davidwboswell at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 29 11:23:22 EDT 2006
Let's see what the SmarySync project owner says and then we can decide
what to do. If needed, we can ask the lawyers on our board to review
how the terms apply in this case.
AFAICT, the SmartSync project is hosted on a different site and the
mozdev project page is just redirecting people. If they just wanted a
link from mozdev to their site, we can add them to the External
Projects page and then the license wouldn't be an issue.
> "All code for each project hosted on the Site must be made available
> under the Mozilla Public License (MPL) unless otherwise noted on the
> project pages. More information about the MPL can be found at
> http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/. If a project is not using the MPL it
> to use one of the other OSI-approved open source licenses."
> The SmartSync project is using:
> Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5
> I'm specifically objecting to:
> "No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon
> As far as I can tell from this page:
> None of the CC licences have been approved by the OSI.
> Based on the Mozdev AUP, I am now assuming that by registering their
> project on Mozdev, they have implicitly released their code under the
> MPL overriding the "No Derivative Works" clause in the CC licence.
> Philip Chee <philip at aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.chee at gmail.com>
> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
> Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
> oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
> [ ]I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause.
> * TagZilla 0.059
> Project_owners mailing list
> Project_owners at mozdev.org
More information about the Project_owners