filippo.possenti at gmail.com
Sun Apr 30 21:42:47 EDT 2006
Matt Seitz wrote:
> What do you think of the GPL? While it would allow commercial use
> without your permission, it would require them to hand over their
> source code. That's usually enough to stop companies from taking
> undue advantage of your work.
I'll consider it.
I'll read carefully the GPL license and any other OSI-approved license
as soon as I'll have the time.
For now, I made my project subject to the MPL.
> That's a laudable goal. I'm not aware of a current license that calls
> for this, but you could add this requirement to an existing license.
> However, I think you would need to be sure that the only requirement
> is that notice be sent to a certain address, either physical or
> e'mail. If you require that you approve of the new project, that
> would be contrary to a basic principle of open source: derived works
> do not require the explicit permission of the original author, just
> conformance with a predefined set of terms.
I'll never thought to force people requiring my approval... nor I think
it would be a good strategy, since this first release of the extension
required only a few hours to be developed (6 months working 1
hour/week... this means something like 30 hours of working time). This
small amount of time, for sure, will not stop people from creating a
similar project from scratch if needed.
An email notice is enough. I'll look for the possibility to add this
requirement to an existing OSI-approved license.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Project_owners