[Greasemonkey] UI "bug" in GM

[Aaron Boodman]

You mean when people change them through the UI? I guess.

In that design which everyone hated that I sent around, the idea was
to get away from the fancy UI and more toward the shell scripting. In
such a design, you might not even have an include exclude UI. It would
be understood that you just change the script metadata directly.

This wouldn't be hard because the scripts would be right there in the UI.

-- 
Aaron

On 5/4/05, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is one of the rough edges in the current design. I'd been
> > contemplating the idea of getting rid of config.xml at one time, and
> > just relying on the contents of the script directory and their
> > metadata.
> >
> > Any opinions?
> 
> Would you alter the files to reflect the @include/exclude?
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>