From wtd at pobox.com  Fri Jun 12 07:34:16 2009
From: wtd at pobox.com (William Denton)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>

Hi,

We're setting up VuFind at York University (in Toronto); by default it has 
COinS metadata in its pages.  Because we have LibX on all the library 
computers, OpenURL cues appear everywhere, and it's starting to confuse 
people when they look at a book in our catalogue and they're told to press 
a button to see if we have it.

Whether it's possible to remove cues from one catalogue was asked and 
answered here last September:

 	http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/2008-September/000424.html

Godmar said, "In the current LibX, this must be hardcoded and can't be 
configured on a per-edition basis (our upcoming framework, LibX 2.0, will 
allow edition maintainers to specify such parameters)."

I assume this is still the case, so is there an expected date for a stable 
2.0 release?  I think we'll have to remove the COinS from our pages until 
we can move up to 2.0, which makes our catalogue less confusing for our 
users but less useful for the rest of the world.

Bill
-- 
William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org

From rossfsinger at gmail.com  Fri Jun 12 08:51:22 2009
From: rossfsinger at gmail.com (Ross Singer)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:51:22 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
Message-ID: <23b83f160906120851n5d24aba9s7284e858786f8117@mail.gmail.com>

How man non-York users with COinS aware agents do you think use your
catalog, on average?

-Ross.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:34 AM, William Denton<wtd at pobox.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're setting up VuFind at York University (in Toronto); by default it has
> COinS metadata in its pages. ?Because we have LibX on all the library
> computers, OpenURL cues appear everywhere, and it's starting to confuse
> people when they look at a book in our catalogue and they're told to press a
> button to see if we have it.
>
> Whether it's possible to remove cues from one catalogue was asked and
> answered here last September:
>
> ? ? ? ?http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/2008-September/000424.html
>
> Godmar said, "In the current LibX, this must be hardcoded and can't be
> configured on a per-edition basis (our upcoming framework, LibX 2.0, will
> allow edition maintainers to specify such parameters)."
>
> I assume this is still the case, so is there an expected date for a stable
> 2.0 release? ?I think we'll have to remove the COinS from our pages until we
> can move up to 2.0, which makes our catalogue less confusing for our users
> but less useful for the rest of the world.
>
> Bill
> --
> William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>

From wtd at pobox.com  Fri Jun 12 08:59:10 2009
From: wtd at pobox.com (William Denton)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
In-Reply-To: <23b83f160906120851n5d24aba9s7284e858786f8117@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
	<23b83f160906120851n5d24aba9s7284e858786f8117@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121155450.17733@as2.dm.egate.net>

On 12 June 2009, Ross Singer wrote:

> How man non-York users with COinS aware agents do you think use your
> catalog, on average?

At a guess, very few.


Bill
-- 
William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org

From rossfsinger at gmail.com  Fri Jun 12 09:01:59 2009
From: rossfsinger at gmail.com (Ross Singer)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:01:59 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121155450.17733@as2.dm.egate.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
	<23b83f160906120851n5d24aba9s7284e858786f8117@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121155450.17733@as2.dm.egate.net>
Message-ID: <23b83f160906120901mddbfa89p271606f39f976120@mail.gmail.com>

Yeah, I'm guessing your local population's need should trump the
possibility that an external user might find this useful.

As much as I'd hate to see that many COinS go away...

-Ross.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM, William Denton<wtd at pobox.com> wrote:
> On 12 June 2009, Ross Singer wrote:
>
>> How man non-York users with COinS aware agents do you think use your
>> catalog, on average?
>
> At a guess, very few.
>
>
> Bill
> --
> William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>

From jkglenn at umich.edu  Fri Jun 12 11:40:01 2009
From: jkglenn at umich.edu (Glenn, Jacob)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:40:01 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
Message-ID: <C6581941.15EE8%jkglenn@umich.edu>

We ran up against the same problem here when adding COinS to HathiTrust, and
it's going to come up again when we officially launch our VuFind-based
catalog. This is why I made a point of asking Godmar about cue scoping
during the LibX breakout session at code4lib back in February. We really
need this feature; otherwise that global block list is about to become very
crowded.

