[Enigmail] Breaking sigs

John W. Moore III jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net
Mon Jul 28 21:09:20 PDT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

John Clizbe wrote:

> When I put forth a position, I am inclined to also be able to put forth the
> reasoning supporting it. What some may consider obstreperous, I consider merely
> to be emphatic.

What I am finding so amusing about the direction this thread has taken
is that the majority of Readers of this Forum are using Enigmail.
Without expenditure of added effort the GnuPG version [& all Comments]
are not even visible.

Of course, when a Signature is 'invalid/broken/Bad' then Enigmail does
display the Signature Block in the body of the Message Screen.  Still,
I'd wager that there are very few folks who routinely or even fairly
often bother to look at the Message Source [Ctrl+U] to determine the
version or read the Comments.

That said; it is entertaining to watch reasonable Men "write their names
in the snow."  :-D

JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Tuesday 29 Jul 2008, 00:09  --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4799: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org
Comment: Homepage:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJIjpfqAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPBAUH/RGSemosY7PR/+PKYFloKygX
CEMKPfAD4Qz+1gjLSnrhDrk90Qz1ZeqeJCfCfe8x+xNcwriE4Jsgvl+5SJ1/57e1
YG7aG6B7sTo4sJNioVLqHzThen6qYPYCP3OVvmc52FauvPcPGXh+GU8LhTrDOuKb
FP3ftQSPcmlTCJu8UZ8TtLqVxbAZ67kAcEQiaJFtiPtfV3vYd8xfAmhn71b8PhZF
ZHTtX456wSP64vc+t09XyAkvEblmk6epJk6V3HdS8GTYLvwOBzxLfUwAijrn7HlO
0CpMV/v3WUh6DeH8c8IxOYVNvX1/dIA14vF/wDauPXF7MjT2i2SP3NgDe2NCFu0=
=4QbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Enigmail mailing list