From varnum at umich.edu Tue Nov 3 13:15:05 2009 From: varnum at umich.edu (Varnum, Ken) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:15:05 -0500 Subject: [LibX] MPL and local edition code Message-ID: It's been pointed out to me that the terms of the Mozilla Public License under which LibX is distributed require that local editions - or any code with binary distribution -- requires that the code modifications be made available (Section 3.2. of the MPL version 1.1). Is there a way to link to the code itself on the LibX site to stay in compliance with the MPL? Or is this not needed? Ken -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From godmar at gmail.com Tue Nov 3 13:31:52 2009 From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:31:52 -0500 Subject: [LibX] MPL and local edition code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <719dced30911031331o7983f79y8feb8a7961a5a6f0@mail.gmail.com> I'd much rather discuss how we could integrate any improvements into LibX than the technicalities of the MPL license. Perhaps you could post a patch for perusal? That would also make the code modifications available. - Godmar On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Varnum, Ken wrote: > It?s been pointed out to me that the terms of the Mozilla Public License > under which LibX is distributed require that local editions ? or any code > with binary distribution -- requires that the code modifications be made > available (Section 3.2. of the MPL version 1.1). Is there a way to link to > the code itself on the LibX site to stay in compliance with the MPL? Or is > this not needed? > > Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Libx mailing list > Libx at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From varnum at umich.edu Tue Nov 3 13:45:33 2009 From: varnum at umich.edu (Varnum, Ken) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:45:33 -0500 Subject: [LibX] MPL and local edition code In-Reply-To: <719dced30911031331o7983f79y8feb8a7961a5a6f0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I guess the question is, to stay in compliance with MPL, do we need to have downloadable code for the specific configuration for our edition - or are the changes we make simply to configuration files that have no effect on the open-source code? (We haven't made changes to the core code, to my knowledge.) Ken On 11/3/09 4:31 PM, "Godmar Back" wrote: I'd much rather discuss how we could integrate any improvements into LibX than the technicalities of the MPL license. Perhaps you could post a patch for perusal? That would also make the code modifications available. - Godmar On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Varnum, Ken wrote: It's been pointed out to me that the terms of the Mozilla Public License under which LibX is distributed require that local editions - or any code with binary distribution -- requires that the code modifications be made available (Section 3.2. of the MPL version 1.1). Is there a way to link to the code itself on the LibX site to stay in compliance with the MPL? Or is this not needed? Ken _______________________________________________ Libx mailing list Libx at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From godmar at gmail.com Tue Nov 3 14:04:03 2009 From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:04:03 -0500 Subject: [LibX] MPL and local edition code In-Reply-To: References: <719dced30911031331o7983f79y8feb8a7961a5a6f0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <719dced30911031404r1f2d6efdwe03f1c5c284baceb@mail.gmail.com> I would presume that technically, the configuration files you're building are owned by you. At least according to the default behavior in copyright law, which says that when you create something, you own the copyright. We could, but haven't, specified anything else with respect to these files. Our intent, obviously, is for no one to enforce any copyright on the configuration files. We would, if someone did that, probably revoke their right to access our server or stipulate in the condition that files created on our machine may not be restricted. This has nothing to do with changes to the LibX code which the MPL under which LibX is distributed covers, in my opinion. - Godmar On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Varnum, Ken wrote: > I guess the question is, to stay in compliance with MPL, do we need to > have downloadable code for the specific configuration for our edition ? or > are the changes we make simply to configuration files that have no effect on > the open-source code? (We haven?t made changes to the core code, to my > knowledge.) > > Ken > > > > On 11/3/09 4:31 PM, "Godmar Back" wrote: > > > I'd much rather discuss how we could integrate any improvements into LibX > than the technicalities of the MPL license. Perhaps you could post a patch > for perusal? That would also make the code modifications available. > > - Godmar > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Varnum, Ken wrote: > > It?s been pointed out to me that the terms of the Mozilla Public License > under which LibX is distributed require that local editions ? or any code > with binary distribution -- requires that the code modifications be made > available (Section 3.2. of the MPL version 1.1). Is there a way to link to > the code itself on the LibX site to stay in compliance with the MPL? Or is > this not needed? > > Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Libx mailing list > Libx at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libx mailing list > Libx at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ejones at nu.edu Mon Nov 9 08:56:05 2009 From: ejones at nu.edu (Ed Jones) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:56:05 -0800 Subject: [LibX] LibX and iPhones Message-ID: <1A6E25761E4B86479D07E1EF23371DFEE404EA54@EXCHANGE.nu.edu> I had a query from a colleague as to whether there were any plans for a LibX iPhone app. Ed Jones Assistant Director, Assessment and Metadata Services National University Library 9393 Lightwave Avenue San Diego, California 92123-1447 +1 858 541 7920 (voice) +1 858 541 7997 (fax) http://national.academia.edu/EdJones -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bennetttm at appstate.edu Mon Nov 9 11:31:19 2009 From: bennetttm at appstate.edu (Thomas Bennett) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:31:19 -0500 Subject: [LibX] LibX and iPhones In-Reply-To: <1A6E25761E4B86479D07E1EF23371DFEE404EA54@EXCHANGE.nu.edu> References: <1A6E25761E4B86479D07E1EF23371DFEE404EA54@EXCHANGE.nu.edu> Message-ID: <200911091431.20025.bennetttm@appstate.edu> If there are plans please keep in mind the Andorid OS also. Many apps for the iPhone are already available for Android based phones. Thomas On Monday 09 November 2009 11:56:05 Ed Jones wrote: > I had a query from a colleague as to whether there were any plans for a > LibX iPhone app. > > > Ed Jones > Assistant Director, Assessment and Metadata Services > National University Library > 9393 Lightwave Avenue > San Diego, California 92123-1447 > > +1 858 541 7920 (voice) > +1 858 541 7997 (fax) > > http://national.academia.edu/EdJones > -- ========================================== Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett Appalachian State University Operations & Systems Analyst P O Box 32026 University Library Boone, North Carolina 28608 (828) 262 6587 Library Systems Help Desk: https://www.library.appstate.edu/help/ ==========================================