[Project_owners] Getting to know you...
friedfox.mozdev at asheesh.org
Fri May 27 02:23:58 EDT 2005
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Todd Ross wrote:
> Michael Vincent van Rantwijk wrote:
>> I don't know any of you personally, but we have a common goal here, so
>> my question for you is; How old are you, if you don't mind me asking,
>> and what project(s) are you working on?
As someone earlier said, "I'll join the a/s/l thread."
Name: Asheesh Laroia
Online handle: paulproteus (in case you know me as that)
Location: Currently in Rochester, NY, at home with my parents for a week.
Usually in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, attending the Johns Hopkins
Friedfox is a quick hack of the Firefox installer for Windows so that it
installs unconditionally, doing its best without Administrator privileges.
It's been hard to continue development without root on a Windows machine
(I run GNU/Linux on all my workstations), but I'll be setting up a virtual
machine for Friedfox development soon.
Friedfox was intended so I could do a one-click install of Firefox
wherever I sat down to use a Windows machine.
> This may be an unpopular opinion, but I just don't think it's ready yet.
I find this a very interesting statement. On one hand, I believe that
Firefox is very much still more a "project" than a product. For Ubuntu
and Debian users like me, that project gets packaged by Debian into
something that fits in a consistent way into my computing environment.
For Windows users, some work has to be done by the user that would
normally be part of the product. For example, selecting extensions to
download (it comes with none, despite how many of them rock),
In the Free Software world, GNU writes code, and GNU/Linux distributors
package it up. We're moving away from "distributions" like Slackware and
toward "products" like RedHat Enterprise Linux and Ubuntu; we're moving
from balls of code to systems that are well-integrated. In the same
sense, I would be very interested to see more *products* based on Firefox,
like a Windows "Megafox" that, on install, grabs the latest version of
Sun's Java, Macromedia's Flash, and other commonly-desired plugins and
that grabs cool extensions like Greasemonkey and Adblock by default. I
would be happier recommending such a "Megafox" to my Windows-using
At the same time, the answer that it is not "ready yet" begs the question,
"Ready for what?". To me, Mozilla XPCOM has become the real Java: It
seems to me to be the current home of cross-platform GUI programming for
the end-user. Clearly, it's in use. So, I'm curious: what does "ready"
mean for you?
(By the way, I also think Java programming didn't take off in the way Sun
wanted because they don't have native widgets. That problem was worsened
by Sun's non-native ugly widget toolkits being EXTREMELY SLOW.)
It is a mistake to let any mechanical object realise that you
are in a hurry.
More information about the Project_owners