From tjrbjwzmibByron at ao-pisa.toscana.it Fri Jan 2 20:17:14 2009 From: tjrbjwzmibByron at ao-pisa.toscana.it (Sinclair M Edwardo) Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:17:14 -0100 Subject: [Epiphany] List of general practitioners and many more specialties Message-ID: <664481m1cgs0$h1768ul0$1014s8r0@Delldim5150 Licensed Doctors in America 788,778 in total <> 17,420 emails Doctor in over 34 specialties Can easily be sorted by 16 different fields Now priced at: $392 ()()() You get these for F-Ree with every order this week ()()() Contact List of US Pharma Companies Personal email addresses (47,000 in total) and names for top level executives American Hospitals Complete contact information for the important jobs held at the hospitals Directory of US Dentists Virtually every dentist in the United States with full contact details Directory of US Chiropractors Over than 100k chiropractors practicing in America reply by email: Crain at filemasterpro.com exp. mar January 09 email getoff at filemasterpro.com for delisting From contact at lookglamour.fr Thu Jan 8 08:21:05 2009 From: contact at lookglamour.fr (Nathalie LookGlamour.fr) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:21:05 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] Les ventes Calvin Klein, Gianfranco Ferre. Message-ID: <0ML25U-1LKxd23eBq-0000Eo@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> ???? ?? ?? ?????? ??? ???????? ?????????, ??????? ????? Les ventes?????????? Calvin Klein - 80%, Gianfranco Ferre -60%(?????, ?????) ??? ????, ??? ?? ???????? ??? ???? ????????? ? ????? ?????? ? ????? ?????????, ???????????, ?? ?????? ??????????? ?? ?????????????? ???????? ????????. ??? ???????? contact at lookglamour.com ? ?????? ????? ?????????. ??????? ????, ???? ?? ?? ?????? ????? ???????? ???? ?????????. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pcxwpqyhsptr at mail.ru Tue Jan 13 04:00:01 2009 From: pcxwpqyhsptr at mail.ru (=?koi8-r?Q?=F6=C5=CC=D8=D7=C9=D2=C1_=F2=C1=C4=DE=C5=CE=CB=CF?=) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:01 +0300 Subject: [Epiphany] =?koi8-r?b?68/EZctjYSDy5iBjINXeZdTPzSDQz2PMZcTVwN3J?= =?koi8-r?b?yCDJ2s1lzmXOycogySDEz9DPzM5lzsnKLg==?= Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wwfohh.jpg Type: image/gif Size: 8041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From info at dvtmodule.com Wed Jan 14 06:39:33 2009 From: info at dvtmodule.com (=?windows-1252?Q?DVT-Module=AE?=) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:39:33 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?windows-1252?q?DVT-Module_=3A_Divisez_par_3_ou_4_foi?= =?windows-1252?q?s_votre_budget_r=E9ferencement=2E=2E=2E?= Message-ID: <053cbd2f904c2e0697f539602e7da05e@dvtmodule.com> MAGELY - DVTMODULE Bonjour, L'?quipe de Magely France vous pr?sente ses meilleurs voeux pour cette ann?e 2009 et vous remercie de l'attention que vous portez ? notre Mail. Nous vous rappelons que notre DVT-Module? (WIKIPEDIA - Data Vaccum Technologie) remplace avantageusement les syst?mes CPC (Adwords), pour un cout inf?rieur ? ces derniers. (voir article r?f?rencement naturel / liens commerciaux) En effet notre module algorithmique, raccorder ? votre site, sans modifier celui-ci, permet une meilleure lecture du code de ce dernier par les moteurs de recherche. Cela attribue ? votre site un meilleur positionnement (r?ferencement) sur les diff?rents moteurs de recherche, et donc une augmentation de votre visibilit? sur internet. Magely vous garantie gr?ce ? son DVT-Module? un positionnement TOP10 (1?re page) sur les moteurs de recherche principaux. Satisfait ou Rembours? ! Nous sommes ? votre disposition pour tout renseignement. DVT-Module ? : Demandez un devis .... Il nous ont fait confiance ..... BOURQUIN S.A. - http://www.bourquinsa.ch "Chose promise, chose due ! Voici ce que m'inspire le DVT-MODULE, merci Magely pour vos conseil et votre produit qui marchent ? merveille... A peine 2 mois et demis et voila que nous sommes d?j? dans le top10. " VON ARX S.A. - http://www.vonarxsa.ch "Bonjours, nous souhaitons remercier votre ?quipe pour votre approche professionelle et votre savoir faire concernant le r?f?rencement de notre site. Nous ne regrettons pas notre investissement et nous esp?rons que ce professionalisme sera conserv? tout au long de notre partenariat. Cordialement, Von Arx S.A." PUBLIAZ S.A. - http://www.publiaz.com "Bonjours, le DVT-Module est un produit fantastique.Merci ? l'?quipe professionelle de Magely.Enfin un r?f?renceur qui sort du lot. Salutation PUBLIAZ." Cordialement l'?quipe Magely France . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 2074 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lawrence.auster at att.net Mon Jan 19 12:10:53 2009 From: lawrence.auster at att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:10:53 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-1?q?Israel=92s_Inalienable_Rights_--_Childr?= =?iso-8859-1?q?en_Can_Now_Be_Taken_from_Parents_for_Thought_Crimes_--__Mo?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_on_Madoff?= Message-ID: <20090119201056.XYLZ28152.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@2ao1z> Israel?s Inalienable Rights Posted by Charles Glass on January 19, 2009 Self-evident Truths: For Barack Obama on the Eve of His Inauguration as President of the United States. ? Israel has the inalienable right to pursue terrorists in the Gaza Strip and everywhere else they are hiding. ? Israel has the inalienable right to attack houses, mosques, churches, United Nations shelters, schools and hospitals to kill terrorists. ? Israel has the inalienable right to expropriate the land of Palestinian farmers for Israeli Jewish settlers. ? Israel has the inalienable right to arrest, torture and brutalise Palestinians who resist the expropriation of their land. ? Israel has the inalienable right to restrict the movement of Palestinians from one place to another in order to protect the settlements it has built on land expropriated, by inalienable right, from Palestinians. ? Israel has the inalienable right to demolish the houses of Palestinians, provided: the land on which the houses stand are needed for Israeli settlement; the owners of the houses are related to terrorist suspects; or Israeli military commanders determine that demolition is necessary. ? Israel has the right to erect concrete walls within the occupied territories to put more land on the Israeli side of the line for future use by Israeli settlers. ? Israel has the inalienable right to establish road networks that non-Israeli residents of the occupied territories are forbidden to use. ? Israel has the right to instruct the President of the United States how the Secretary of State must vote at the United Nations, which criminals must be granted presidential pardons and how he should treat other nations of the Middle East. ? Israel has the inalienable right to a minimum of $1,500 per Israeli Jewish citizen every year from the American Treasury. ? Israel has the inalienable right to the most sophisticated and lethal American weaponry. ? Israel has the right to deploy any and all American weapons on terrorists, whether in violation of international law or agreements with the United States not to deploy phosphorous and cluster bombs against civilian populations. ? Israel has the inalienable right to defy United Nations resolutions and World Court rulings. (A corollary of this right means that United Nations resolutions do not apply to Israel.) ? Israel has the inalienable right to accuse those who disagree with its occupation ?anti-Semites,? unless the dissenters are Jewish, in which case Israel has the inalienable right to declare them ?self-hating.? ? Israel has the inalienable right to demand the dismissal of American academics, journalists and politicians who voice opinions that question any of Israel?s inalienable rights. ? Israel has the inalienable right to invoke the memory of the victims of Nazi persecution to exempt itself from blame for any of its actions. ? Israel has the inalienable right to determine what rights the Palestinians have. Thus, ? The Palestinians have no right to resist military occupation, confiscation of land, seizure of their water supply, collective punishment, arbitrary taxation, torture, public beatings, school closures and the destruction of crops and orchards. ? The Palestinians have no right to disobey Israeli soldiers? orders or to appeal for outside assistance. ? The Palestinians have no right to non-violent civil disobedience, to armed struggle or to international representation to present their case. ? The Palestinians have no right to withhold taxes that pay for the Israeli occupation. ? The Palestinians have no rights, except those granted to them by the Israeli authorities, whose inalienable rights may not be contested. http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/israel_inalienable_rights/ ----- Children Can Now Be Taken from Parents for Thought Crimes by James Buchanan Most of us saw that news story about a birthday cake for a little boy named ?Adolf Hitler Campbell.? The family was complaining about a store that refused to spell out the boy?s name on the cake. There was considerable controversy about a father giving his son such a controversial name, but most people acknowledged that this was America and the boy could always change his name when he turns 18. It?s fairly obvious that the parents must be pro-White politically. The father has been evasive about having any support for Hitler and has claimed that he gave the boy the name ?Adolf Hitler? for the sake of having a unique name. It seems highly unlikely that anyone would actually believe that explanation especially considering that a sister of the boy has ?Aryan Nation? as her middle name. Well, that story just became a whole lot more sinister as Heath and Deborah Campbell just lost custody of their children thanks to the state of New Jersey. An article from the NY Daily News reports ?A young boy named Adolf Hitler, who attracted national attention when a local supermarket refused to make a birthday cake with his name on it, has been taken away from his parents by authorities, according to a local website. LehighValleyLive.com reports that Adolf and his sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation, 1, and 8-month-old Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie, were removed from their home by New Jersey?s Division of Youth and Family Services. No reason was given for why the children were removed, however, and Holland Township police chief David Van Gilson told the site they had not received any reports of abuse or negligence. Back in December, the boy?s parents, Heath and Deborah, were outraged when a local ShopRite declined to provide them with cake for Adolf?s birthday.? This is an extremely ominous development. These ?child protective services? agencies have been getting more and more intrusive in recent years. This is possibly the first case of children being taken away for thoughtcrimes or political beliefs. If the name ?Adolf Hitler? is grounds for a child being taken away, then what about ?Robert E. Lee?? Liberals