[Greasemonkey] Real soon now: S3 script val store
Jason W.
jwellband at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 01:04:48 EDT 2006
On 4/4/06, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with this idea? :)
Nothing wrong, per se. Multiple backends would be a must for me to
want to use it. But I don't think it would be wrong to support only
S3, just not useful for me.
As a datapoint, I keep my entire FX profile in SVN so I can update and
commit multiple copies of my profile at will so long as FX is closed.
Since this works for me and I run my own SVN server and can get to it
from anywhere, I'd require a lot of goodies to want to change that. :)
--
HTH, YMMV, HANW :)
Jason
The nice thing about standards, there is enough for everyone to have their own.
More information about the Greasemonkey
mailing list