Jake (local LibX instigator)


On 6/12/09 10:34 AM, "William Denton" <wtd at pobox.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're setting up VuFind at York University (in Toronto); by default it has
> COinS metadata in its pages.  Because we have LibX on all the library
> computers, OpenURL cues appear everywhere, and it's starting to confuse
> people when they look at a book in our catalogue and they're told to press
> a button to see if we have it.
> 
> Whether it's possible to remove cues from one catalogue was asked and
> answered here last September:
> 
>         http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/2008-September/000424.html
> 
> Godmar said, "In the current LibX, this must be hardcoded and can't be
> configured on a per-edition basis (our upcoming framework, LibX 2.0, will
> allow edition maintainers to specify such parameters)."
> 
> I assume this is still the case, so is there an expected date for a stable
> 2.0 release?  I think we'll have to remove the COinS from our pages until
> we can move up to 2.0, which makes our catalogue less confusing for our
> users but less useful for the rest of the world.
> 
> Bill
> --
> William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx


From godmar at gmail.com  Fri Jun 12 11:40:47 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:40:47 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Removing cues from one catalogue, redux
In-Reply-To: <C6581941.15EE8%jkglenn@umich.edu>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0906121025000.3123@as2.dm.egate.net>
	<C6581941.15EE8%jkglenn@umich.edu>
Message-ID: <719dced30906121140j59d49806qa1414d4456c50a96@mail.gmail.com>

Note: we can add individual sites to the exclusion list for COinS easily
already; see
http://libx.org/libx/src/feeds/cues/coins.js

Right now, we have:

var exclude = [ /mit\.worldcat\.org/,
                    /lens\.lib\.uchicago\.edu/
                  ];


Give me yours, we'll add it. We only need LibX 2.0 for each of you to add
sites without asking us.

 - Godmar

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Glenn, Jacob <jkglenn at umich.edu> wrote:

> We ran up against the same problem here when adding COinS to HathiTrust,
> and
> it's going to come up again when we officially launch our VuFind-based
> catalog. This is why I made a point of asking Godmar about cue scoping
> during the LibX breakout session at code4lib back in February. We really
> need this feature; otherwise that global block list is about to become very
> crowded.
>
> Jake (local LibX instigator)
>
>
> On 6/12/09 10:34 AM, "William Denton" <wtd at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're setting up VuFind at York University (in Toronto); by default it
> has
> > COinS metadata in its pages.  Because we have LibX on all the library
> > computers, OpenURL cues appear everywhere, and it's starting to confuse
> > people when they look at a book in our catalogue and they're told to
> press
> > a button to see if we have it.
> >
> > Whether it's possible to remove cues from one catalogue was asked and
> > answered here last September:
> >
> >         http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/2008-September/000424.html
> >
> > Godmar said, "In the current LibX, this must be hardcoded and can't be
> > configured on a per-edition basis (our upcoming framework, LibX 2.0, will
> > allow edition maintainers to specify such parameters)."
> >
> > I assume this is still the case, so is there an expected date for a
> stable
> > 2.0 release?  I think we'll have to remove the COinS from our pages until
> > we can move up to 2.0, which makes our catalogue less confusing for our
> > users but less useful for the rest of the world.
> >
> > Bill
> > --
> > William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libx mailing list
> > Libx at mozdev.org
> > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090612/f6a3170f/attachment.html>

From es287 at cornell.edu  Fri Jun 12 14:47:49 2009
From: es287 at cornell.edu (Enrico Silterra)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:47:49 -0400
Subject: [LibX] FF 3.5
Message-ID: <ca99f1790906121447i4fcbd7d0x869101c4706f0989@mail.gmail.com>

now that ff 3.5 is close to hitting the streets -- what do we need to
do to update?
i installed ff 3.5, and several extensions, among them, libX "are not
compatible and have been disabled"
this FF 3.5 is a 'preview', and not yet an official "release".
is this a problem, or will this go away upon official release?
Thanks,
Rick


-- 
Enrico Silterra Software Engineer
501 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853
Voice: 607-255-6851 Fax:     607-255-6110 E-mail: es287 at cornell.edu
http://www.library.cornell.edu/dlit
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the
realm of genius. " Young Frankenstein
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and destroy any copies of this document.

