[Project_owners] Ant for XUL
mats.lindblad at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 09:03:24 EST 2004
Very cool, I used a shell script but Ant is easier. And I think that
Ant is sufficient.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:01:37 -0500, Babak Esfandiari
<babak at sce.carleton.ca> wrote:
> This reminds me: I use Ant to package my XPI. I think most extension
> developers can reuse my Ant file directly, you can check it out at:
> which links to the build.xml:
> Comments welcome!
> Daniel Fournier wrote:
> > Hi Mozdev fellows,
> > I'm considering to develop a new Mozdev project based on Ant, the Apache
> > Java building system, i.e. a kind of Unix Make tool. One of the main
> > purposes would be to offer a friendly XPI packaging tool to XUL
> > developers. This project would be named, well: Xant.
> > However, instead of using build files coded in XML as Ant and Phing for
> > PHP do, it will rather use RDF-XML, the XUL "native" language (probably
> > adding an XSLT converter to read original Ant/Phing build files). For
> > those who fear RDF, I plan to include the Mozquery engine I already
> > developped to ease RDF build file generation.
> > My questions to all project owners are:
> > - Do you think such a project would be helpful?
> > - Would you use it?
> > - Would you contribute?
> > - What suggestions do you have?
> > Useful links:
> > # <http://ant.apache.org/>
> > # <http://phing.info/wiki/index.php>
> > # <http://mozquery.mozdev.org>
> > Daniel Fournier
> > _______________________________________________
> > Project_owners mailing list
> > Project_owners at mozdev.org
> > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
> Project_owners mailing list
> Project_owners at mozdev.org
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently
programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
More information about the Project_owners