From newsaccount at XXRemoveXXkfwebs.net Sun Feb 1 09:26:56 2009 From: newsaccount at XXRemoveXXkfwebs.net (Kristian Fiskerstrand) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:26:56 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] pool.sks-keyservers.net and ipv6 Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Greetings As of yesterday the main pool.sks-keyservers.net includes AAAA records for IPv6-enabled SKS keyservers. This should not affect ordinary working systems, but if it for some reason someone is operating with a broken IPv6 setup it could cause delays, for this reason an IPv4 pool is added at ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net for those affected ( according to google's report Global IPv6 statistics - Measuring the current state of IPv6 for ordinary users 0.09% of users have broken IPv6 connectivity ) So it shouldn't be many complaints, but consider yourself warned :) - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand http://www.kfwebs.net - ---------------------------- Fabricando fit faber Practice makes perfect - ---------------------------- http://www.secure-my-email.com http://www.secure-my-internet.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJJhdtgAAoJEBbgz41rC5UIVm8P/A8W0MNqhhezwpc3b7aygq8f iVfUYnpbTxFaKJTOYb1srPoudlws6RvCMix23LijARB9Mx/6zfv6bwfhHFxWmxQ9 wd/DV4U5yjR69Fm+XmzpqUCZqOnQRmZTCxOLqSZ2VqEUVMM4kzTRUEJGgf28lfJ1 plGFUKJMDsGGWqeRNW0k59BuuJcV/THlW4X49zKFPMd+Oi8qd79fM8y5rniJvobu uusoQrHDDyDZFFqiCxTz1qBW0g0lfvSIxO0dBXDBuO7uWm864vg8aGzgKC1MWwvX jtf4CK7g3EbHAlSEY5pDvZWw0Dc19BRwx74sUsgvtK9lUYB79Il7w1oleBcY2n8p ht58OcJWV7lMNByQmnUc/EO842cgttSEMXhLpZvXx1t83/WupLnfTa7RFwSQQOAQ wKp1IIamoZcKM+RxkMLN575eG6CDY7OighZqt7FzbgHurKeffEBI1nWOelvV1BjA qbqJS1kfCv/SevyYDdBmZA7J6Cul7N5vbpqClAnRjjipChMAaemFfIY9tjnlnRRo N+sNed4L+iABujAIgYMMONADifhbGhj6tL4HSSysTuJqS+9IF8HAv71U41zMtJGV PqD/LFOOtSI7c/sNEPn9OKCbejtNhTdPYH/rfCW8ybeDb9eujnLoGx60VCpOTDwi N1ZRfzqLyr6cJKY+SLA1 =ppTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From sushiosoyum at gmail.com Sun Feb 1 10:06:22 2009 From: sushiosoyum at gmail.com (Mr. Sushi) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Encryption Test Message-ID: <4985E49E.9050109@gmail.com> Hello! Who would like to practice using OpenPGP with me? I attached my public key. Respond with your public key and I will send you an encrypted message. I want to make sure I'm doing it correctly. - Sushi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x4530A443.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 1680 bytes Desc: not available URL: From raimund.macek at ray-undma-ek.net Sun Feb 1 14:56:13 2009 From: raimund.macek at ray-undma-ek.net (Raimund Macek) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:56:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail Encryption Test Message-ID: <213.47.132.175.1233528973.wm@webmail.inode.at> Hi Mister Sushi What can I help? Give my information and I make it! Hi Ray -- Raimund Macek E-Mail: raimund.macek at ray-undma-ek.net Homepage: http://www.ray-undma-ek.net From rainmakerltu at gmail.com Mon Feb 2 09:37:00 2009 From: rainmakerltu at gmail.com (RainmakerLTU) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:37:00 +0200 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello all Message-ID: <49872F3C.1000808@gmail.com> Hello, I`m new at PGP, and trying to know how it works. Tried some times to send test letters to Adele mail robot, but it replies that I didn`t signed or encrypted. But I did... welll... at least i tried. Could someone help me with this problem? Best regards, Rain. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Mon Feb 2 11:02:50 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello all In-Reply-To: <49872F3C.1000808@gmail.com> References: <49872F3C.1000808@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4987435A.6050804@mac.com> RainmakerLTU wrote the following on 2/2/09 12:37 PM: > Hello, > > I`m new at PGP, and trying to know how it works. Tried some times to > send test letters to Adele mail robot, but it replies that I didn`t > signed or encrypted. But I did... welll... at least i tried. > > Could someone help me with this problem? > > Best regards, > Rain. Rainmaker, the message you posted to this list was signed, and its signature verifies: OpenPGP Security Info Good signature from RainmakerLTU (GSF pass) Key ID: 0x0BAED577 / Signed on: 2/2/09 12:37 PM Key fingerprint: 3DE6 0565 951F C502 E44A 6779 9F1C D66E 0BAE D577 Furthermore you are using: Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Everything seems to be OK. About the Adele mail robot, I can't help, sorry. Welcome, Charly From rainmakerltu at gmail.com Mon Feb 2 11:28:57 2009 From: rainmakerltu at gmail.com (RainmakerLTU) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:28:57 +0200 Subject: [Enigmail] ty Message-ID: <49874979.8000701@gmail.com> Yeah, thank you, everything seems OK to me too... at last the robot correctly identified encrypted mail from me. Rain. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From david.ward at gatech.edu Tue Feb 3 00:59:44 2009 From: david.ward at gatech.edu (David Ward) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Building Enigmail for TB comm-central: static or shared, libxul or not? Message-ID: <49880780.40502@gatech.edu> Michael J Gruber wrote: > Patrick Brunschwig venit, vidit, dixit 26.01.2009 14:56: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Michael J Gruber wrote: >>> Ludwig H?gelsch?fer venit, vidit, dixit 01/23/09 20:42: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Michael J Gruber wrote on 23.01.2009 13:56 Uhr: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to build Enigmail for current TB nightlies. (I'm on 64bit >>>>> Fedora 10 so I can't run Mozilla's 3.0b1 binaries easily anyways, and >>>>> can't used binary Enigmail xpi either). >>>>> >>>>> I can build and run TB from a hg checkout of comm-central. Yeah ;) >>>>> >>>>> For building Enigmail (from cvs), >>>> Are you using enigmail trunk (aka 0.96a)? >>> Yes, that's what I meant by cvs, sorry. A current cvs checkout from >>> trunk. >>> >>>>> I've been following the instructions >>>>> on the Enigmail website and ended up with the attached error which >>>>> seems >>>>> to be related to a conflict in build options (shared/static). >>>>> >>>>> I've built TB with "ac_add_options --enable-static --disable-libxul" >>>>> because d.m.o. says TB can't be built shared with libxul (and also >>>>> because I wanted to "make package"). Is this still true? How >>>>> (static/shared/libxul) do you build TB when you build Enigmail for >>>>> TB 3 >>>>> nightlies? >>>> Sorry, I don't know anything about the building process on linux. In >>>> order to build the Mac OS X nightlies, I'm using these options for >>>> TB trunk: >>>> >>>> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=/path/to/my/objdir >>>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>>> ac_add_options --enable-crypto >>>> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >>>> ac_add_options --enable-static-mail >>>> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >>>> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >>>> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf213 >>>> >>>> Maybe you get better help in mozilla.dev.builds on news.mozilla.org. >>> I tried those options (they're the ones from enigmail.mozdev.org) minus >>> the autoconf. I can build and run TB comm-central successfully with >>> these options as well as others. >>> >>> My problem is building enigmail, which is why I think I'd better post >>> here than on mozilla.dev.builds. So, my questions really are: >>> >>> - Which options do you use when you build enigmail.xpi? (probably the >>> ones above) >> >> Here are my options: >> >> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/enigdev >> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf2.13 >> >> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >> ac_add_options --disable-debug >> ac_add_options --disable-tests >> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >> ac_add_options --disable-shared >> ac_add_options --enable-static >> ac_add_options --disable-update-packaging >> ac_add_options --disable-debug >> ac_add_options --disable-tests >> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >> ac_add_options --disable-shared >> ac_add_options --enable-static >> ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter >> >>> - Which combination of TB comm-central sha1 and Enigmail cvs rev. is >>> known to build and run well together? >> >> any. I create nightly builds and they usually work fine. > > Patrick, thanks for taking the time. I can compile TB with the options > above just nicely. Yet, building Enigmail gives me pain again, see > below. Specifically, I > did a make -f client.mk clean" and rm -Rf'ed the enigmail copy, > built TB, ran it , > copied ${enigmailcvscheckout}/enigmail/src to > ${comm-central-with-gecko-1.9.1-checkout}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail, > ran "./makemake -r" in the latter and "make" in > ${objdir}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail. > > Instructions say cp enigmail/src to mozilla/mailnews/extensions/enigmail > which doesn't exist. With the current build structure, mailnews > "contains" (pulls as a module) mozilla-central (or rather 1.9.1), so I > think what I used is the place to put enigmail. (I've tried > mozilla/extensions/enigmail before, not better.) > > The error sounds as if ipc is being built shared whereas TB is built > static (as per .mozconfig). Any more hints? makemake does pick up objdir > so it sees the .mozconfig. > > This is on 64bit Fedora 10, by the way, gcc/g++ is gcc version 4.3.2 > 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) (GCC). > > Thanks for your patience... > Michael I'm having the same error, compiling under Ubuntu 8.10 with Thunderbird 3.0 beta 1 sources. Any luck figuring out if shared building of ipc is the problem? Thanks, David Ward Georgia Institute of Technology From michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm Tue Feb 3 07:22:04 2009 From: michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm (Michael J Gruber) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:22:04 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Building Enigmail for TB comm-central: static or shared, libxul or not? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: David Ward venit, vidit, dixit 03.02.2009 09:59: > Michael J Gruber wrote: >> Patrick Brunschwig venit, vidit, dixit 26.01.2009 14:56: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Michael J Gruber wrote: >>>> Ludwig H?gelsch?fer venit, vidit, dixit 01/23/09 20:42: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Michael J Gruber wrote on 23.01.2009 13:56 Uhr: >>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm trying to build Enigmail for current TB nightlies. (I'm on 64bit >>>>>> Fedora 10 so I can't run Mozilla's 3.0b1 binaries easily anyways, and >>>>>> can't used binary Enigmail xpi either). >>>>>> >>>>>> I can build and run TB from a hg checkout of comm-central. Yeah ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> For building Enigmail (from cvs), >>>>> Are you using enigmail trunk (aka 0.96a)? >>>> Yes, that's what I meant by cvs, sorry. A current cvs checkout from >>>> trunk. >>>> >>>>>> I've been following the instructions >>>>>> on the Enigmail website and ended up with the attached error which >>>>>> seems >>>>>> to be related to a conflict in build options (shared/static). >>>>>> >>>>>> I've built TB with "ac_add_options --enable-static --disable-libxul" >>>>>> because d.m.o. says TB can't be built shared with libxul (and also >>>>>> because I wanted to "make package"). Is this still true? How >>>>>> (static/shared/libxul) do you build TB when you build Enigmail for >>>>>> TB 3 >>>>>> nightlies? >>>>> Sorry, I don't know anything about the building process on linux. In >>>>> order to build the Mac OS X nightlies, I'm using these options for >>>>> TB trunk: >>>>> >>>>> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=/path/to/my/objdir >>>>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>>>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>>>> ac_add_options --enable-crypto >>>>> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >>>>> ac_add_options --enable-static-mail >>>>> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >>>>> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >>>>> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf213 >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you get better help in mozilla.dev.builds on news.mozilla.org. >>>> I tried those options (they're the ones from enigmail.mozdev.org) minus >>>> the autoconf. I can build and run TB comm-central successfully with >>>> these options as well as others. >>>> >>>> My problem is building enigmail, which is why I think I'd better post >>>> here than on mozilla.dev.builds. So, my questions really are: >>>> >>>> - Which options do you use when you build enigmail.xpi? (probably the >>>> ones above) >>> Here are my options: >>> >>> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >>> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/enigdev >>> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf2.13 >>> >>> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >>> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >>> ac_add_options --disable-shared >>> ac_add_options --enable-static >>> ac_add_options --disable-update-packaging >>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >>> ac_add_options --disable-shared >>> ac_add_options --enable-static >>> ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter >>> >>>> - Which combination of TB comm-central sha1 and Enigmail cvs rev. is >>>> known to build and run well together? >>> any. I create nightly builds and they usually work fine. >> Patrick, thanks for taking the time. I can compile TB with the options >> above just nicely. Yet, building Enigmail gives me pain again, see >> below. Specifically, I >> did a make -f client.mk clean" and rm -Rf'ed the enigmail copy, >> built TB, ran it , >> copied ${enigmailcvscheckout}/enigmail/src to >> ${comm-central-with-gecko-1.9.1-checkout}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail, >> ran "./makemake -r" in the latter and "make" in >> ${objdir}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail. >> >> Instructions say cp enigmail/src to mozilla/mailnews/extensions/enigmail >> which doesn't exist. With the current build structure, mailnews >> "contains" (pulls as a module) mozilla-central (or rather 1.9.1), so I >> think what I used is the place to put enigmail. (I've tried >> mozilla/extensions/enigmail before, not better.) >> >> The error sounds as if ipc is being built shared whereas TB is built >> static (as per .mozconfig). Any more hints? makemake does pick up objdir >> so it sees the .mozconfig. >> >> This is on 64bit Fedora 10, by the way, gcc/g++ is gcc version 4.3.2 >> 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) (GCC). >> >> Thanks for your patience... >> Michael > > I'm having the same error, compiling under Ubuntu 8.10 with Thunderbird > 3.0 beta 1 sources. Any luck figuring out if shared building of ipc is > the problem? Well, that was my conclusion from the saga, and the point where I gave up, at least for now. I would not be surprised if building in a 32bit environment would work with these configs (relocating is a minor issue there), maybe even cross-building the 32bit version in a 64bit environment. Is your Ubuntu 64bit? At least I haven't heard a success story about a 64bit build of Enigmail with TB 3ish yet; PB wasn't specific on his setup. It's a shame Mozilla doesn't even provide 64bit builds, there are no 64bit Tinderboxen. I'm still not sure whether the culprit is Thunderbird's (even though it builds and runs) or Enigmail's build process. Michael From david.ward at gatech.edu Tue Feb 3 07:47:29 2009 From: david.ward at gatech.edu (David Ward) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Building Enigmail for TB comm-central: static or shared, libxul or not? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49886711.6050705@gatech.edu> On 02/03/2009 10:22 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > David Ward venit, vidit, dixit 03.02.2009 09:59: > >> Michael J Gruber wrote: >> >>> Patrick Brunschwig venit, vidit, dixit 26.01.2009 14:56: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> Michael J Gruber wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ludwig H?gelsch?fer venit, vidit, dixit 01/23/09 20:42: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael J Gruber wrote on 23.01.2009 13:56 Uhr: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm trying to build Enigmail for current TB nightlies. (I'm on 64bit >>>>>>> Fedora 10 so I can't run Mozilla's 3.0b1 binaries easily anyways, and >>>>>>> can't used binary Enigmail xpi either). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can build and run TB from a hg checkout of comm-central. Yeah ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For building Enigmail (from cvs), >>>>>>> >>>>>> Are you using enigmail trunk (aka 0.96a)? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, that's what I meant by cvs, sorry. A current cvs checkout from >>>>> trunk. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I've been following the instructions >>>>>>> on the Enigmail website and ended up with the attached error which >>>>>>> seems >>>>>>> to be related to a conflict in build options (shared/static). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've built TB with "ac_add_options --enable-static --disable-libxul" >>>>>>> because d.m.o. says TB can't be built shared with libxul (and also >>>>>>> because I wanted to "make package"). Is this still true? How >>>>>>> (static/shared/libxul) do you build TB when you build Enigmail for >>>>>>> TB 3 >>>>>>> nightlies? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I don't know anything about the building process on linux. In >>>>>> order to build the Mac OS X nightlies, I'm using these options for >>>>>> TB trunk: >>>>>> >>>>>> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=/path/to/my/objdir >>>>>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>>>>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>>>>> ac_add_options --enable-crypto >>>>>> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >>>>>> ac_add_options --enable-static-mail >>>>>> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >>>>>> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >>>>>> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf213 >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you get better help in mozilla.dev.builds on news.mozilla.org. >>>>>> >>>>> I tried those options (they're the ones from enigmail.mozdev.org) minus >>>>> the autoconf. I can build and run TB comm-central successfully with >>>>> these options as well as others. >>>>> >>>>> My problem is building enigmail, which is why I think I'd better post >>>>> here than on mozilla.dev.builds. So, my questions really are: >>>>> >>>>> - Which options do you use when you build enigmail.xpi? (probably the >>>>> ones above) >>>>> >>>> Here are my options: >>>> >>>> mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=mail >>>> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/enigdev >>>> mk_add_options AUTOCONF=autoconf2.13 >>>> >>>> ac_add_options --enable-application=mail >>>> ac_add_options --enable-optimize >>>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>>> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >>>> ac_add_options --disable-shared >>>> ac_add_options --enable-static >>>> ac_add_options --disable-update-packaging >>>> ac_add_options --disable-debug >>>> ac_add_options --disable-tests >>>> ac_add_options --enable-codesighs >>>> ac_add_options --disable-shared >>>> ac_add_options --enable-static >>>> ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter >>>> >>>> >>>>> - Which combination of TB comm-central sha1 and Enigmail cvs rev. is >>>>> known to build and run well together? >>>>> >>>> any. I create nightly builds and they usually work fine. >>>> >>> Patrick, thanks for taking the time. I can compile TB with the options >>> above just nicely. Yet, building Enigmail gives me pain again, see >>> below. Specifically, I >>> did a make -f client.mk clean" and rm -Rf'ed the enigmail copy, >>> built TB, ran it , >>> copied ${enigmailcvscheckout}/enigmail/src to >>> ${comm-central-with-gecko-1.9.1-checkout}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail, >>> ran "./makemake -r" in the latter and "make" in >>> ${objdir}/mailnews/extensions/enigmail. >>> >>> Instructions say cp enigmail/src to mozilla/mailnews/extensions/enigmail >>> which doesn't exist. With the current build structure, mailnews >>> "contains" (pulls as a module) mozilla-central (or rather 1.9.1), so I >>> think what I used is the place to put enigmail. (I've tried >>> mozilla/extensions/enigmail before, not better.) >>> >>> The error sounds as if ipc is being built shared whereas TB is built >>> static (as per .mozconfig). Any more hints? makemake does pick up objdir >>> so it sees the .mozconfig. >>> >>> This is on 64bit Fedora 10, by the way, gcc/g++ is gcc version 4.3.2 >>> 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) (GCC). >>> >>> Thanks for your patience... >>> Michael >>> >> I'm having the same error, compiling under Ubuntu 8.10 with Thunderbird >> 3.0 beta 1 sources. Any luck figuring out if shared building of ipc is >> the problem? >> > > Well, that was my conclusion from the saga, and the point where I gave > up, at least for now. I would not be surprised if building in a 32bit > environment would work with these configs (relocating is a minor issue > there), maybe even cross-building the 32bit version in a 64bit > environment. Is your Ubuntu 64bit? > > At least I haven't heard a success story about a 64bit build of Enigmail > with TB 3ish yet; PB wasn't specific on his setup. It's a shame Mozilla > doesn't even provide 64bit builds, there are no 64bit Tinderboxen. I'm > still not sure whether the culprit is Thunderbird's (even though it > builds and runs) or Enigmail's build process. > > Michael > Yes, I'm also using 64-bit. If the problem is just in the building and not anything in the code, then it should just be a matter of finding where the right flags for 64-bit are not being passed in the configure scripts/make files. I'll give that a try... Thanks, David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rjh at sixdemonbag.org Tue Feb 3 07:57:28 2009 From: rjh at sixdemonbag.org (Robert J. Hansen) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Building Enigmail for TB comm-central: static or shared, libxul or not? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49886968.4010000@sixdemonbag.org> Michael J Gruber wrote: > I'm still not sure whether the culprit is Thunderbird's (even though > it builds and runs) or Enigmail's build process. We understand that some people (distro maintainers, mostly) need to be looking to the future and getting a 64-bit toolchain and release ready. These people should feel free to contact the Enigmail team off-list. Tell us as precisely as possible about your current build environment, including at the very least: * Base Thunderbird version * All diffs and patches to the base Tbird * Enigmail version being built * All diffs and patches to the base Enigmail * Toolchain used (autoconf, automake, libtool, GNU Make, gcc, ld, libc, libstdc++) We will provide as much guidance as we can for how to prepare for Thunderbird 3. However, due to the limited amount of time we have, we can really only help distro maintainers and significant third-party developers (PortableApps, etc.). Everyone else should wait for Thunderbird 3 to be officially released. If you want to try and compile Enigmail for 64-bit betas of Thunderbird 3, well... we wish you a lot of luck. If it works, great. If it doesn't, we hope you're able to fix it. From mlisten at hammernoch.net Wed Feb 4 00:36:04 2009 From: mlisten at hammernoch.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludwig_H=FCgelsch=E4fer?=) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:36:04 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail nightly builds for MacOSX In-Reply-To: <497D8B5C.3050205@mac.com> References: <8d7e25b6deb894f451e53a48cc23a24b@127.0.0.1> <496A1993.4080806@mozilla-enigmail.org> <497D8B5C.3050205@mac.com> Message-ID: <49895374.3060006@hammernoch.net> Hi, Charly Avital wrote on 26.01.2009 11:07 Uhr: > Hi, > > Running MacOSX 10.5.6, GPG 2.0.10, on an MacBook5,1 Intel Core 2 Duo > > Till an hour ago, Thunderbird 3.0.b1 Oh well, TB 3.0b1 is quite old (in fact from december, 9th). There have been a lot changes to TB code since then. A beta 2 is still a time away. > 1. On January 5, I already reported on a problem with attachments, using > Enigmail version 0.96a (20090104-1343). The other crypto functions > performed correctly, including gpg-agent, excluding verification of > PGP/MIME e-mails. > > 2. Updated to enigmail-trunk-tb-darwin-x86-ppc-trunk.xpi (December 30, > 2008). The problem with attachments persisted, but now when trying to > decrypt or to sign, gpg-agent would not start, a warning indicated > "...gpg-agent needed for your gpg 2.0.10 could not be started...". At > the same time, in GPGMail (v56) all crypto functions performed correctly. I have tried to reproduce this with my actual setup Enigmail version 0.96a (20090204-0836) gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090203 Shredder/3.0b2pre but all is working well here. I'm working on 10.5.6, but on ppc and I don't have gpg-agent running and am still using gpg 1.4.9. > 3. Updated to enigmail-trunk-tb-darwin-x86-ppc-trunk.xpi (January 13, > 2009). When cliking on Menu/OpenPGP, Thunderbird would crash. Reported > twice via built-in crash reporter. This is a known bug in Thunderbird (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433858) that has been fixed on trunk and 1.9.1 branch only some days ago. Patrick has put a workaround in enigmail 0.96a before, but this will not prevent the first crash after changing enigmail version on older TB3.0 versions. If you want to test again, please use the latest nightly build of Thunderbird (called shredder, available at: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/latest-trunk/ Please use the latest enigmail nightly. And please use it in a test environment! Ludwig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Wed Feb 4 02:53:08 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail nightly builds for MacOSX In-Reply-To: <49895374.3060006@hammernoch.net> References: <8d7e25b6deb894f451e53a48cc23a24b@127.0.0.1> <496A1993.4080806@mozilla-enigmail.org> <497D8B5C.3050205@mac.com> <49895374.3060006@hammernoch.net> Message-ID: <49897394.7030808@mac.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 ? wrote the following on 2/4/09 3:36 AM: > Hi, [...] > > I have tried to reproduce this with my actual setup > > Enigmail version 0.96a (20090204-0836) > gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9 > Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) > Gecko/20090203 Shredder/3.0b2pre > > but all is working well here. I'm working on 10.5.6, but on ppc and I > don't have gpg-agent running and am still using gpg 1.4.9. I have now downloaded and I am testing: Running Enigmail version 0.96a (20090204-0836) Shredder 3.0b2pre thunderbird-3.0b2pre.en-US.mac.dmg 03-Feb-2009 03:46 (the previous release of Shredder I had tested a few weeks ago was 3.0b2pre released January 5, 2009, which I discontinued testing because too unstable - reported about it). Debug test shows in Console (sorry for the long copy/paste): ===========quote========= enigmail> AAAAAAE4AAIAAA1NYWNpbnRvc2ggSEREAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADFLQo+SCsAAAAK+tsEZ3 BnMgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAHIsasWYZYMAAAAAAAAAAP////8AAAkgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA2JpbgAAEAAIAADFLUJ+AAAAEQ AIAADFmKvTAAAAAQAMAAr62wAK8X8ACtpvAAIAIE1hY2ludG9zaCBIREQ6dXNyOmxvY2FsOmJpbjpncG cyAA4ACgAEAGcAcABnADIADwAcAA0ATQBhAGMAaQBuAHQAbwBzAGgAIABIAEQARAASABJ1c3IvbG9jYW wvYmluL2dwZzIAEwABLwD//wAA --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 - --keyse rver-options auto-key-retrieve --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net -d gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 29 22:11:47 2009 EST using DSA key ID A8055A45 gpg: Good signature from "Frank Swatland " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 4633 518B DC53 25E5 8AEA B4CF E6CD CE64 A805 5A45 enigmail> AAAAAAE4AAIAAA1NYWNpbnRvc2ggSEREAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADFLQo+SCsAAAAK+tsEZ3 BnMgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAHIsasWYZYMAAAAAAAAAAP////8AAAkgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA2JpbgAAEAAIAADFLUJ+AAAAEQ AIAADFmKvTAAAAAQAMAAr62wAK8X8ACtpvAAIAIE1hY2ludG9zaCBIREQ6dXNyOmxvY2FsOmJpbjpncG cyAA4ACgAEAGcAcABnADIADwAcAA0ATQBhAGMAaQBuAHQAbwBzAGgAIABIAEQARAASABJ1c3IvbG9jYW wvYmluL2dwZzIAEwABLwD//wAA --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 - --fixed -list-mode --with-colons --list-keys E6CDCE64A8055A45 ========unquote========= Note: the bit about "Good signature from "Frank Swatland "" is a bit baffling, because I performed the test with one of my keys. The result of the debug test was ".....is performing correctly..." 1. Menu/OpenPGP does not crash the application 2. gpg-agent works correctly. 3. your name (before the e-mail address) as displayed in the line ....wrote the following) is replaced by an interrogation mark with a black background, most probably because I have not set Shredder to properly display characters like the ? (umlaut /u/) as in your last name. I'll see to that later. [...] > If you want to test again, please use the latest nightly build of > Thunderbird (called shredder Yes I know about Shredder, please see above remarks. > available at: > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/latest-trunk/ Done, and so far tests seem to be OK. thanks to you all. Charly -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: GnuPG for Privacy Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJiXONAAoJEM3GMi2FW4Pvbz8H/3VggQXzQHOfvjlxNQy1yjBi xl9UpN2jAtEMWDIhtCIKl1E6GMUfxeQioL2NSBWcu9d0b6Gtg0btL5RQFLmnnlSU AtJNX1cn54Xhpcv88vRweUPj9j+SU+gOZwj0wz3gA6YoC1j+mz0OSjezDiSNVpb0 yUAw8Ms02+t+3eL0yLrEoucJJBKBHBift4NNST11epvJC+JyxD4kzcDDFGK4qKO8 M4rmhfYali2wNb68NZ2dBrG8GHvQSSgj6Rta/8E99tmobM5KAOQsUcnFFtuwAj+l oCTCjmAEf4smAC68MOZykS+9JiQsyxB3HW4m87P+5Z3Nrlbutv0pBkqeg5H+PDg= =gzAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From david.ward at gatech.edu Thu Feb 5 18:17:22 2009 From: david.ward at gatech.edu (David Ward) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Building Enigmail for TB comm-central: static or shared, libxul or not? Message-ID: <498B9DB2.4050105@gatech.edu> Michael J Gruber wrote: > The error sounds as if ipc is being built shared whereas TB is built > static (as per .mozconfig). Any more hints? makemake does pick up objdir > so it sees the .mozconfig. Okay, the R_X86_64_32 error is apparently caused because the files in /mailnews/extensions/enigmail/ipc/src need to be built with -fPIC, but they are not. To fix this, you can add the line FORCE_USE_PIC = 1 to the Makefile in the above directory. Unfortunately, after fixing that, it leads me to the errors you were having originally: ../src/libipc_s.a(nsPipeTransport.o): In function `nsStdinWriter::Run()': nsPipeTransport.cpp:(.text+0x8d1): undefined reference to `nsCOMPtr_base::begin_assignment()' nsPipeTransport.cpp:(.text+0x9c8): undefined reference to `nsCOMPtr_base::~nsCOMPtr_base()' etc., then /usr/bin/ld: libipc.so: hidden symbol `nsCOMPtr_base::~nsCOMPtr_base()' isn't defined /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: ld returned 1 exit status David From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 02:20:18 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (ushills) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:20:18 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Signing subkey - different key id. Message-ID: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I need to see if I have done this correctly, I have created a signing sub-key as recommended on this mailing list to sign emails on less trustworthy machines without exposing my primary key. However, when opening the email the signature does not reference my primary key and therefore from my perspective appears to indicate that the email could be sent from someone pretending to be me with a key they have created themselves. My primary key id is 0xBE7E87FD, however all signatures come across as 0xCA265DC6 is this how it is supposed to work. I have attached my public key, can someone verify that this has come from the correct identity. Also, I set a different passphrase for the signing sub-key, however, when sending from thunderbird I have to enter the passphrase from my primary key not the sub-key, is this correct - it doesn't appear to be as I do not want any potential key logger to grab my primary key passphrase however I don't mind it grabbing my sub-key passphrase as I can revoke that sub-key and create another easily. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJjA7i99A+Y8omXcYRAkdPAJ9kxbdEEMlpOuUFwgiEW2sFYVEeZgCfVbAZ 6YH+/2T7fz6AIxcupQ8hNjI= =P/Cz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 02:43:22 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (ushills) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:43:22 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Subkey revocation certificate Message-ID: <498C144A.1050905@ushills.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As I have created a separate signing sub key (see separate post about issues with this) how do I go about just creating a revocation certificate for the sub-key and not my primary key. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJjBRJ99A+Y8omXcYRAme2AJ0ZLDhMjRptuwfSRCsb8E0LCMzHuQCeM/Ni zB0TBmAr282DXm+qYK/quGU= =kBpj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 02:44:59 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (ushills) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:44:59 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Signing subkey - different key id. Message-ID: <498C14AB.8020206@ushills.co.uk> I need to see if I have done this correctly, I have created a signing sub-key as recommended on this mailing list to sign emails on less trustworthy machines without exposing my primary key. However, when opening the email the signature does not reference my primary key and therefore from my perspective appears to indicate that the email could be sent from someone pretending to be me with a key they have created themselves. My primary key id is 0xBE7E87FD, however all signatures come across as 0xCA265DC6 is this how it is supposed to work. I have attached my public key, can someone verify that this has come from the correct identity. Also, I set a different passphrase for the signing sub-key, however, when sending from thunderbird I have to enter the passphrase from my primary key not the sub-key, is this correct - it doesn't appear to be as I do not want any potential key logger to grab my primary key passphrase however I don't mind it grabbing my sub-key passphrase as I can revoke that sub-key and create another easily. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 04:14:30 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (ushills) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:14:30 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Paperkey problem Message-ID: <498C29A6.7080904@ushills.co.uk> Using windows I have used paperkey with my secret key as such paperkey --secret-key \Home\GPG\secring.gpg --output printthis.txt However, when I try to recompile my key with paperkey --pubring \Home\GPG\pubring.gpg --secrets printthis.txt --output secretkey.gpg and reimport it to my secring, I get the following error. Key without self-signature was detected (This key is not suitable for encryption) What am I doing wrong, I notice this comment in the paperkey output # Repeat fields b through e as needed to cover all subkeys. but there is not explanation. Please help. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Fri Feb 6 04:46:25 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Signing subkey - different key id. In-Reply-To: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498C3121.2070906@mac.com> ushills wrote the following on 2/6/09 5:20 AM: > I need to see if I have done this correctly, I have created a signing > sub-key as recommended on this mailing list to sign emails on less > trustworthy machines without exposing my primary key. > > However, when opening the email the signature does not reference my > primary key and therefore from my perspective appears to indicate that > the email could be sent from someone pretending to be me with a key > they have created themselves. > > My primary key id is 0xBE7E87FD, however all signatures come across as > 0xCA265DC6 is this how it is supposed to work. Yes. > I have attached my > public key, can someone verify that this has come from the correct > identity. I have received no public key attached to any of your postings to this list. Please read on. > > Also, I set a different passphrase for the signing sub-key, however, > when sending from thunderbird I have to enter the passphrase from my > primary key not the sub-key, is this correct - it doesn't appear to be > as I do not want any potential key logger to grab my primary key > passphrase however I don't mind it grabbing my sub-key passphrase as I > can revoke that sub-key and create another easily. I believe that when signing, IF your system is using ONLY the newly generated signing subkey, you should be required to enter the passphrase you entered when you generated that signing subkey. On with your postings, in order to sum them up. > As I have created a separate signing sub key (see separate post about > issues with this) how do I go about just creating a revocation > certificate for the sub-key and not my primary key. You are running a Windows platform. I don't know how to do that in Windows, I am a Mac user. When running MacOSX or any Linux operating system, where Terminal is available, you use the --edit-key command, then you choose the uid of the subkey you want to revoke, and you issue the command --gen-revoke You'll get a proper answer from other members of this forum. > My primary key id is 0xBE7E87FD, however all signatures come across as > 0xCA265DC6 is this how it is supposed to work. I have attached my > public key, can someone verify that this has come from the correct > identity. > When I download key 0xBE7E87FD, I get: This key may be revoked by DSA key 43501E64 [?] pub 1024D/BE7E87FD created: 2007-03-14 expires: never usage: SC trust: unknown validity: full sub 2048g/3173113E created: 2007-03-14 expires: never usage: E [ full ] (1). Web Ushills [ unknown] (2). [jpeg image of size 3099] [ unknown] (3) Ian Hill [ full ] (4) Ian Hill [ full ] (5) Ian Hill [ revoked] (6) Ian Hill (Work Email) [ full ] (7) ushills (Secure email to ushills.co.uk) [ unknown] (8) [jpeg image of size 2408] If your primary key is, as you indicate BE7E87FD, and if you have created a signing subkey (that apparently would be CA265DC6), the latter does not show in the above key as I have downloaded it (more than once) from the keyservers. There are two possibilities: - you have not uploaded your new key block (after generating a signing subkey) to the keyservers. - if you have uploaded it, it has not yet propagated. Did you upload your new key block to the keyservers? I'd like to point out that: if key BE7E87FD is your key, it was generated on 2007-03-14, it was a "basic" 1024 bits DSA key - was the signing subkey you generated also a 1024 bits key? Apparently yes, judging from the SHA1 digest that shows in your in-line signed e-mail. Did you cross-certify your newly generated signing subkey? You are still running gpg 1.4.7. Let me suggest that you update your system to gpg 1.4.9, that is the current stable release. Best of lucks. Charly MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - GPG2 2.0.10 - Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 - Enigmail 0.95.7 (Testing Shredder 3.0b2pre+EM 0.96a+)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Fri Feb 6 07:25:30 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:25:30 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Paperkey problem In-Reply-To: <498C29A6.7080904@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C29A6.7080904@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498C566A.2000003@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> ushills wrote: > Using windows I have used paperkey with my secret key as such > > paperkey --secret-key \Home\GPG\secring.gpg --output printthis.txt > > However, when I try to recompile my key with > > paperkey --pubring \Home\GPG\pubring.gpg --secrets printthis.txt > --output secretkey.gpg > > and reimport it to my secring, I get the following error. > > Key without self-signature was detected > (This key is not suitable for encryption) > > What am I doing wrong, I notice this comment in the paperkey output > > # Repeat fields b through e as needed to cover all subkeys. > > but there is not explanation. > > Please help. Paperkey was written by Dave Shaw. You may find him at the GnuPG-Users mailing list, -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 680 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From rjh at sixdemonbag.org Fri Feb 6 10:46:13 2009 From: rjh at sixdemonbag.org (Robert J. Hansen) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Paperkey problem In-Reply-To: <498C29A6.7080904@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C29A6.7080904@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498C8575.90906@sixdemonbag.org> ushills wrote: > Using windows I have used paperkey with my secret key as such Paperkey is not part of Enigmail. Try asking David Shaw over on GnuPG-Users. From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 10:55:56 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (web at ushills.co.uk) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:55:56 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key Message-ID: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> For whatever reason I now have two versions of my private key one without the ELG encryption key, the other without the RSA signing key. How can I combine them so I have one secret key with both the ELG and RSA subkeys under the primary key. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 260 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Fri Feb 6 11:01:01 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:01:01 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key In-Reply-To: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498C88ED.5010606@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> web at ushills.co.uk wrote: > For whatever reason I now have two versions of my private key one > without the ELG encryption key, the other without the RSA signing key. > > How can I combine them so I have one secret key with both the ELG and > RSA subkeys under the primary key. From your description, it sounds more like you have two key pairs. Best to seek guidance at GnuPG-Users -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 680 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From web at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 6 11:46:19 2009 From: web at ushills.co.uk (web at ushills.co.uk) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:46:19 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key In-Reply-To: <498C8B4D.4070203@mac.com> References: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> <498C8B4D.4070203@mac.com> Message-ID: <498C938B.1050503@ushills.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Basically, it happened as I stripped the primary key and encryption key for signing using the RSA key on my work pc, however this meant that my backup private key at home does not have the RSA key used to sign on my work PC. I need to combine both. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmMk4oACgkQdS/id75+h/3m+ACeJX5I62uql0r95qZmc5rqq8Fh YEUAn3z1TYQyw6FrTK78HUUCvm3skh4K =ItSB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Fri Feb 6 11:49:44 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:49:44 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key In-Reply-To: <498C938B.1050503@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> <498C8B4D.4070203@mac.com> <498C938B.1050503@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498C9458.5020307@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> web at ushills.co.uk wrote: > > I need to combine both. You need the GnuPG-Users list. That is beyond the scope of the Enigmail list. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 680 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 6 13:24:48 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:24:48 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Signing subkey - different key id. In-Reply-To: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498CAAA0.3030901@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 ushills escribi?: > I need to see if I have done this correctly, I have created a signing > sub-key as recommended on this mailing list to sign emails on less > trustworthy machines without exposing my primary key. Good. Just don't forget to make sure the whole set of keys (the main key with it's subkeys) are safe... > However, when opening the email the signature does not reference my > primary key and therefore from my perspective appears to indicate that > the email could be sent from someone pretending to be me with a key > they have created themselves. I don't have much experience with those signatures, but since the signing subkey is signed by your main key, and the whole set of keys are present in your public key, I suppose it won't cause misunderstandings. Take a look at this message, probably it will be signed with my signing subkey... > My primary key id is 0xBE7E87FD, however all signatures come across as > 0xCA265DC6 is this how it is supposed to work. I have attached my The attachment was lost somehow, but your public key is available at keyservers, so there is no problem. > Also, I set a different passphrase for the signing sub-key, however, > when sending from thunderbird I have to enter the passphrase from my > primary key not the sub-key, is this correct - it doesn't appear to be Well, what I did, was to generate the signing subkeys, export the subkeys, and in other machine without my whole key, I imported the subkeys. At that point, IIRC, the subkeys had the same passphrase as the main key. I changed the passphrase, and that is what I have to enter when I use those subkeys. If you import the subkeys to your keyring which already has the whole set of keys, _probably_ (I am just supposing, since I have never done that) gpg will say "I already have those keys" and you would have to use the passphrase of the main key. You can test how does it works by moving your keyring to another folder, and then, importing the subkeys to the "new" keyring. Of course, be VERY careful when you move your keyring files, you don't want to damage or lose it (don't forget the important files are secring.gpg, pubring.gpg and trustdb.gpg). And remember the public key you need is the one with the whole set of keys... Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjKqgAAoJEMV4f6PvczxATZ4H/jf4I3NAtf3VvXAKLCjARtyt ucyfCURrbOxqTDLq2qbGMuCzrWPOnEXuuhDR1Yirhy4Q1VqjxsW5WIQhLTbKRLUR qMIk7YW+9WWifYszfXfK1xpvD17GydW04GR/xEUEOxHCEwR6MJDxc+DiIymKVXTg NgClIl4a8pKxglxm4TrTTAM3MI06sU6SIW8J1mtLTriEL4J9L/hMw4+U8mkQkMQ2 RPGrPketsE21Rd3u30nY3Zx0n57X3Ev05lYth+ipmeIf4UlddMWMt9g2e90JhZMf KEHqrWyE+0bwMjbAsC/dq7s6d9y89Edp5cHEUEbU23JmxWsV3Frvatf64KcdQiY= =lcxV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 6 13:33:36 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:33:36 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Signing subkey - different key id. In-Reply-To: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C0EE2.3020004@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498CACB0.6040703@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I forgot to say: Enigmail's security info about your message: "Informaci?n de seguridad OpenPGPSIN CONFIANZA La firma de Web Ushills es correcta Id de clave: 0xCA265DC6 / Firmada el: 06-02-2009 7:20 Huella de la clave: ED4A C9AE 3B43 0A7B 9F0D C956 752F E277 BE7E 87FD" Which means: "OpenPGP Security information NO TRUST The signature of Web Ushills is valid Key ID: 0xCA265DC6 / Signed on: 06-02-2009 7:20 Key Fingerprint: ED4A C9AE 3B43 0A7B 9F0D C956 752F E277 BE7E 87FD" As you can see, it shows the signature was made with your signing subkey, but the fingerprint displayed is the fingerprint of your main key, so it is clear the subkey belongs to you. I _think_ to forge your subkey, an attacker would need to create a signing subkey with the same fingerprint of the signing subkey, something that probably would require an incredible amount of time... Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjKywAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAtSMIAJB1MRnehb4psPBZ3n0CxK61 nx5PjG25kZJ3VFtOxMFpNvUYeeHoexLH9XHlwPgjQBtGbBxwmB5FYyXzllwyIn3O yOmJaAm+b945l2Zul0kFrPOpNMMQbUs1YsemYLcFld22NEFZWiQOTIA7jFz2QyMh Mea8aY2S3p6gTWq8BxYv6Lj6x5TQZKtteLrj9SA2pTYeXlIZn8yZ1T3+vPed/bfl cDCliYCQ+UX6EaJbGY88a7ELgj7I9zDGkICJw4A33NAVh4UQN4vW32dNFqeitZN1 KAnl245bVkxjBFkUNJf3tQN/0k3/OS6GklCdPLeRDrR4rSi8PfySpwQ/wFeopZ8= =Qela -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 6 13:39:36 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Subkey revocation certificate In-Reply-To: <498C144A.1050905@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C144A.1050905@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498CAE18.204@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 ushills escribi?: > As I have created a separate signing sub key (see separate post about > issues with this) how do I go about just creating a revocation > certificate for the sub-key and not my primary key. I am not sure... I would focus on keeping the whole set of keys safe (I even printed a copy of my keys, and asked somebody I really trust to store them in a safe place at her house -so I made a "remote backup"). If you need to revoke the signing subkeys, edit the whole set of keys and revoke the signing subkey... I just did it once, so I am not 100% sure about how to do it. If you ever revoke a subkey, check it is done right (check you have not accidentally revoked the main key) before sending the public key to the keyservers... if you made a mistake, you can delete the public key, and import it from a backup or from keyservers. And always keep a backup when you revoke things... Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjK4YAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAuyEH/0JdP8IFTK7rJHInV07Y9x4m ZoZfehQpwQieqQkt3tjkugOd6XunfQJnN7269wAl6sbOdDEEdRDcjOkoJpTY0eHG zyMsiQHFDBLKQnvs4jRr545LOkYbz/7j5JjYfngRusdlIWawLdXLq9gIcR48bphu ty49KtxgYYA3C5OEIGIwwWZFkBjCiGItZ64d7KzXSyPVr6VvcMWQaWOOpidBf6/4 MCAo0vNRFEq8Vk8K4WqYiZVvw1QNbftHWy8xctnn0ytiB8IF7KtOxnjigMMuCVBi Qlp3H+zH0H5XHaevZwbOb0koTOSjR4Yj9NdGWR2qrGD2EDBhPNXgC9Yqx7qA1XM= =O6bN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 6 14:31:10 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:31:10 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key In-Reply-To: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498CBA2E.8080401@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 web at ushills.co.uk escribi?: > For whatever reason I now have two versions of my private key one > without the ELG encryption key, the other without the RSA signing key. Both versions using the same main key? O_o' Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjLouAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAihYH/j9Yd18wVsGvnA1yJHTZ+S3x HfbiPEzKfcGun8dywwoq4uUIeyFHHn4l8HG6iC2c+MWy7cI/kyTQlRvL+KPQwJ2j +wCyy0sU32QcPikt5VE3YIQFhAImXOKJMio8JxZqwl0Nr5gbwArkH/HBVaK3cjNS u2ZFXgRQ2YHp8Rgm/NchZZqAYLxG5c0H3UKqT+xU8Hn6sMJyFeS3y+cPRfqsBXiz DSMRhZ4fD/tBU5V6fy1JkPisRhChfPawWNXML5gMvoYgTPSrrRlqRKK42apUZRiS iTVpDn+NtpcC2jqvrDVFAKrgoj9B2ZHv2Uq9OKDTBIHEFBWH59/xBUBcxnMIqzw= =e50J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 6 14:36:21 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:36:21 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key In-Reply-To: <498C938B.1050503@ushills.co.uk> References: <498C87BC.5090602@ushills.co.uk> <498C8B4D.4070203@mac.com> <498C938B.1050503@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <498CBB65.8040403@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 web at ushills.co.uk escribi?: > Basically, it happened as I stripped the primary key and encryption key > for signing using the RSA key on my work pc, however this meant that my > backup private key at home does not have the RSA key used to sign on my > work PC. > > I need to combine both. Ahh... they are in different machines... maybe you can export the keys from your work PC, and import them to your home pc. Don't forget to make a backup first, since I don't know what would happen if the passphrase of the keys mismatch... Best Regards P.S: if that doesn't solve it, try at GnuPG list, if people there don't know the answer, then nobody knows it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjLtkAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAGtUH/iOT2uKQOXkzRDYs2u5q3SJP KDepVbgnywwEOsDlAgXRktzN/rGaXPNfQ9GJkubFjAhjTIM783WFKq4vTwDV2IYn HpoSy5GwPCNTrjc7fKmNuOk11AlNs3KIU8rEqStO6pXinsoNng68tsV/nWiHE7IQ Q7d4SgIRf9zPowNtOI/kJANpdNwHiCDN50vgrGcoeINt87AyXJlMJD2/IvMpnoDq Pb3cjM+bt/+mE1X6K9GsNlLvBBVXkg8frqiGvXKfWdmomUn1Zl/i4/qLsqbHrTlO 1uq9WcfWhnCmzo7Ar+p840iC863MrfEZef8rZPC3aQBmCzOQ3D0fmzrGW7g55Z0= =9jGj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ian at ushills.co.uk Sat Feb 7 03:02:30 2009 From: ian at ushills.co.uk (ian at ushills.co.uk) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:02:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key Message-ID: <9192552.2323.1234004554138.JavaMail.seven@ap0.trial.red.7sys.net> Yes both have the same primary key although the one on the new key is hashed meaning it is unavailable. For some reason even though I have exported just the subkey from the new key I cannot import this subkey into the old key as it says that it is unchanged. -----Original Message----- From: Faramir Sent: 06 February 2009 22:31 To: Enigmail user discussion list Subject: Re: [Enigmail] Copy subkeys to primary key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 web at ushills.co.uk escribi?: > For whatever reason I now have two versions of my private key one > without the ELG encryption key, the other without the RSA signing key. Both versions using the same main key? O_o' Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJjLouAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAihYH/j9Yd18wVsGvnA1yJHTZ+S3x HfbiPEzKfcGun8dywwoq4uUIeyFHHn4l8HG6iC2c+MWy7cI/kyTQlRvL+KPQwJ2j +wCyy0sU32QcPikt5VE3YIQFhAImXOKJMio8JxZqwl0Nr5gbwArkH/HBVaK3cjNS u2ZFXgRQ2YHp8Rgm/NchZZqAYLxG5c0H3UKqT+xU8Hn6sMJyFeS3y+cPRfqsBXiz DSMRhZ4fD/tBU5V6fy1JkPisRhChfPawWNXML5gMvoYgTPSrrRlqRKK42apUZRiS iTVpDn+NtpcC2jqvrDVFAKrgoj9B2ZHv2Uq9OKDTBIHEFBWH59/xBUBcxnMIqzw= =e50J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Enigmail mailing list Enigmail at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail From 2600denver at gmail.com Tue Feb 10 17:09:42 2009 From: 2600denver at gmail.com (Ringo Kamens) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? Message-ID: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey Enigmail users, I've been on this list and using Enigmail for about a year now. My entire hard drive is encrypted including swap. It's easy to secure my computing environment when I first login to the computer, but when I use enigmail it asks me for my password about every five minutes because so many of my emails are encrypted/signed. Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. Thanks for any help you can offer Ringo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJkiVV6pWcWSc5BE4RArJ1AJ45DjNVhx67j3MhD56hvKhDjJeipACg0QVv gGux9RZBJax3C1R0K1bZr54= =S5wl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From alaric at metrocast.net Tue Feb 10 17:20:55 2009 From: alaric at metrocast.net (Phil Stracchino) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> Message-ID: <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ringo Kamens wrote: > Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like > until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent > version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. OpenPGP menu -> Preferences -> Basic tab Passphrase settings: Remember password for [ ] minutes - -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 alaric at caerllewys.net alaric at metrocast.net phil at co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkmSJ/cACgkQ0DfOju+hMklL7wCdH5Skq2qHHp2ENloYqkciH+oi st4AoJkwxga5slT9TsMK6BB19PmDcsbA =z9X0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From 2600denver at gmail.com Tue Feb 10 17:33:14 2009 From: 2600denver at gmail.com (Ringo Kamens) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: <49922ADA.50404@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wow. I can't believe I never saw that before. Thanks! Ringo Phil Stracchino wrote: > Ringo Kamens wrote: >> Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like >> until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent >> version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. > > OpenPGP menu -> Preferences -> Basic tab > > Passphrase settings: > Remember password for [ ] minutes > > > _______________________________________________ Enigmail mailing list Enigmail at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJkira6pWcWSc5BE4RAmHkAJ43HrSlrYapM8O0EdLvV2oqAd39SwCeOEhy JeS0wkhkj0w20EWe6Pgv7M0= =KhGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm Thu Feb 12 02:52:49 2009 From: michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm (Michael J Gruber) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:52:49 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: Ringo Kamens venit, vidit, dixit 11.02.2009 02:33: > Wow. I can't believe I never saw that before. > > Thanks! > Ringo > > Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Ringo Kamens wrote: >>> Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like >>> until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent >>> version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. >> OpenPGP menu -> Preferences -> Basic tab > >> Passphrase settings: >> Remember password for [ ] minutes Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent. Michael From jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net Thu Feb 12 03:12:41 2009 From: jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net (John W. Moore III) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: <49940429.2090909@bellsouth.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Michael J Gruber wrote: > Ringo Kamens venit, vidit, dixit 11.02.2009 02:33: >> Wow. I can't believe I never saw that before. >> >> Thanks! >> Ringo >> >> Phil Stracchino wrote: >>> Ringo Kamens wrote: >>>> Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like >>>> until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent >>>> version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. >>> OpenPGP menu -> Preferences -> Basic tab >>> Passphrase settings: >>> Remember password for [ ] minutes > > Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent. I disagree; unless One requires the 'features' of GPG2 then GPG Agent is totally unnecessary! Enigmail can/will cache the passphrase for the necessary amount of time. JOHN 8-) Timestamp: Thursday 12 Feb 2009, 06:12 --500 (Eastern Standard Time) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4925: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJJlAQnAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPo+MH/1JX37yBMx8Yno3XAYSCQhqf ZHnAedtSx4whmMZ6X/fciNwT6QhMbfETpFxuoxXEEDdiwdIe+K99Yhsbzvj0nZ2b FPb+wVez5MnZXI572eMydetDPsGtPnylcRRZlB4RoXBYnbt6faNMA+/L+yNDfkf+ CMLErgklJQl5MKFUmhE2h6k7YRJr5FulPPjxZfyiul1Emy8PkAtzwF7xq0MiZPY+ G0BNgHX10QSoHJ3C74mF6dG++XnufoeEAwpaUXlMfC0ogHE3b8fg6x7487BOlh0Y bH5YSbVI1E6EZFNfkSrwirTKQ67VMD0nhxngGOV/MIYKvY8liE1qjJQy/o+p8Fw= =GHf0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ian at ushills.co.uk Fri Feb 13 07:30:52 2009 From: ian at ushills.co.uk (Ian Hill) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:52 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] S/MIME passphrase Message-ID: <4995922C.3060107@ushills.co.uk> For those here that use both gpg and s/mime in Thunderbird, is there a way to get thunderbird to remember you s/mime certificate in a similar way to the way it can be set to remember your gpg cert. I have now need to use both. PS I use ubuntu if this affects things. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 552 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From faramir.cl at gmail.com Fri Feb 13 10:18:18 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:18:18 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] S/MIME passphrase In-Reply-To: <4995922C.3060107@ushills.co.uk> References: <4995922C.3060107@ushills.co.uk> Message-ID: <4995B96A.8070404@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ian Hill escribi?: > For those here that use both gpg and s/mime in Thunderbird, is there a > way to get thunderbird to remember you s/mime certificate in a similar > way to the way it can be set to remember your gpg cert. I use both standards, and, if I understood your question right, it's easy to configure. On Accounts setup (sorry, I use Spanish version, so names can be a little different). First import your certificate to Thunderbird, using Edit menu -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Certificates -> See Certificates -> Import Once you have imported your certificate, go to Edit menu, Account Settings, and in Security item, select the certificate you want to use with that account. Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJlblqAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAkq8H/jzXcU4OhD6kJk+7VPLsgzul AO2AYE2nUFhYKMA4BVObLtf2JpC/E0EYrlyQRhFrntdJXWbCXLlhXZTHmajRE6BA erTSiCA1DNI5WilcdY6v17C4Nagg5/E35WgEFQv8qGZ3vAB/CzcoA88SOMywdmuT 5bVhShJ0AHpXRBpTtmMmo26N+jRII+uBPPLxhRWocC/HWGvgjhbcvqoLfDKcpkuM E938TVjIx0VnNWXULjaoy/hDCiJFBjqY9SIkoLkcgs75+WDw7+KnzqxQmbzer/jU wWk37VEDMdw0drEpGww63VAz2nSJNvBhMhaqX/f2pYFyZAeBQHq0SGQXWuJZFvI= =s7Uq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From patfjordan at eircom.net Thu Feb 12 13:06:10 2009 From: patfjordan at eircom.net (Pat Jordan) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:06:10 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello Message-ID: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is my first venture into Enigmail?s encryption features. My name is Patrick and I'm in Ireland. Is there anyone willing to assist me test the encryption features. I have only signed this email. I've sent my key to pool.sks-keyservers.net Thanks ** -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJlI9C3sy1TThkPE4RAgdNAJkBfTP6kvUDLTKUbO1lJ8bJk1Dj1QCffcW9 UbJKMg2zi6mMIcqZycADsMQ= =XCCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dcguard2008-enigmail at yahoo.co.uk Sat Feb 14 07:06:38 2009 From: dcguard2008-enigmail at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Cameron) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:06:38 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> Message-ID: <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Enigmail] Hello From: Pat Jordan To: enigmail at mozdev.org Date: 12 February 2009 21:06:10 > This is my first venture into Enigmail?s encryption features. My name > is Patrick and I'm in Ireland. > Is there anyone willing to assist me test the encryption features. I > have only signed this email. > I've sent my key to pool.sks-keyservers.net > > Thanks > > ** Your signature verified successfully. regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmW3f4ACgkQzrVRhE6Izim+qwCeJTPGCb8wGxE/nK4yUU8VwYLA y3MAniIezQHsETblQq1Yqwv+1GsYKM9i =n2n7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bjtasker at btasker.me.uk Sat Feb 14 07:33:27 2009 From: bjtasker at btasker.me.uk (B J Tasker) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:33:27 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> Message-ID: <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Duncan Cameron wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Enigmail] Hello > From: Pat Jordan > To: enigmail at mozdev.org > Date: 12 February 2009 21:06:10 >> This is my first venture into Enigmails encryption features. My name >> is Patrick and I'm in Ireland. >> Is there anyone willing to assist me test the encryption features. I >> have only signed this email. >> I've sent my key to pool.sks-keyservers.net > >> Thanks > >> ** > Your signature verified successfully. > > regards > On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error Quote ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large gpg: requesting key 38643C4E from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0_ Unquote Does anyone know what this means? Bernard______________________________________________ Enigmail mailing list Enigmail at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmW5EcACgkQqPQ3uX5O/PeWrACfY5qpB4e+sIQC+d1WmOpImn1E 6PgAnjw9bELvfuerCfPtPhq6zAZpXhYd =UKcu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From shavital at mac.com Sat Feb 14 09:21:22 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> Message-ID: <4996FD92.4000507@mac.com> Pat Jordan wrote the following on 2/12/09 4:06 PM: > This is my first venture into Enigmail?s encryption features. My name > is Patrick and I'm in Ireland. > Is there anyone willing to assist me test the encryption features. I > have only signed this email. > I've sent my key to pool.sks-keyservers.net > > Thanks Hi Pat: Good signature from Pat Jordan Key ID: 0x38643C4E / Signed on: 2/12/09 4:06 PM Key fingerprint: 7CF1 0AA7 DE99 FF06 B6AA B51E DECC B54D 3864 3C4E User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Current GnuPG stable is version 1.4.9, you might want to update. By separate, a test encryption e-mail Welcome. Charly From mlisten at hammernoch.net Sat Feb 14 09:27:19 2009 From: mlisten at hammernoch.