From godmar at gmail.com  Fri Jun 12 14:55:04 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:55:04 -0400
Subject: [LibX] FF 3.5
In-Reply-To: <ca99f1790906121447i4fcbd7d0x869101c4706f0989@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ca99f1790906121447i4fcbd7d0x869101c4706f0989@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <719dced30906121455i2b78695ao761975db114c0cda@mail.gmail.com>

Mike tested with 3.5, and it looks like we're good.

I updated the "maximum compatible" version number to 3.5.  All revisions
built or rebuilt after now should be compatible.

I think we'll do the same as for FF 3.0, which is to send an email to all
registered maintainers of live editions and give instructions on what to do.

Thanks for the heads up!

 - Godmar

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Enrico Silterra <es287 at cornell.edu> wrote:

> now that ff 3.5 is close to hitting the streets -- what do we need to
> do to update?
> i installed ff 3.5, and several extensions, among them, libX "are not
> compatible and have been disabled"
> this FF 3.5 is a 'preview', and not yet an official "release".
> is this a problem, or will this go away upon official release?
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>
> --
> Enrico Silterra Software Engineer
> 501 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853
> Voice: 607-255-6851 Fax:     607-255-6110 E-mail: es287 at cornell.edu
> http://www.library.cornell.edu/dlit
> "For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the
> realm of genius. " Young Frankenstein
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
> The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only
> for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
> upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
> the sender and destroy any copies of this document.
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090612/345ea7f5/attachment.html>

From palermo at lsu.edu  Thu Jun 25 08:12:01 2009
From: palermo at lsu.edu (Natalie M Palermo)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:12:01 -0500
Subject: [LibX] Problem with cues
Message-ID: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701E8BD9B@email002.lsu.edu>

I'm not seeing any cues or COinS icons in Firefox 3.0.11 for my live
edition or my test edition. 2.  In IE 8, the cues are there but the icon
is missing for my live edition and my test edition. Is anyone else
having this problem?

 

 

Natalie Palermo, Systems Librarian

LSU Libraries, Louisiana State University

Baton Rouge, LA  70803

Email:  palermo at lsu.edu

Phone: (225) 578-3330 Fax: (225) 578-6535

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090625/dc74a10a/attachment.html>

From godmar at gmail.com  Thu Jun 25 08:23:59 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:23:59 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Problem with cues
In-Reply-To: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701E8BD9B@email002.lsu.edu>
References: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701E8BD9B@email002.lsu.edu>
Message-ID: <719dced30906250823s55afc59bq22e6c2ba93db6c0@mail.gmail.com>

Natalie,

which edition (id?), which revision, and which page/cue are you looking at.
Best: send a help request from the edition builder, this will give us a
direct link to your configuration.

 - Godmar

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Natalie M Palermo <palermo at lsu.edu> wrote:

>  I?m not seeing any cues or COinS icons in Firefox 3.0.11 for my live
> edition or my test edition. 2.  In IE 8, the cues are there but the icon is
> missing for my live edition and my test edition. Is anyone else having this
> problem?
>
>
>
>
>
> Natalie Palermo, Systems Librarian
>
> LSU Libraries, Louisiana State University
>
> Baton Rouge, LA  70803
>
> Email:  palermo at lsu.edu
>
> Phone: (225) 578-3330 Fax: (225) 578-6535
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090625/728f9d57/attachment-0001.html>

From jkglenn at umich.edu  Thu Jun 25 08:32:15 2009
From: jkglenn at umich.edu (Glenn, Jacob)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:32:15 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Problem with cues
In-Reply-To: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701E8BD9B@email002.lsu.edu>
Message-ID: <C66910BF.16431%jkglenn@umich.edu>

I've had problems with cues not showing up after installing a new test
edition on top of the old edition (even if you uninstall the old edition
Firefox doesn't remove all the files). Your best bet is to create a new
Firefox profile for testing and delete it when you're done, or go into your
profile directory and manually remove all the LibX files before installing
the new test edition - that's fixed it for me in the past.

