From master at sitesbr.net Fri Mar 3 16:57:35 2006
From: master at sitesbr.net (Master Br)
Date: Fri Mar 3 14:52:44 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Is it continuing Bene's extension ???
Message-ID: <44089FAF.3030503@sitesbr.net>
Because I am the first translator for Portuguese Locales and I don't see
my name anywhere there !
Are different extensions ?
Sergio Abreu
From trev at gtchat.de Fri Mar 3 21:14:41 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Fri Mar 3 15:15:21 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Is it continuing Bene's extension ???
In-Reply-To: <44089FAF.3030503@sitesbr.net>
References: <44089FAF.3030503@sitesbr.net>
Message-ID: <4408A3B1.5060309@gtchat.de>
Master Br wrote:
> Because I am the first translator for Portuguese Locales and I don't see
> my name anywhere there !
> Are different extensions ?
See http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_project.html#adblock
Adblock Plus 0.6+ has a separate entry on Babelzilla due to a different
GUID (Adblock Plus 0.5 was sharing its GUID with Adblock, this had to be
changed). You can find it here:
http://www.babelzilla.org/index.php?option=com_wts&Itemid=51&extension=584&type=lang
I think I sent messages to all previous translators of Adblock Plus 0.5,
but there is no Portuguese translation listed on Babelzilla. Somebody
translated Adblock Plus 0.6 to Portuguese however, this translation is
included in the latest development build:
http://p2.forumforfree.com/-vp3788-adblockplus.html#3788. Babelzilla
supports multiple translators however, you are free to join.
Wladimir
From sharkwang at gmail.com Sat Mar 4 15:26:25 2006
From: sharkwang at gmail.com (Shark Wang)
Date: Sat Mar 4 02:26:57 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] How can I use adblock plus to block the html tag ![]()
Dears,
I wrote this regex ' /]*>/' in my filters, but it do not work .
Could you tell me what's wrong with it ? and how can I block the images
with adblock regex or other way....
thanks a lot ~~~!
--
I'm just a bitMaker !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060304/bd533ae4/attachment.htm
From denad at gmx.net Sun Mar 5 14:09:53 2006
From: denad at gmx.net (Nora & Dennis Adler)
Date: Sun Mar 5 08:10:52 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Some wishes for the adblock sidebar
Message-ID: <26494.1141564193@www003.gmx.net>
Hi,
I'm using the official AdBlock Plus 0.6.1.1 and Firefox 1.5.0.1 on Windows
XP prof.
Some little issues I found are:
If I make the sidebar smaller (push the right border to the left) the
vertical scrollbar disappears. Perhaps a fixed minimum size for the width of
the sidebar solves that.
On a page with many objects, like www.spiegel.de, it would be nice, if the
shown elements in the sidebar are grouped into 'blocked' and 'unblocked'.
The tooltip in the sidebar of a blocked item is sometimes not readable
because the content is too large.
Do you have the possibility to add a line break or word wrap for very long
entries?
Can I influence the time of the tooltip appearance? The tooltip should come
faster and stay longer.
If I click on a blocked item and do not move the mouse, I do not get the
tooltip.
I'm using a filter subscription. Now I would like to copy an entry of the
fixed filter. The context menu with 'copy and paste' would be cool.
Thank and regards,
Dennis
--
Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 01:16:49 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 5 19:17:37 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] How can I use adblock plus to block the html tag
![]()
References: <1e22f3590603032326w13b6d01bv17be8ddde2281c32@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <440B7F71.6060601@gtchat.de>
Shark Wang wrote:
> I wrote this regex ' /]*>/' in my filters, but it do not work .
>
> Could you tell me what's wrong with it ? and how can I block the
> images with adblock regex or other way....
Adblock Plus doesn't block HTML code, it blocks addresses. For example
the filter http://google.com/* will block all images (and other
externally loaded objects) from google.com.
There is also something called element hiding
(http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_features.html#divblock). It can hide
any HTML elements - that's for things that can't be blocked by address.
Here you can add a filter like #img - this one will hide all images.
Wladimir
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 01:27:42 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 5 19:28:28 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Some wishes for the adblock sidebar
In-Reply-To: <26494.1141564193@www003.gmx.net>
References: <26494.1141564193@www003.gmx.net>
Message-ID: <440B81FE.30701@gtchat.de>
Nora & Dennis Adler wrote:
> If I make the sidebar smaller (push the right border to the left) the
> vertical scrollbar disappears. Perhaps a fixed minimum size for the width of
> the sidebar solves that.
No, the reason is rather that the sidebar content isn't fully resizable
- the text on the top doesn't let it get any smaller. Firefox doesn't
notice it and resizes the sidebar even further, that's why you don't see
the scrollbar.
> On a page with many objects, like www.spiegel.de, it would be nice, if the
> shown elements in the sidebar are grouped into 'blocked' and 'unblocked'.
Column sorting for the sidebar is on the plan. I guess
"blocked/unblocked" can be a column as well.
> The tooltip in the sidebar of a blocked item is sometimes not readable
> because the content is too large.
> Do you have the possibility to add a line break or word wrap for very long
> entries?
This can be done...
> Can I influence the time of the tooltip appearance? The tooltip should come
> faster and stay longer.
That behavior is the same for the whole browser, maybe there are some
settings in about:config...
> If I click on a blocked item and do not move the mouse, I do not get the
> tooltip.
That's how it works in Gecko...
> I'm using a filter subscription. Now I would like to copy an entry of the
> fixed filter. The context menu with 'copy and paste' would be cool.
Yep, is on the plan (now also listed on
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html).
Wladimir
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 02:33:01 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 5 20:33:49 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1.2 released
Message-ID: <440B914D.4040100@gtchat.de>
Adblock Plus 0.6.1.2 has been released today.