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludwig_H=FCgelsch=E4fer?=) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:27:19 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> Message-ID: <4996FEF7.6040500@hammernoch.net> B J Tasker wrote on 14.02.2009 16:33 Uhr: > On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error > Quote > ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 > gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large > gpg: requesting key 38643C4E from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0_ > > Unquote > > Does anyone know what this means? The message is "Host not found", which usually is a result from a DNS problem. Either you have the wrong nameserver configured, your connection to your configured nameserver is not working, or your nameserver has a problem. HTH Ludwig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Sat Feb 14 09:32:01 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> Message-ID: <49970011.9060706@mac.com> B J Tasker wrote the following on 2/14/09 10:33 AM: [...] > On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error > Quote > ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 > gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large > gpg: requesting key 38643C4E from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0_ > > Unquote > > Does anyone know what this means? > > Bernard I got a similar response from pool.sks-keyservers.net. That server might be experiencing some kind of problem at the moment. I got Pat Jordan's public key from hkp server blackhole.pca.dfn.de, without problems. Charly From faramir.cl at gmail.com Sat Feb 14 10:29:39 2009 From: faramir.cl at gmail.com (Faramir) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:29:39 -0300 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <49970011.9060706@mac.com> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> <49970011.9060706@mac.com> Message-ID: <49970D93.1050407@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Charly Avital escribi?: > B J Tasker wrote the following on 2/14/09 10:33 AM: > [...] >> On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error >> Quote >> ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 >> gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large ... > I got a similar response from pool.sks-keyservers.net. That server might > be experiencing some kind of problem at the moment. ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: No error That's strange... remember pool.sks... is not a server, but a pool of servers. Maybe the "thing" that choices a random server from the pool is having problems... I downloaded the key from gingerbear. And the signature was valid. Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJlw2TAAoJEMV4f6PvczxA9bcIAI5fqpevxPv0cb1GnriVO5UI Zho+PFrglkDhrGEA0p37pLYK+KVtkJI2rmv+7rl1GmEvATMV01OuZtLVjd6rOsge 7xgLEtvoD94FVNl0RauAYORddJAHE05Y49W1Ou6J0UdfdbQgwpnKd5yiquzCUTon 5kb4Dz/9BqVE3x7z3tc+cAZpsE1WprwbVkvh4RKuhZuVmkQNLFpCzM5XDfPAlcek aipU7aSLl4TqcqsNKeJ0Du8SsChyux/DtsXtyqabbqky+TPZJOz7pkwvpocwSIR3 Th+WtlAXTEbbFi6+rRYv1Un3TTMkH2ua8AF9fs/2wIQ7VP3Ga9hv3TEsfPAo12Y= =Jz5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Sat Feb 14 11:48:36 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:48:36 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> Message-ID: <49972014.4030809@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> B J Tasker wrote: > On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error > Quote > ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 > gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large > gpg: requesting key 38643C4E from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0_ > > Unquote It's nothing to do with pool.sks-keyservers.net. The DNS resolver code in Windows sometimes gets "St00pid". Try again in about 30 seconds. I've had XP boxes give the same error for machines that have local addresses in the host file. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 677 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Sat Feb 14 12:02:04 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:02:04 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> Message-ID: <4997233C.9010905@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> Pat Jordan wrote: > This is my first venture into Enigmail?s encryption features. My name > is Patrick and I'm in Ireland. > Is there anyone willing to assist me test the encryption features. I > have only signed this email. Hello Patrick, Looks like you've got things setup correctly. A few things, 1) Please turn HTML composition off when signing messages with OpenPGP. HTML tends to break signature verification. 2) It looks like your message was held in the moderation queue for a while. Please consider subscribing and your messages will post directly. https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail 3) GnuPG 1.4.3 is quite dated. Please upgrade to the current release 1.4.9 for the most recent bug and security fixes: ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9.exe Signature: ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9.exe.sig SHA-1: c2efad983dfe50e6d8007257bad2c76604be389a gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9.exe > I've sent my key to pool.sks-keyservers.net Excellent. That worked fine. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 677 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From jeandavid8 at verizon.net Sat Feb 14 13:35:01 2009 From: jeandavid8 at verizon.net (Jean-David Beyer) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <4997233C.9010905@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4997233C.9010905@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> Message-ID: <49973905.7020405@verizon.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Clizbe wrote: | 3) GnuPG 1.4.3 is quite dated. Please upgrade to the current release 1.4.9 for the | most recent bug and security fixes: | ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9.exe I run Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, and their latest version is called: gnupg-1.4.5-14 When RHEL5 first came out, it came with gnupg-1.4.5-12. What Red Hat try to do is never change the main release (in this case 1.4.5) so as to guarantee that a program will always work with the rest of the distribution. They keep the user interface and the programmer interface and the binary interface the same throughout the life of a release (in this case, RHEL5). They do backport security fixes and bug fixes as they come by. It is just that their release numbers do not go up as fast as others. - -- ~ .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. ~ /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. ~ /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ~ ^^-^^ 16:30:01 up 24 days, 8:21, 4 users, load average: 4.40, 4.25, 4.10 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJlzkEPtu2XpovyZoRAs3GAJ91MZrFga0Ql3j4T9H0gqdcYrBDHwCgyFCh XYsUeg34nifRp9N8E0gVHL4= =L46h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bjtasker at btasker.me.uk Sat Feb 14 23:52:24 2009 From: bjtasker at btasker.me.uk (B J Tasker) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:52:24 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Hello In-Reply-To: <49970011.9060706@mac.com> References: <49948F42.5000109@eircom.net> <4996DDFE.7000504@yahoo.co.uk> <4996E447.9090203@btasker.me.uk> <49970011.9060706@mac.com> Message-ID: <4997C9B8.3060102@btasker.me.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charly Avital wrote: > B J Tasker wrote the following on 2/14/09 10:33 AM: > [...] >> On trying to import Patrick's key I got the following error >> Quote >> ?: pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found: ec=11004 >> gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Result too large >> gpg: requesting key 38643C4E from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net >> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. >> gpg: Total number processed: 0_ >> >> Unquote >> >> Does anyone know what this means? >> >> Bernard > > I got a similar response from pool.sks-keyservers.net. That server might > be experiencing some kind of problem at the moment. > > I got Pat Jordan's public key from hkp server blackhole.pca.dfn.de, > without problems. > > Charly > > > _______________________________________________ > Enigmail mailing list > Enigmail at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail > thanks Charly - that worked for me too Bernard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmXybgACgkQqPQ3uX5O/Pf2qgCgg+I9VLsRn06ArKsyepvWyd4n 5usAnA1RmzLiwlik/FIIFSIqzGNqVgi1 =Ng+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From suspect at thotwerx.com Mon Feb 16 13:05:43 2009 From: suspect at thotwerx.com (David Caplan) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:05:43 -0800 Subject: [Enigmail] Problem decrypting messages Message-ID: <4999D527.3040806@thotwerx.com> Hi there, I'm a newbie with OpenPGP, and I'm hoping Enigmail can help me secure my correspondence while minimizing my opportunities to screw up the encryption/decryption process. I've installed OpenPGP 1.4.9 and Enignmail 0.95.7 on my PC that runs Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 on Windows XP SP3. Installation seemed to go well, I created a passphrase and key pair, and I published my public key to the default servers. To verify that all was well, I sent an encrypted email message to the automated Adele server in Germany (adele at gnupp.de) with my public key as the text. It replied with a message that, once I typed in my passphrase to view it, contained my public key as the text. So far so good. However, Thunderbird also displays a message at the top of the received email stating: "OpenPGP: Part of the message encrypted; click Key icon for details." When I click the Key icon, the following error message pops up: "OpenPGP Security Info Error - secret key needed to decrypt message gpg command line and output: C:\\Program Files\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -d --passphrase-fd 0 --no-use-agent gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 2BFD503F gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available" I've spent hours trying to determine what I'm doing wrong, but to no avail so far. Can anyone please help me out? David From michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm Tue Feb 17 01:35:46 2009 From: michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm (Michael J Gruber) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:35:46 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: John W. Moore III venit, vidit, dixit 12.02.2009 12:12: > Michael J Gruber wrote: >> Ringo Kamens venit, vidit, dixit 11.02.2009 02:33: >>> Wow. I can't believe I never saw that before. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Ringo >>> >>> Phil Stracchino wrote: >>>> Ringo Kamens wrote: >>>>> Is there any way to make enigmail remember passwords longer? Maybe like >>>>> until shutdown or until I close Thunderbird? I'm on the most recent >>>>> version of Ubuntu. If I have to install another program that's fine by me. >>>> OpenPGP menu -> Preferences -> Basic tab >>>> Passphrase settings: >>>> Remember password for [ ] minutes >> Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent. > > I disagree; unless One requires the 'features' of GPG2 then GPG Agent is > totally unnecessary! Enigmail can/will cache the passphrase for the > necessary amount of time. John, gpg-agent isn't really about making gpg2 features available, although it is part of gpg2 now. The main point is that gpg-agent is small and well-audited. OTOH, having Enigmail cache the passphrase means having Thunderbird cache the passphrase. So, from a security perspective gpg-agent is the much better approach, rather than being "totally unnecessary". May I suggest you recheck whether your strong wording is really an appropriate match to my "Also, you might want to..."? Besides, gpg-agent keeps the passphrase across restarts of TB and provides it to other clients as well, although this might not matter to the OP. Cheers, Michael From shavital at mac.com Tue Feb 17 02:03:23 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: <499A8B6B.1090901@mac.com> Michael J Gruber wrote the following on 2/17/09 4:35 AM: [...] > John, > > gpg-agent isn't really about making gpg2 features available, although it > is part of gpg2 now. > > The main point is that gpg-agent is small and well-audited. OTOH, having > Enigmail cache the passphrase means having Thunderbird cache the > passphrase. So, from a security perspective gpg-agent is the much better > approach, rather than being "totally unnecessary". May I suggest you > recheck whether your strong wording is really an appropriate match to my > "Also, you might want to..."? > > Besides, gpg-agent keeps the passphrase across restarts of TB and > provides it to other clients as well, although this might not matter to > the OP. > > Cheers, > Michael Thank you Michael, you have taken the words out of my keyboard. I use currently gpg-agent with gpg 2.0.10. Best regards, Charly MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - GPG2 2.0.10 - Testing Shredder 3.0b2pre+Enigmail version 0.96a (20090215-1226)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA From ludovic at mozillamessaging.com Tue Feb 17 02:10:37 2009 From: ludovic at mozillamessaging.com (Ludovic Hirlimann) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:10:37 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day Message-ID: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Hi all, I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read . We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to participate. Hope to see some of you on Friday Ludovic -- Ludovic Hirlimann MozillaMessaging QA lead http://www.spreadthunderbird.com/aff/79/2 From mlisten at hammernoch.net Tue Feb 17 02:36:51 2009 From: mlisten at hammernoch.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludwig_H=FCgelsch=E4fer?=) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:36:51 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> Ludovic Hirlimann wrote on 17.02.2009 11:10 Uhr: > Hi all, > > I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here > because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 > and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. > > This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is > going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and > making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on > a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read > . > > We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail > so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to > participate. This, however, is not true. There are nightly builds of enigmail for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X which work with nightly builds of Thunderbird trunk (aka Shredder). http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/nightly.php As always: Testers should take the red warning seriously! Ludwig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Tue Feb 17 02:54:54 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> Message-ID: <499A977E.1010908@mac.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ludwig H?gelsch?fer wrote the following on 2/17/09 5:36 AM: > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote on 17.02.2009 11:10 Uhr: [...] >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > This, however, is not true. There are nightly builds of enigmail for > Windows, Linux and Mac OS X which work with nightly builds of > Thunderbird trunk (aka Shredder). > > http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/nightly.php > > As always: Testers should take the red warning seriously! > > Ludwig I am now running Shredder 3.0b2pre with security update 2009021602454 and Enigmail version 0.96a (20090217-0823) (I believe that both are the current available updates). I couldn't verify Ludwig's PGP/MIME signed message. The following warning showed three times: Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found Charly MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - GPG2 2.0.10 - Testing Shredder 3.0b2pre+Enigmail version 0.96a (20090217-0823)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: GnuPG for Privacy Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJJmpd0AAoJEM3GMi2FW4Pvvf0IAKmZ4jJ9cKLfmV1+wh6KZeGg 52qk5AyMkxTK3oJ/NMXhyJoAxDQ90FEWQrWM/m5EBNvy0N7J7MSL0HCeNNrRjXFH kTP+VsVcGPNWPPcd9G4Y16Q1icjIt6xHK5vmtjXn1kxiVb2D4zpQFTRWaoXO68EY pdyhuaEkwKaKfvnG8eIXXe8bbQZW66ZVpezDK5tBB9vZ64yuemmg4RYd7cY8jtMu P7SCzIABw21/1jHrUeQynzZXxuLb3/Ue8W3gpGGtkliLmVTYQaCWBFvXQlqRo7Qk 0BwlXr4AUOFlL45b7tVvTZ9WxhPACOxKf0NBNyNs7/BAm50Pp7jiNsXDyvzqohk= =EO1u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org Tue Feb 17 03:11:53 2009 From: patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org (Patrick Brunschwig) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:11:53 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> Message-ID: <499A9B79.8020904@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ludwig H?gelsch?fer wrote: > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote on 17.02.2009 11:10 Uhr: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here >> because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 >> and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. >> >> This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is >> going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and >> making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on >> a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read >> . >> >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > This, however, is not true. There are nightly builds of enigmail for > Windows, Linux and Mac OS X which work with nightly builds of > Thunderbird trunk (aka Shredder). > > http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/nightly.php > > As always: Testers should take the red warning seriously! Please read carefully what Ludovic has written: we know that the *Windows* builds are not compatible with Enigmail. And yes, I know it too -- but I will probably not have time to fix this until Friday. - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZqbeHcOpHodsOiwAQh9Mwf+IxMXcUfCKMZHGyUnaEkqKVkiSeBpBRfE eZGluQWT1AymUri9UMlegQ2eYQUY+uCDwkcGwblfXBwxrxr/YMJfyw0mgzbDYher YlDOHxckh8n1ZXrkMRxR8Fc1fQjDCNw8pD5A765TtP5mH+0hD2yxZlGwyoeB/wNk Zs1GvKIvAetvpQqg7Wg6+ar3FllYJlURzq/MfOwBi5SRopuJKfpwPfMRqq4j8VWr 8vDTRPDnNxlD1+osryEulSVFZ+zpIsyTdkpMbT26zrRqj3IgAuORpYXa5Gzahm6Q tcSqELE0w9uP8pdY4WLBO3aPFJgHKjXp1uQiFgXhauhUG/iST+509Q== =8QKM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Tue Feb 17 03:14:48 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:14:48 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: <499A9C28.50307@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> Michael J Gruber wrote: > John W. Moore III venit, vidit, dixit 12.02.2009 12:12: >> Michael J Gruber wrote: >>> Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent. >> >> I disagree; unless One requires the 'features' of GPG2 then GPG Agent is >> totally unnecessary! Enigmail can/will cache the passphrase for the >> necessary amount of time. > > gpg-agent isn't really about making gpg2 features available, although it > is part of gpg2 now. > > The main point is that gpg-agent is small and well-audited. OTOH, having > Enigmail cache the passphrase means having Thunderbird cache the > passphrase. So, from a security perspective gpg-agent is the much better > approach, rather than being "totally unnecessary". May I suggest you > recheck whether your strong wording is really an appropriate match to my > "Also, you might want to..."? > > Besides, gpg-agent keeps the passphrase across restarts of TB and > provides it to other clients as well, although this might not matter to > the OP. All of those are correct, Michael, BUT I thoroughly understand John's POV and I'll add, as it was stated, I disagree. "Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent." lacks a key caveat: Also since you are running a Linux,..." would be correct in this case. There are a large number of Windows users on this list. There is no gpg-agent support in GnuPG 1.4 on win32. For Windows users, John is correct in stating that GnuPG 2.0 is required. In order to get agent support on win32 requires GnuPG 2.0. gpg2 for win32 is so far only available as part of gpg4win, which up until the present RC doesn't work on Vista and there seem to be some issues with the entire package getting to a gpg4win 2.0 which keep some of use from wholeheartedly recommending it. My own use case for recommending GnuPG2.0 on win32 is to get gpg-agent support for multiple keys with multiple passphrases. For a single key or multiple keys with null or the same passphrase, Enigmail is sufficient. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 677 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de Tue Feb 17 03:20:09 2009 From: funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de (Tobias Fischer) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:20:09 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: On 17.02.2009 11:36, Ludwig H?gelsch?fer wrote: > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote on 17.02.2009 11:10 Uhr: >> Hi all, >> [...] >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > This, however, is not true. There are nightly builds of enigmail for > Windows, Linux and Mac OS X which work with nightly builds of > Thunderbird trunk (aka Shredder). > > http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/nightly.php Sure, there are Enigmail-Nightly-Builds, but enable jemalloc for Thunderbird (and before for SeaMonkey Trunk) has broke Enigmail on Windows in some cases, see: https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18886 and the new one for TB: https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20563 With jemalloc enabled, the msvc*80.dll Files and the Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest were removed, and SeaMonkey and Thunderbird are shipping the mozcrt19.dll instead. If there are some SDKs installed on the Windows System, there was no msvcrt80.dll in the ..\windows\system32 Folder, instead there are multiple Versions of this File in some ..\WINDOWS\WinSxS\ Subfolders, and while installing Enigmail it could not find an msvcr80.dll, so the enigmime-x86-msvc.dll fails to register and the Enigmime-Service was not available. On a fresh Windows-System without additional SDKs, where the msvcr80.dll is still located in the ..windows\system32 Folder, Enigmail installs and work properly also for SeaMonkey-Trunk-Builds with jemalloc enabled. Some days ago mcsmurf has asked Ted Mielczarek on IRC, and he said, that it was needed to link statically to the CRT building Enigmail for Windows to fix this issue. > > As always: Testers should take the red warning seriously! Japp, but testing might help to find Bugs and get them fixed. :) From jeandavid8 at verizon.net Tue Feb 17 04:51:52 2009 From: jeandavid8 at verizon.net (Jean-David Beyer) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A977E.1010908@mac.com> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> <499A977E.1010908@mac.com> Message-ID: <499AB2E8.5010503@verizon.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charly Avital wrote (in part): | I couldn't verify Ludwig's PGP/MIME signed message. The following | warning showed three times: | Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found | Very strange. The version I received of Ludwig's message was not signed and contained no MIME at all. - -- ~ .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. ~ /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. ~ /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ~ ^^-^^ 07:50:01 up 26 days, 23:41, 3 users, load average: 4.53, 4.26, 4.11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJmrLoPtu2XpovyZoRAgEqAKCoR9RGb2yYYEGHncJLMhiD7h8omACgoI1w vfR/mJ3lbUC9E7w33cT1CRA= =oCNO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From olav at mozilla-enigmail.org Tue Feb 17 05:52:31 2009 From: olav at mozilla-enigmail.org (Olav Seyfarth) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:52:31 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Problem decrypting messages In-Reply-To: <4999D527.3040806@thotwerx.com> References: <4999D527.3040806@thotwerx.com> Message-ID: <499AC11F.8090101@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi David, > C:\\Program Files\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty > --status-fd 2 -d --passphrase-fd 0 --no-use-agent > gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 2BFD503F > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available" you REVOKED your key by importing the revocation certificate. At least the key I downloaded from the keyservers was revoked 2009-02-12. You should CREATE a rev cert and NOT import it but store it at safe place(s). Olav -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Diese ist eine Digitale Signatur nach OpenPGP-Standard Comment: Weitere Informationen: http://privat.seyfarth.de/olav/schluessel.html Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkmawR8ACgkQL/NBt8fdKe39TACcCRu4pO2Ax91kgKvB8QhhZK6y xjYAnRmJqpH2H++dF6Set9eVMpcYz63W =tdTr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mlisten at hammernoch.net Tue Feb 17 07:16:58 2009 From: mlisten at hammernoch.net (=?UTF-8?B?THVkd2lnIEjDvGdlbHNjaMOkZmVy?=) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:16:58 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A9B79.8020904@mozilla-enigmail.org> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> <499A9B79.8020904@mozilla-enigmail.org> Message-ID: <499AD4EA.5000301@hammernoch.net> Hi, Patrick Brunschwig wrote on 17.02.2009 12:11 Uhr: > Please read carefully what Ludovic has written: we know that the > *Windows* builds are not compatible with Enigmail. And yes, I know it > too -- but I will probably not have time to fix this until Friday. I stand corrected. Sorry for the confusion. Concerning my signature: I've received it ok, Mac TB2 + enigmail nightly. No signature is recognized on todays Mac Shredder + enigmail nightly and on todays Mac Seamonkey 2.0a3 + enigmail nightly. The latter two show two attachments (signature and mailing list footer). Ludwig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From shavital at mac.com Tue Feb 17 07:35:46 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499AB2E8.5010503@verizon.net> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499A9343.6040503@hammernoch.net> <499A977E.1010908@mac.com> <499AB2E8.5010503@verizon.net> Message-ID: <499AD952.1070300@mac.com> Jean-David Beyer wrote the following on 2/17/09 7:51 AM: > Charly Avital wrote (in part): > > | I couldn't verify Ludwig's PGP/MIME signed message. The following > | warning showed three times: > | Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found > | > Very strange. The version I received of Ludwig's message was not signed and > contained no MIME at all. 1. I verified the same signed message using Apple's Mail with GPGMail Version: 1.2.0 (v56), here's the output: Signed by Ludwig Huegelschaefer . Signed on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:37:00 AM US/Eastern Key fingerprint: B6 65 BD 1A CA 1A 98 DB 7B 41 E6 D5 13 C5 0F 5A 2. Here's a copy/paste of the relevant portion of Ludwig's e-mail raw source: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0840438557== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD548996B50B4ECAB6CF3387B" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD548996B50B4ECAB6CF3387B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 3. In Shredder, Ludwig's above e-mail comprises two attachments: one named: 'signature.asc' that when opened with a text editor shows: ====================quote============== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZqTTFYnpxVXVowdAQo1oAf+LgYkOaW5wsxcD8gX5OXwkUmGDoEmYtC7 EW9Q5i76sxcTFHzTDDPFVtlcGhUERjcMKhAE6MYhijzp0eVEUV4pI0knSbR47yN+ 6zJbyBQ4aV3UyhF0Xd0dlveJr96th33i5PcEVGrJZSnfO/ITzSoXpO+15QDieC+k XOVyx6dbEGAVP3yrFetJUzjro6X0VEiX+PSffk0fstQzyRbgxMHsh6CWYO97fgcK xmee9xuXG8TYXWYVf1mhuPmXwYEDdKh8PwO6ng8ocEBzwS1GH1JhV73K4fcnVsKc Hqr8oJjbZRVdjl6osiU3inEIEc9nVtKyZcHZV6LCvUV1upkGOQosoQ== =LIcH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- =====================unquote=============== the other one named Part 1.2 that when when opened with a text editor shows: =====================quote================= _______________________________________________ Enigmail mailing list Enigmail at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail =====================unquote============== Your own e-mail, signed in-line, verifies: OpenPGP Security Info Good signature from Jean-David Beyer (Institute for Regimented Whimsey) Key ID: 0x9A2FC99A / Signed on: 2/17/09 7:51 AM Key fingerprint: CC3C 3A4D D593 3491 DA41 8FE9 3EDB B65E 9A2F C99A When I send myself a PGP/MIME signed message, it does not show upon reception any attachment, it verifies correctly, and its raw source shows: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig14A8F748F3C20DD06DEED5D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charly From gschoelles at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 05:38:38 2009 From: gschoelles at gmail.com (George Schoelles) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:38:38 -0800 Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail Can't find GPG.EXE Message-ID: Even when I show Enigmail where the executable is it still can't find it. using 2/19 Nightly of both TB3 and Enigmail. From michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm Thu Feb 19 06:53:13 2009 From: michaeljgruber+mozdevnews at fastmail.fm (Michael J Gruber) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:53:13 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Telling Enigmail to remember passwords? In-Reply-To: References: <49922556.8090601@gmail.com> <499227F7.3040206@metrocast.net> Message-ID: John Clizbe venit, vidit, dixit 17.02.2009 12:14: > Michael J Gruber wrote: >> John W. Moore III venit, vidit, dixit 12.02.2009 12:12: >>> Michael J Gruber wrote: >>>> Also, you might want to look into using gpg-agent. >>> I disagree; unless One requires the 'features' of GPG2 then GPG Agent is >>> totally unnecessary! Enigmail can/will cache the passphrase for the >>> necessary amount of time. >> gpg-agent isn't really about making gpg2 features available, although it >> is part of gpg2 now. >> >> The main point is that gpg-agent is small and well-audited. OTOH, having >> Enigmail cache the passphrase means having Thunderbird cache the >> passphrase. So, from a security perspective gpg-agent is the much better >> approach, rather than being "totally unnecessary". May I suggest you >> recheck whether your strong wording is really an appropriate match to my >> "Also, you might want to..."