[Greasemonkey] Explicit ID, Not Namespace

[Jeremy Dunck]

On 3/12/06, Bill Donnelly <donnelly at snowcrest.net> wrote:
> here is a link to an MD5 hash library and some other
> good encryption info for those who want to attempt
> storing sensitive data "safely" (note the quotes)
>
> http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/

Hashes aren't 2-way, and 2-way would require a key of some kind.

> something like this should probably be incorporated into
> Gm so that people can use it if they want without people
> having to duplicate code

How would that work?  How would the key be created and available to
script A, yet kept secret from script B?