HTH,
Jake

On 6/25/09 11:12 AM, "Natalie M Palermo" <palermo at lsu.edu> wrote:

> I?m not seeing any cues or COinS icons in Firefox 3.0.11 for my live edition
> or my test edition. 2.  In IE 8, the cues are there but the icon is missing
> for my live edition and my test edition. Is anyone else having this problem?
> 
>  
>  
> Natalie Palermo, Systems Librarian
> LSU Libraries, Louisiana State University
> Baton Rouge, LA  70803
> Email:  palermo at lsu.edu
> Phone: (225) 578-3330 Fax: (225) 578-6535
>  
> 
>  


From senior at up.edu  Thu Jun 25 16:47:30 2009
From: senior at up.edu (Senior, Heidi)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:47:30 -0700
Subject: [LibX] LibX toolbar interference with Meebo in Internet Explorer
Message-ID: <5DF1314C476B904193CC06A9725FDCD102724FFA@london.campus.up.edu>

Here at UP we have noticed that the Meebo widget, through which we offer
instant messaging reference service, doesn't accept conversations in
Internet Explorer 7 if the LibX toolbar is installed. Is anyone else
having this difficulty? You can see an example of the widget here:
http://library.up.edu/default.aspx?cid=2347&pid=55.

 

Basically, the Meebo widget is visible, and the "[username] is online"
message appears, but if you try to type in the "Type here and hit enter
to send a private message" box, you can't send a message. You can type,
but when you press enter nothing happens. This seems to occur only in
Internet Explorer, not in Firefox. 

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Heidi Senior

 

Heidi E. K. Senior

Reference/Instruction Librarian

W. W. Clark Memorial Library

University of Portland

Portland, OR 97203

503-943-8037 <> senior at up.edu <mailto:senior at up.edu> 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090625/7e835b0a/attachment.html>

From p.jorgensen at mail.lcl.lib.ne.us  Fri Jun 26 06:57:54 2009
From: p.jorgensen at mail.lcl.lib.ne.us (Peter Jorgensen)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:57:54 GMT
Subject: [LibX] LibX toolbar interference with Meebo in Internet Explorer
Message-ID: <200906260857593.SM01744@[172.25.1.250]>

Hadn't noticed it before, but we appear to have the same problem.
---
Peter Jorgensen
Virtual Services ManagerLincoln City Libraries
136 S. 14th St.
Lincoln, NE 68508
402-441-8587Have you listened to our Podcasts?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Senior, Heidi" <senior at up.edu>
Sent 6/25/2009 6:47:30 PM
To: Libx at mozdev.org
Subject: [LibX] LibX toolbar interference with Meebo in Internet ExplorerHere at UP we have noticed that the Meebo widget, through which we offer instant messaging reference service, doesn?t accept conversations in Internet Explorer 7 if the LibX toolbar is installed. Is anyone else having this difficulty? You can see an example of the widget here: http://library.up.edu/default.aspx?cid=2347&pid=55.?Basically, the Meebo widget is visible, and the ?[username] is online? message appears, but if you try to type in the ?Type here and hit enter to send a private message? box, you can?t send a message. You can type, but when you press enter nothing happens. This seems to occur only in Internet Explorer, not in Firefox. ?Thanks for your help!?Heidi Senior?Heidi E. K. SeniorReference/Instruction LibrarianW. W. Clark Memorial LibraryUniversity of PortlandPortland, OR 97203503-943-8037 <> senior at up.edu??_______________________________________________
Libx mailing list
Libx at mozdev.org
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090626/1532e66c/attachment.html>

From godmar at gmail.com  Fri Jun 26 07:12:42 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:12:42 -0400
Subject: [LibX] LibX toolbar interference with Meebo in Internet Explorer
In-Reply-To: <200906260857593.SM01744@172.25.1.250>
References: <200906260857593.SM01744@172.25.1.250>
Message-ID: <719dced30906260712n3d77a1b9tbe377706d1a55f26@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the heads-up.

