[Project_owners] Story: XULRunner Conversion
axel at pike.org
Thu Apr 28 09:44:24 EDT 2005
Todd Ross wrote:
> Axel Hecht wrote:
>> chrome.manifest is documented at
> Should that be linked to from the XULRunner Wiki page, then? I would
> say yes as that was my first exposure to chrome.manifest. I admit that
> I didn't search high and low as I was able to get it working through
> trial and error.
Actually, it should end up on devmo, rather than wiki.m.o. It's just
that I refuse to go into account hell right now, so I'm leaving that up
>> The rest looks pretty good. Your application.ini should have an ID,
>> though, see
> I have an ID in my real application.ini. I didn't want to paste all of
> it into an already-long e-mail.
>> That is used for the EM, for example.
> If EM is the Extension Manager, I thought that was a Firefox/Thunderbird
> feature. How does that apply to XULRunner? (I'm not trying to maintain
> Firefox compatability.)
Well, all xul applications should have a chance to have extensions, not
just firefox and thunderbird. And as at least firefox is aimed to run on
top of xulrunner, that's pretty much a requirement in itself.
More information about the Project_owners