote: "mozdev is hard to navigate for novices"
> > > and "every useful extension for end users should be on AMO."
> > > later he adds: "mozdev is not well-navigatable by normal users"
> > > so I guess we all here are wasting out time on mozdev.org
> > >
> > > If, and I said *if* mozdev.org _is_ hard to navigate somehow,
> > > then I guess we should take care of it, by making a change but
> > > not by ignoring it.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Do we need to make a change, and if that is a yes
> > > what should we change?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Vincent van Rantwijk
> > > - MultiZilla Project Team Lead
> > > - XUL Boot Camp Staff member (ActiveState Training Partner)
> > > - iPhone Application Developer
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Project_owners mailing list
> > > Project_owners at mozdev.org
> > > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Project_owners mailing list
> > Project_owners at mozdev.org
> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
> Standard Ogame Project - http://stogame.lepihost.net
> Making Ogame a better place...
> Project_owners mailing list
> Project_owners at mozdev.org
More information about the Project_owners