? >> >> Besides, gpg-agent keeps the passphrase across restarts of TB and >> provides it to other clients as well, although this might not matter to >> the OP. > > > All of those are correct, Michael, BUT I thoroughly understand John's POV and I'll > add, as it was stated, I disagree. "Also, you might want to look into using > gpg-agent." lacks a key caveat: Also since you are running a Linux,..." would be > correct in this case. ...but he is! And yes, I had checked before answering. But if two native speakers don't take "Also, you might want to..." as a hint offering an additional option, not invalidating nor disapproving the first one given, then there's really no point in dragging this on. Michael From patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org Thu Feb 19 08:20:32 2009 From: patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org (Patrick Brunschwig) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:20:32 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail Can't find GPG.EXE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <499D86D0.7090306@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 George Schoelles wrote: > Even when I show Enigmail where the executable is it still can't find it. > > using 2/19 Nightly of both TB3 and Enigmail. The windows build of Enigmail of Shredder is known to be not working for the moment. - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZ2Gz3cOpHodsOiwAQgBAAgAleZN5ytZXttPecZP2/KA/pjexaEQWKfr SzXtUAqR7U1kOi4DYWZuk4zxj5AMqh9/C10qz0YMsZDJxDR0ZbsWF1L4JVQ+4PV7 M68AzLRWdLIkWTHU4J9wGkjJWfJ9kzpTdb/m1zzKR0RTPzhvnqL6V0unUc4QhY8i NKGewt7deSkSjGKlgNZ4YaJc1rHVkRmQUFF8Njo+AR+FFkF5E0BSneGfOYmqmhMp O/WlxlDhp0LhYep+9wCfvf/v2c644BYUdv2+j6aTfgGD8H+O44UD+ISx5G2i9QLj CwaOSIEEiNmabkd2f+Vgk0VpeeZ1JROdmHeqvHWN5pgCDlJVN9Vevg== =d1GU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mstormo at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 03:22:01 2009 From: mstormo at gmail.com (Marius Storm-Olsen) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:22:01 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Extension to avoid signing on certain mails Message-ID: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> Hi guys, I'm working on an extension which will send a certain type of mails, which should never be signed. However, I'm struggling with getting the .js code right to turn off the PGP signing. Right now I have something like window.addEventListener('compose-send-message', checkSigning, true); where checkSigning: function() { var signing_on = false; try { if (document.getElementById("enigmail_signed_send").getBoolAttribute("checked")) { enigSetSendMode('toggle-sign'); } } catch (e) {} }, as I couldn't see any particular way for other extensions to query the signing state, and setting it. However, the code above fails miserably. Any input on how I can correctly handle this? My configuration is extensions.enigmail.confirmBeforeSend = false extensions.enigmail.disableSMIMEui = false extensions.enigmail.displaySignWarn = false mail.identity.id1.pgpSignPlain = true and I want my extension to only automatically turn off the signing for *this particular mail type*, even if my mail.identity says that I'm supposed to be signing them. Thanks for any input! -- .marius From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Thu Feb 19 14:25:04 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:25:04 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Extension to avoid signing on certain mails In-Reply-To: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> References: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> Message-ID: <499DDC40.6050106@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> Marius Storm-Olsen wrote: > > and I want my extension to only automatically turn off > the signing for *this particular mail type*, even if > my mail.identity says that I'm supposed to be signing > them. Is sounds more like you'd want to extend per-recipient rules to do this. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 680 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org Fri Feb 20 00:08:29 2009 From: patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org (Patrick Brunschwig) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:08:29 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Extension to avoid signing on certain mails In-Reply-To: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> References: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> Message-ID: <499E64FD.9000508@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Marius Storm-Olsen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm working on an extension which will send a certain type > of mails, which should never be signed. However, I'm > struggling with getting the .js code right to turn off the > PGP signing. > > Right now I have something like > window.addEventListener('compose-send-message', checkSigning, true); > > where checkSigning: function() { > var signing_on = false; > try { > if > (document.getElementById("enigmail_signed_send").getBoolAttribute("checked")) > { > enigSetSendMode('toggle-sign'); > } > } catch (e) {} > }, > > as I couldn't see any particular way for other extensions > to query the signing state, and setting it. However, the > code above fails miserably. Any input on how I can > correctly handle this? > > My configuration is > extensions.enigmail.confirmBeforeSend = false > extensions.enigmail.disableSMIMEui = false > extensions.enigmail.displaySignWarn = false > mail.identity.id1.pgpSignPlain = true > > and I want my extension to only automatically turn off > the signing for *this particular mail type*, even if > my mail.identity says that I'm supposed to be signing > them. > > Thanks for any input! I think the main problem for your listener is that it's not defined if it should be run before or after the event listener that Enigmail specified. There is no guarantee of any sequence. If I were you, I'd hook on some other event that is triggered earlier, like observing "mail:composeOnSend". In addition, I'd make sure you also activate the option to ignore per-recipient rules. But as John said: you may be better off by just using the per-recipient rules ... - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZ5k/HcOpHodsOiwAQjIKwf+LYY0vO4TbaPzh2ngbRCquX/Yl0L1Wj+i KocxcAwbwvmpL5dgd2ugeqe355WvrCPoE3TLsM+hMvRbOF9dff40EQ+luseMdTh4 RVvoeLHtHJG1vNAkk9vL7QYGWFXy4tYGXSSoc1MIKPrkJFxHkf7j9p0xnI3COROE 2vwFlS0t290bOpbASYvti7lfB5ZVl5phsd4lc5/gJOIFlJQlFypXJweEauFuqxW9 YQkCK+NYFb9WeViO5jbj/dZ2N5/bFuYMo5yDdkaFCKVbH55Jiu8E15uNL4vfXMbG qlocztVwvPRI25WnOmjim2F1hf4DJrrq3TBcyvAJk0zChYSuLWx2/Q== =9ktC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org Fri Feb 20 01:38:02 2009 From: patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org (Patrick Brunschwig) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:38:02 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: <499E79FA.6090407@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here > because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 > and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. > > This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is > going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and > making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on > a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read > . > > We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail > so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to > participate. Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) Happy testing - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZ55+XcOpHodsOiwAQgWiAf/SOjulK2BDdTkm56FXH64n+1kGrEwWC3D PYBCYcCI0AlOrHVfXqIKUtcQDPkz76AAA1/7Dusn3Gh14jRqR6/yurFusUJlHE1B 2w8kOn4M5MQqjLGdCNGAui0xcV3QsWR1hOlFfEXjPmKC2UypuchHAgSjtldA3jq1 aYc3iLeuKh02vMvZ6Kf/WnyjPgOn34woPVl0jO0WtIy1OgJWqIP/8+hQxNTCsWK0 THun1bNI6Gi4GKrgnhL7pl3VxLcDQpUAbumfnOnYNc+MgXXLFkZ10ILwjZw/AJug ppCddiCFPke9uRK/5L++jOrRKPImAMWQP12Y+n+eFArSjWccY+jcBg== =cSqR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ludovic at mozillamessaging.com Fri Feb 20 01:42:02 2009 From: ludovic at mozillamessaging.com (Ludovic Hirlimann) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:42:02 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499E79FA.6090407@mozilla-enigmail.org> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499E79FA.6090407@mozilla-enigmail.org> Message-ID: <499E7AEA.8070702@mozillamessaging.com> On 2/20/09 10:38 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here >> because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 >> and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. >> >> This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is >> going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and >> making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on >> a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read >> . >> >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again > with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) > > Happy testing Yes !!! Thanks a lot for the effort Patrick. Any link - revision worth mentioning for people to get the proper version of enigmail ? In paralegal to the test day from this afternoon - we are also running test cases on litmus - the test run for thunderbird 3.0b2 is at https://litmus.mozilla.org/run_tests.cgi?test_run_id=39 Ludo -- Ludovic Hirlimann MozillaMessaging QA lead http://www.spreadthunderbird.com/aff/79/2 From funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de Fri Feb 20 01:51:51 2009 From: funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de (Tobias Fischer) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:51:51 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20.02.2009 10:38, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: [...] >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again > with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) > > Happy testing > -Patrick Yeah! Enigmail works again in SeaMonkey 2.0pre too! Thanks, many thanks for your work Patrick. I am happy again now. :) Tobias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmefTcACgkQteWPty8yIfyhLQCgpa9yVAqzfz9MLC7RAgblpDDa w1QAniyJ/KWeCJXZF9SfbJ140WkudT+5 =0Q/A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org Fri Feb 20 04:34:26 2009 From: patrick at mozilla-enigmail.org (Patrick Brunschwig) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:34:26 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: <499E7AEA.8070702@mozillamessaging.com> References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> <499E79FA.6090407@mozilla-enigmail.org> <499E7AEA.8070702@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: <499EA352.5020201@mozilla-enigmail.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: > On 2/20/09 10:38 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here >>> because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 >>> and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. >>> >>> This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is >>> going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and >>> making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on >>> a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read >>> . >>> >>> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >>> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >>> participate. >> >> Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again >> with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) >> >> Happy testing > > Yes !!! Thanks a lot for the effort Patrick. Any link - revision worth > mentioning for people to get the proper version of enigmail ? > > In paralegal to the test day from this afternoon - we are also running > test cases on litmus - the test run for thunderbird 3.0b2 is at > https://litmus.mozilla.org/run_tests.cgi?test_run_id=39 Take the latest version from . In the OpenPGP > About dialog, make sure that the version info is something like this (or any newer date): Running Enigmail version 0.96a (20090220-xxxx) - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSZ6jUHcOpHodsOiwAQjREwf/Z6Ph2q2qXXJjWPQB6GixiFNLziBDHig+ 1GQ4XQal4CdxJg+mbf7z1qLTLhLf84RvByXoA8czjY0Wpk+LqzqsZIMoWPvCQ9Dk 5FwTZNGzNyQRrmlOx7orItt4WbgidSErd5AWctUurPOVD3IDcgwRPavdtKpU+mCH s081X3tH0Riu4yAfBGEup1rz9d+pdLGzGpoweQwJypbVCb0UZ5pa3NSX+XBOnvQz HIj5BfBpYWxYwXANCNeMqbLus3dSE5xMeRgHkDwX2xMddmGW6V9E66BH7Y0HImHP VRRbAbN3391z4LDrAqOusG0KGswDmr9bkphNDtzIcnuUVAAxOTtPyQ== =NOrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de Fri Feb 20 08:48:46 2009 From: funktioniert_trotz_SPAM at nurfuerspam.de (Tobias Fischer) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:48:46 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: On 20.02.2009 10:38, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: [...] > Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again > with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) > > Happy testing There was a small issue installing Enigmail on SeaMonkey 2.0pre, the maxVersion in the install.rdf was set to something like 1.5.x, and does not really fit. Caused of SMs Version Bump to 2.0b1pre I have not noticed it first, while I have disabled extensions.compatibilityCheck for the other Add-Ons. Tobias From mstormo at gmail.com Fri Feb 20 04:14:18 2009 From: mstormo at gmail.com (mstormo) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:14:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Enigmail] Extension to avoid signing on certain mails In-Reply-To: <499E64FD.9000508@mozilla-enigmail.org> References: <499D40D9.7080203@gmail.com> <499E64FD.9000508@mozilla-enigmail.org> Message-ID: <22119536.post@talk.nabble.com> Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > > Marius Storm-Olsen wrote: >> and I want my extension to only automatically turn off >> the signing for *this particular mail type*, even if >> my mail.identity says that I'm supposed to be signing >> them. > > I think the main problem for your listener is that it's not defined if > it should be run before or after the event listener that Enigmail > specified. There is no guarantee of any sequence. > > If I were you, I'd hook on some other event that is triggered earlier, > like observing "mail:composeOnSend". > > In addition, I'd make sure you also activate the option to ignore > per-recipient rules. But as John said: you may be better off by just > using the per-recipient rules ... > Hmm, using mail:composeOnSend is an idea, I'll give that a try. Though, I guess I really want to do this right after I create the create the composer window. I could then turn off the signing, and notify the user with a message in the window. This would then allow the user to turn it *on* again, if he/she *really* wants to sign the mail. Btw, I can't really use the per-recipient rules, as it's not related to the person receiving it, but the type of email. Basically, I want to send Git patches. The patches are sent in the body, and not as an attachment. So, the mail cannot be signed, or else it would create complications for the receiving part, which needs to perform extra steps on his end, before he can apply the patch. So, when you send patches with my extension, I need to check if Enigmail is installed, if so check if signing is turned on, if so turn it off and notify the user that Signing is turned off for this mail, contrary to mail account default settings. -- .marius -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extension-to-avoid-signing-on-certain-mails-tp22109883p22119536.html Sent from the MozDev - enigmail mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From gschoelles at gmail.com Fri Feb 20 15:41:18 2009 From: gschoelles at gmail.com (George Schoelles) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:41:18 -0800 Subject: [Enigmail] Enigmail Can't find GPG.EXE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/19/2009 5:38 AM, George Schoelles wrote: > Even when I show Enigmail where the executable is it still can't find it. > > using 2/19 Nightly of both TB3 and Enigmail. > 2/20 updates seem to be working well. Thank you for your efforts -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJnz+dAAoJEGB6zXzE6fzR4EMH/A+SivSTRpOCi8M+XWUwrtvF ODucQh57xs48ui2NXcvjzloeqNP0ZmcwWe5859xyNPkKmKEDg3dSVIUyGTh11xCS dtg4ojjXeTgwOAadPWay/fzNPOcCTb4yxykJ2vWHySm1CLVnesPjhsKBtmcmX4pW wCGmEVYygIs00lO6z0bKtc3kLQXL6MI7hnKTmDF3X2DFPedJmYTTgJuqHWUt+1NI qPGQ5odfGUhIEezh3hyQWXG5h+nHsfXN4JCIpMYMqjUPvFyxYM7e7WxfOKjIsJM+ IzdGpZrgSE3y5mmeqEtn7L4FDtp7Pg8fpjD5W5RaOm9N5MV3YAbKlaSrAtr35bI= =mK8g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From gschoelles at gmail.com Sat Feb 21 06:03:11 2009 From: gschoelles at gmail.com (George Schoelles) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:03:11 -0800 Subject: [Enigmail] Thunderbird testing day In-Reply-To: References: <499A8D1D.8090200@mozillamessaging.com> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/20/2009 1:38 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: >> Hi all, > >> I'm the new Quality Assurance (QA) lead for Thunderbird. I'm here >> because the thunderbird project needs some help to make thunderbird 3.0 >> and later releases as good as possible. For that we need more man power. > >> This upcoming Friday we are having a bug Day event - where the focus is >> going to be testing the new features added to thunderbird 3.0b2 and >> making sure that they work correctly. We have setup some instructions on >> a wiki page, so If you want to participate make sure to read >> . > >> We know that the current windows build is not compatible with enigmail >> so for this Friday you will not be able to run enigmail if you want to >> participate. > > Good news: I managed to build Enigmail such that it should work again > with the Windows builds of Shredder :-) > > Happy testing > -Patrick > Your efforts are greatly appreciated. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJoAmfAAoJEGB6zXzE6fzRFiQH/0YTShaxxczucsmA05FhKMun cjH5PzlToTBz7oYhmszGcGVw0iE+tT2lJ4XGU7gYxWw9LLMs1ceDx1BkHdX3kSGv aON1GBhmV7Q+ezCrF2lP+Yhb4xAR4ZAykH13QImZTu34oHIt/10EH1UwHPQljNys Ku0e1obQjB8EsR6VdmrysSVVXnVSRCCZGJVT3bFD6YkO4H2i0Wr+odienp33+S0X gZ3qjHP/orI5b1OYk+astdW+WQ0CrYCwp0rGZJ2ntoFRT8GvNdFN/Ilp7wF0VJUo 5G2ykrhKM4uHnNUtB/ytED6H0+BExZml98T9hdW5Nvu0NRjzcnRk6y5E9mBsQ/4= =02x1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mst_crow5429 at yahoo.com Wed Feb 25 09:24:51 2009 From: mst_crow5429 at yahoo.com (Crow) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:24:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele Message-ID: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> I am using Enigmail with GnuPG, on Mozilla Thunderbird. I have been attempting to verify correct configuration with adele-en at gnupp.de. However, it replies "I could not find a public key that matches your email address so I cannot reply with encrypted messge." I have published my public key to a keyserver, and the public key is inline with the email. How do I ensure that Enigmail is configured correctly? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org Wed Feb 25 14:31:54 2009 From: John at Mozilla-Enigmail.org (John Clizbe) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:31:54 -0600 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49A5C6DA.3030608@Mozilla-Enigmail.org> Crow wrote: > How do I ensure that Enigmail is configured correctly? Thanks. Well, instead of Yahoo! web mail, you could send a normal signed email message to the list, enigmail at mozdev.org. As a quick test, signing and/or encrypting a message to yourself is a good start. If you can sign a message and can verify the received message you have Enigmail working. -- John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-keys at gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 680 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dcguard2008-enigmail at yahoo.co.uk Wed Feb 25 15:06:38 2009 From: dcguard2008-enigmail at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Cameron) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:06:38 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49A5CEFE.7050800@yahoo.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele From: Crow To: enigmail at mozdev.org Date: 25 February 2009 17:24:51 > > I am using Enigmail with GnuPG, on Mozilla Thunderbird. I have been > attempting to verify correct configuration with adele-en at gnupp.de > . However, it replies "I could not find a > public key that matches your email address so I cannot reply with > encrypted messge." I have published my public key to a keyserver, > and the public key is inline with the email. How do I ensure that > Enigmail is configured correctly? Thanks. > I guess that you did not include your public key in the email to adele or you sent the email from an address different to that in the key. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmlzv4ACgkQzrVRhE6IzinZCACgjuvukmepp7Tf2zelF+smEqnR wxYAoLd02cvZGDQpo95GRGrSS3zIxyVj =TZ2v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shavital at mac.com Wed Feb 25 21:12:11 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49A624AB.1000909@mac.com> Crow wrote the following on 2/25/09 12:24 PM: > I am using Enigmail with GnuPG, on Mozilla Thunderbird. I have been > attempting to verify correct configuration with adele-en at gnupp.de > . However, it replies "I could not find a > public key that matches your email address so I cannot reply with > encrypted messge." I have published my public key to a keyserver, and > the public key is inline with the email. How do I ensure that Enigmail > is configured correctly? Thanks. I have been unable to find a key with UID mst_crow5429 at yahoo.com. Searches with crow, or mst have produced at least 114 different keys, I have not checked them. What UID did you use for the key you uploaded to the keyservers? Could you please attach the keyblock to your next e-mail to this list? And sign it? Thanks, Charly From ian at ushills.co.uk Wed Feb 25 23:54:49 2009 From: ian at ushills.co.uk (Ian Hill) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:54:49 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <49A5CEFE.7050800@yahoo.co.uk> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <49A5CEFE.7050800@yahoo.co.uk> Message-ID: <49A64AC9.9000505@ushills.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Message received and public key downloaded from subkeys.pgp.net, with fingerprint FC4B 6AED 02F5 A0F5 86A7 0371 CEB5 5184 4E88 CE29. Duncan Cameron wrote: > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele > From: Crow > To: enigmail at mozdev.org > Date: 25 February 2009 17:24:51 >> >> I am using Enigmail with GnuPG, on Mozilla Thunderbird. I have been >> attempting to verify correct configuration with adele-en at gnupp.de >> . However, it replies "I could not find a >> public key that matches your email address so I cannot reply with >> encrypted messge." I have published my public key to a keyserver, >> and the public key is inline with the email. How do I ensure that >> Enigmail is configured correctly? Thanks. > > > I guess that you did not include your public key in the email to adele > or you sent the email from an address different to that in the key. > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Enigmail mailing list Enigmail at mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJpkrJAAoJEKedYJYX5A4sMM0H/j9rnRqG183Bz8xBtVs8HgOX bytRvXDwBAsU2/Yy62V1mxupj3fI8OS2txeCm3YCD9mMC9newRIqSok4aQBHCRzN wFX4FkiQAiWEc14c/sGYnbfzCj8tvSa38aFUbKBO8hIi3L3o3n4G+IriMXLCt8PF haK9xNyY7/ITGWM+HYHhRagCx4FVjpGew4HVk7B0ye7Bv0Z2Cf1ONXdennMxmpjO cPxU73ZMbbxnDzNnkFz7WCe5xZ8MRXhLOupAUyGR4kO3genJoDSc5ZmlH09J9P21 yNpcjNn6d9kZGmOtGyEs/SsSERqZahJjq4qoh9eh3zpV9O3EeKqIUKpHVXHI5ZE= =uFD6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bruno.matos at gmail.com Thu Feb 26 11:47:27 2009 From: bruno.matos at gmail.com (Bruno Matos) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:47:27 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends Message-ID: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> Hello, When I ask to download PGP keys it never endes. Thank you, Bruno Matos From mlisten at hammernoch.net Thu Feb 26 11:56:36 2009 From: mlisten at hammernoch.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludwig_H=FCgelsch=E4fer?=) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:56:36 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends In-Reply-To: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> References: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> Message-ID: <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> Hi, this is a known problem on Mac OS X. Are you on x86(Intel) or on PPC? Which OS version are you using? 10.3? 10.4? 10.5? Ludwig Bruno Matos wrote on 26.02.2009 20:47 Uhr: > Hello, > > When I ask to download PGP keys it never endes. > > Thank you, > Bruno Matos -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From bruno.matos at gmail.com Thu Feb 26 12:00:38 2009 From: bruno.matos at gmail.com (Bruno Matos) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:00:38 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends In-Reply-To: <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> References: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> Message-ID: <49A6F4E6.7070608@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ludwig, Mac OS X 10.4 on a PPC G4. i would like to help if I can. Thank you, Bruno Matos Ludwig H?gelsch?fer wrote: > Hi, > > this is a known problem on Mac OS X. Are you on x86(Intel) or on PPC? > Which OS version are you using? 10.3? 10.4? 10.5? > > Ludwig > > Bruno Matos wrote on 26.02.2009 20:47 Uhr: >> Hello, >> >> When I ask to download PGP keys it never endes. >> >> Thank you, >> Bruno Matos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Enigmail mailing list > Enigmail at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJpvTk5EbIpZbvsiIRAogaAJ9tq22zKfgt/HOhoQeYJGqXNL9jcQCfRO6s jt2H9VW0OtKz0oyDhaDAXBg= =6kmT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From shavital at mac.com Thu Feb 26 12:54:30 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends In-Reply-To: <49A6F4E6.7070608@gmail.com> References: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> <49A6F4E6.7070608@gmail.com> Message-ID: <49A70186.2000708@mac.com> Bruno Matos wrote the following on 2/26/09 3:00 PM: > Hello Ludwig, > > Mac OS X 10.4 on a PPC G4. i would like to help if I can. > > Thank you, > Bruno Matos > > > > Ludwig H??gelsch??fer wrote: >> Hi, > >> this is a known problem on Mac OS X. Are you on x86(Intel) or on PPC? >> Which OS version are you using? 10.3? 10.4? 10.5? > >> Ludwig > >> Bruno Matos wrote on 26.02.2009 20:47 Uhr: >>> Hello, >>> >>> When I ask to download PGP keys it never endes. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Bruno Matos > OpenPGP Security Info Good signature from Bruno Matos Key ID: 0x96EFB222 / Signed on: 2/26/09 3:00 PM Key fingerprint: F7AA DD6B C8EC 3DC6 CC6F CD5D E446 C8A5 96EF B222 It took about five seconds to download Bruno's key. What problem with MacOSX? Charly MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - GPG2 2.0.10 - Testing Thunderbird 3.0b2+Enigmail version 0.96a (20090225-0833)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA From bruno.matos at gmail.com Thu Feb 26 13:26:51 2009 From: bruno.matos at gmail.com (Bruno Matos) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:26:51 +0000 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends In-Reply-To: <49A70186.2000708@mac.com> References: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> <49A6F4E6.7070608@gmail.com> <49A70186.2000708@mac.com> Message-ID: <49A7091B.3040802@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charly Avital wrote: > Bruno Matos wrote the following on 2/26/09 3:00 PM: >> Hello Ludwig, >> >> Mac OS X 10.4 on a PPC G4. i would like to help if I can. >> >> Thank you, >> Bruno Matos >> >> >> >> Ludwig H??gelsch??fer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> this is a known problem on Mac OS X. Are you on x86(Intel) or on PPC? >>> Which OS version are you using? 10.3? 10.4? 10.5? >>> Ludwig >>> Bruno Matos wrote on 26.02.2009 20:47 Uhr: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> When I ask to download PGP keys it never endes. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Bruno Matos > > OpenPGP Security Info > Good signature from Bruno Matos > Key ID: 0x96EFB222 / Signed on: 2/26/09 3:00 PM > Key fingerprint: F7AA DD6B C8EC 3DC6 CC6F CD5D E446 C8A5 96EF B222 > > It took about five seconds to download Bruno's key. What problem with > MacOSX? > > Charly > MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - > GPG2 2.0.10 - Testing Thunderbird 3.0b2+Enigmail version 0.96a > (20090225-0833)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA > > _______________________________________________ > Enigmail mailing list > Enigmail at mozdev.org > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail I'll try the 0.96a version, and let you know... Thanks, Bruno -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJpwka5EbIpZbvsiIRAvUPAJ40SmJyIfms632Q4Gmc8VLvonHqiACgkiwo 7dSH97y+FPhoTFu2vgI8qPw= =4Pti -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From shavital at mac.com Thu Feb 26 21:58:30 2009 From: shavital at mac.com (Charly Avital) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Enigmail] PGP key download never ends In-Reply-To: <49A7091B.3040802@gmail.com> References: <49A6F1CF.7060305@gmail.com> <49A6F3F4.2090001@hammernoch.net> <49A6F4E6.7070608@gmail.com> <49A70186.2000708@mac.com> <49A7091B.3040802@gmail.com> Message-ID: <49A78106.5000508@mac.com> Bruno Matos wrote the following on 2/26/09 4:26 PM: [...] > > I'll try the 0.96a version, and let you know... > > Thanks, > Bruno Enigmail version 0.96a is the nightly release for Thunderbird trunk, currently 3.0b2, as indicated in my signature comments. If you are running Thunderbird (stable) 2.0.0.19, I believe you'd better stay with the current Enigmail stable version 0.95.7 Best regards, Charly MacOS 10.5.6 - MacBook Intel C2Duo "Aluminum Late 2008"- GnuPG 1.4.9 - GPG2 2.0.10 - Testing Thunderbird 3.0b2+Enigmail version 0.96a (20090226-1955)- Apple's Mail+GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56), PGP key: 0xA57A8EFA From m534c.subscribe at gmail.com Thu Feb 26 23:17:17 2009 From: m534c.subscribe at gmail.com (Jonas Islander) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:17:17 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 2009/2/25 Crow : > I am using Enigmail with GnuPG, on Mozilla Thunderbird. I have been > attempting to verify correct configuration with adele-en at gnupp.de. However, > it replies "I could not find a public key that matches your email address so > I cannot reply with encrypted messge." I have published my public key to a > keyserver, and the public key is inline with the email. I had the same problem when I tried to send my key in an encrypted message. I so lved it by first sending a signed, unencrypted message with my key attached, and then a signed encrypted message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkmnkgMACgkQ4cr2nwrKBjxlXgCfTiVnC6kHQo1NEzxp/JaoXV2e uWsAn3x3Zf+yx1iffrqYWjrBdoEMCHrx =yC92 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From m534c.subscribe at gmail.com Fri Feb 27 14:34:14 2009 From: m534c.subscribe at gmail.com (Jonas Islander) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:34:14 +0100 Subject: [Enigmail] Configuring Enigmail, testing with Adele In-Reply-To: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <306359.55974.qm@web51406.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49A86A66.4050200@gmail.com> Resending message due to bad signature... Crow wrote: > I have been attempting to verify correct configuration with > adele-en at gnupp.de . However, it replies "I > could not find a public key that matches your email address so I > cannot reply with encrypted messge." I have published my public key > to a keyserver, and the public key is inline with the email. How do I > ensure that Enigmail is configured correctly? Thanks. I had the same problem when I tried to send my key in an encrypted message. I solved it by first sending a signed, unencrypted message with my key attached, and then a signed encrypted message. -- Jonas Islander -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: