[Project_owners] XPInstall Js in FireFox
xknight at users.sourceforge.net
Sat Jul 10 18:42:22 EDT 2004
described as a mess, so I can see why the RDF route is more manageable.
At first, I also didn't like the idea of needing the RDF when the
however does 99% of what I need it to do for my MAF project. The last 1%
(copying some files to a non-chrome directory) was done by a post
install script in my application itself.
I'm curious to know what more you need from the installer. If it's
installer APIs you need using XPCOM and "eval" a postinstall.js script.
I even think you were the one that suggested a
<em:postinstall>postinstall.js</em:postinstall> addition to the RDF
based extension manager. Does anyone know if this is being considered by
version going to be totally duplicated eventually?
Robin Monks wrote:
>I will always use .js. I will never give in... It has so much more
>power and function. Who would want to go to (gasp!) rdf?
More information about the Project_owners