It's possible that LibX is interfering with certain AJAX communication
mechanisms that exploit hidden windows or frames. We've seen that before
with Evergreen, but thought had it fixed. Will look at it.

 - Godmar


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Peter Jorgensen <
p.jorgensen at mail.lcl.lib.ne.us> wrote:

> Hadn't noticed it before, but we appear to have the same problem.
> ---
> Peter Jorgensen
> Virtual Services Manager
> Lincoln City Libraries <http://www.lincolnlibraries.org>
> 136 S. 14th St.
> Lincoln, NE 68508
> 402-441-8587
> *Have you listened to our Podcasts?*<http://www.lincolnlibraries.org/podcasts/>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Senior, Heidi" <senior at up.edu>
> Sent 6/25/2009 6:47:30 PM
> To: Libx at mozdev.org
> Subject: [LibX] LibX toolbar interference with Meebo in Internet Explorer
>
>  Here at UP we have noticed that the Meebo widget, through which we offer
> instant messaging reference service, doesn?t accept conversations in
> Internet Explorer 7 if the LibX toolbar is installed. Is anyone else having
> this difficulty? You can see an example of the widget here:
> http://library.up.edu/default.aspx?cid=2347&pid=55.
>
>
>
> Basically, the Meebo widget is visible, and the ?[username] is online?
> message appears, but if you try to type in the ?Type here and hit enter to
> send a private message? box, you can?t send a message. You can type, but
> when you press enter nothing happens. This seems to occur only in Internet
> Explorer, not in Firefox.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
>
> Heidi Senior
>
>
>
> Heidi E. K. Senior
>
> Reference/Instruction Librarian
>
> W. W. Clark Memorial Library
>
> University of Portland
>
> Portland, OR 97203
>
> 503-943-8037 <> senior at up.edu
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing listLibx at mozdev.orghttps://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090626/4b1fcf85/attachment.html>

From dansich at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 09:58:49 2009
From: dansich at gmail.com (Dan Sich)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:58:49 -0400
Subject: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
Message-ID: <1118ef3d0906300958s72a2ac85kef4ca470bbe020fb@mail.gmail.com>

Greetings,

I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with
Firefox v 3.5.  Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work
to be done under the hood at the developer end?

Thanks,
Dan Sich

University of Western Ontario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090630/99d689b6/attachment.html>

From kbuxton at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 09:59:47 2009
From: kbuxton at gmail.com (kristin buxton)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:59:47 -0700
Subject: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <1118ef3d0906300958s72a2ac85kef4ca470bbe020fb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1118ef3d0906300958s72a2ac85kef4ca470bbe020fb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1ef5ef8a0906300959n64efb798j10d12a2f8840e58e@mail.gmail.com>

I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with
> Firefox v 3.5.  Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work
> to be done under the hood at the developer end?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan Sich
>
> University of Western Ontario
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090630/56080c88/attachment.html>

From jmc at virginia.edu  Tue Jun 30 10:09:28 2009
From: jmc at virginia.edu (Campbell, James (jmc))
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:09:28 -0400
Subject: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <1ef5ef8a0906300959n64efb798j10d12a2f8840e58e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1118ef3d0906300958s72a2ac85kef4ca470bbe020fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1ef5ef8a0906300959n64efb798j10d12a2f8840e58e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B0123513FA2C9044B01D2AA5F48BB32610D259270B@MCCLANE.eservices.virginia.edu>

This was discussed here a couple of weeks ago. The LibX folks reported having tested successfully with 3.5, added it to the list of FF versions compatible with LibX, and recommended a rebuild.   It's working fine for me. Unlike half my other add-ons.