could make an argument that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were both slave owners and that no children should be named after them either. How far down this slippery slope should we tolerate government going? There was an incident in Brunswick, Ohio in which an equivalent state agency wanted to make an issue of a father having a gun collection and carrying a gun around inside his own home. Apparently a state worker, who was giving medical care to Mrs. Lekan, complained about Mr. Lekan cleaning his guns and carrying a gun around inside his home. The police should have told that worker to mind her own business, but some liberal tyrant decided to send police in to harass Mr. Lekan over his fondness for guns. One website notes ?At 3 p.m. Friday, March 31, 1995, two Brunswick police officers arrived at the Lekan home. Officer Sam Puzella knocked on the door. When Lekan refused to let them in, Puzella kicked in the door. This is the second point at which government officials violated Lekan?s rights. At this point, there was no suspicion that anyone was in immediate danger, nor was there a search or arrest warrant enabling the officers to enter the property. When the door was kicked in, Lekan?s eccentricity turned violent. Lekan shot Puzella in the chest. The police retreated. Puzella was airlifted to a hospital.? The police tried to rush the home again suffering two more wounded. The father and boy were eventually shot dead after police surrounded the home and riddled it with bullets. This case involving a boy named ?Adolf Hitler? may not seem very important, but it is extremely important to all of us. If liberal state authorities can assume the power to take children away from parents for the politics and beliefs of the parents, then all of us may have to make a decision one day to hand over our children to the state and hope that a liberal judge will give them back months or years into the future. Or we will have to make a decision not to meekly surrender our children. Alexander Solzhenitsyn once said that the police state tyranny in the Soviet Union could have been stopped and millions of lives could have been spared and even more people could have been spared a brutal imprisonment if just a few brave citizens had killed some of the KGB officers, who came to take away innocent people in the middle of the night. Hopefully Americans will stand up and support the Campbells so that this tyranny is stopped now before it spreads. Right now, things are looking especially dark and gloomy. ------ Bernie Madoff?s Ethno-Nepotistic Ponzi Scheme James Murray January 4, 2008 Haaretz has run an article claiming that anti-Semites will jump on Madoff's $56 billion fraud against Jewish investors to besmirch the good name of Jews. Some Jews have proclaimed Madoff's fraud to be a new Kristallnacht. The Jewish Journal connects Madoff to the perpetrators of the Holocaust. Some Jews even insist that "Christmas came early" for anti-Semites because of the collapse of the Madoff scheme, implying that some Jews think that Christmas is a holiday of pure hatred toward Jews. Perhaps. However, the demographics of the Madoff scheme deserve some ethnic analysis: Was this really a story about how a Jewish turncoat victimizes Jewish-millionaire Holocaust survivors, leading to gloating among anti-Semites at Christmastime? Or ? could it be that the dirty little secret of the Madoff scheme that Jews are desperate to conceal is that Jews were not the victims but rather the beneficiaries of the scheme? First, it is important to realize that Jews lost only a relatively small amount of the money in Madoff's fraud scheme. As the New York Times shows, those who invested early and withdrew profits ? many of them presumably Jews ? did not lose a penny but rather profited rather grandly. Second, a quick glance at the table in the December 17, 2008 Wall Street Journal (reproduced below) makes clear that of the top 30 investors in the fund, only 2 are Jewish, and relatively small investors at that. Granted, the list is incomplete. It omits, for the sake of respect I suppose, the $37 million reportedly lost by Elie Wiesel and his foundation (modestly named after himself). (As an aside, it should be noted that Wiesel, the Holocaust promoter and Jewish moralizer, is absolutely indifferent to the extermination of the Palestinians.) Although many other versions of this table have appeared (and many major investors who lost will try to keep their identity secret), it is worth noting that the identifiable Jewish share of monies lost through Madoff in this compilation of victims is precisely 2.31%. While this omits the Jewish petty-millionaires who were the mainstay of Madoff's scheme for decades, even if there are 1000 Jewish petty-millionaires, the Jewish share of the Ponzi scheme is surely less than 5%. And since the best compilation so far argues for only 2.31% of the victims being Jewish, are the crocodile tears of Jewish columnists for the Jewish millionaire-victims really appropriate? One is reminded of the Jewish book on the Katyn Forest Massacre, in which 20,000 Polish Catholics and a few identified Jews were slaughtered: Of course, that book, written by a Jew, focuses only on the few Jewish victims. The non-Jewish victims are simply meaningless. Then and now. There are many articles about Jewish petty-millionaries who have lived on their profits from Madoff for years or decades of retirement (10?20% a year in payouts). (See here, here, and here.) These articles make the structure of this Ponzi scheme immediately clear. That there was something wrong was certainly clear to many investors; they just did not know what was wrong. Anecdotally, many Jewish investors thought they were buying into a long-lived insider trading scam. Does the fact that some of Madoff's early Jewish investors always believed that their "profits" were derived from financial crimes make them more or less sympathetic? Madoff is described as having spent decades building a carefully structured Ponzi scheme (which large European investors note was one of the American investments highest rated for return and being risk-free for decades by the SEC and rating services). Yet, Madoff's scheme was something else and something more: It was, in fact an Ethno-Nepotistic-Ponzi scheme, a Ponzi scheme where most of the payouts were to the investors of the same ethnicity as the conspirators. And here is how it worked: In the first period (perhaps two decades), beginning in the 1960s, Madoff ran a carefully structured Ponzi scheme, possibly beginning when he really could not get the returns he thought he could get by legitimate means. But once started, there was no turning back. Madoff's genius (linked to guaranteed super-safe investment ratings from the rating agencies) was to have the larger investors reinvest a lot of their imaginary "profits", while using their money to keep the scheme going. Madoff carefully structured his scheme and limited the number of investors. (He was notorious for refusing to accept all potential investors?many relate how they begged him for years before he allowed them to invest; many joined his country clubs just to stalk him. And I suspect he required a high rate of reinvestment). Madoff was therefore able to meet the payouts he promised since so much of the imaginary "profits" were simply reinvested and because bigger non-Jewish investors were brought in to keep the scheme going. If investors could be held to 1% a month payoffs (and this was a typical rate of payoffs), it would take 8 years, 4 months before a given investor would use up their own money in "profit" payouts. If Madoff could convince an investor to take only 0.5% a month in payouts (or less: many Jewish charities appear to have taken such lower rates of "profit" payouts), Madoff would have 16 years, 8 months before he would have to use someone else's money to maintain the stream of "profit" payouts. These modest, if impossibly consistent returns, differentiate Madoff from normal Ponzi schemes that pay out big early on but crash and burn within a year or two. Madoff built his scheme to run for decades. These long term horizons ? on the order of a decade or so ? required that Madoff restructure his scheme periodically. The first decade or two saw Madoff operate real money-making securities services and begin to collect his portfolio of million-dollar investors. At the beginning of this period he built an innovative, heavily computerized and successful financial services business. On top of this real and profitable business, he slowly started building a portfolio of unsophisticated Jewish investors, many of whom placed their life savings with him. These are the Jewish petty-millionaire ($1?3 million) investors everyone has been crying about in the newspapers. Many of them drew substantial cash payoffs for decades ? payouts that were often multiples of what they invested. Towards the end of this period, Jewish-Zionist charities and Jewish-segregated schools came into the system, but few were as large as $10 million, and all can be presumed to have profited from Madoff's fraud. For example, Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization, was one charity that came in at this time: Its initial $7 million investment in 1988 would be supplemented by $33 million over the next decade until 1998. By including paper profits, Hadassah would ultimately claim to have lost $90 million with Madoff; that is: 7 + 33 = 90. It is actually worse than this, since Hadassah may have actually lost nothing at all. A quick and dirty estimate of Hadassah "profits" suggests that if Hadassah had averaged $23.5 million in 1988?1998 and left all its "profits" with Madoff, there should have been about $64 million in their account, not $40 million in 1998 as reported, suggesting that Hadassah could have drawn as much as $24 million in "profits" in the first decade. Similarly, if Hadassah had started 1998 with $40 million as they report, 1% per month would yield $110 million, not $90 million as they report now, suggesting that Hadassah withdrew as much as another $20 million in the second decade with Madoff. Hadassah could have withdrawn as much as $44 million from the $40 million they invested with Madoff, and this would mean that Hadassah's losses are not the $40 million actually invested, or the $90 million as they now claim, but rather no more than zero. (Incidentally, some newspapers are so terrified of Jews that they will not even print the word "Zionist" unless it is in the address of a letter to the editor from an imperious Zionist organization: The cringing, terrorized Seattle Post-Intelligencer will only call Hadassah, which is officially "The Women's Zionist Organization of America," "a Jewish women's charity.") Interestingly, Madoff was so immune from regulatory oversight that he would not even be correctly registered as an investment firm until 2006, when SEC investigators were credibly informed that Madoff had committed numerous violations but settled for asking him to please, please, please register his firm in an appropriate manner... after it had been operating outside