[Enigmail] Error with 20081211 and 20081212 and 3.0b2

[Patrick Brunschwig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John W. Moore III wrote:
> Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> 
>> Conclusion: If you want to have a useable version, stick to TB 2.0.0.18.
> 
> I am experiencing no problems with Tb 2.0.0.20pre which scratches My
> 'Bleeding Edge' itch while still providing reliability and consistency.
>  [http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8/]
>  I am using this with the most current Enigmail Nightly Build and GnuPG
> 1.4.10-svn4901.
> 
> IMHO, the Thunderbird 3.x code has strayed way too far into the realm of
> bloated, unwieldy and far too complicated.  I am sensing a future move
> to either SeaMonkey or Spicebird. [www.spicebird.com]

I don't think this reflects reality. It's just a fact that Thunderbird
is currently -- for the 1st time in its history -- undergoing heavy
development. I think the current changes are necessary and I was hoping
for them for a long time. It's no surprise that nightly releases on the
active development branch are not always stable. The nightly builds of
TB 2.0.0.20pre cannot be compared to the nightly builds of TB 3.0b2.

If you want something working, then stick to released versions: either
Thunderbird 2.0.x or -- if you want some more uncertainty about
stability then 3.0b1.

- -Patrick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEVAwUBSUQIjncOpHodsOiwAQLuCAf/dWTh8x9MpGAHS/aWNi/5Iimml0qHkQoX
Oa3M0A39QsSN25PsmzdwrNl1q/OZjFBbBtiVbq5ns2zUhb8xXomNt6Pyh0T5Ozfr
/8Cc/0LQVBAgS3zBsyzAGqDUwikP0Hgs8HxbT9es+WqXsCmnPbR0cKnxLzCPfFPQ
7ovd0zgBEhmPur5IK06M6MGNGvONyVDXQmOo596BjNTbi5c8sS6zar3hXeO0v5S1
fXzCM7cE84G30ZPfsIDc1EEqUZGQpDfIGs6O2jz4GISzxLAxRkgeGnz9KUcDG6tY
LAHkY6+CwykK74NVOJpemAfmeJrFx2vhqXC39Gyjofc4hp8az2eOUQ==
=4+WB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----