      - Jim Campbell

      Digital Access Librarian | Librarian for German
      University of Virginia Library | Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112

      513 Alderman | campbell at virginia.edu | 434-924-4985

From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On Behalf Of kristin buxton
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:00 PM
To: Dan Sich
Cc: libx at mozdev.org
Subject: Re: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5

I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com<mailto:dansich at gmail.com>> wrote:
Greetings,

I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with Firefox v 3.5.  Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work to be done under the hood at the developer end?

Thanks,
Dan Sich

University of Western Ontario

_______________________________________________
Libx mailing list
Libx at mozdev.org<mailto:Libx at mozdev.org>
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090630/b2a32848/attachment.html>

From godmar at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 10:18:31 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:31 -0400
Subject: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <B0123513FA2C9044B01D2AA5F48BB32610D259270B@MCCLANE.eservices.virginia.edu>
References: <1118ef3d0906300958s72a2ac85kef4ca470bbe020fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1ef5ef8a0906300959n64efb798j10d12a2f8840e58e@mail.gmail.com>
	<B0123513FA2C9044B01D2AA5F48BB32610D259270B@MCCLANE.eservices.virginia.edu>
Message-ID: <719dced30906301018y3d5d852es43433efe8a47f19f@mail.gmail.com>

Correct - it should work if built after June 13.

I have just started a script that will rebuild all 1498 live editions and
send an email to the edition maintainer explaining what action is required
if your live revision was not rebuilt after June 13.

In short, unless it was built after June 13, you need to test and "make
live" your test revision to ensure your users will have an update available
when they update to 3.5. Otherwise, LibX will be disabled (though the
browser will continue to check for compatible updates should they later
become available.)

 - Godmar

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Campbell, James (jmc) <jmc at virginia.edu>wrote:

>  This was discussed here a couple of weeks ago. The LibX folks reported
> having tested successfully with 3.5, added it to the list of FF versions
> compatible with LibX, and recommended a rebuild.   It?s working fine for me.
> Unlike half my other add-ons.
>
>
>
>       - Jim Campbell
>
>
>
>       Digital Access Librarian | Librarian for German
>
>       University of Virginia Library | Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112
>
>
>
>       513 Alderman | campbell at virginia.edu | 434-924-4985
>
>
>
> *From:* libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] *On
> Behalf Of *kristin buxton
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:00 PM
> *To:* Dan Sich
> *Cc:* libx at mozdev.org
> *Subject:* Re: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
>
>
>
> I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with
> Firefox v 3.5.  Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work
> to be done under the hood at the developer end?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan Sich
>
> University of Western Ontario
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090630/eed3be1c/attachment.html>

From jkglenn at umich.edu  Tue Jun 30 12:25:11 2009
From: jkglenn at umich.edu (Glenn, Jacob)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:25:11 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Broken cues with Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <719dced30906301018y3d5d852es43433efe8a47f19f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C66FDED7.166AA%jkglenn@umich.edu>

Cues that are not working in my recently rebuilt LibX edition, using Firefox
3.5:

1. abebooks.com (1)
2. google.com
3. google.ca
4. powells.com

Anybody else having the same problem?