Installation:
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html
Major changes:
* Added translations: Danish, British English, Portuguese, Swedish,
Chinese Traditional
* Filters starting with http:// or https:// no longer match only at the
beginning of the address
* Starting filters with | makes them match only at the beginning of the
address, finishing them with | makes them match only at the end
* Maximal compatible Netscape version set to Netscape 8.1
Detailed changelog:
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/changelog-0.6.1.2.html
From sclarke81 at gmail.com Mon Mar 6 11:09:17 2006
From: sclarke81 at gmail.com (Stephen Clarke)
Date: Mon Mar 6 06:09:49 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
Message-ID: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com>
Hi
Firstly I guess I should mention that I'm pretty new to Firefox and its
extensions in general, so please excuse me if I make any silly comments, but
there are a few thoughts I'd like to share with regards to Adblock Plus.
I'm using Firefox 1.5.0.1 and Adblock Plus 0.6.1.2 on XP Pro.
My first point is that as a new user I'm unfamiliar with the adblocking
process and have been finding it difficult to understand the differences
between Adblock, Adblock Plus and Filter.G Updater, mainly because it is
difficult to locate a good source of information. After doing some searching
all I find is people arguing about names/development issues, so maybe this
is obscuring what I'm looking for. I'd really appreciate either a
comparision chart or a description of terms/features to allow me to gain a
better understanding.
I also use All-in-one Sidebar (0.6.4) and it would be really great if there
was an icon to show/hide the Adblock Plus sidebar that doesnt have the
dropdown menu. This would allow it to integrate much better. It would also
be useful if the options in the dropdown menu appeared in the Adblock Plus
sidebar as buttons or a menu.
I'd also like to say thank you. For me the extensions to Firefox are what
makes it so perfect, the fact that you can shape it to the way you work. So
its great that people put time and effort into creating and sharing them,
thanks!
Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060306/2e11fb28/attachment.htm
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 19:21:31 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 6 13:22:13 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
Stephen Clarke wrote:
> My first point is that as a new user I'm unfamiliar with the adblocking
> process and have been finding it difficult to understand the differences
> between Adblock, Adblock Plus and Filter.G Updater, mainly because it is
> difficult to locate a good source of information.
I hope the FAQ are a good starting point:
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_project.html#adblock
> I'd really appreciate
> either a comparision chart or a description of terms/features to allow
> me to gain a better understanding.
I can't do this - I'm biased. From my point of view Adblock is written
so badly that it is irresponsible to let people use it.
The very first changelog is probably somewhat useful:
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/changelog-0.6.html
> I also use All-in-one Sidebar (0.6.4) and it would be really great if
> there was an icon to show/hide the Adblock Plus sidebar that doesnt have
> the dropdown menu. This would allow it to integrate much better.
Here: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/2006-February/000063.html
And I'll look at a more general solution when I have time.
> It
> would also be useful if the options in the dropdown menu appeared in the
> Adblock Plus sidebar as buttons or a menu.
That's an overkill - we have these options in three different places
already. But ok, maybe in the sidebar's context menu once there is one...
Wladimir
From pitdicker at gmail.com Mon Mar 6 20:14:26 2006
From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker)
Date: Mon Mar 6 14:15:00 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com>
<440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <440C8A12.20300@gmail.com>
Maybe you have something to this. I almost didn.t use Adblock 0.5, so
there might be some mistakes.
Adblock 0.5 build 3
Adblock 6
/User interface/
Status bar icon
o
o
Toolbar icon
x
o
Under 'Tools'
o
o
Multilingual
o
o
/Blocking elements/
Context menu
o
o
Object tabs
o
o
Overlay Flash
o
x
Quickblock
o
x
List of blockable-elements
o
o
Block entire sites
o
x
/Filter import/
ClickImport
o
x
Filter subscriptions
x
o
Import file
o
o
Export file
o
o
/Functionality/
DIV blocking
o
partially
Whitelisting
o
o
Block before loading
o
o
Collapse blocked elements
o
o
Finally I want to say Adblock Plus is faster and more easy (but still
might be difficult).
Hope this helps,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060306/2e5a4383/attachment-0001.htm
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 20:40:30 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 6 14:41:31 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440C8A12.20300@gmail.com>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com> <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
<440C8A12.20300@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <440C902E.1000509@gtchat.de>
Paul Dicker wrote:
> Maybe you have something to this. I almost didn.t use Adblock 0.5, so
> there might be some mistakes.
Yes, there are. You listed quite a few features that Adblock doesn't
have, I think you were referring to Adblock Plus 0.5: Status bar icon
(Adblock only has text in the status bar), Multilingual (Adblock is
English only), DIV blocking (Adblock never had this).
And you missed out a lot of things that are more important than the
hypothetical "QuickBlock" feature that nobody knows about: *dynamical*
list of all blocked items, blocking background images via context menu,
showing the filter that blocked an item, proper filter sorting in the
preferences, proper blocking of banner links (buggy in Adblock) etc etc...
Wladimir
From pirlouy at free.fr Mon Mar 6 21:07:17 2006
From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy)
Date: Mon Mar 6 15:00:34 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com>
<440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <440C9675.1010004@free.fr>
Wladimir Palant a ?crit :
> I can't do this - I'm biased. From my point of view Adblock is written
> so badly that it is irresponsible to let people use it.
Just for curiosity and like you seem to be sure that Adblock is bad-coded:
Have you said your opinion to "rue" and all the team ? Then, what was
their answers ? If there were lots of problems, they should have
recognized these errors, no ?
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 6 21:57:48 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 6 15:58:27 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440C9675.1010004@free.fr>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com> <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de>
<440C9675.1010004@free.fr>
Message-ID: <440CA24C.1060905@gtchat.de>
pirlouy wrote:
> Just for curiosity and like you seem to be sure that Adblock is bad-coded:
> Have you said your opinion to "rue" and all the team ?
Lol :)
I've been discussing this with rue for years.
> Then, what was their answers ?
The response was: "Your contribution is very appreciated"
And then we discussed a really trivial bug for hours again. And in the
end rue decided again that he knows everything better and the bug
shouldn't be fixed (my favorites are these weird Apply/Revert buttons in
the preferences, I suggested to make OK/Cancel out of it several times,
always with a long discussion). Usually we didn't even come to the
really serious problems - no time.
> If there were lots of problems, they should have
> recognized these errors, no ?
By anyone with a little programming knowledge - yes, sure. I helped
improving several extensions, usually the authors know it when they see
good suggestions. Sadly, this isn't about rue.
Wladimir
From pitdicker at gmail.com Wed Mar 8 09:34:34 2006
From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker)
Date: Wed Mar 8 03:35:06 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440C902E.1000509@gtchat.de>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com> <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de> <440C8A12.20300@gmail.com>
<440C902E.1000509@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <440E971A.5060905@gmail.com>
Wladimir Palant schreef:
> Paul Dicker wrote:
>
>> Maybe you have something to this. I almost didn.t use Adblock 0.5,
>> so there might be some mistakes.
>
>
> Yes, there are. You listed quite a few features that Adblock doesn't
> have, I think you were referring to Adblock Plus 0.5: Status bar icon
> (Adblock only has text in the status bar), Multilingual (Adblock is
> English only), DIV blocking (Adblock never had this).
>
> And you missed out a lot of things that are more important than the
> hypothetical "QuickBlock" feature that nobody knows about: *dynamical*
> list of all blocked items, blocking background images via context
> menu, showing the filter that blocked an item, proper filter sorting
> in the preferences, proper blocking of banner links (buggy in Adblock)
> etc etc...
>
> Wladimir
> _______________________________________________
> AdblockPlus mailing list
> AdblockPlus@mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus
>
I'm sorry for giving bad information.
DIV blocking was rong indeed, but Adblock is transated into miltiple
languges, it is only difficult to find them.
Thanks for correcting me, as developer you know it the best.
From trev at gtchat.de Wed Mar 8 11:47:43 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Wed Mar 8 05:48:30 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] A couple of thoughts from a new user
In-Reply-To: <440E971A.5060905@gmail.com>
References: <54d64e910603060309m358a539bh@mail.gmail.com> <440C7DAB.4060204@gtchat.de> <440C8A12.20300@gmail.com> <440C902E.1000509@gtchat.de>
<440E971A.5060905@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <440EB64F.7030006@gtchat.de>
Paul Dicker wrote:
> DIV blocking was rong indeed, but Adblock is transated into miltiple
> languges, it is only difficult to find them.
Yes, I've seen at the very least a German version of Adblock. My respect
to the translators - translating Adblock is an awful job, there is no
separation between user interface and locale, you have to edit user
interface files directly to translate. And once a new version is out you
have to start all over again. So the fact that there are translations of
Adblock doesn't make it multilingual.
Wladimir
From pirlouy at free.fr Thu Mar 9 17:22:22 2006
From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy)
Date: Thu Mar 9 11:17:22 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
Message-ID: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr>
@Wladimir: I know you're very busy, so I just want to discuss about a
possible feature for AB+.
I notice that 95% of scripts which not belong to the domain of the site,
are not essential.
So I thought AB could have a function which... an example is easier:
I'm on the site "www.blabla.example.com", this feature would
automatically block scripts which not belong to "example.com" (warning:
"ads.example.com" shouldn't be blocked by this feature)
I hope you've understood...
Now, I'm 99% sure you don't like this feature, and you won't put it on
AB+. Or you will advise me to use Noscript, and I won't because Noscript
is too "evil" and also blocks nice scripts. More, I think this feature
is linked to an extension like Adblock...
So, I'm just here to propose you to think about an inofficial add-on for
AB+, of course not for now, but... one day, maybe in 1 year ?
From trev at gtchat.de Thu Mar 9 17:52:30 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Thu Mar 9 11:53:22 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
In-Reply-To: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr>
References: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr>
Message-ID: <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
pirlouy wrote:
> Now, I'm 99% sure you don't like this feature, and you won't put it on
> AB+. Or you will advise me to use Noscript, and I won't because Noscript
> is too "evil" and also blocks nice scripts. More, I think this feature
> is linked to an extension like Adblock...
Wrong and wrong :)
I like the idea and I think it is the right thing to do. Actually, this
should be done on the browser level, because it is a security issue as
well (unfortunately not going to happen - would break too many sites).
Problem is - how do we define "external" scripts? For example look at
(www.)about.com - it loads scripts from z.about.com. So "external" is
probably everything coming from another second level domain. Which
leaves us with the problem to determine what a second level domain is
(about.co.uk is one, but news.spb.ru isn't).
Wladimir
From Calain80 at h3c.de Thu Mar 9 18:08:00 2006
From: Calain80 at h3c.de (Calain80)
Date: Thu Mar 9 12:08:37 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
In-Reply-To: <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
References: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr> <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <441060F0.305@h3c.de>
Wladimir Palant schrieb:
> pirlouy wrote:
>> Now, I'm 99% sure you don't like this feature, and you won't put it
>> on AB+. Or you will advise me to use Noscript, and I won't because
>> Noscript is too "evil" and also blocks nice scripts. More, I think
>> this feature is linked to an extension like Adblock...
