[Camino] Icon's weight doesn't quite fit.

[Ricky]

Isn't it actually a 128 by 128, not 256 by 256?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Icon_Image

On 5/5/06, Polycarbonate at open-jugular.com
<Polycarbonate at open-jugular.com> wrote:
> I used to like it okay.  But glassy things got overdone and it does
> have that disadvantage of looking small.  When i turned a designer's
> eye at all the different browser logos/icons grouped together, i was
> surprised to find Seamonkey's leaping out as most eye-catching and
> upscale.
>
>   Scott
>
>
> On May 3, 2006, at 09:53•, Silas Palmer-Cannon wrote:
>
> > I have just started using Camino yesterday, as this is when I first
> > heard about it. The only thing that I think is a little bit
> > 'unpolished' about the program is the icon.
> >
> > It isn't as weighty (visually) as I think it could be. All the
> > other icons for apps don't 'feel small' when you look at their
> > icons. The reason for this is that they use much of the icon
> > 256x256 canvas. Camino's icon does use the space, but not well in
> > my opinion. Perhaps you could consider expanding the size of the
> > inner circle till its visual weight felt consistent with other
> > major apps on one's dock.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Camino mailing list
> Camino at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
>