[Camino] Icon's weight doesn't quite fit.

[Polycarbonate at Open-Jugular.com]

On May 5, 2006, at 10:32=C6, Silas Palmer-Cannon wrote:
> I just want to clear up any misunderstanding about the word =20
> polished. I didn't mean "having a shiny and smooth appearance". I =20
> meant it more as in "showing a high degree of efinement", ie being =20
> properly finished...
>
> Silas

Woops.
I created your perception of a misunderstanding.  I knew you meant =20
polished in that manner and didn't notice that it seemed i was using =20
it to mean glassy.  I was really just agreeing, and my being tired of =20=

glassy icons is a side-point.


On other matters, i was lurking about back when the lengthy =20
discussions took place about all the graphical UI elements and =20
various proposals were popping up, set off somewhat by Jasper's =20
initial designs.  Then it seemed all potential additional ideas and =20
most of those already around were axed by the decision to use =20
Jasper's designs with only minor modifications.

It seemed at the time that his designs were allowed to steamroller =20
all others more than has been the case with proposals about non-=20
graphical elements.

   Scott