>
> Wrong and wrong :)
>
> I like the idea and I think it is the right thing to do. Actually,
> this should be done on the browser level, because it is a security
> issue as well (unfortunately not going to happen - would break too
> many sites).
>
> Problem is - how do we define "external" scripts? For example look at
> (www.)about.com - it loads scripts from z.about.com. So "external" is
> probably everything coming from another second level domain. Which
> leaves us with the problem to determine what a second level domain is
> (about.co.uk is one, but news.spb.ru isn't).
How would it be to rule, that an domain is an different domain, if more
then the first section is different for the current domain?
Like:
www.test.co.uk to *.test.co.uk
It might even allow ab.cd.test.co.uk.
Calain
From trev at gtchat.de Thu Mar 9 18:51:02 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Thu Mar 9 12:51:54 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
In-Reply-To: <441060F0.305@h3c.de>
References: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr> <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
<441060F0.305@h3c.de>
Message-ID: <44106B06.2090300@gtchat.de>
Calain80 wrote:
> How would it be to rule, that an domain is an different domain, if more
> then the first section is different for the current domain?
> Like:
>
> www.test.co.uk to *.test.co.uk
And about.com isn't different from mozilla.com? No, that isn't going to
work. Looking at image permissions that are built into Firefox - they
simply assume that the last two parts of the host name are the domain
name (noting in a comment that it will break on .co.uk). Cookie
permissions are more thorough (they check for IP addresses) but also
consider anything with a dot in it a domain. Comment is:
* note: RFC2109 section 4.3.2 requires that we check the following:
* that the portion of host not in domain does not contain a dot.
* this prevents hosts of the form x.y.co.nz from setting cookies in the
* entire .co.nz domain. however, it's only a only a partial solution and
* it breaks sites (IE doesn't enforce it), so we don't perform this check.
I guess we will have to follow the lead, maybe hard-coding one exception
for domain.co.*.
Wladimir
From pirlouy at free.fr Thu Mar 9 19:18:58 2006
From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy)
Date: Thu Mar 9 13:11:15 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
In-Reply-To: <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
References: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr> <44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <44107192.3000205@free.fr>
Do you have an example of site in .co.uk which has "ads" script in .co.uk ?
Most of "server ads" are in .com, .net I think, no ?
Of course this feature doesn't work for the ads in betanews for example
(ads.betanews.com), but the standard feature of AB will catch them.
--
Pirlouy
Stairway To Heaven
From fx at nekno.com Fri Mar 10 19:30:09 2006
From: fx at nekno.com (Firefox Support)
Date: Fri Mar 10 20:30:07 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 8
Message-ID: <44122821.3090103@nekno.com>
> I guess we will have to follow the lead, maybe hard-coding one exception
> for domain.co.*.
>
> Wladimir
Wladimir,
That would catch the majority of cases, but don't forget that just about
every top-level domain has those exceptions, e.g., domain.com.*,
domain.org.*, domain.net.*, etc. Any of the country-code top-level
domains can reserve the popular subdomains and sell off the
sub-subdomains individually.
See http://www.iana.org/domain-names.htm for a list of TLDs, ccTLDs, and
more.
This approach will also fall down when the second-level domain matches a
top-level domain, i.e., com.com (CNet), org.org, net.com, com.net, etc.
Just a thought.
Kevin
From mp3geek at gmail.com Sun Mar 12 21:17:28 2006
From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek)
Date: Sun Mar 12 03:18:02 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] export a subscription?
Message-ID:
trying to export (to a text file) a subscription directly from adblock, and
the option is grey'd out :/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060312/60c80122/attachment.htm
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 13 14:55:36 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 13 08:56:27 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] export a subscription?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <441579D8.1070706@gtchat.de>
mp3geek wrote:
> trying to export (to a text file) a subscription directly from adblock,
> and the option is grey'd out :/
Export is for user-defined filters only and you obviously don't have any
to export. It doesn't make much sense to export a subscription. Latest
development build has the option to copy/paste filters however, and
there is a filter patterns.ini where all filters and subscriptions are
stored - this one can be backuped if that's what you want to do.
Wladimir
From bderks at web.de Mon Mar 13 18:45:44 2006
From: bderks at web.de (Bernhard Derks)
Date: Mon Mar 13 12:46:44 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Installation ok,
but grey field with red message under statusline
Message-ID: <200603131845.44203.bderks@web.de>
Hi, after installing a fresh emerge of seamonkey 1.0 and creating a
new profile in my homedir and installing adblock plus 0.6.1.2 i
have the curious grey field under the liftet tatus-line at the
bottom, and i have a red ^ in it.
Googling after that sayd, that there is a corrupt extension, but
adblock plus 0.6.1.2 is the only one...
What to do??
BeDe
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 13 19:09:59 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 13 13:10:54 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Installation ok, but grey field with red message
under statusline
In-Reply-To: <200603131845.44203.bderks@web.de>
References: <200603131845.44203.bderks@web.de>
Message-ID: <4415B577.4080103@gtchat.de>
Bernhard Derks wrote:
> Hi, after installing a fresh emerge of seamonkey 1.0 and creating a
> new profile in my homedir and installing adblock plus 0.6.1.2 i
> have the curious grey field under the liftet tatus-line at the
> bottom, and i have a red ^ in it.
It seems that SeaMonkey couldn't choose the correct translation for
Adblock Plus automatically, it has problems with this. You should try
one of those: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation_localized.html
Wladimir
From bderks at web.de Mon Mar 13 19:31:36 2006
From: bderks at web.de (Bernhard Derks)
Date: Mon Mar 13 13:32:37 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Installation ok,
=?iso-8859-1?q?=09but_grey_field_with_red_message_under?= statusline
In-Reply-To: <4415B577.4080103@gtchat.de>
References: <200603131845.44203.bderks@web.de> <4415B577.4080103@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <200603131931.36530.bderks@web.de>
Am Montag, 13. M?rz 2006 19:09 schrieb Wladimir Palant:
You
> should try one of those:
> http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation_localized.html
>
Tried en-us. de_de. en_en.