Jake

On 6/30/09 1:18 PM, "Godmar Back" <godmar at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Correct - it should work if built after June 13.
> 
> I have just started a script that will rebuild all 1498 live editions and send
> an email to the edition maintainer explaining what action is required if your
> live revision was not rebuilt after June 13.
> 
> In short, unless it was built after June 13, you need to test and "make live"
> your test revision to ensure your users will have an update available when
> they update to 3.5. Otherwise, LibX will be disabled (though the browser will
> continue to check for compatible updates should they later become available.)
> 
> ?- Godmar
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Campbell, James (jmc) <jmc at virginia.edu>
> wrote:
>> This was discussed here a couple of weeks ago. The LibX folks reported having
>> tested successfully with 3.5, added it to the list of FF versions compatible
>> with LibX, and recommended a rebuild.?? It?s working fine for me. Unlike half
>> my other add-ons.
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? - Jim Campbell
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? Digital Access Librarian | Librarian for German
>> 
>> ????? University of Virginia Library | Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? 513 Alderman | campbell at virginia.edu | 434-924-4985
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On Behalf Of
>> kristin buxton
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:00 PM
>> To: Dan Sich
>> Cc: libx at mozdev.org
>> Subject: Re: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with Firefox
>> v 3.5.? Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work to be
>> done under the hood at the developer end?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dan Sich
>> 
>> University of Western Ontario
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libx mailing list
>> Libx at mozdev.org
>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libx mailing list
>> Libx at mozdev.org
>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>> 
>> 


From palermo at lsu.edu  Tue Jun 30 12:32:02 2009
From: palermo at lsu.edu (Natalie M Palermo)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:32:02 -0500
Subject: [LibX] Broken cues with Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <C66FDED7.166AA%jkglenn@umich.edu>
References: <719dced30906301018y3d5d852es43433efe8a47f19f@mail.gmail.com>
	<C66FDED7.166AA%jkglenn@umich.edu>
Message-ID: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701EF567A@email002.lsu.edu>

I have the same problem. Earlier this morning, powells.com was the only one that did not show cues. I could swear that was after building my revision but before making it live.


Natalie Palermo, Systems Librarian
LSU Libraries, Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA? 70803
Email:? palermo at lsu.edu
Phone: (225) 578-3330 Fax: (225) 578-6535

-----Original Message-----
From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On Behalf Of Glenn, Jacob
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:25 PM
To: libx at mozdev.org
Subject: [LibX] Broken cues with Firefox 3.5

Cues that are not working in my recently rebuilt LibX edition, using Firefox
3.5:

1. abebooks.com (1)
2. google.com
3. google.ca
4. powells.com

Anybody else having the same problem?

Jake

On 6/30/09 1:18 PM, "Godmar Back" <godmar at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Correct - it should work if built after June 13.
> 
> I have just started a script that will rebuild all 1498 live editions and send
> an email to the edition maintainer explaining what action is required if your
> live revision was not rebuilt after June 13.
> 
> In short, unless it was built after June 13, you need to test and "make live"
> your test revision to ensure your users will have an update available when
> they update to 3.5. Otherwise, LibX will be disabled (though the browser will
> continue to check for compatible updates should they later become available.)
> 
> ?- Godmar
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Campbell, James (jmc) <jmc at virginia.edu>
> wrote:
>> This was discussed here a couple of weeks ago. The LibX folks reported having
>> tested successfully with 3.5, added it to the list of FF versions compatible
>> with LibX, and recommended a rebuild.?? It?s working fine for me. Unlike half
>> my other add-ons.
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? - Jim Campbell
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? Digital Access Librarian | Librarian for German
>> 
>> ????? University of Virginia Library | Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> ????? 513 Alderman | campbell at virginia.edu | 434-924-4985
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On Behalf Of
>> kristin buxton
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:00 PM
>> To: Dan Sich
>> Cc: libx at mozdev.org
>> Subject: Re: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with Firefox
>> v 3.5.? Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work to be
>> done under the hood at the developer end?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dan Sich
>> 
>> University of Western Ontario
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libx mailing list
>> Libx at mozdev.org
>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libx mailing list
>> Libx at mozdev.org
>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________
Libx mailing list
Libx at mozdev.org
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx

From godmar at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 13:54:14 2009
From: godmar at gmail.com (Godmar Back)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:54:14 -0400
Subject: [LibX] Broken cues with Firefox 3.5
In-Reply-To: <7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701EF567A@email002.lsu.edu>
References: <719dced30906301018y3d5d852es43433efe8a47f19f@mail.gmail.com>
	<C66FDED7.166AA%jkglenn@umich.edu>
	<7AD49329A9CF384DB714098DB58A623701EF567A@email002.lsu.edu>
Message-ID: <719dced30906301354w228d3305w4f1e3fb2d82161cd@mail.gmail.com>

The Google cue is definitely broken - we'll look at it. Hopefully, we can
push an update without requiring a rebuild.

