[Greasemonkey] Greasemonkey 0.6.4

Zoolcar9 (LouCypher) zoolcar9 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 23:36:21 EST 2005


You have two versions of Greasemonkey because the ID changed.
See my comments at Greaseblog about it.
http://greaseblog.blogspot.com/2005/11/greasemonkey-064_30.html#c113344412847893595

On 12/5/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There was a bug in 0.6.3 that made it show up as a different extension
> entirely, not an upgrade. This was fixed in 0.6.4, so that explains
> why both installed at the same time. sorry about that.
>
> The monkey menu only shows the scripts which match the currently
> displayed page. Is that what you were seeing?
>
> - a
>
> On 12/2/05, dmccunney <dennis.mccunney at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/30/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Attached is the Greasemonkey I'm planning to release as the final for
> > > Firefox 1.5.
> >
> > Okay, I'm confused.  I just upgraded from GM 0.63 to GM 0.64, on FF
> > 1.5 release version..
> >
> > I first tried just installing it over the existing 0.63 version.
> > Extension Manager told me I have GM 0.63 *and* 0.64 installed, and a
> > had an odd artifact on the bottom of the sidebar.
> >
> > Remove both 0.63 and 0.64, then install 0.64 again, and the artifact
> goes away.
> >
> > But the "monkey menu" seems to be gone as well, and right clicking the
> > GM icon says "No userscripts installed", yet if I go into Manage
> > Userscripts, I see a dozen or so installed scripts.
> >
> > Looking at it again now, I see the monkey menu is partly back: it
> > shows some of the installed scripts, but only the *disabled* ones.
> >
> > Is this what is *supposed* to happen?
> > ______
> > Dennis
>



--
LouCypher


More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list