[Project_owners] Clarification for a SeaMonkey User
brian at mozdev.org
Sat Sep 13 22:33:11 EDT 2003
Pete Collins wrote:
> So let me see if I have this correct:
> Firebird (still referred to as PHOENIX if you are compiling the sucker)
> is a "stand alone" browser.
> 9.2M (tarball)
> Thunderbird is a "stand alone" mail client:
> 9.5M (tarball)
> So for a browser and mail client:
> 9.2M + 9.5M = 18.7 M download
The aim is to make these smaller.
> Is there a compelling reason why I would want to use Firebird/Thunderbird?
Maybe not you, but many many people didn't want the bloat. They didn't
want Composer, Chatzilla ... and all the other extras.
> What is the future of the Mozilla/SeaMonkey suite?
Signs are that it is being phased out. See (though out of date):
"After the release of 1.4 we will be doing our primary development on
the Firebird and Thunderbird projects. When we do releases of that
codebase we should be using self-descriptive brand identities for the
public and the press."
> Why all the disparate shoot offs of the same Mozilla base libraries?
> Why not have the Mozilla browser be "the main browser". The Mozilla mail
> client be "the main mail cleint" etc. Unify the effort to making these
> be best they can possibly be? If Firebird and Thunderbird are the new
> "defacto" effort, then call them "Mozilla". Then offer stand alone
> distributions of each module for end users who don't want an entire suite.
Again in the branding document, Phoenix/Firebird is supposed to evolve
into Mozilla Browser, and Thunderbird into Mozilla Mail. This naming
policy has not happened, and there are no signs that it will.
> AFAIK, no one owns SeaMonkey anymore. Am I correct in presuming it is
> essentially abandoned?
No, branches are still maintained (1.4, 1.5 ...). For whom I am not
sure. Legacy reasons perhaps (netscape) ... third party developers?
> Or does Netscape still retain some kind of intellectual property
> ownership of the old suite?
AOL you mean. Doubt it ... only the Netscape name. The code was handed
off to the Mozilla Foundation.
> I personally prefer to run ./mozilla instead of ./MozillaFirebird.
I run mozilla -mail, and MozillaFirebird. The two can co-exist :) I will
probably switch to Thunderbird around v0.4.
> Or is all of this just a "transitional" stage until "Gecko Runtime
> Environment" (Mozilla base libraries) is mature enough to use as an SDK
> and Firebird and Thunderbird can eventually be released as xpi packages
> that install on top of a base GRE install?
And Calendar, and Chatzilla, and <insert your favourite extension here>.
> I don't think Mozilla.org is doing a good job *clearly* articulating at
> a higher level the direction the project is heading.
Agreed. A clearly defined plan, well publicised and executed .... is
More information about the Project_owners