the law for over 40 years!!!! (Madoff would marry off a daughter, Shana, to one of the investigators in that 2006 inquiry.) The second decade or so began with the need for investors at least in the $10 million range, since the costs of the scheme kept growing. By the end of the decade he apparently needed investors in the $50 million range. This phase saw the development of the "feeder" system, in which investment companies ? often Jewish- controlled ? marketed Madoff's services to larger, non-Jewish investors, worldwide. For example, in the mid-1990s, Jacob Ezra Merkin, from one of the most distinguished rabbinical families in world Judaism, president of the Fifth Avenue Synagogue in New York, head of the investment committee for the UJA-Federation of New York, and manager of Ascot Partners, brought in Elie Wiesel's Foundation for Humanity. Four of the five largest "losers" in the Madoff scheme are feeder operators who lost essentially nothing of their own: Fairfield Greenwich Advisors, Tremont Capital Management, Ascot Partners, and Access International Advisors brought in other investors and lost their money for them. The end of this period came in 1999?2000: The result was that, as recently as 1999, Madoff rejected an investment by Jeffrey R. Gural, chairman of Newmark Knight Frank because he could not invest at least $20 million. By 1999, $20 million was too trivial a sum to bother with at this point in Madoff's scheme. Madoff was entering the third and final stage of his scheme, and it required globalization and much, much larger investors. The last decade saw bigger and bigger investors, like European banks, Arab institutional investors, a Korean pension, maybe a Saudi prince, etc., who put in hundreds of millions or billions and got nothing at all back, or very little. The costs of the scheme kept growing. This period was the heyday of the feeder system: Fairfield Greenwich Advisors, Tremont Capital Management, Ascot Partners, and Access International Advisors were bringing in billions now, and almost none of it was from Jews. The investment by Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, which placed $400 million with Madoff in 2005, is typical of the third and final period. It was large, it was non-Jewish, it was used to pay early Jewish investors, and was unusual only in the fact that Abu Dhabi Investment Authority got cold feet and pulled out $268 million in redemptions in 2005 and 2006. Bank Medici of Austria became a sub-feeder collecting monies from smaller investors in New York, Vienna, Gibraltar, Zurich and Milan, through its hedge funds in the United States and Luxembourg: Its investors were happy with 7% a year. And the money still poured into the hands of Jewish "investors", including the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity, and the Jewish retired petty-millionaires of Florida, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Minnesota, etc. Year after year, they received their "profits", extracted from unknowing, duped investors from Singapore to Dublin, from Spain to South Korea. So, it is clear that there were at least three categories of investors: (1) The core Jewish petty-millionaire investors, who made a lot of money for decades, living richly on their "profits" from Madoff's fund. As the New York Times admits, many made a lot of money. (2) More recent Jewish charities who agreed to reinvest a lot of their "profits", like Wiesel's loot from the Holocaust-trade: These investors got good payoffs but reinvested most of it. These people could have lost a little, but if they were really greedy they were easily suckered into big, consistent reinvestments, accumulating only large imaginary paper "profits." In this cohort of investors, actual loses are entirely correlated with excessive greed: If they let their "profits" accumulate without payouts, they could have lost everything. (3) The non-Jews, like Banco Santander, HSBC Holdings PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland, BNP Paribas, etc., who invested large amounts of money recently and who probably got nothing or next to nothing from Madoff. These investors now know that all their money disappeared into the hands of groups (1) and (2) and Madoff and his buddies. (Incidentally, Madoff and his family made a lot of money: One family investment firm alone had $160 million in assets until it was seized last week.) There never was a group (4) because the market melted down and Madoff could not find people big enough to fund the next generation of the scam. (Although he did reportedly scam a Saudi Prince for $3 billion.) In fact, one finds Jeffrey Tucker, a feeder partner in Fairfield Greenwich Group complaining, in an article in HedgeWorld in November 2007, that Chinese and Thai investors are stupid and unsophisticated because they will not provide money to Madoff. When investors sought $7 billion in redemptions in November 2008, the end was near. A careful reader will note that there were real winners. We will call them the Jews, since they were Jews, This group would ultimately have large losses of imaginary paper "profits." And there were big losers. Let's call them the Goys or the Suckers, since they are non-Jews. Of course, the difference between these groups is their ethnicity. It is worth noting that the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, and the mass media in general, see this as a fraud that essentially affected only Jews. As we have seen, this is the exact opposite of the truth. Jews were winners, and non-Jews were losers. To repeat: in Madoff's scheme, Jews were winners, and non-Jews were losers. It was not just a Ponzi scheme, it was a Ponzi scheme structured around a massive transfer of wealth to one's own ethnic group, a kind of previously undescribed Ethno-Nepotistic-Ponzi scheme. Finally, this suggests that the real reason why Haaretz and Abe Foxman are so hysterical about the Madoff scandal and its possible effect of increasing anti-semitism is not because they fear irrational goyim who are overly eager to paint all Jews with the traits of Bernie Madoff. It is that there simply were very few real Jewish victims and quite a few non-Jewish victims: The so-called Jewish victims actually made money. And they made millions and millions and millions. James Murray is the pen name of an academic sociologist. Permanent link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Murray-Madoff.html Appendix 1: Wall Street Journal List of Madoff's Victims. [There are many omissions from this Wall Street Journal list, like that of Elie Wiesel's Holocaust profits foundation with $37 million in exposure. And the Lapin foundation that was simply vaporized last week.] * Indicates Jewish investors. Table 1: "Madoff's Victims: A List of Reported Victims and Their Exposure", in Wall Street Journal, December 17, 2008. p. A14. (Victims For Whom No Exposure Amount Is Available Are Not Shown.) Fairfield Greenwich Advisors (investment management firm): $7500 million. Tremont Capital Management (fund of funds run by Tremont Group Holdings): $3300 million. Banco Santander SA (Spanish bank): $2870 million. Ascot Partners (hedge fund frounded by GMAC chief J. Ezra Merkin): $1800 million. Access International Advisors (New York investment firm): $1400 million. Fortis Bank Nederland NV (Dutch bank): $1350 million. Union Bancaire Privee (Swiss bank): $1000 million. HSBC Holdings PLC (British bank): $1000 million. Natixis SA (French investment bank): $560 million. *Carl Shapiro (former chairman Kay Windsor Inc.): $550 million. Royal Bank of Scotland (British Bank): $492.76 million. BNP Paribas (French Bank): $431.17 million. BBVA (Spanish bank): $369,57 million. Man Group PLC (British hedge fund): $360 million. Reichmuth & Co. (Swiss private bank): $327 million. Nomura Holdings Ltd. (Japanese brokerage house): $303 million. Maxam Capital Management Inc. (fund of funds based in Dairen, Conn.): $280 million. EIM SA (European investment manager with $11 billion in assets): $230 million. Aozora Bank Ltd. (Japan bank in which Cerebus Capital owns majority stake): $137 million. AXA (French insurer): $123 million. UniCredit SA (Italian bank): $92.39 million. Nordea Bank AB (Swedish bank): $59.13 million. Hyposwiss (Swiss private bank owned by St. Galler Kantonalbank): $50 million. Banque Bendict Hoetsch & Cie SA (Swiss private bank): $48.8 million. City of Fairfield-Connecticut (town pension fund): $42 million. Bramdean Alternatives (asset manager): $31.2 million. *Haredi Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd. (Israeli insurer): $14.2 million. Societe Generale (French bank): $12.32 million. Groupama SA (French insurer): $12.32 million. Credit Agricola SA (French bank): $12.32 million. Richard Spring (individual investor): $11 million. RAB Capital (hedge fund): $10 million. Banco Populare (Italian bank): $9.86 million. Korea Teachers Pension (Korean pension fund): $9.1 million. *Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles (Jewish charity manager): $6.4 million. Neue Privat Bank (Swiss bank): $5 million. *Clal Insurance Enterprise Holdings Ltd. (Israeli financial services): $3.1 million. Mediobanca SpA (via its unit Compagnie Monegasque de Banque): $671000. Permanent link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Murray-Madoff.html Source: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Murray-Madoff.html http://www.davidduke.com/general/7051_7051.html#more-7051 --------------------------------------------- Lawrence Auster, 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B New York, NY 10025 Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net From newsletter at lesannonces.fr Tue Jan 20 00:33:36 2009 From: newsletter at lesannonces.fr (=?utf-8?B?TGVzYW5ub25jZXMuZnI=?=) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:33:36 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?utf-8?q?Votre_annonce_a_0_euro_pendant_1_mois?= Message-ID: <20090120-09333635-5d0-0@s14.netnoe.com> Lesannonces.fr -------------- Votre annonce avec photos gratuite pendant 1 mois Automobile et 4x4 : http://www.annonces-automobile.com Bateau : http://www.annonces-marine.com Camping-car et caravane : http://www.annonces-caravaning.com Offre r?serv?e aux particuliers, valable jusqu'au 02/02/2009 Aussi, un projet immobilier ? Utilisez notre solution gratuite de recherche immobili?re sur http://www.immo-theque.com Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, suivez le lien: http://www.lesannonces.fr/infomedia/operation-gratuit/mailing-gratuit.html Vous recevez ce message car vous ?tes affili? ? l'un de nos sites partenaires. Pour ne plus recevoir de message de notre part, suivez le lien ci dessous Pour vous d?sabonner, collez ce lien dans votre navigateur : http://www.emailstrategie-s14.com/divers/desabonnement.asp?id_client=72&ml_3551=1&email=epiphany at mozdev.