Using german version seamonkey offers the grey part with a longer
red message even running as root, bit whatever version is
installed - as user i have a grey part at the bottom with at least
a red ^ in it...
BeDe
From m_j_churchill at yahoo.com Fri Mar 17 13:14:20 2006
From: m_j_churchill at yahoo.com (mike churchill)
Date: Fri Mar 17 16:15:20 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] salon.com/adblockplus
Message-ID: <20060317211420.2276.qmail@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
I'm sorry if this subject has been posted before; I searched the
archive and didn't find any entries involving salon.com
How does one configure adblockplus so that it allows viewing the ad
supported content at salon.com?
From trev at gtchat.de Fri Mar 17 22:23:28 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Fri Mar 17 16:24:54 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] salon.com/adblockplus
In-Reply-To: <20060317211420.2276.qmail@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060317211420.2276.qmail@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <441B28D0.3000304@gtchat.de>
mike churchill wrote:
> I'm sorry if this subject has been posted before; I searched the
> archive and didn't find any entries involving salon.com
>
> How does one configure adblockplus so that it allows viewing the ad
> supported content at salon.com?
You add the filter @@http://salon.com/ or choose "Disable on salon.com"
from the toolbar icon's menu when you are on salon.com.
Wladimir
From tiwunster at gmail.com Sun Mar 19 12:39:42 2006
From: tiwunster at gmail.com (Ti Wun)
Date: Sat Mar 18 23:40:15 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus Functionality
Message-ID: <9e1756ba0603182039r7a21ae88l9ab3d162d6411fb4@mail.gmail.com>
Hi there
I would like to know if Adblock Plus has the funtion to block websites
(prevent accessilbilty to certain website). If yes, how can I go about do
it? Thanks.
Best regards
T. W. TONG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060319/d0a6ab92/attachment.htm
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 19 10:20:03 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 19 04:21:10 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus Functionality
In-Reply-To: <9e1756ba0603182039r7a21ae88l9ab3d162d6411fb4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9e1756ba0603182039r7a21ae88l9ab3d162d6411fb4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <441D2243.2090507@gtchat.de>
Ti Wun wrote:
> I would like to know if Adblock Plus has the funtion to block websites
> (prevent accessilbilty to certain website).
No. Why should it do that?
Wladimir
From dimicelli at comcast.net Sat Mar 25 15:51:42 2006
From: dimicelli at comcast.net (dimicelli@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Mar 25 15:52:54 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock plus crashing on gaming site
Message-ID: <4425AD5E.6050309@comcast.net>
Not sure if this has been mentioned before but when I visit guild
wars.com using firefox (1.5.0.1) with adblock plus enabled, it causes
the browser to crash. Any ideas or solutions besides disabling it?
Pete
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 26 16:41:30 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 26 09:43:16 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock plus crashing on gaming site
In-Reply-To: <4425AD5E.6050309@comcast.net>
References: <4425AD5E.6050309@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <4426A81A.5060000@gtchat.de>
dimicelli@comcast.net wrote:
> Not sure if this has been mentioned before but when I visit guild
> wars.com using firefox (1.5.0.1) with adblock plus enabled, it causes
> the browser to crash. Any ideas or solutions besides disabling it?
This is most probably http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13368,
so unchecking "Show tabs on Flash and Java" in options will probably
also solve the problem. Could you maybe go to about:plugins and send me
everything you have there? This crashes are obviously a problem with
Flash, but I would like to know why they don't happen for me.
Wladimir
From lespagnol.claude at tiscali.fr Sat Mar 25 13:33:40 2006
From: lespagnol.claude at tiscali.fr (Claude Lespagnol)
Date: Sun Mar 26 09:43:52 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Icon for Adblock_plus !
Message-ID: <442538A4.000007.00220@NOM-MAX0Q2AIFG2>
Skipped content of type multipart/related-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 855946 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060325/6145a6b9/attachment-0001.bin
From denad at gmx.net Sat Mar 25 23:17:02 2006
From: denad at gmx.net (Nora & Dennis Adler)
Date: Sun Mar 26 09:43:53 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Sometimes I see an ad
Message-ID: <25422.1143325022@www079.gmx.net>
Hi,
I use gmx.net for my emails and have FireFox 1.5.0.1 and Adblock plus
0.6.1.2 with a filter subscription
(http://maltekraus.de/Firefox/adblock.txt).
This combination works fine for me to block the most ads.
Sometimes not regularly I get an advertising, which I can not remove and
Adblock can not block too.
Hopefully the attached screenshots show more information.
The ad (PLUS) is a flash banner, but has no tab to block.
Also the link resp. the banner is not shown the source code of the page.
Only in the side information page this media appears as embedded object.
The link of this object is:
http://img.web.de/PLUS/plus_060316_superbanner_728x90.swf?clicktag=http%3A//extads.web.de/event.ng/Type%3Dclick%26FlightID%3D47042%26AdID%3D172763%26TargetID%3D10661%26RawValues%3DUSERIDRAW%252Cac140546-20756-1142795240-3%26Redirect%3Dhttp%3A//www.etracker.de/rdirect.php%253Fet%253DPFs1l3%2526et_cid%253D100%2526et_lid%253D312%2526et_sub%253DFLASH_Fahrrad%2526et_url%253Dhttp%3A//www.plus.de/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/de/-/EUR/PlusPKBrowseCatalog-Start%253FCategoryName%253DMAG0611FP1%2526RefID%253D3400304
Questions:
Is that a known problem?
Is that something, that has to be solved by Adblock?
Is my filter to weak?
How can I help to solve this problem?
Thanks and regards,
Dennis
---------
German version:
Hi,
ich benutze gmx.net f?r meine emails und habe FireFox 1.5.0.1 und Adblock
Plus mit einem Filter-Abo (http://maltekraus.de/Firefox/adblock.txt).
Diese Kombination hilft mir sehr gut die Werbung zu blocken.
Doch ab und zu bekomme ich eine Werbung angezeigt, die ich nicht wegbekomme
und auch nicht blocken kann.
Die angeh?ngten Bilder zeigen hoffentlich noch mehr Informationen.
Die Werbung (PLUS) ist ein Flash-Banner; hat jedoch kein Tab zum blockieren.
Ebenso finde ich nicht den Link bzw. das Bild im Quellcode der Page.
Nur in den Seiteninformationen taucht das Medium als eingebettes Objekt auf.
Dort hat es den
Link:
http://img.web.de/PLUS/plus_060316_superbanner_728x90.swf?clicktag=http%3A//extads.web.de/event.ng/Type%3Dclick%26FlightID%3D47042%26AdID%3D172763%26TargetID%3D10661%26RawValues%3DUSERIDRAW%252Cac140546-20756-1142795240-3%26Redirect%3Dhttp%3A//www.etracker.de/rdirect.php%253Fet%253DPFs1l3%2526et_cid%253D100%2526et_lid%253D312%2526et_sub%253DFLASH_Fahrrad%2526et_url%253Dhttp%3A//www.plus.de/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/de/-/EUR/PlusPKBrowseCatalog-Start%253FCategoryName%253DMAG0611FP1%2526RefID%253D3400304
Fragen:
Ist das ein bekanntes Problem?
Ist das jetzt etwas, das in Adblock gel?st mu??
Ist nur mein Filter zu schwach?
Wie kann ich helfen, um das Problem zu l?sen?
Danke und sch?ne Gr??e
Dennis
--
Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ad_plus1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 71312 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060325/cfc23567/ad_plus1-0001.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ad_plus2.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 49061 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060325/cfc23567/ad_plus2-0001.jpg
From pitdicker at gmail.com Sun Mar 26 16:55:07 2006
From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker)
Date: Sun Mar 26 09:55:41 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Icon for Adblock_plus !
In-Reply-To: <442538A4.000007.00220@NOM-MAX0Q2AIFG2>
References: <442538A4.000007.00220@NOM-MAX0Q2AIFG2>
Message-ID: <4426AB4B.1070109@gmail.com>
I like them!
Only the banner on top becomes hardly visible at 16x16, maybe it can be
a little larger
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 26 16:57:35 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 26 09:58:25 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Sometimes I see an ad
In-Reply-To: <25422.1143325022@www079.gmx.net>
References: <25422.1143325022@www079.gmx.net>
Message-ID: <4426ABDF.7090100@gtchat.de>
Nora & Dennis Adler wrote:
> Sometimes not regularly I get an advertising, which I can not remove and
> Adblock can not block too.
...
> The link of this object is:
>
> http://img.web.de/PLUS/plus_060316_superbanner_728x90.swf?clicktag=http%3A//extads.web.de/event.ng/Type%3Dclick%26FlightID%3D47042%26AdID%3D172763%26TargetID%3D10661%26RawValues%3DUSERIDRAW%252Cac140546-20756-1142795240-3%26Redirect%3Dhttp%3A//www.etracker.de/rdirect.php%253Fet%253DPFs1l3%2526et_cid%253D100%2526et_lid%253D312%2526et_sub%253DFLASH_Fahrrad%2526et_url%253Dhttp%3A//www.plus.de/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/de/-/EUR/PlusPKBrowseCatalog-Start%253FCategoryName%253DMAG0611FP1%2526RefID%253D3400304
This filter blocks all ads on GMX for me:
http://bs*.gmx.net/*
I also have one more that shouldn't be necessary here however:
*//extads.web.de/*
Wladimir
From dimicelli at comcast.net Sun Mar 26 10:04:19 2006
From: dimicelli at comcast.net (dimicelli@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Mar 26 10:05:39 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 15
Message-ID: <4426AD73.7060404@comcast.net>
Installed plug-ins
Find more information about browser plug-ins at mozilla.org
.
Help for installing plug-ins is available from plugindoc.mozdev.org
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Web Search Plugin Stub
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\NPMyWebS.dll
My Web Search Plugin Stub for 32-bit Windows
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-mws-mywebsearchplugin My Web Search Plugin Stub mws Yes
Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin support
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npmozax.dll
Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin module
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-oleobject ActiveX *.ocx Yes
application/oleobject ActiveX *.ocx Yes
Mozilla Default Plug-in
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npnul32.dll
Default Plug-in
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
* Mozilla Default Plug-in * No
PopCap Games Plugin
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\nppopcaploader.dll
PopCap Games Plugin
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-popcaploader;version=1.0.0.1 nppopcaploader
Yes
Adobe Acrobat
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\nppdf32.dll
Adobe Acrobat Plug-In Version 7.00 for Netscape
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/pdf Acrobat Portable Document Format pdf Yes
application/vnd.fdf Acrobat Forms Data Format fdf Yes
application/vnd.adobe.xfdf XML Version of Acrobat Forms Data Format
xfdf Yes
application/vnd.adobe.xdp+xml Acrobat XML Data Package xdp Yes
application/vnd.adobe.xfd+xml Adobe FormFlow99 Data File xfd Yes
WindizUpdate Plug-in
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npupd62.dll
WindizUpdate for Mozilla, Opera and Netscape; version 2.0.2005.0913.
