[Project_owners] Should mozdev.org generate an updates.rdf file for our projects?

[Eric H. Jung]

--- "Douglas E. Warner" <silfreed at silfreed.net> wrote:

> On Thursday 06 December 2007, Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote:
> > > One of the bugs I'm working on now tracks what applications a project
> > > works with.
> >
> > Eh, how should this work?  And with 'applications' you refer to:
> > Flock, Mozilla Firefox, Netscape, SeaMonkey, XULRunner etc, right?
> 
> These applications, yes.  A project owner would have to choose which 
> applications their project supports.
>


You can get the list of applications with which the addon works from the install.rdf. That's how
AMO does it.
 

> If the feed is capable of identifying multiple applications (firefox, 
> seamonkey, etc) AND multiple files (an extension, a theme, etc) then there 
> may be some more things for me to think about.
> 

I'm curious why you keep referring to update.rdf as a "feed" and not a file?