Eric H. Jung
grimholtz at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 30 17:54:51 EDT 2006
I second the idea to opening mozdev to licenses which require source
code to be open, but disallow its reuse. What constitues reuse? I don't
know, I'm not a lawyer. But clearly there's a definition (look at the
whole SCO / System5 / Linux legal battle)
--- David Boswell <davidwboswell at yahoo.com> wrote:
> list or open a bug and we can track comments there. If there is a
> general consensus for a change, we're certainly open to updating it.
> > Which then leads to the next question: does MozDev want to limit
> > itself
> > to "open source" projects, or include all "freely distributable"
> > software? If there are concerns about code safety, perhaps MozDev
> > could
> > require that source code also be distributed, but not require
> > automatic permission for derived works?
> Project_owners mailing list
> Project_owners at mozdev.org
More information about the Project_owners