From danceman at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 14:45:40 2006 From: danceman at gmail.com (Dance Man) Date: Wed Feb 1 17:46:14 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Filterset update behaviour Message-ID: <4df655f80602011445u45ca13f2td7bddbb86ff0f2d@mail.gmail.com> After my filterset had updated I noticed that filters I'd added myself had been removed. In this case they were images from a page I visit regularly. It would appear that when the filterset updates, it removes all the previous filters. I would prefer that it either not do that, or there be a method whereby only the filterset is replaced. I searched options but found nothing to address this situation. Love the program. Thanks for your effort in writing and maintaining it. From trev at gtchat.de Thu Feb 2 00:13:38 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Wed Feb 1 18:14:54 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Filterset update behaviour In-Reply-To: <4df655f80602011445u45ca13f2td7bddbb86ff0f2d@mail.gmail.com> References: <4df655f80602011445u45ca13f2td7bddbb86ff0f2d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43E140A2.8090104@gtchat.de> Dance Man wrote: > After my filterset had updated I noticed that filters I'd added > myself had been removed. In this case they were images from a page I > visit regularly. It would appear that when the filterset updates, it > removes all the previous filters. I would prefer that it either not do > that, or there be a method whereby only the filterset is replaced. Read about it here: http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12959 Wladimir From dmjaeger at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 12:21:23 2006 From: dmjaeger at gmail.com (david jaeger) Date: Thu Feb 2 15:22:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Thank you Message-ID: Thank you for providing this product. It is a wonderful resource. I am so happy that it works. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060202/173b466a/attachment.htm From antonio_baeza at terra.es Fri Feb 3 00:04:06 2006 From: antonio_baeza at terra.es (adum) Date: Thu Feb 2 18:05:25 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] DIV blocking in specific sites Message-ID: <43E28FE6.1080909@terra.es> Please consider the following as a possibility to be considered, not as feature request. Some weeks ago I did not know what DIVs were, with all the discussions I learned it and tried to use RIP with ABP 0.6. I now think DIV can be convenient in some situations (always in a per site basis), even really dangerous if used without control. You now you have decided to implement some kind of "controlled DIV blocking", perhaps you could consider this. If you test any of these sites (Spanish P2P sites): www.elitedivx.com www.estrenosdivx.com you will see the very agressive adbox, you have to click it in order to close it. And when you enter in the site (press ENTRAR) it appears in every page. You cannot block it, but can block the ad inside it and remove the box with RIP (perhaps with some javascript or css, but too far from my possibilities). With RIP I could remove the box (after some recursive tries, because it is made up of some nested DIVs), but RIP finds and filters the DIV "from a fixed position" (bad described, I hope it can be understood), and when using the filter in the subpages it did not work (div position was different). I found a solution checking HTML (all boxes have id="postit") and it works in different sites with the same ad. But this solution is too complicated for most users, specially if they do not understand English (explanations about XPATH and HTML). I was wondering if it would be possible a DIV identification process and filter generation starting from an ads link (localized by adblock and selected in sidebar by user) and then looking for nested DIVS containing the ad, or some reference (id, or similar) of DIVs containing it. But this kind of solution (with some GUI interface) would more linked to ABP than to RIP (since it would imply a filter generation from the ad, not from the position or characteristics of the DIV). Probably I have been too long and confusing, but if you have been able of understanding which I tried to express, at least I hope you can think about it. Thanks adum From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 04:34:37 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Thu Feb 2 22:35:22 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions Message-ID: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> I really like the idea of a slim rewritten adblock+, my gratulations. :) There are a few things I really miss though, I know this is an early developement stage, so they may be added later anyways, but still: - a keyboard shortcut to enable/disable adblock (strg+shift+b?) - a shortcut to overlay flash (what shift+strg+f did before) - use the same shortcuts as former adblock+? I'm so used to them and many other probably too... - make the blockable elements list optionally appear as a window, not in the sidebar. - if a blocked element is selected in that list, show the filter that causes the block and also mark the element on the site - make it possible to temporary remove certain elements by clicking while holding a shortcut - clicking the adblock-toolbar-icon should list all blockable and blocked elemetns like it did before and not the preferences. I think more often