[Greasemonkey] userscripts.org uptime.
Arvid Jakobsson
arvid.jakobsson at gmail.com
Tue Jul 4 00:14:04 EDT 2006
Will there maybe be a beta, for very special people? :)
On 7/3/06, Britt Selvitelle <anotherbritt at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/06, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any idea why the rails community (which is obviously large and active)
> > has so much trouble with deployment?
>
> It's progressing, but there have definitely been hiccups.
>
> 1) CGI, of course, is not an option.
> 2) FCGI has some crut (w/ any web framework)
> 3) The initial proposal at a solution to fcgi, SCGI, was actively
> worked on for a while by Zed Shaw. He then redirected most of his
> efforts to Mongrel, the lightweight webserver written in pure ruby
> that is ideal for handling dynamic content (SCGI development will
> continue in the future, I've heard).
>
> We've got a very stable software setup going now, so I've just got to
> dive in and get the raid drives fixed, and we'll be rockin.
>
> Jesse and I are VERY excited about some of the features we'll be
> rolling out in the next bit, and I'd like to set up a snapshot view of
> these as they progress.
>
> Then, as I've mentioned before, as soon as the code is cleaned up a
> bit more we'll be opening up the codebase to the public, which I'm
> super exited about as well.
>
> Britt
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>
More information about the Greasemonkey
mailing list