From lorenzo at colitti.com Mon Feb 18 10:37:21 2008 From: lorenzo at colitti.com (Lorenzo Colitti) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:37:21 -0800 Subject: [Flashblock] flashblock In-Reply-To: <000601c871a6$51dfa420$6601a8c0@Macc> References: <000601c871a6$51dfa420$6601a8c0@Macc> Message-ID: <47B9D061.9010509@colitti.com> Macca wrote: > sports website that seems to manage to avoid the block and annoyingly > starts playing it's swfs when you go into one of the articles. I assume > there are more such sites but I thought I'd let you have a look in case > you'd want references for future updates : > > http://www.one.co.il <---- home page > > almost every article in that site has an swf video in it Hi, [Pulling in the Flashblock mailing list as well] I can't reproduce this problem using Firefox 3.0 beta and Flashblock 1.5.5. Flash is correctly blocked both on http://www.one.co.il/ and on (randomly chosen link) http://www.one.co.il/Article/110692.html Are you using recent versions of Firefox (at least 2.x) and Flashblock? Cheers, Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Colitti http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/ From philip.chee at gmail.com Mon Feb 18 22:14:05 2008 From: philip.chee at gmail.com (Philip Chee) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:14:05 +0800 Subject: [Flashblock] flashblock In-Reply-To: <47B9D061.9010509@colitti.com> References: <000601c871a6$51dfa420$6601a8c0@Macc> <47B9D061.9010509@colitti.com> Message-ID: <8e8943620802182214v1d106c4cjd934d333d431ff5c@mail.gmail.com> On 19/02/2008, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > Macca wrote: > I can't reproduce this problem using Firefox 3.0 beta and Flashblock > 1.5.5. I can't reproduce on BonEcho either: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13pre) Gecko/20080208 BonEcho/2.0.0.13pre > Flash is correctly blocked both on http://www.one.co.il/ and on > (randomly chosen link) http://www.one.co.il/Article/110692.html Wow, each of those pages took more than 3 minutes to load via a broadband connection. But eventually they do load and all the flash on those pages are blocked (as far as I can tell). Phil From lorenzo at colitti.com Sat Feb 23 13:21:38 2008 From: lorenzo at colitti.com (Lorenzo Colitti) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:21:38 -0800 Subject: [Flashblock] Flashblock In-Reply-To: <4C73067B-D914-4831-B86D-81A92D8B6B40@gmail.com> References: <4C73067B-D914-4831-B86D-81A92D8B6B40@gmail.com> Message-ID: <47C08E62.2060109@colitti.com> Tim Pera wrote: > Hi Lorenzo- > > Flashblock is a beautiful piece of work. Thank you, thank you, thank you. > > -- > Tim Pera > chadacook at gmail.com > 651 246-4288 cell > Hi Tim, I'm only one of the developers, and probably not the one you need to thank the most. CCing the others so they know. Cheers, Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Colitti http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/ From erich at debian.org Thu Feb 28 16:53:20 2008 From: erich at debian.org (Erich Schubert) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:53:20 +0100 Subject: [Flashblock] Flashblock whitelisting and epiphany Message-ID: <1204246400.7542.59.camel@hepcat.vitavonni.de> Hi, How can I use flashblock whitelisting with Epiphany? I tried setting flashblock.whitelist in about:config, but that didn't help. There is no flashblock in the context menu on the markers either (guess because the epiphany UI is not XUL). Still I'd really like to be able to use whitelisting. Any hints? best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org) -- GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C (o_ Go away or i'll replace you with a very small shell script. //\ "Wissen ist Macht" - wenn man das richtige daraus macht. V_/_ From philip.chee at gmail.com Fri Feb 29 01:37:29 2008 From: philip.chee at gmail.com (Philip Chee) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:37:29 +0800 Subject: [Flashblock] Flashblock whitelisting and epiphany In-Reply-To: <1204246400.7542.59.camel@hepcat.vitavonni.de> References: <1204246400.7542.59.camel@hepcat.vitavonni.de> Message-ID: <8e8943620802290137k20077a63yafa8c75432f6eeff@mail.gmail.com> On 29/02/2008, Erich Schubert wrote: > How can I use flashblock whitelisting with Epiphany? > I tried setting flashblock.whitelist in about:config, but that didn't > help. There is no flashblock in the context menu on the markers either > (guess because the epiphany UI is not XUL). > Still I'd really like to be able to use whitelisting. Any hints? Epiphany is an embedded app so as you said the UI is not XUL and our whitelist code runs in the browsers XUL. Camino also had this problem, so the Camino developers re-implemented our whitelist listener code in Objective C. I guess the Epiphany developers could do the same in C++ or whatever language it is written in. So the question is, how good are your C++ coding skills? Phil