Unfortunately, there was another issue between when I rebuild all test
revisions at about 1pm that I noticed only now. It required another rebuild,
which I did just now; however, I did not send another email to all edition
maintainers about it. So even if you rebuild after June 13, you'll probably
need to make the last test revision live.

There's a subtlety here: this second fix is needed to allow for automatic
updates where a client will see "there's an update" when they start their
Firefox, or when they update to 3.5.  You will not have noticed the need for
this fix unless you tested this exact scenario. (Simply installing LibX in
FF3.5 has worked for all builds since June 13, but notice the difference
between the two scenarios.)

 - Godmar

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Natalie M Palermo <palermo at lsu.edu> wrote:

> I have the same problem. Earlier this morning, powells.com was the only
> one that did not show cues. I could swear that was after building my
> revision but before making it live.
>
>
> Natalie Palermo, Systems Librarian
> LSU Libraries, Louisiana State University
> Baton Rouge, LA  70803
> Email:  palermo at lsu.edu
> Phone: (225) 578-3330 Fax: (225) 578-6535
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On Behalf
> Of Glenn, Jacob
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:25 PM
> To: libx at mozdev.org
> Subject: [LibX] Broken cues with Firefox 3.5
>
> Cues that are not working in my recently rebuilt LibX edition, using
> Firefox
> 3.5:
>
> 1. abebooks.com (1)
> 2. google.com
> 3. google.ca
> 4. powells.com
>
> Anybody else having the same problem?
>
> Jake
>
> On 6/30/09 1:18 PM, "Godmar Back" <godmar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Correct - it should work if built after June 13.
> >
> > I have just started a script that will rebuild all 1498 live editions and
> send
> > an email to the edition maintainer explaining what action is required if
> your
> > live revision was not rebuilt after June 13.
> >
> > In short, unless it was built after June 13, you need to test and "make
> live"
> > your test revision to ensure your users will have an update available
> when
> > they update to 3.5. Otherwise, LibX will be disabled (though the browser
> will
> > continue to check for compatible updates should they later become
> available.)
> >
> >  - Godmar
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Campbell, James (jmc) <jmc at virginia.edu
> >
> > wrote:
> >> This was discussed here a couple of weeks ago. The LibX folks reported
> having
> >> tested successfully with 3.5, added it to the list of FF versions
> compatible
> >> with LibX, and recommended a rebuild.   It?s working fine for me. Unlike
> half
> >> my other add-ons.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>       - Jim Campbell
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>       Digital Access Librarian | Librarian for German
> >>
> >>       University of Virginia Library | Charlottesville, VA 22904-4112
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>       513 Alderman | campbell at virginia.edu | 434-924-4985
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: libx-bounces at mozdev.org [mailto:libx-bounces at mozdev.org] On
> Behalf Of
> >> kristin buxton
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:00 PM
> >> To: Dan Sich
> >> Cc: libx at mozdev.org
> >> Subject: Re: [LibX] LibX v Firefox 3.5
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I just rebuilt and it worked fine for me.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dan Sich <dansich at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I'm seeing some posts in twitter suggesting that LibX won't work with
> Firefox
> >> v 3.5.  Will a re-build surmount this problem, or is there more work to
> be
> >> done under the hood at the developer end?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dan Sich
> >>
> >> University of Western Ontario
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Libx mailing list
> >> Libx at mozdev.org
> >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Libx mailing list
> >> Libx at mozdev.org
> >> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
> _______________________________________________
> Libx mailing list
> Libx at mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/libx/attachments/20090630/6a9e5ef5/attachment.html>