For details, visit windizupdate.com
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-windizupdate WindizUpdate data u62 Yes
RealJukebox NS Plugin
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\nprjplug.dll
RealJukebox Netscape Plugin
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
none RealJukebox NS Plugin File none Yes
RealPlayer(tm) G2 LiveConnect-Enabled Plug-In (32-bit)
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\nppl3260.dll
RealPlayer(tm) LiveConnect-Enabled Plug-In
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin RealPlayer(tm) as Plug-in rpm Yes
RealPlayer Version Plugin
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\nprpjplug.dll
6.0.12.1212
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/vnd.rn-realplayer-javascript RealPlayer Version Plugin
rpj Yes
Shockwave Flash
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\NPSWF32.dll
Shockwave Flash 8.0 r22
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-shockwave-flash Macromedia Flash movie swf Yes
application/futuresplash FutureSplash movie spl Yes
AOL Media Playback Plugin
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npunagi2.dll
npunagi2
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-unagi-2 npunagi2 unagi2 Yes
Shockwave for Director
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\np32dsw.dll
Macromedia Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 10.1
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-director Shockwave Movie dir,dxr,dcr Yes
Microsoft Office 2003
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\NPOFFICE.DLL
Office Plugin for Netscape Navigator
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-msoffice 11.0.5510 * Yes
McAfee Clinic
File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\NPMGWRAP.DLL
McAfee Clinic Activator Plugin (1,0,0,5)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-mc-activator McAfee Clinic Activator mcp Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJPI150_04.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.5.0_04 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.5.0_04 JavaBeans
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPOJI610.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-vm Java
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJava11.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean JavaBeans
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJava12.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2 JavaBeans
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJava13.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1 JavaBeans
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJava14.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.5 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.5 JavaBeans
Yes
Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 4
File name: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\bin\NPJava32.dll
Java Plug-in 1.5.0_04 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2 JavaBeans
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1 Java Applet
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1 JavaBeans
Yes
Windows Media Player Plug-in Dynamic Link Library
File name: C:\Program Files\Windows Media Player\npdsplay.dll
Npdsplay dll
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/asx Media Files * Yes
video/x-ms-asf-plugin Media Files * Yes
application/x-mplayer2 Media Files * Yes
video/x-ms-asf Media Files asf,asx,* Yes
video/x-ms-wm Media Files wm,* Yes
audio/x-ms-wma Media Files wma,* Yes
audio/x-ms-wax Media Files wax,* Yes
video/x-ms-wmv Media Files wmv,* Yes
video/x-ms-wvx Media Files wvx,* Yes
Microsoft? DRM
File name: C:\Program Files\Windows Media Player\npdrmv2.dll
DRM Netscape Network Object
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-drm-v2 Network Interface Plugin nip Yes
Microsoft? DRM
File name: C:\Program Files\Windows Media Player\npwmsdrm.dll
DRM Store Netscape Plugin
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-drm Network Interface Plugin nip Yes
adblockplus-request@mozdev.org wrote:
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:41:30 +0200
> From: Wladimir Palant
> Subject: Re: [AdblockPlus] Adblock plus crashing on gaming site
> To: adblockplus@mozdev.org
> Message-ID: <4426A81A.5060000@gtchat.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> dimicelli@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this has been mentioned before but when I visit guild
>> wars.com using firefox (1.5.0.1) with adblock plus enabled, it causes
>> the browser to crash. Any ideas or solutions besides disabling it?
>>
>
> This is most probably http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13368,
> so unchecking "Show tabs on Flash and Java" in options will probably
> also solve the problem. Could you maybe go to about:plugins and send me
> everything you have there? This crashes are obviously a problem with
> Flash, but I would like to know why they don't happen for me.
>
> Wladimir
>
> ------------------------------
>
From dimicelli at comcast.net Sun Mar 26 10:06:52 2006
From: dimicelli at comcast.net (dimicelli@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Mar 26 10:07:52 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 15
Message-ID: <4426AE0C.4010908@comcast.net>
After trying what you said, it ended up working after all.
Thanks Wladimir!
Pete
adblockplus-request@mozdev.org wrote:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:41:30 +0200
> From: Wladimir Palant
> Subject: Re: [AdblockPlus] Adblock plus crashing on gaming site
> To: adblockplus@mozdev.org
> Message-ID: <4426A81A.5060000@gtchat.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> dimicelli@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this has been mentioned before but when I visit guild
>> wars.com using firefox (1.5.0.1) with adblock plus enabled, it causes
>> the browser to crash. Any ideas or solutions besides disabling it?
>>
>
> This is most probably http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13368,
> so unchecking "Show tabs on Flash and Java" in options will probably
> also solve the problem. Could you maybe go to about:plugins and send me
> everything you have there? This crashes are obviously a problem with
> Flash, but I would like to know why they don't happen for me.
>
> Wladimir
>
>
>
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 26 17:12:58 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 26 10:13:43 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Icon for Adblock_plus !
In-Reply-To: <442538A4.000007.00220@NOM-MAX0Q2AIFG2>
References: <442538A4.000007.00220@NOM-MAX0Q2AIFG2>
Message-ID: <4426AF7A.8080008@gtchat.de>
Claude Lespagnol wrote:
> I have create these two icones following the dissension of certain for
> the current icone can be that one of that Ci will make the deal.
I opened a discussion thread on these icons here:
http://p2.forumforfree.com/-vp4620-adblockplus.html#4620
Wladimir
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 26 17:40:32 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 26 10:41:21 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 15
In-Reply-To: <4426AD73.7060404@comcast.net>
References: <4426AD73.7060404@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <4426B5F0.8070508@gtchat.de>
dimicelli@comcast.net wrote:
> Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin support
>
> File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npmozax.dll
> Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin module
Thanks, this is suspect nr.1 then...
Wladimir
From dimicelli at comcast.net Sun Mar 26 12:11:25 2006
From: dimicelli at comcast.net (dimicelli@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Mar 26 12:12:26 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 17
Message-ID: <4426CB3D.4060304@comcast.net>
Any idea how I can get rid of it?
~Pete
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:40:32 +0200
> From: Wladimir Palant
> Subject: Re: [AdblockPlus] Re: AdblockPlus Digest, Vol 3, Issue 15
> To: adblockplus@mozdev.org
> Message-ID: <4426B5F0.8070508@gtchat.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> dimicelli@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin support
>>
>> File name: G:\Mozilla FireFox\plugins\npmozax.dll
>> Mozilla ActiveX control and plugin module
>>
>
> Thanks, this is suspect nr.1 then...
>
> Wladimir
>
>
From trev at gtchat.de Sun Mar 26 22:45:03 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Sun Mar 26 15:45:47 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking more scripts...
In-Reply-To: <44106B06.2090300@gtchat.de>
References: <4410563E.2060000@free.fr>
<44105D4E.50002@gtchat.de> <441060F0.305@h3c.de>
<44106B06.2090300@gtchat.de>
Message-ID: <4426FD4F.3070307@gtchat.de>
Wladimir Palant wrote:
> Cookie permissions are more thorough (they check for IP addresses) but also
> consider anything with a dot in it a domain. Comment is:
> * note: RFC2109 section 4.3.2 requires that we check the following:
> * that the portion of host not in domain does not contain a dot.
> * this prevents hosts of the form x.y.co.nz from setting cookies in the
> * entire .co.nz domain. however, it's only a only a partial solution and
> * it breaks sites (IE doesn't enforce it), so we don't perform this check.
> I guess we will have to follow the lead, maybe hard-coding one exception
> for domain.co.*.
And now I noticed that Darin Fisher is also trying to solve just this
problem: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331510
Target milestone is 1.8.1, nice! I hope Firefox 2.0 will ship with a
list of TLDs that we can use, so that we only have to fall back to the
trivial implementation in older versions.
Wladimir
From szhorvat at yahoo.co.uk Mon Mar 27 06:16:20 2006
From: szhorvat at yahoo.co.uk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Szabolcs=20Horv=E1t?=)
Date: Mon Mar 27 09:17:20 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] icon to indicate whether anything is blocked
Message-ID: <20060327141620.71190.qmail@web30811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Hello,
It would be very useful if Adblock Plus had a feature to indicate whether any elements are blocked on the current page. For example the icon in the status bar could change accordingly. I know that I can check which elements are blocked on the page by opening the sidebar, but you don't normally keep open the sidebar while browsing, and sometimes it happens that the filterset blocks some elements on a page where I know that nothing should have been blocked. For example it took me a while until I noticed that the 3 little pictures on the http://www.wolfram.com/ site do not appear when using Filterset.G. It would have been much easier to notice this if the Adblock icon would change when elements are blocked.
Szabolcs
From trev at gtchat.de Mon Mar 27 16:30:15 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Mon Mar 27 09:31:12 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] icon to indicate whether anything is blocked
In-Reply-To: <20060327141620.71190.qmail@web30811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060327141620.71190.qmail@web30811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4427F6F7.7060104@gtchat.de>
Szabolcs Horv?t wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It would be very useful if Adblock Plus had a feature to indicate whether any elements are blocked on the current page.
This is the first item on the plan for Adblock Plus 0.7.1 -
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html
Wladimir
From PattyLyon at amnetsystems.com Wed Mar 29 07:48:57 2006
From: PattyLyon at amnetsystems.com (Anne Black)
Date: Wed Mar 29 02:19:32 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] News from DLsoft: new Mac's products added
Message-ID:
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060329/41ea31b3/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 12660 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060329/41ea31b3/attachment.gif
From ericwrasmussen at gmail.com Thu Mar 30 11:51:04 2006
From: ericwrasmussen at gmail.com (MajorityWhip)
Date: Thu Mar 30 12:51:45 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] adblock for Tbird
Message-ID: <442C1A88.9000302@gmail.com>
Tbird blocks images in my regular email, and this is a great thing.
However, wouldn't it be great if the adblock extension were available to
block images in my rss feeds? Is it possible? Is there an extension
available to accomplish this goal?
From trev at gtchat.de Thu Mar 30 20:10:19 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Thu Mar 30 13:10:59 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] adblock for Tbird
In-Reply-To: <442C1A88.9000302@gmail.com>
References: <442C1A88.9000302@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <442C1F0B.70808@gtchat.de>
MajorityWhip wrote:
> Tbird blocks images in my regular email, and this is a great thing.
> However, wouldn't it be great if the adblock extension were available to
> block images in my rss feeds? Is it possible? Is there an extension
> available to accomplish this goal?
Thunderbird support is in my plans:
http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html. There is a question
mark because I still have to check whether it makes sense at all to port
Adblock Plus now or whether the Thunderbird bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245361 needs to be fixed
first (this bug will affect Adblock Plus in Thunderbird in any case but
maybe it will still block most of what it should block).
Wladimir
From trev at gtchat.de Fri Mar 31 01:19:03 2006
From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant)
Date: Thu Mar 30 18:19:47 2006
Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus FAQ and History of Adblock in French
Message-ID: <442C6767.20603@gtchat.de>
I just uploaded a French translation for the FAQ
(http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/fr/faq.html) and the history
(http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/fr/history.html). Thanks to jojaba!
Wladimir