[Greasemonkey] Bill is right - we need a forum

[The Chris Method]

I've been lurking on this list for a little while now, but I would like to 
add my two cents:
I think this is best as a mailing list. I think using gmail is superior to a 
lot of forum software I have used before, and I see that the majority of the 
people on this list are using gmail anyway. The searching is better, the 
interface is nice, and things are just dandy. Plus you don't have to 
maintain your the board software and there are copies of the archives kept 
all over the place by many different people. I think it'd be easier to 
convince the few people without gmail to use it than to install some bb 
software on someone's server and use that. 

-Chris

On 6/18/05, Lenny Domnitser <ldrhcp at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 6/18/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I know Bill has complained about this a few times, and I think it's
> > finally time. On the new site, we should install a forum system. Does
> > anyone have suggestions on which one is best?
> 
> I think a forum would result in more noise than a mailing list, so the
> list should be kept for its current purpose.
> 
> That said, non-script writing GM users should get a support forum so
> they don't have to subscribe to all of the non-relevant messages. A
> good package is PunBB (http://www.punbb.org/).
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/greasemonkey/attachments/20050620/d94cc543/attachment.htm