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lawrence.auster at att.net Tue Jan 20 10:02:31 2009 From: lawrence.auster at att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:02:31 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] The problem with intellectually insecure whites - Jewish Involvement in Black American Affairs Message-ID: <20090120180244.13D478449C@mozdev.mozdev.org> The problem with intellectually insecure whites By Kevin MacDonald January 19, 2009 America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired state of affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and shape public opinion. But it certainly creates some management issues ? at least in the long run. After all, it?s difficult to come up with an historical example of a nation with a solid ethnic majority (90% white in 1950) that has voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural power. Such transformations are typically accomplished by military invasions, great battles, and untold suffering. And it?s not as if everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view their own demographic and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative. Indeed, as I have noted previously, it is striking that racial nationalism has triumphed in Israel at the same time that the Jewish intellectual and political movements and the organized Jewish community have been the most active and effective force for a non-white America. Indeed, a poll in 2008 found that Avigdor Lieberman was the second most popular politician in Israel. Lieberman has advocated expulsion of Arabs from Israel and has declared himself a follower of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leading pioneer of racial Zionism. The most popular politician in the poll was Benjamin Netanyahu ? another admirer of Jabotinsky. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni are also Jabotinskyists. The racial Zionists are now carrying out yet another orgy of mass murder after a starvation-inducing blockade and the usual triggering assault designed to provoke Palestinian retaliation ? which then becomes the cover for claims that Israel is merely defending itself against terrorism. This monstrosity was approved by overwhelming majorities of both Houses of Congress. The craven Bush administration did its part by abstaining from a UN resolution designed by the US Secretary of State as a result of a personal appeal by the Israeli Prime Minister. This is yet another accomplishment of the Israel Lobby, but one they would rather not have discussed in public. People might get the impression that the Lobby really does dictate US foreign policy in the Mideast. Obviously, such thoughts are only entertained by anti-Semites. But I digress. In managing the eclipse of white America, one strategy of the mainstream media is to simply ignore the issue. Christopher Donovan (?For the media, the less whites think about their coming minority status, the better?) has noted that the media, and in particular, the New York Times, are quite uninterested in doing stories that discuss what white people think about this state of affairs. It?s not surprising that the New York Times ? the Jewish-owned flagship of anti-white, pro-multicultural media ? ignores the issue. The issue is also missing from so-called conservative media even though one would think that conservatives would find the eclipse of white America to be an important issue. Certainly, their audiences would find it interesting. Now we have an article ?The End of White America? written by Hua Hsu, an Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College. The article is a rather depressing display of what passes for intellectual discourse on the most important question confronting white people in America. Hsu begins by quoting a passage in F. Scott Fitzgerald?s The Great Gatsby in which a character, Tom Buchanan, states: ?Have you read The Rise of the Colored Empires by this man Goddard?? ? Well, it?s a fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don?t look out the white race will be?will be utterly submerged. It?s all scientific stuff; it?s been proved.? Buchanan?s comment is a thinly veiled reference to Lothrop Stoddard?s The Rising Tide of Color which Hsu describes as ?rationalized hatred? presented in a scholarly, gentlemanly, and scientific tone. (This wording that will certainly help him when he comes up for tenure.) As Hsu notes, Stoddard had a doctorate from Harvard and was a member of many academic associations. His book was published by a major publisher. It was therefore ?precisely the kind of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan?s profile ? wealthy, Ivy League?educated, at once pretentious and intellectually insecure ? might have been expected to bring up in casual conversation.? Let?s ponder that a bit. The simple reality is that in the year 2009 an Ivy League-educated person, "at once pretentious and intellectually insecure," would just as glibly assert the same sort of nonsense as Hsu. To wit: The coming white minority does not mean that the racial hierarchy of American culture will suddenly become inverted, as in 1995?s White Man?s Burden, an awful thought experiment of a film, starring John Travolta, that envisions an upside-down world in which whites are subjugated to their high-class black oppressors. There will be dislocations and resentments along the way, but the demographic shifts of the next 40 years are likely to reduce the power of racial hierarchies over everyone?s lives, producing a culture that?s more likely than any before to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than members of a caste or identity group. The fact is that no one can say for certain what multicultural America without a white majority will be like. There is no scientific or historical basis for claims like ?the demographic shifts of the next 40 years are likely to reduce the power of racial hierarchies over everyone?s lives, producing a culture that?s more likely than any before to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than members of a caste or identity group.? Indeed, there is no evidence at all that we are proceeding to a color blind future. The election results continue to show that white people are coalescing in the Republican Party, while the Democrats are increasingly the party of a non-white soon-to-be majority. Is it so hard to believe that when this coalition achieves a majority that it will further compromise the interests of whites far beyond contemporary concerns such as immigration policy and affirmative action? Hsu anticipates a colorblind world, but affirmative action means that blacks and other minorities are certainly not treated as individuals. And it means that whites ? especially white males ? are losing out on opportunities they would have had without these policies and without the massive non-white immigration of the last few decades. Given the intractability of changing intelligence and other traits required for success in the contemporary economy, it is unlikely that 40 more years of affirmative action will attain the outcomes desired by the minority lobbies. Indeed, in Obama's America, blacks are rioting in Oakland over perceived racial injustices, and from 2002 ?2007, black juvenile homicide victims increased 31%, while black juvenile perpetrators increased 43%. Hence, the reasonable outlook is for a continuing need for affirmative action and for racial activism in these groups, even after whites become a minority. Whites will also lose out because of large-scale importation of relatively talented immigrants from East Asia. Indeed, as I noted over a decade ago, "The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite." Hsu shows that there already is considerable anxiety among whites about the future. An advertizing executive says, ?I think white people feel like they?re under siege right now ? like it?s not okay to be white right now, especially if you?re a white male. ... People are stressed out about it. ?We used to be in control! We?re losing control?? Another says, "There?s a lot of fear and a lot of resentment." It's hard to see why these feelings won't increase in the future. A huge problem for white people is lack of intellectual and cultural confidence. Hsu quotes Christian (Stuff White People Like) Lander saying, "I get it: as a straight white male, I?m the worst thing on Earth." A professor comments that for his students "to be white is to be culturally broke. The classic thing white students say when you ask them to talk about who they are is, ?I don?t have a culture.? They might be privileged, they might be loaded socioeconomically, but they feel bankrupt when it comes to culture ? They feel disadvantaged, and they feel marginalized." This lack of cultural confidence is no accident. For nearly 100 years whites have been subjected to a culture of critique emanating from the most prestigious academic and media institutions. And, as Hsu points out, the most vibrant and influential aspect of American popular culture is hip-hop?a product of the African American urban culture. The only significant group of white people with any cultural confidence centers itself around country music, NASCAR, and the small town values of traditional white America. For this group of whites ? and only this group ? there is "a racial pride that dares not speak its name, and that defines itself through cultural cues instead?a suspicion of intellectual elites and city dwellers, a preference for folksiness and plainness of speech (whether real or feigned), and the association of a working-class white minority with 'the real America.'? This is what I term implicit whiteness ? implicit because explicit assertions of white identity have been banned by the anti-white elites that dominate our politics and culture. It is a culture that, as Hsu notes, "cannot speak its name." But that implies that the submerged white identity of the white working class and the lack of cultural confidence exhibited by the rest of white America are imposed from outside. Although there may well be characteristics of whites that facilitate this process, this suppression of white identity and interests is certainly not the natural outcome of modernization or any other force internal to whites as a people. In my opinion, they are the result of the successful erection of a culture of critique in the West dominated by Jewish intellectual and political movements. The result is that educated, intellectually insecure white people these days are far more likely to believe in the utopian future described by Hsu than in hard and cautious thinking about what the future might have in store for them. It's worth dwelling a bit on the intellectual insecurity of the whites who mindlessly utter the mantras of multiculturalism that they have soaked up from the school system and from the media. Most people do not have much confidence in their intellectual ability and look to elite opinion to shape their beliefs. As I noted elsewhere, A critical component of the success of the culture of critique is that it achieved control of the most prestigious and influential institutions of the West, and it became a consensus among the elites, Jewish and non-Jewish alike. Once this happened, it is not surprising that this culture became widely accepted among people of very different levels of education and among people of different social classes. Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But they know that the professors at Harvard, and the editorial page of the New York Times and the Washington Post, and even conservative commentators like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are all on page when it comes to racial and ethnic issues. This is a formidable array, to the point that you almost have to be a crank to dissent from this consensus. I think one of the greatest triumphs of the left has been to get people to believe that people who assert white identity and interests or who make unflattering portrayals of organized Jewish movements are morally degenerate, stupid, and perhaps psychiatrically disturbed. Obviously, all of these adjectives designate low status. The reality is that the multicultural emperor has no clothes and, because of its support for racial Zionism and the racialism of ethnic minorities in America, it is massively hypocritical to boot. The New York Times, the academic left, and the faux conservatives that dominate elite discourse on race and ethnicity are intellectually bankrupt and can only remain in power by ruthlessly suppressing or ignoring the scientific findings. This is particularly a problem for college-educated whites. Like Fitzgerald's Tom Buchanan, such people have a strong need to feel that their ideas are respectable and part of the mainstream. But the respectable mainstream gives them absolutely nothing with which to validate themselves except perhaps the idea that the world will be a better place when people like them no longer have power. Hsu quotes the pathetic Christian Lander: "?Like, I?m aware of all the horrible crimes that my demographic has done in the world. ... And there?s a bunch of white people who are desperate ? desperate ? to say, ?You know what? My skin?s white, but I?m not one of the white people who?s destroying the world.?? As a zombie leftist during the 1960s and 1970s, I know what that feeling of desperation is like ? what it's like to be a self-hating white. We must get to the point where college-educated whites proudly and confidently say they are white and that they do not want to become a minority in America. This reminds me of the recent docudrama Milk, which depicts the life of gay activist Harvey Milk. Milk is sure be nominated for an Oscar as Best Picture because it lovingly illustrates a triumph of the cultural left. But is has an important message that should resonate with the millions of whites who have been deprived of their confidence and their culture: Be explicit. Just as Harvey Milk advocated being openly gay even in the face of dire consequences, whites need to tell their family and their friends that they have an identity as a white person and believe that whites have legitimate interests as white people. They must accept the consequences when they are harassed, fired from their jobs, or put in prison for such beliefs. They must run for political office as openly pro-white. Milk shows that homosexuals were fired from their jobs and arrested for congregating in public. Now it's the Southern Poverty Law Center and the rest of the leftist intellectual and political establishment that harasses and attempts to get people fired. But it's the same situation with the roles reversed. No revolution was ever accomplished without some martyrs. The revolution that restores the legitimacy of white identity and the legitimacy of white interests will be no exception. But it is a revolution that is absolutely necessary. The white majority is foolish indeed to entrust its future to a utopian hope that racial and ethnic identifications will disappear and that they won?t continue to influence public policy in ways that compromise the interests of whites. It does not take an overactive imagination to see that coalitions of minority groups could compromise the interests of formerly dominant whites. We already see numerous examples in which coalitions of minority groups attempt to influence public policy, including immigration policy, against the interests of the whites. Placing ourselves in a position of vulnerability would be extremely risky, given the deep sense of historical grievance harbored by many ethnic activists and organized ethnic lobbies. This is especially the case with Jews. Jewish organisations have been unanimous in condemning Western societies, Western traditions, and Christianity, for past crimes against Jews. Similar sentiments are typical of a great many African Americans and Latinos, and especially among the ethnic activists from these groups. The ?God damn America? sermon by President Obama's pastor comes to mind as a recent notorious example. The precedent of the early decades of the Soviet Union should give pause to anyone who believes that surrendering ethnic hegemony does not carry risks. The Bolshevik revolution had a pronounced ethnic angle: To a very great extent, Jews and other non-Russians ruled over the Russian people, with disastrous consequences for the Russians and other ethnic groups that were not able to become part of the power structure. Jews formed a hostile elite within this power structure ? as they will in the future white-minority America; Jews were ?Stalin?s willing executioners.? Two passages from my review of Yuri Slezkine's The Jewish Century seem particularly appropriate here. The first passage reminds me of the many American Jews who adopt a veneer of support for causes of leftist versions of social justice and racial tolerance while nevertheless managing to support racial Zionism and the mass murder, torture, and incarceration of the Palestinians. Such people may be very different when they become a hostile elite in a white-minority America. Many of the commentators on Jewish Bolsheviks noted the ?transformation? of Jews [after the Bolshevik Revolution]. In the words of [a] Jewish commentator, G. A. Landau, ?cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed alien to a nation so far removed from physical activity.? And another Jewish commentator, Ia. A. Bromberg, noted that: the formerly oppressed lover of liberty had turned into a tyrant of ?unheard-of-despotic arbitrariness??. The convinced and unconditional opponent of the death penalty not just for political crimes but for the most heinous offenses, who could not, as it were, watch a chicken being killed, has been transformed outwardly into a leather-clad person with a revolver and, in fact, lost all human likeness. ... After the Revolution, ... there was active suppression of any remnants of the older order and their descendants. ... The mass murder of peasants and nationalists was combined with the systematic exclusion of the previously existing non-Jewish middle class. The wife of a Leningrad University professor noted, ?in all the institutions, only workers and Israelites are admitted; the life of the intelligentsia is very hard? (p. 243). Even at the end of the 1930s, prior to the Russification that accompanied World War II, ?the Russian Federation?was still doing penance for its imperial past while also serving as an example of an ethnicity-free society? (p. 276). While all other nationalities, including Jews, were allowed and encouraged to keep their ethnic identities, the revolution remained an anti-majoritarian movement. The difference from the Soviet Union may well be that in white-minority America it will not be workers and Israelites who are favored, but non-whites and Israelites. Whites may dream that they are entering the post-racial utopia imagined by their erstwhile intellectual superiors. But it is quite possible that they are entering into a racial dystopia of unimaginable cruelty in which whites will be systematically excluded in favor of the new elites recruited from the soon-to-be majority. It's happened before. Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at California State University?Long Beach. URL with hyperlink sources: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html ------- Jewish Involvement in Black American Affairs Reflections on Martin Luther King Jr?s Birthday By Paul Grubach Just about every year on the eve of the national holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr.?s birthday, the mainstream media in the United States put forth numerous articles about the large Jewish involvement with Dr. King and the equally large Jewish involvement with the Black American Civil Rights movement. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media?s description of this phenomenon is seen through rose-colored glasses. Jewish influence in Black American affairs is portrayed as overwhelmingly selfless, altruistic, charitable and humane. But is this really true? Let?s take a look. In 1991, The Nation of Islam, a Black religious group, published a very important study of Jewish involvement with the Black slave trade. Entitled The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews (SRBBJ), it is a well documented and well argued book, and the authors make this clear from the very beginning: ?The information contained herein has been compiled primarily from Jewish historical literature. Every effort has been made to present evidence from the most respected of the Jewish authorities and whose works appear in established historical journals or are published by authoritative Jewish publishing houses.? The Black American expert on the slave trade, Dr. Tony Martin, has endorsed the book, as he has made it assigned reading in his courses. I have investigated at least some of the sources and they do indeed check out. In the book?s introduction we read: ?Deep within the recesses of the Jewish historical record is the irrefutable evidence that the most prominent of the Jewish pilgrim fathers used kidnapped Black Africans disproportionately more than any other ethnic or religious group in New World history and participated in every aspect of the international slave trade.? Further on it is written: ?Most have always assumed that the relationship between Blacks and Jews has been mutually supportive, friendly and fruitful ? two suffering people bonding to overcome hatred and bigotry to achieve success. But history tells an altogether different story.? Not surprisingly, Jewish-Zionist groups, and those allied with them, have attempted to blacken the book?s reputation. Unable to refute its thesis, they resort to smear tactics. But Black Americans would do well to heed SRBBJ?s advice. The relationship between Blacks and Jews, they write, ?is a relationship that needs further analysis. [?] Hidden and misunderstood, it is indeed time to reopen the files and reconsider The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.? Furthermore, the irrational attacks upon SRBBJ highlight the hypocritical double standard that pervades the study of the sordid and evil business of the Black slave trade. It is socially and morally acceptable for Jewish scholars like Bernard Lewis to write books (Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An Historical Inquiry) that discuss Arab involvement in the Black slave trade, and it is socially and morally acceptable to discuss Black and European involvement