[Enigmail] My Bad, Sorry About That

[Faramir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

John W. Moore III escribió:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
> 
>> If you're on a 100% person-to-person encrypted list at all, it's because
>> you need a list but want your list to be really, really secure.  So
...

> Not necessarily; there are 'Training/Practice' Lists where Message
> Secrecy isn't the Goal & in an Enterprise situation the Trust
> Assignments and Key Issuance would all be handled by the IT or Security
> Department.

  In that context (the IT Department acting as a CA), it looks better...

> This thread originated simply because it was pointed out that an
> encrypted List is possible & feasible.  How it wandered down this
> 'rabbit trail' of musings escapes Me.  IIRC, Nobody recommended

  Well, since most of us are interested in how GPG work in different
situations, and what problems can be solved by using it, and what kind
of problems shouldn't be solved with GPG, it was very likely we would
discuss about the good and bad points of having an encrypted list (if
the list is not a "test list").

  By the way, and completely off topic, what does IIRC means?

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIslvcAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAt6sH/33SXDws6k9mgR8Hzvehhn0t
qcZo9el3Ls/vEZkWzGbj0Vp/PPDFER0vlsvYpvRKkwMj2dKV/Onm86yPYQZygEwt
p44DhSPEayqZd/x2YmcNaBhS0lr3UATnSic+7drHADRyucnWTXT/rjjjUmClSlGr
zZ2TgP6bVABACmhhY7D+e91hYKloujSE0TsF7bBZWewQZ1Svp/VJYdqdq/RcBhnp
jPMADwrUF2PuSTCPfsFjsHjteY1Jii6xnBuSDBt4119m+0s87bzieIyCC/gMvh/l
CEctleGNlGllEutBFWZFMkRXUpUNmBfWz7utEA1PxqLXwVyxQ77jbmZLatZtZxM=
=BgUB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----