jeff at vertexdev.com
Wed Aug 3 14:18:44 EDT 2005
It is good to hear you mention microformats. It is my belief that
are a natural friend and ally of GM, and that a company can declare
itself to be
GM-friendly (basically saying to developers "we don't mind, in fact we
you, to take the data from our pages.") by marking up its web pages with
microdata (data in microformats).
Another way of looking at this is to think of microformats as "poor
Based on the success that I have had with my feed finder script so far,
idea of using GM scripts to uncover and process metadata that is latent
the page has a lot of appeal to me.
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:54:02 -0400, "Jesse Andrews"
<anotherjesse at gmail.com> said:
> Too bad we cannot fix it before GM book is published (if a new API is
> This is AWESOME. I'd like to hook it up to look for other
> microformats (so you can add to calendars, ...)
> On 8/3/05, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/2/05, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >The next step (in my copious
> > > free time) will probably be to make an extension out of it so it can
> > > use a more scalable storage mechanism.
> > We need to make GM have a better storage implementation anyway...
> > _______________________________________________
> > Greasemonkey mailing list
> > Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
More information about the Greasemonkey