in the Black Slave trade. But it is positively ?wrong, evil, and immoral? for any non-Jewish scholar to openly discuss Jewish involvement in the Black slave trade. Indeed, consider the case of the brave Black scholar Tony Martin, who did try to tell the world about the large Jewish involvement in the Black slave trade. Readers of The Revisionist should check out his book The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront. For attempting to tell the truth about the large Jewish involvement in the Black slave trade he was harassed, persecuted, and Jewish-Zionist forces tried to damage his career. Indeed, any non-Jewish intellectual that attempts to bring to light the large Jewish involvement in the Black slave trade will almost certainly be attacked and maligned by Jewish-Zionist groups. Black American intellectual Harold Cruse and California psychology professor Kevin MacDonald have also fearlessly scrutinized Jewish involvement in Black affairs. Both have written some very insightful analyses of the question: Why were Jews so disproportionately involved in the Black Civil Rights movement? In their books, Cruse?s The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual and MacDonald,?s The Culture of Critique, they have noted that many Jews want a racially integrated society because it provides a hospitable environment for their long term policy of non-assimilation and group solidarity. Many Jews view white/Euro-American nationalism as their greatest potential threat, and they promote racial integration precisely because this presumably dilutes Euro-American power and lessens the possibility that a powerful and cohesive Euro-American standing in opposition to Jewish interests will develop. There is evidence that supports their viewpoints. If the primary motive of the Jewish groups that were involved in the Black American Civil Rights movement was to promote racial equality and racial integration, then we should expect that they would promote racial equality and ethnic integration in Israel just as ardently as they promoted it in the United States. But this is not the case. For the most part, the Jewish groups that were and are working to create a racially integrated society in the US are the same Jewish groups that were and are ardent supporters of the ethnically segregated apartheid state of Israel where racial segregation and Jewish supremacism are enshrined in law. Jewish scholar Uri Davis has written a book, the title of which says it all: Israel: An Apartheid State. If there is ever to be harmony between the races in the United States, then we are all going to have to literally lay ?all of the cards on the table.? That is to say, Blacks and whites, Jews and non-Jews, are going to have to discuss these racial problems in an open, honest and forthright manner, free of name-calling and emotional outbursts. The history of Jewish involvement in Black affairs has been, for the most part, surrounded by taboos and ?off-limits? for discussion. It is about time that Black Americans ? and all other Americans for that matter ? break down these taboos and reconsider Jewish involvement in Black American affairs. Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/the-suppressed-history-between-blacks-and-jews_7214.html Jewish Involvement in Black American Affairs Part 2 www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=1444 --------------------------------------------- Lawrence Auster, 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B New York, NY 10025 Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net From psmith1785 at msn.com Wed Jan 21 17:40:14 2009 From: psmith1785 at msn.com (psmith1785 at msn.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:10:14 +0630 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-5?q?Sexual_health_for_man-health_for_life?= =?iso-8859-5?q?=2E_Get_Viagra!?= Message-ID: <2950329524.20080912193226@msn.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From b.williams at erols.com Thu Jan 22 02:44:25 2009 From: b.williams at erols.com (eBay Membre: your_dressmaker_medieval) Date: 22 Jan 2009 21:44:25 +1100 Subject: Vous avez reçu une question sur l'objet eBay: Robe Moyen Age Medievale Mariage Gothique Baroque KP (270327804107) [MSG ID: 530001] Message-ID: <20090122214425.AC4F54A1C7F127F8@erols.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mutuelle-conseil-par-14002 at votremessage.net Fri Jan 23 08:11:14 2009 From: mutuelle-conseil-par-14002 at votremessage.net (Mutuelle conseil par Otokoo) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:11:14 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] Votre demande de devis gratuit ! Message-ID: Si vous desirez visualiser ce mail au format html, recopiez l'adresse suivante dans votre navigateur: http://www.vmail-gamma.com/view.html?id=14002&ref=h4b6df35f -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lawrence.auster at att.net Sun Jan 25 09:05:05 2009 From: lawrence.auster at att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:05:05 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-1?q?Obama_=97_The_Judas_Goat?= Message-ID: <20090125170505.LLGR16090.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@3lyw4> Obama ? The Judas Goat Judas Goat\ A goat that leads other goats or sheep to slaughter. Also, one who entices into danger and betrays others. The name is an allusion to Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of slaughter. (From Merriam Webster?s Dictionary) Barack Hussein Obama is a Judas Goat. Extremist Jews guided Barack Hussein Obama?s career from day one, even all the way back to Harvard Law School. Radical Zionist hitman, David Axelrod previously orchestrated the Jewish-financed and organized defeat of perceived anti-Zionist Sen. Charles Percy. He is the man who ran Obama?s campaign for President and who is his chief handler. Obama?s campaign was overwhelmingly financed by the most powerful Zionist bankers in the world. His campaign?s largest contribution source was the Zionist international banking firm of Goldman Sachs. (FEC campaign records). In both Obama?s Senate and Presidential campaign he prostrated himself before AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) promising even more money and blood for Israel?s terrorism than even the supine John McCain, and even more money and blood than the previous Shabbez Goy in the White House, George Bush. Before the Israeli terrorism and mass murder in Gaza, he went to Israel and said that he supported Israel?s p lanned murderous terrorism against the men, women and children of Gaza. His first act as President-elect was to appoint a rabid Zionist, Israeli dual citizen who served in the Israeli Army as his Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel. As thousands of women and children in Gaza were killed or maimed, Obama remained silent. Within a few days as President Obama supported indiscriminate American missile strikes in villages of our ally Pakistan, a clear continuation of Bush?s policies. He completely supports the theft of trillions of American taxpayer dollars to the Zionist international bankers. Eighty percent of American Jews voted for Obama, and all the main leaders of the Jewish Supremacist state of Israel have proclaimed Obama as the perfect man for U.S. President. What better for the Zionists to have their own servant perceived as a clean break from the Jewish extremist-controlled Bush administration? What better than for the Zionists than to have their Shabbez Goy be treated by the world?s press and even by much of the anti-Zionist community as a man of ?real change?? What better for the Zionists than for the world to think that Obama will be a change from the Zionist-controlled policies when he willing to do anything that Israel demands? What better for the Zionist murderers to have their craven puppet be looked at by the whole world as a man of honor and integrity and fairness. In the slaughterhouse, the Judas Goat is often painted with bright colors, adorned with strong, sweet scents to lure the sheep to their pens and to their death. Obama, the Judas Goat of our time, is looked upon by millions of Zionist-propagandized sheep as the man who will lead them to salvation. Instead, he leads America, Palestine and the world to the bloody altar of Jewish Supremacism. Any supposed anti-Zionist who praises Barack Obama is actually aiding this Judas Goat to lead us all to slaughter. Every person who truly opposes Jewish extremism must speak out and expose the Judas Goat named Barack Obama! ? Dr. David Duke Former Member of the House of Representatives State of Louisiana United States of America It is up to you the people of the United States who can still think freely, and up to all of the people of the world who are able to see through the deceptions of the Zionist-influenced Global media ? to get this simple, powerful message to everyone on earth. Email this message to your friends, post it on forums and websites and put links to it on every website, facebook or other media in the world. Go and seek out media and Internet sites not controlled by Zionist power. Make youtube videos of this message, (use the short audio and find good illustrative pictures) and post it untill your fingers are worn and tired, print it and mail it to newspapers or any media outlet that has still not fallen under the propaganda of the Zionists. Let the world know the truth. Person by person, in the USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Italy, japan, Russia, China, Africa, Palestine, South America and across the whole world this Judas Goat must be exposed for what he is, so that when begins to do his evil for Israel, the whole world will know exactly what is going on and resist! Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/obama-the-judas-goat_7317.html ------------------------------------- You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the Lawrence Auster Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284 Thanks, Lawrence Auster, 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B New York, NY 10025 Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net ------------------------------------- From rugken78 at aol.com Wed Jan 28 00:58:54 2009 From: rugken78 at aol.com (rugken78 at aol.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:58:54 +0200 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-5?q?Dont_allow_intimate_problems_destroy_yo?= =?iso-8859-5?q?ur_life=2C_we_have_the_solution_for_you=2E?= Message-ID: <181476983.20080706011940@aol.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lawrence.auster at att.net Thu Jan 29 12:42:02 2009 From: lawrence.auster at att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:42:02 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-1?q?The_=93Military=2C_Industrial_Complex?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=94_is_no_more_--_The_Hidden_Massive_Racial_Discrimination?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_in_America_against_Whites?= Message-ID: <20090129204212.HPPJ12540.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> The ?Military, Industrial Complex? is no more. Today it is the Political, Financial and Media ? Zionist Complex! 