[Enigmail] About Supprting BCCed Recipients

[John Clizbe]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> John Clizbe wrote:
>> https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20867
>> Summary:RFE: Pass BCC recip to gpg with --hidden-recipient instead of -r
> 
> Given this RFE has such a large potential impact on users and there is
> no consensus for if it should be implemented, I think this RFE needs to
> be tagged NOTNOW and work shifted to other things in the RFE queue.
> 
> I do not think this RFE is ripe for implementation.  Let's keep
> discussing it, sure -- but let's not implement it now.  Six months from
> now, maybe.

Given Patrick's clarification about the key selection dialog, I agree.
That's an awfully snarly issue that needs resolved first.

Let's take it back to the devel list and beat on it a bit more.

-- 
John P. Clizbe                      Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net  or
     mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP

Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 678 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/enigmail/attachments/20090513/710953e3/attachment.bin>