[Greasemonkey] UI "bug" in GM

[Jeremy Dunck]

On 5/4/05, Scott R. Turner <srt at aero.org> wrote:
> I noticed today that if you select "Edit" on a script and change the
> @include, that change does not propogate.  That's probably
> counter-intuitive for most people.  I don't know how much work it
> would be to re-read the script after the edit, but it's worth a look.

I don't think this should be done because I may have (and regularly
do) customize @include/exclude, and just because I edit that script
doesn't mean I want to overwrite those changes.

... I suppose we could rewrite the file to have @include/exclude as
appropriate for the installed config, but that seems like too much
work.

I agree that this is not entirely obvious; is documenting it
sufficient, or do people really want this?