1/28/2009 An short essay by Dr. David Duke The ?Military-Industrial complex? really has no relevance to the real holders of global power today. America is the most powerful military and economic nation on earth. The powers that control the levers of political power in America possess the greatest power the world has ever seen. Who really has power over the government today? Is it the fabled ?Military, Industrial Complex?? An effective gauge of direct political power in America is ?to discover who provided the pivotal amounts of the billion-dollar recent campaigns for U.S. President. You can look directly at campaign contributions for every candidate from the Federal Election Commission in order to find out who holds the real power in politics. So, who holds the real power over the American political establishment? Let?s first look at who does not hold much power over the establishment. 1) It is not the military. There is not any organized military monetary influence or even significant political influence of the military over the politicians. In fact, no one in military positions of authority are allowed to openly get involved in politics. No active sergeant, lieutenant, or General can send out a directive to the men under him to support or oppose a particular candidate (the one exception I know to that was when the Louisiana commanding general of the National Guard, under Jewish influence, sent a letter to all national guardsmen telling them that it was their ?patriotic duty? to vote against David Duke and for the Liberal corrupt former Governor, Edwin Edwards. Even that caused a scandal in military circles, as it should have. 2) It is NOT major manufacturing or even the huge oil companies. There was not one oil company and only a couple of legitimate manufacturing or industrial concerns on Obama and McCain?s top twenty contributor list. The list was completely dominated by Zionist international banking firms. If one combines every defense contractor?s contributions the money they give in politics is minuscule compared to Zionist international banks. They don?t even come close to the power in lobbying that AIPAC and a couple of dozen more Jewish extremist organizations have. Jewish lobbyists literally get almost unanimous support in Congress for outrageous giveaways to Israel, a nation that has committed terrorism against us and killed or maimed scores of Americans. I am not talking about contracts here, I am speaking about giving away billions of dollars to a foreign nation. So, so much for the media-popularized term, the military-industrial complex In direct political money and lobbying then, Zionists are the undisputed masters of the American political establishment. In addition to their control through the use of money as an inducement or a threat, they have tens of thousands of Jewish extremists scattered throughout the entire bureaucracy who are very conscious of supporting their brethren and supporting the organized Jewish agenda. They also are ready to act against any Gentile who dares to go against Israel or the Jewish agenda. How will a Jewish federal judge rule in a huge litigation issue between Jewish and non-Jewish parties? Why was the biggest robber in the history of the world, Bernie Madoff who stole over 50 billion dollars and who ruined tens of thousands of families, only charged with one criminal count, and allowed to stay in his luxury apartment to await trial? Is there an organized Jewish agenda? Absolutely. In fact, the leading and most powerful Jewish groups have a supra-organization called the Council of Presidents (composed of the most powerful 5 dozen Jewish organizations in America). They issue detailed positions not just on Mideast policy but on many other issues that have nothing to do with Israel, aspects of domestic policy including issues such as opening America?s borders. They even assume positions on issues that you wouldn?t even think would have unanimity among Jews, such as abortion rights. Their job is to make sure that Jewish power is absolutely united on what they decide are their common agendas. Next, we must talk about one of the most influential parts of the American political process, the mass media. The media, such as the NY Times and the Washington Post (the newspaper read by every member of America?s government and bureaucracy in Washington). The Washington Post can determine even what issues Congress will discuss and it greatly affects the publicity for or against those issues. Broadcast and cable television also have an enormous impact, and we can include movies, books, magazines and the newspaper chains that reach down into almost every American community. As my chapters in Jewish Supremacism on ?Jewish Media Supremacy? document, the ownership, depth and breadth of Jewish influence in the media is simply breathtaking. In media, whether you speak of owners, administrators, managers, editors, producers, writers, correspondents, pundits and reporters, there is an army of Jews who are animated by the Holocaust and the issues of the organized Jewish community. If you haven?t yet read them, you simply must see the evidence on the Jewish supremacy in media I have compiled in my books Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening. The other great seat of establishment power is simply money, huge sums of money and the willingness to use those funds on behalf of an agenda. The biggest concentrations of wealth in the world today are in the Zionist international banks, and in financial groups that the Jews completely control such as the Federal Reserve Corporation, the same forces that have led us to the doorstep of a great depression. It is no accident that Alan Greenspan and Ben Shalom Bernanke are the last two of the Federal Reserve czars. Even in days of World War I, an immensely rich, Jewish international banker, Jacob Schiff, voiced pride in the fact that he was instrumental in weakening Czarist Russia (the government that Jews universally hated), and that he supported Russia?s enemies so as to make Russia ripe for communist overthrow (Jewish groups brag of his help to Japan in the Russo-Japanese War so as to hurt the Russian government). Schiff also gave millions of dollars to directly finance the Jews who led and organized the Russian revolution and the Bolshevik terror in Russia. There is no disputing of these facts. Plenty of Jewish history books detail all of it. So, frankly, financial power in the control of people who will use it for an agenda is also a key ingredient of real power. Again, the financial power in the hands of modern day Jacob Schiff?s, is an incredibly powerful weapon. So forget about the ?Military-Industrial Complex.? That is passe. In today?s world it makes more sense to speak about the ?Political, Financial and Media Zionist complex.? That is the real core of power that bends everything whether it be local laws, or giant corporations, to its will. Even if one of the world?s richest firms, such as Microsoft (which is now by the way run by a Jewish extremist), would buck the political, financial, and media Zionist complex, it would be broken by government fiat, the Jewish-influenced courts (such as anti-trust actions), and by vicious attacks by the Jewish-influenced media. Microsoft would either be dismembered or destroyed. Such are the realities of the modern world. There is no longer a ?military industrial complex,? but there is a Political and media and financial Zionist complex that rules us and aims to control the whole world. No single part of this behemoth can be defeated, because it can use its other assets to defend the section under attack. It can only be brought down by concentrating all our political and ideological fire right on the core the problem, International Zionism and its driving impetus: Jewish Supremacism. ?Dr. David Duke Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/forget-the-military-industrial-complex-today-its-the-political-financial-and-media-zionist-complex_7394.html ---- The Hidden Massive Racial Discrimination in America against Whites 1/29/2009 The main argument for affirmative action is that institutions should reflect racial percentages of population, if not there must be de facto racial discrimination. Here is the breakdown of students by race at America?s premier university, Obama?s alma mater, Harvard. Even though non-Jewish White Americans are almost 70 percent of the population and on average score much higher on entrance exams, they are only about 22 percent of the Harvard student body. So what race is really the victim of racial discrimination? For those who are truly dedicated to stopping racial discrimination, what are you going to do about this massive discrimination, or does it not matter to you because White people happen to be the victims? The hidden, massive racial discrimination that goes on in America against White people! A U.S. Government study offers proof that European Americans face massive institutional racial discrimination that affects millions of the most talented and educated of our people Introduction by Dr. David Duke ? As most of you know, the term ?white supremacist? has become literally a prefix of my name when I am in the news. It is the media?s way to condition readers not to pay attention to what I say because I am a ?white supremacist.? The truth is I am not a White supremacist, and I seek no supremacy or control over any people, but I do demand that the rights of people of European descent to be respected as much as any other people?s rights. The fact is that in the United States of America, Canada, the UK in many areas of Europe Whites face a powerful state-sanctioned, and often mandated, racial discrimination against White people who are better-qualified than their non-White counterparts. It may be surprising to some reading this, but millions of discriminated against Whites are often poorer and who face more difficult social situations than many of their non-White counterparts who are being given preference over them. It also affects the most talented of our people. Many Whites are under the mistaken impression that the White victims of racial discrimination are mostly from the low income and low IQ sectors of the population. Nothing could be further from the truth. In actuality, the percentages of Whites who are victims of racial discrimination are much higher in the sectors of the White population with the highest intelligence and greatest abilities. The facts are shocking, but true. Most people know that most universities have programs of admittance that give less-qualified minorities preference over better-qualified Whites. Almost all of the Fortune 500 largest corporations have affirmative action and diversity programs that discriminate against White people, both male and female, in hiring. They also have programs of discrimination that favor non-Whites in promotions and advancement. This is true in the academic area as well. You can look at almost any academic department of any American university and you will see in place a strong racial bias for ?minorities? in preface over Whites in hiring and advancement. Whether you are talking about a university History, English or Math department in almost any university these policies are in place and powerful. These racial discriminatory policies are real, and they can be easily proven to exist. But, now we thanks to a government study, there is even a more powerful way to show their real impact on tens of mi llions of White Americans. The brilliant economist and author whose pen name is Yggdrasil has compiled the data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) 1979, which was a massive study conducted by the Department of Labor to track the lives of 155,000 Americans by race, IQ, income, education and other factors to see how remedial efforts for minorities were doing. It was done after the installation of so called ?affirmative action? programs which gave preference to non-White groups over whites. The NLSY study is meant to follow this huge sampling for their entire lives to see how diversity is working out for America. The data is from this ongoing study is tangible proof of the horrendous level of racial discrimination going on against White people. I will link you to Yggdrasil?s fine paper in a moment, but let me first give you a couple of snippets from his work that proves the existence of massive racial discrimination going on against our people. Here is a chart showing the ethnic breakdown of the most prestigious university in the United States of America: Harvard. America?s premier university is extremely expensive (unless you receive special grants and scholarships) and a degree from it just about guarantees its graduates the best paid and prestigious jobs America has to offer. Affirmative action advocates have long said the companies or institutions that don?t reflect the actual racial population percentages are de facto racist and discriminatory. So what is the situation at Harvard, non-Jewish Whites who are about 70 pecent of the American population are only about 22 percent of the Harvard student body. One should first consider the fact that Whites are represented in the top two percentile level on college admission tests on an average that is a 5 times higher rate than non-White groups. If one then factors in the fact that Whites are also 70 percent of the population, there should be at least 25 times more Whites who would be better qualified than the non-White students currently at Harvard. But even though these Whites are the best and brightest America has to offer they are limited to only 20 percent of Harvard students! Such is nothing more than blatant, racial discrimination. Another interesting fact one can gleam from this chart and many in the NLSY studies that Jewish over-representation is not based simply on the fact that Jews have a high intelligence, they often do twice as well as their intelligence bracket would indicate. Such would suggest the intra-tribal support system for group cohesion and advancements aids their success rate. The NLSY data also shows how incomes today in the USA correlate with race and intelligence. Let?s take a look NLSY tracking studies of intelligent White women, these are White women in the 90 to 97 percent IQ bracket as compared to Black women in that same high 90 to 97 percent IQ bracket. The average Black females of that IQ level earned an average of approximately $54,000 per year through 1996, whereas White females on the same IQ level earned only half of that amount, about $28,000 per year through 1996. When White women in the same intelligent bracket of Black women earn half of the average amount that the Black women do, that?s real racial discrimination. I am not referring here to a few White women who are at least equally qualified but getting half the salary that Black women do, I am talking about the average White women in America! The NLSY is a big enough sample that reflects the whole nation. In fact it is meant to. The average White woman of high intelligence earns one-half of what Black women do of the same intelligence! I obviously don?t like this racial discrimination against our people. Neither does the economist Yggdrasil. We advocate that the best person regardless of race gets whatever college admission or job or promotion their abilities dictate. We have no fear of how well our people will do on a fair playing field. Because we stand for true civil rights, human rights in the matter, we are called racists, and the real capper: ?white supremacists.? There are many people in America and around the world who are ignorant of the facts of anti-White racial discrimination. The media acts like it doesn?t exist. Even after the election of an affirmative action African-American President, America is still painted as an anti-Black racist country. The truth is that European Americans are facing racial discrimination in the very institutions and nation that our forefathers created. Our movement is truly a liberation movement like any other in the world that strives for a people to free and live in society of our own values rather than oppressive society imposed upon us. We are not racists or supremacists trying to deny the rights of others. We are human rights activists defending our people?s rights and heritage. ?Dr. David Duke Source & Charts : http://www.davidduke.com/general/the-real-racial-discrimination-that-goes-on-in-america_7407.html ----- Obama?s Mideast Jewish Wet Dream Team George Mitchell is the new American envoy now in the Mideast. Who is Mitchell and who are the key players in Obama?s Mideast policy team? First, let?s examine the major players on the Obama foreign policy team. Roger Cohen writing in The New York Times on January 11, 2009 wrote some things that if he were a Gentile would have earned him some attacks as an ?anti-Semite.? He pointed out the incredible top-heavy pro-Zionist content of the team which is supposed to broker a fair and just peace in the Mideast. In discussing the team he identified them with these words: They include Dennis Ross (the veteran Clinton administration Mideast peace envoy who may now extend his brief to Iran) [a long-time Jewish Zionist]; James Steinberg [Jewish Zionist] (as deputy secretary of state) ; Dan Kurtzer [Jewish Zionist] (the former U.S. ambassador to Israel); Dan Shapiro [Jewish Zionist] (a longtime aide to Obama); and Martin Indyk [Jewish Zionist] another former ambassador to Israel who is close to the incoming secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.) Now, I have nothing against smart, driven, liberal, Jewish (or half-Jewish) males; I?ve looked in the mirror. I know or have talked to all these guys, except Shapiro. They?re knowledgeable, broad-minded and determined. Still, on the diversity front they fall short. On the change-you-can-believe-in front, they also leave something to be desired. Cohen did not even mention that the two closest advisers to Obama, the guys that filter almost everything that Obama see and hears and makes the day to day decisions of running the oval office. They are David Axelrod and Rahm Emmanuel, two long time dedicated Jewish extremists. Emmanuel, son of an Irgun terrorist and named after another Irgun terrorist, even fought in the Israeli Army. Now we come to the new envoy to the Mideast, George Mitchell of Maine, the man who is supposed to be a broadminded and just arbitrator between Israel and the Palestinians. The Jewish-influenced has made a big point of Mitchell?s Lebanese ancestry. What the Zionist media doesn?t tell you is that he has been completely under the control of AIPAC and radical Zionists for years. As Senate Majority Leader he rammed through everything Israel wanted. He even supported the Senate resolution that gave Israel unconditional support during the Zionist massacre of thousands of Gaza civilians. In fact, originally an appointee to the Senate, Mitchell owes his entire Senate career on the massive support given him in 1982 and since by AIPAC and 27 other Jewish extremist controlled political action committees that AIPAC arranged. AIPAC?s Tom Dine summarized AIPAC?s success in Mitchell?s election by saying that ?American Jews are thus able to form our own foreign policy agenda.? Of course, Dine spoke the complete and unvarnished truth. American and Israeli extremist Jews do indeed control the foreign policy of the United States. Such control has long gone on in concert with past U.S. Presidents and it goes on today with Obama. Only difference is that today there is a greater danger because many in America and around the world falsely believe that Obama represents change. With the incredible respect and adulation given to Obama, he is in a much better position to support the Zionist war agenda and ultimately do far more harm than a discredited George Bush. Hold on to your hats, America. I predict Obama will usher in war and conflagration that will make George Bush?s presidency seem mild in comparison. He has already announced a doubling of American troops in Afghanistan. Can a catastrophic war with Iran be far behind? Jewish extremists want this war and Obama is completely under their control! ? Dr. David Duke Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/who-is-on-obamas-dream-team-for-mideast-peace_7380.html ------------------------------------- You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the Lawrence Auster Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know by calling "to 1 212 865 1284 Thanks, Lawrence Auster, 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B New York, NY 10025 Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net ------------------------------------- From qball_99 at msn.com Sat Jan 31 04:45:30 2009 From: qball_99 at msn.com (qball_99 at msn.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:45:30 +0100 Subject: [Epiphany] =?iso-8859-5?q?Discover_the_best_kept_secret_pornostar?= =?iso-8859-5?q?s?= Message-ID: <347147271.20090115093843@msn.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bray at yipintsoi.com Sat Jan 31 02:57:30 2009 From: bray at yipintsoi.com (Dyer wireman) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:57:30 -0300 Subject: [Epiphany] MD Directory Message-ID: <190553w6fda0$c0005vi0$8515t8h0@Delldim5150 Here is the package deal we're running for this week Certified MDs in America 788,323 in total * 17,686 emails Coverage in many different areas of medicine such as Endocrinology, Pathology, Urology, Neurology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry, Cardiology and much more 16 different sortable fields Database of US Pharma Companies Names and email addresses of 47,000 employees in high-ranking positions Database of US Hospitals more than 23k hospital administrators in over 7k hospitals [worth over $300 alone) US Dentist Listing 597,000 dentists and dental services ( a $350 value!) US Chiropractor Listing 100k Chiropractors offices with full contact data including email, postal address, phone and fax Cost just slashed - $399 for all above data reply by email: Ambrose at listamaze.com above expires on February 06 to terminate please send a blank message to discontinue at listamaze.com