[Greasemonkey] bug 11423

Aaron Boodman zboogs at gmail.com
Tue Aug 30 14:11:56 EDT 2005


On 8/30/05, chris feldmann <cfeldmann at gmail.com> wrote:
> One thing that occurs to me is the possibility of "userscript arms
> escalation" if it becomes useful or efficacious to exploit the
> injection model within one script to the detriment of another. Then
> the affected script could reply by hijacking the injection hacks of
> the first and so on ad indefinitum. Sounds like fun to me.

Right, but why would users install such scripts. Sure they could be
tricked into doing so, but once you trick a user into installing a
script there are much more fun ways to exploit them than interfereing
with some other script.


More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list