[Greasemonkey] Re: Explicit ID, Not Namespace

Aaron Boodman zboogs at gmail.com
Mon Mar 13 11:01:48 EST 2006


Yeah, I agree the current naming scheme is not ideal in some ways.
I'll keep the change in mind for some future version, but it doesn't
seem high priority.

- a

On 2/28/06, Lenny Domnitser <ldrhcp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/28/06, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you don't consider me one, then I guess you mean Nik or Aaron, right?
>
> I was going by ability to commit code to CVS, so I guess that's you,
> Aaron, and Nik.
>
> Anyway, your last reply mentioned some problems with the proposal, but
> it didn't sound like a definite no, which is why I brought this up
> again.
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>


More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list