[Enigmail] Robert Hansen's pop quiz
Billy O Clinton
billyoclintonpgp at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 21:29:50 PDT 2008
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Pop quiz! All answers must be justified.
>
>
>
> Part 1: Basic Trust Skills (Short Answer)
>
> Search for keya 0xFEAF8109, 0x5B0358A2 and 0xCCEC227B. Answer these
> four questions for each key.
>
> 1. Should you sign this key and make it valid?
> 2. Stipulate the key belongs to the person it claims, and that
> the key is correct. Should you now sign it?
> 3. Do you trust the person named in the key?
> 4. Should the answers to #2 and #3 have been the same?
>
>
> Part 2: Advanced Trust Skills (Short Answer)
>
> 1. Do digital signatures create a trust relationship, or do
> they only reflect an already-existing trust relationship?
> 2. Do digital signatures serve any purpose in the absence of
> an already-existing trust relationship?
> 3. Should you know all the root authorities your operating
> system trusts?
> 4. Why do you trust your OS vendor to decide which root
> authorities are trustworthy?
>
>
>
>
> I would politely ask that people who can easily answer these questions
> hold off until Friday--let's let the newbies mull these questions over
> in peace. :)
>
> Man, I miss teaching Computer Literacy... :)
>
Part 1
0xFEAF8109: Unsure if I should sign this key. *Pretending* this key is
100% your key, I would sign the key "I have done casual checking". I
would not sign your key as "I have done very careful checking" because I
do not know you IRL, have not seen your actual ID, or at the least know
your voice to verify your public key fingerprints over the phone.
0x5B0358A2: What I wrote above would apply here in my reasoning.
0xCCEC227B: I would not sign, trust, or even send an encrypted message
to this user because their public key was revoked.
Part 2
1. From what I've read about digital signatures on Wikipedia, they seem
difficult to forge. So in this sense it simply creates trust between
exchanging users. I don't think these signatures reflect an already
existing trust-relationship because it is only another layer of
assurance between the parties; ie. what would be the point of digital
signatures if they only served a reflection of a trust relationship?
2-4: No idea.
-Bill
-----
MacOSX 10.5.2//C2D2.2+4GBRAM
Thunderbird 2.0+Enigmail+GnuPG1.4.8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/enigmail/attachments/20080313/9582c5be/attachment.bin
More information about the Enigmail
mailing list