[Jslib] Re: Redesign for RDF Extension

Pete Collins pete at mozdevgroup.com
Wed Dec 28 08:31:13 EST 2005

A transaction manager for RDF calls may be good but be careful not avoid 
any unnecessary added complexity.

Keeping an encapsulated journal sounds like a good idea.


Fred Eisele wrote:

>A continuing request I get is for Undo.
>I have started work to modify the RDF API I have been using so that
>the functions that modify the RDF graph are reversable (undo/redo).
>Does anyone have experience with such things?
>I want to keep the false starts to a minimum.
>My thought is that a graph (datasource) object would have an
>encapsulated journal.
>The journal would be a stack of the inverse commands (transactions if
>multiple commands are needed).
>Jslib mailing list
>Jslib at mozdev.org

Pete Collins - Founder, Mozdev Group Inc.
Mozilla Software Development Solutions
tel: 1-719-302-5811
fax: 1-719-302-5813

More information about the Jslib mailing list