[Greasemonkey] Greasemonkey 0.6.6

[esquifit]

2006/10/18, Aaron Boodman <boogs at youngpup.net>:

> I really want to be able to call versions of my script "ducky". That
> would the h0t.

I see this more as "flavour" than a "version".  Ducky, Potato, etc are
good for really big things, like Debian major releases, Apple PC
models, etc.  If I were told of a popular script that its being
referred to here as ducky, there as jello pudding, and there again as
don quijote, rumpelstilchen, etc, how on earth would I decide to
install this or that "version"? Which of them is working right now?
Flavours would mean incarnation of the same idea with slightly varying
implementations, whereas a version is an implementation that obsoletes
all the "previous" ones, where the meaning of "previous" should be
evident by itself.
That said, I'd rather discourage flavors (in the above sense), as it
would just serve to
increase the enthropy in monkeypace ;)

> On 10/18/06, Henrik Nyh <henrik at nyh.se> wrote:
> > Monkey >
> >         + Script one
> >                 + Enabled
> >                 --
> >                 Some command
> >                 Some other command
> >           Script two
> >                   Enabled
> >         --
> >         New User Script
> >         Manage User Scripts...
> >         --
> >         + Enabled
>
> The only thing is that if the script doesn't have any commands (most
> scripts) then there will only be one option in the pull out --
> enabled/disabled, which might look silly.

Good point. What a pity.