[Project_owners] Are contents.rdf files needed in
patrick.brunschwig at gmx.net
Wed Nov 10 22:28:27 EST 2004
Brian King schrieb:
> One of the staples of traditional packages (in Mozilla) is that
> contents.rdf manifest files are needed to register a particular portion
> of your package as content | skin | locale, and enable chrome:// URLs to
> those locations.
> I'm wondering if contents.rdf files are redundant in Firefox given that:
> a) install.rdf contains the front end data such as extension name,
> author, version, etc.
> b) install.rdf lists the package, skin and locale location, e.g.
> <Description about="urn:mozilla:extension:file:mypackage.jar">
> I could do a simple test to check, but I'm asking here out of laziness
> and for others to be informed.
> Another way to ask would be -- does anyone have a working extension
> *without* packaging any contents.rdf files?
I would turn it this way: there are some parts in contents.rdf that may
be redundant given the new extensions, but other parts are still needed.
Just think of how you specify overlays: you can't do that in
install.rdf. From this, I conclude that contents.rdf is certainly not
obsolete. But is it mandatory? -- I don't know.
More information about the Project_owners