[Greasemonkey] GPL compatibility

[Nikolas Coukouma]

Mark Pilgrim wrote:

>On 5/28/05, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>On 5/28/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>GPL is fine by me. Actually, I'd prefer something more like the
>>>Academic Free License because it doesn't restrict mods to being as
>>>open as the original.
>>>      
>>>
>>Well that wouldn't really be a step in the right direction, since the
>>Academic Free License isn't GPL-compatible either.
>>
>>If you want to allow proprietary derivative works of Greasemonkey
>>itself, then I recommend the MIT license or the BSD-new license.
>>    
>>
>
>We've heard from 2 of the 3 (?) GM developers agreeing to re-licensing
>GM to GPL.  No word from Nikolas Coukouma.  Are there other
>contributors that would need to agree?
>
I'm fine with GPL or BSD-new.

-Nikolas Coukouma