[Greasemonkey] Question about crediting code sources
Nikolas Coukouma
lists at atrus.org
Wed Feb 22 12:16:39 EST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Lieuallen wrote:
> On 2/22/2006 10:18 AM, Nikolas Coukouma wrote:
>> Creative Commons licenses are not suitable for software.
>>
http://creativecommons.org/faq#Can_I_use_a_Creative_Commons_license_for_software?
>>
>>
>
> Interesting ... but why?
I'm not an expert, but here's what I often see addressed in software
licenses:
1. Warranty - Your program ate my data
2. Patents - Not applicable to art
3. Binary Distribution - Kinda different from compression
4. Use - Can I use your software to write and sell a book?
- -Nikolas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFD/Jx2s2zR4YuWmeERAju7AJ9aogp3lgxHbha1L3AeCkg1lxDN+wCeI/P0
ffkVZRZhVgWLjHB0blHDvqA=
=DGfV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Greasemonkey
mailing list