[Greasemonkey] Re: Greasemonkey 0.6.5 -- compat with FF 2.0 and minor icon change

[Aaron Boodman]

Yeah that is what I need to track down. I don't think the FAQ is
saying what you need to put in install.rdf, but is more informational
on what the current versions are.

Gar I say. Gar.

- a

On 7/24/06, Godmar Back <godmar at gmail.com> wrote:
> When making an extension compatible with 2.0, do we have to make it
> *only* compatible with 2.0b1 in a first step, but are not allowed to
> declare it compatible with the 2.0 series, i.e., 2.0, 2.0.1, etc.?
>
> That would mean we'd have to push/test two versions of the add-on, one
> for the 2.0beta series and one for the actual 2.0 series?  Is this
> correct?
>
> I note that https://addons.mozilla.org/faq.php contradicts
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Extension_Versioning,_Update_and_Compatibility
> which stated that "Versions like "2.0b" or "4.2 Preview" are not
> valid. " However, that article has a warning at the top that it may be
> out of date.
>
>  - Godmar
>
> On 7/24/06, arantius at gmail.com <arantius at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/24/2006 11:36 AM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> > > Yeah I noticed the same thing as well. I was going to try and figure
> > > out what versions of 2.0x addons would allow today.
> >
> > https://addons.mozilla.org/faq.php
> >
> > Firefox 1.5.0.* {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > Firefox 2.0a1   {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > Firefox 2.0a2   {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > Firefox 2.0a3   {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > Firefox 2.0b1   {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > Firefox 3.0a1   {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
> > _______________________________________________
> > Greasemonkey mailing list
> > Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>