people want to see what elements are blocked/blockable than to view the preferences - option to remove the adblock menu entry, too many extensions add one already. or integrate the filterset.g updater and adblock options in one cascaded menu like before? That's it so far, basically all stuff that was in there before and I read you said you'll add most of the old things sooner or later. I justed wanted to make sure nothings gets forgotten. ;) Florian From aad at evilemail.com Thu Feb 2 22:40:00 2006 From: aad at evilemail.com (A D) Date: Thu Feb 2 22:40:33 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Button Message-ID: <8b81f4f40602021940m7ccf0739kd25e661c956cc350@mail.gmail.com> I assume this is where I send questions about Adblock plus... Is there a way to remove the drop down arrow from the Adblock button using userChrome.css? Currently I have the button in the All-in-one-sidebar extension toolbar and it gets much too compressed. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060202/f8db7c01/attachment.htm From pirlouy at free.fr Fri Feb 3 11:37:17 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Fri Feb 3 05:31:21 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E3325D.7060505@free.fr> To simplify, The version 6.1 wich will appear soon has some features you want. For the hotkeys, I don't know if it planned to add or changed some. For the menu, it will certainly change. From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 14:05:11 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 08:06:02 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] DIV blocking in specific sites In-Reply-To: <43E28FE6.1080909@terra.es> References: <43E28FE6.1080909@terra.es> Message-ID: <43E35507.3030607@gtchat.de> adum wrote: > I found a solution checking HTML (all boxes have id="postit") and it > works in different sites with the same ad. But this solution is too > complicated for most users, specially if they do not understand English > (explanations about XPATH and HTML). > I was wondering if it would be possible a DIV identification process and > filter generation starting from an ads link (localized by adblock and > selected in sidebar by user) and then looking for nested DIVS containing > the ad, or some reference (id, or similar) of DIVs containing it. But > this kind of solution (with some GUI interface) would more linked to ABP > than to RIP (since it would imply a filter generation from the ad, not > from the position or characteristics of the DIV). See http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq.html#divblock - minimal "DIV blocking" support has been added yesterday. You can test it with the latest development build (http://p2.forumforfree.com/-vp2828-adblockplus.html#2828). From what I understand in your case it would be the filter rule #*(postit) Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 14:15:17 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 08:16:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > There are a few things I really miss though, I know this is an early > developement stage, so they may be added later anyways, but still: > > ... shortcuts I'm reluctant adding more shortcuts as shortcuts are shared space - the more you have, the more likely you are going to have conflicts with other extensions. But I'm considering it. So far middle-clicking ABP icon in the status bar or toolbar works as well. "Overlay flash" isn't there, old code was simply too problematic. http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq.html#objects lists ways to block objects, re-adding something similar to "overlay flash" is being considered. > - make the blockable elements list optionally appear as a window, not in > the sidebar. Is done, see latest development build (http://p2.forumforfree.com/-vp2828-adblockplus.html#2828) or wait for 0.6.1 release - sidebar can be detached. > - if a blocked element is selected in that list, show the filter that > causes the block and also mark the element on the site The filter can be seen in the tooltip. "Mark the element" is done the same way as for unblocked elements - by flashing a red border around them. Doesn't work for all elements though, especially not for the ones that have been collapsed (same restrictions as in the original Adblock, maybe I can improve here later). > - make it possible to temporary remove certain elements by clicking > while holding a shortcut Reasoning? What is it good for? I know this feature was in original Adblock but it is simply not discoverable, you have no chance of finding out it is there. > - clicking the adblock-toolbar-icon should list all blockable and > blocked elemetns like it did before and not the preferences. I think > more often people want to see what elements are blocked/blockable than > to view the preferences Hm, isn't it the way it works in 0.6.0.4? > - option to remove the adblock menu entry, too many extensions add one > already. or integrate the filterset.g updater and adblock options in one > cascaded menu like before? Submenus are bad. As to removing the menu entry - I don't like having an option for everything, considering alternatives. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 14:43:18 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 08:44:20 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > I'm reluctant adding more shortcuts as shortcuts are shared space - the > more you have, the more likely you are going to have conflicts with > other extensions. But I'm considering it. So far middle-clicking ABP > icon in the status bar or toolbar works as well. At least a shortcut to enable/disable adblock would be very helpful. The shift+strg-combination is rare enough imo to justify three shortcuts (B=elements,A=en/disable,F=flash overlay) as Adblock is a popular extension. > "Overlay flash" isn't there, old code was simply too problematic. > http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq.html#objects lists ways to block > objects, re-adding something similar to "overlay flash" is being > considered. I don't absolutely need the overlay, but being able to determine the URL of a flash so easy and optionally block it was nice. Currently you have to go to the options menu and enable tabs to do so (i have them disabled by default for the looks). Maybe having strg+shift+f (yes, I love shortcuts) showing the tabs on flash is possible? Then it'd be almost the same functionality as before but without any overlay code needed. >> - make it possible to temporary remove certain elements by clicking >> while holding a shortcut > > Reasoning? What is it good for? > I know this feature was in original Adblock but it is simply not > discoverable, you have no chance of finding out it is there. I was using it, don't know how I found out though... :) It's good if a site has annoying ads, but you don't want a lasting filter as it might interfere with other sites. Okay, this feature is not that needed. >> - clicking the adblock-toolbar-icon should list all blockable and >> blocked elemetns like it did before and not the preferences. I think >> more often people want to see what elements are blocked/blockable than >> to view the preferences > > Hm, isn't it the way it works in 0.6.0.4? Sorry, I meant statusbar. I have the toolbar disabled and use the status bar. But I can see that many others probably use the toolbar. >> - option to remove the adblock menu entry, too many extensions add one >> already. or integrate the filterset.g updater and adblock options in one >> cascaded menu like before? > > Submenus are bad. As to removing the menu entry - I don't like having an > option for everything, considering alternatives. What's against submenus? The problem is, I have two entries now, one for Adblock, one for the updater. The Adblock entry is rather useless as you can access it through the statusbar/toolbar as well. Too many extensions add an entry to the menu, so it clusters up. From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 15:02:38 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 09:03:18 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > Sorry, I meant statusbar. I have the toolbar disabled and use the status > bar. But I can see that many others probably use the toolbar. Yes, I'm not sure about this. Right now clicking toolbar and status bar does different things. Maybe they should both open the sidebar instead, but I need to get more opinions on that. > What's against submenus? They add perceived complexity, not a good thing for something that should be a mainstream extension. > The Adblock entry is rather useless as you > can access it through the statusbar/toolbar as well. You can use userChrome.css to hide it, add the following lines: #menu_ToolsPopup > menuitem[key="key-launch-abp-preferences"] { display: none; } Maybe it really should be removed but here I need more opinions as well. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 19:56:15 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 13:56:56 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3A74F.3080006@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > You can use userChrome.css to hide it, add the following lines: Ah, thanks alot. From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 20:02:03 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 14:02:44 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > You can use userChrome.css to hide it, add the following lines: > > #menu_ToolsPopup > menuitem[key="key-launch-abp-preferences"] { > display: none; For some reasons this doesn't work. I copy&pasted this to userchrome.css in the profile directory and restarted Firefox. From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 20:21:39 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 14:22:36 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > For some reasons this doesn't work. I copy&pasted this to userchrome.css > in the profile directory and restarted Firefox. It works for me... I hope you only forgot to quote the closing bracket. Other than that: the file should be named userChrome.css and it should be located in the chrome subdirectory of your profile. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 20:32:23 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 14:33:06 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > be located in the chrome subdirectory of your profile. ^^; I put it in the profile directory, not the subdir. Works flawless now. BTW, do you know of any good ressources to learn editing userchrome.css and usercontent.css? I only found sites that explained a few commands, but I'm looking for a more generic article. I have good knowledge of CSS, so I'd only need the Chrome-specific properties. From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 20:47:55 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 14:48:35 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > ^^; I put it in the profile directory, not the subdir. Works flawless > now. BTW, do you know of any good ressources to learn editing > userchrome.css and usercontent.css? I only found sites that explained a > few commands, but I'm looking for a more generic article. I have good > knowledge of CSS, so I'd only need the Chrome-specific properties. There is nothing special about these files, it is regular CSS. CSS2 allows to do pretty nice things like the attribute selector I used (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/selector.html#attribute-selectors) - matching the menu item by the value of its key attribute. You usually don't use it on the web because IE doesn't support them, but here it isn't a problem. There is also some Mozilla-specific CSS that can be used: http://www.xulplanet.com/references/elemref/ref_StyleProperties.html userChrome.css gets applied to all chrome content (application's user interface). userContent.css will be applied to the web pages you visit. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 20:57:28 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 14:58:09 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3B5A8.5040200@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > There is nothing special about these files, it is regular CSS. CSS2 But I need to know the IDs like menu_ToolsPopup and the attributes like "key-launch-abp-preferences", or do I get something wrong here? From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 21:04:06 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 15:04:44 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3B5A8.5040200@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> <43E3B5A8.5040200@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43E3B736.4080805@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > But I need to know the IDs like menu_ToolsPopup and the attributes like > "key-launch-abp-preferences", or do I get something wrong here? Unless you want to dig into XUL files defining the user interface (it is overlay.xul inside adblockplus.jar in this case by the way) DOM Inspector can help you. When it starts up it shows the current web page but you can use File / Inspect Window to make it show the chrome. Then you "only" need to find the menu there. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 21:07:11 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Fri Feb 3 15:07:52 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3B736.4080805@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> <43E3B5A8.5040200@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B736.4080805@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3B7EF.10801@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > but you can use File / Inspect Window to make it show the chrome. Then > you "only" need to find the menu there. Okay thanks for all your help, I'll try editing my Fx's appearence now... :) From antonio_baeza at terra.es Fri Feb 3 21:36:43 2006 From: antonio_baeza at terra.es (adum) Date: Fri Feb 3 15:37:51 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] DIV blocking in specific sites Message-ID: <43E3BEDB.50909@terra.es> I have used this last development build and I am impressed (and delighted), it includes locales and a lot of new things, I hope you will release it soon. I tested DIV blocking with this filter and works OK (even it seems faster than RIP, I cannot even see the adbox). But how could I change the DIV filter #*(postit) so only aplies to selected sites (pages and subpages)? I tried to configure the filter but I havent been able. Reason: I only want to use DIV blocking when it is really the only available option (like this example, because the adbox covered the text), and having a generic DIV filter which can screw up or slow down any page looks like a blind man with a gun. I tried something like www.elitedivx.com*#*(postit) but no way. The second thing I also tried to explain in my previous mail (with my difficult English and my lack of programming knowledge) was the possibility of DIV/element blocking filters based on the detection of a banner/page address (i.e *publicidad\casino*) contained in the DIV, but as you say in the FAQ, probably this should be managed by a different extension, similar to RIP but based on ad detection. Many thanks From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 22:02:38 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 16:04:04 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] DIV blocking in specific sites In-Reply-To: <43E3BEDB.50909@terra.es> References: <43E3BEDB.50909@terra.es> Message-ID: <43E3C4EE.5030700@gtchat.de> adum wrote: > I tested DIV blocking with this filter and works OK (even it seems > faster than RIP, I cannot even see the adbox). You won't be able to see it because it doesn't even appear with this approach. > But how could I change the DIV filter #*(postit) so only aplies to > selected sites (pages and subpages)? You can't. That's part of the reason why it is "minimal support". It could be done better, with much more flexible filters and user interface helping create them. But it is really out of scope of Adblock, it should be a separate extension installing on top of Adblock Plus. And as I explained in http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq.html#divblock, there is no problem writing the code, but I don't want to be the one maintaining it. > Reason: I only want to use DIV blocking when it is really the only > available option (like this example, because the adbox covered the > text), and having a generic DIV filter which can screw up or slow down > any page looks like a blind man with a gun. I tried something like > www.elitedivx.com*#*(postit) but no way. All you can do is combining tag name with id like this: #div(postit) And then just hope such a combination doesn't occur on other pages. That's still better than using DIV blocking in Adblock Plus 0.5 - that one made me a page completely unusable because its web address contained /ad/ and I had a filter that matched this (it was in no way meant for DIV blocking). > The second thing I also tried to explain in my previous mail (with my > difficult English and my lack of programming knowledge) was the > possibility of DIV/element blocking filters based on the detection of a > banner/page address (i.e *publicidad\casino*) contained in the DIV, but > as you say in the FAQ, probably this should be managed by a different > extension, similar to RIP but based on ad detection. Yes. Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 3 22:14:19 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 3 16:14:58 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Button In-Reply-To: <8b81f4f40602021940m7ccf0739kd25e661c956cc350@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b81f4f40602021940m7ccf0739kd25e661c956cc350@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43E3C7AB.4040507@gtchat.de> A D wrote: > Is there a way to remove the drop down arrow from the Adblock button > using userChrome.css? Currently I have the button in the > All-in-one-sidebar extension toolbar and it gets much too compressed. #abp-toolbarbutton dropmarker { display: none; } This does it for me. Wladimir From raghugs at gmail.com Sat Feb 4 15:54:23 2006 From: raghugs at gmail.com (Raghu GS) Date: Sat Feb 4 05:19:47 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] important suggestion Message-ID: <200602041554.24108.raghugs@gmail.com> Hello there, please move the functionality provided by adblock button to status bar button itself, because there is plenty of unused space in status bar, especially in firefox, in monitor resolutions such as 800x600 the address bar and search bar would be highly shorten if multiple extentions like Adblock that uses buttons in top, Raghu GS From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Fri Feb 3 21:06:13 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Sat Feb 4 09:00:40 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E3B736.4080805@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43E35DF6.40209@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3627E.6040607@gtchat.de> <43E3A8AB.5080702@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3AD43.3040007@gtchat.de> <43E3AFC7.7030309@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B36B.8020304@gtchat.de> <43E3B5A8.5040200@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E3B736.4080805@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E3B7B5.9090303@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > but you can use File / Inspect Window to make it show the chrome. Then > you "only" need to find the menu there. > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > > From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 4 17:19:44 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 4 11:21:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] important suggestion In-Reply-To: <200602041554.24108.raghugs@gmail.com> References: <200602041554.24108.raghugs@gmail.com> Message-ID: <43E4D420.6000906@gtchat.de> Raghu GS wrote: > please move the functionality provided by adblock button to status bar button > itself, I don't quite understand - they have identical functionality already (right-click on the status bar). Wladimir From pirlouy at free.fr Sat Feb 4 17:49:53 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Sat Feb 4 11:43:25 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] definition of AB options in the FAQ Message-ID: <43E4DB31.8040707@free.fr> In the FAQ, I see no explanation for the options "Block remote ads in the local pages", "Collapse blocked elements", "check banner link". I think this options are not easy to understand for beginners (and others) without some screenshots. No ? From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 4 17:59:34 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 4 12:00:15 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] definition of AB options in the FAQ In-Reply-To: <43E4DB31.8040707@free.fr> References: <43E4DB31.8040707@free.fr> Message-ID: <43E4DD76.20103@gtchat.de> pirlouy wrote: > In the FAQ, I see no explanation for the options "Block remote ads in > the local pages", "Collapse blocked elements", "check banner link". > > I think this options are not easy to understand for beginners (and > others) without some screenshots. No ? I agree. What we have there right now isn't exactly much but I didn't have time to write more so far. I actually hoped I could take some time for this today. Wladimir From hr_merz at yahoo.de Sat Feb 4 20:48:43 2006 From: hr_merz at yahoo.de (M. Merz) Date: Sat Feb 4 14:49:43 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AbP crashes FF in Yahoo mail forms (new mail, reply) Message-ID: <20060204194843.64778.qmail@web25602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 - Build ID: 2006011112 AbP 0.6.0.4 / GUID {d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d} I am working as a restricted user. I did not check if the same happens as administrator. If AbP is the only active extension I can reproduce FF crashes. Go to Yahoo mail a) Click on 'compose new message -> crash b) read a mail Click on Reply -> Crash If I deactivate all extensions or start FF in Safe Mode a) and b) do not crash FF If I activate all extensions except AbP a) and b) FF do not crash FF. I hope you can find a reason for the crashes. It's pretty annoying :-) PS: I am not on the AbP mailing list ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 4 21:13:00 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 4 15:14:14 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AbP crashes FF in Yahoo mail forms (new mail, reply) In-Reply-To: <20060204194843.64778.qmail@web25602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20060204194843.64778.qmail@web25602.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <43E50ACC.4030802@gtchat.de> M. Merz wrote: > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de; > rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 - Build ID: > 2006011112 Same here. > AbP 0.6.0.4 / GUID > {d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d} Tried with the latest development build and with this version. > Go to Yahoo mail > > a) Click on 'compose new message -> crash > > b) read a mail > Click on Reply -> Crash Doesn't happen to me. Did you send a talkback report on the crash? If so - what's the number? Wladimir From hr_merz at yahoo.de Sat Feb 4 21:24:33 2006 From: hr_merz at yahoo.de (M. Merz) Date: Sat Feb 4 15:27:09 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AbP crashes FF in Yahoo mail forms (new mail, reply) In-Reply-To: <43E50ACC.4030802@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <20060204202433.14293.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> --- Wladimir Palant schrieb: [...] > Doesn't happen to me. Did you send a talkback report > on the crash? If so > - what's the number? TB14752632G, TB14752373H, TB14752355Z, TB14752156G, TB14751626M, TB14751136M, TB14750305W, TB14750173Y, TB14749943Y, TB14749863Y, TB14749763E I think this is the one where I disabled all the other extensions: TB14752156G I hope it helps ... Markus ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From hr_merz at yahoo.de Sat Feb 4 21:34:15 2006 From: hr_merz at yahoo.de (M. Merz) Date: Sat Feb 4 15:35:34 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AbP development version also crashes FF in Yahoo mail forms (new mail, reply) In-Reply-To: <43E50C0D.8080408@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <20060204203415.29097.qmail@web25606.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> --- Wladimir Palant schrieb: > M. Merz wrote: > > AbP 0.6.0.4 / GUID > > {d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d} > > Was vergessen: der Entwickler-Build ist hier: > http://p2.forumforfree.com/-vp2940-adblockplus.html#2940 > Passiert der Crash damit auch? Ja, leider :-( For the mailing list: Using Dev. version of AbP Only AbP and talkback are active. Crash is reproducable again :-( Talkback ID: TB14754444Z Markus ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 4 21:47:42 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 4 15:48:25 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AbP crashes FF in Yahoo mail forms (new mail, reply) In-Reply-To: <20060204202433.14293.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20060204202433.14293.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <43E512EE.8060406@gtchat.de> M. Merz wrote: > TB14752632G, TB14752373H, TB14752355Z, TB14752156G, > TB14751626M, TB14751136M, TB14750305W, TB14750173Y, > TB14749943Y, TB14749863Y, TB14749763E > > I think this is the one where I disabled all the other > extensions: TB14752156G > > I hope it helps ... Argh... It would've helped if the talkback server actually processed the reports - but it seems that it currently has several thousands reports in the queue. It appears to be stuck on report number 14745604, well before any of your reports :-( Guess, I need to reproduce this myself, not much luck so far... Are you using the new Yahoo Mail Beta? Can you send me your filters list? (doesn't need to go to the mailing list :) Wladimir From pitdicker at wanadoo.nl Sun Feb 5 18:52:34 2006 From: pitdicker at wanadoo.nl (Paul Dicker) Date: Sun Feb 5 12:53:05 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation Message-ID: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> I see there isn't yet a Dutch translation in Adblock 0.6.0.4+. If you are looking for someone to translate, please reply to this e-mail Paul From trev at gtchat.de Sun Feb 5 20:23:19 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sun Feb 5 14:24:00 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> Message-ID: <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> Paul Dicker wrote: > I see there isn't yet a Dutch translation in Adblock 0.6.0.4+. > If you are looking for someone to translate, please reply to this e-mail Sure. You might want to register on Babelzilla and say that you are doing the translation: http://www.babelzilla.org/index.php?option=com_wts&Itemid=88&extension=543&type=lang Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Mon Feb 6 17:12:24 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Mon Feb 6 11:15:39 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released Message-ID: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> Adblock Plus 0.6.1 has been released today Installation: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html (multilingual as well as single-language builds) What's new: * First multilingual release: 12 languages * Filter subscriptions * Detachable sidebar * Toolbar icon Detailed changelog: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/changelog-0.6.1.html From pitdicker at gmail.com Mon Feb 6 20:33:17 2006 From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker) Date: Mon Feb 6 14:33:48 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> Wladimir Palant schreef: > Paul Dicker wrote: > >> I see there isn't yet a Dutch translation in Adblock 0.6.0.4+. >> If you are looking for someone to translate, please reply to this e-mail > > > Sure. You might want to register on Babelzilla and say that you are > doing the translation: > http://www.babelzilla.org/index.php?option=com_wts&Itemid=88&extension=543&type=lang > > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > I'm finished translating. I actually wanted to test the translation, but I messed something up and couldn't install Adblock Plus anymore (at least, with this profile, luckly I have a backup). Could you make please build it for me, so I can test it? BTW, I don't understand why babelzilla reports I've translated 90%, while everything is done. Paul Dicker From trev at gtchat.de Mon Feb 6 20:46:53 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Mon Feb 6 14:47:38 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <43E7A7AD.8040301@gtchat.de> Paul Dicker wrote: > I'm finished translating. I actually wanted to test the translation, but > I messed something up and couldn't install Adblock Plus anymore (at > least, with this profile, luckly I have a backup). Could you make please > build it for me, so I can test it? I did already, see here: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation_localized.html The mirrors don't have it yet, it will take a few hours. > BTW, I don't understand why babelzilla reports I've translated 90%, > while everything is done. That's probably because you didn't change contents.rdf, and that's probably also the reason why you couldn't install it. I fixed this. Wladimir From pitdicker at gmail.com Tue Feb 7 12:56:47 2006 From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker) Date: Tue Feb 7 06:57:18 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E7A7AD.8040301@gtchat.de> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> <43E7A7AD.8040301@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E88AFF.4010207@gmail.com> Wladimir Palant schreef: > Paul Dicker wrote: > >> I'm finished translating. I actually wanted to test the translation, >> but I messed something up and couldn't install Adblock Plus anymore >> (at least, with this profile, luckly I have a backup). Could you make >> please build it for me, so I can test it? > > > I did already, see here: > http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation_localized.html > The mirrors don't have it yet, it will take a few hours. > >> BTW, I don't understand why babelzilla reports I've translated 90%, >> while everything is done. > > > That's probably because you didn't change contents.rdf, and that's > probably also the reason why you couldn't install it. I fixed this. > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > Thanks, I've found quite a lot mistakes. Wirh your fix i can now also put it together correctly. Paul From trev at gtchat.de Tue Feb 7 13:28:10 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Tue Feb 7 07:28:47 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E88AFF.4010207@gmail.com> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> <43E7A7AD.8040301@gtchat.de> <43E88AFF.4010207@gmail.com> Message-ID: <43E8925A.9060705@gtchat.de> Paul Dicker wrote: > Thanks, I've found quite a lot mistakes. Wirh your fix i can now also > put it together correctly. Thanks, I've uploaded the changes and made a new single-language build (that's still possible because I didn't make any changes on Adblock Plus since 0.6.1 release). You had the access key N defined twice in the subscriptions dialog, so I changed access key for "Abonnementnaam" to B and for "Automatisch bijwerken" to T. Take a look and tell me whether you agree to the changes. It will take a few hours again until the mirrors update, if you have CVS installed you can download the file already: cvs -d :pserver:guest@mozdev.org:/cvs login cvs -z3 -d :pserver:guest@mozdev.org:/cvs co adblockplus/downloads/adblockplus-0.6.1-nl-NL.xpi (the last two lines are actually one - I had to insert the line break, otherwise the mail client would've done it) Wladimir From pitdicker at gmail.com Tue Feb 7 15:38:30 2006 From: pitdicker at gmail.com (Paul Dicker) Date: Tue Feb 7 09:39:15 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Dutch translation In-Reply-To: <43E8925A.9060705@gtchat.de> References: <43E63B62.5050202@wanadoo.nl> <43E650A7.3080702@gtchat.de> <43E7A47D.30903@gmail.com> <43E7A7AD.8040301@gtchat.de> <43E88AFF.4010207@gmail.com> <43E8925A.9060705@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43E8B0E6.6020207@gmail.com> Wladimir Palant schreef: > Paul Dicker wrote: > >> Thanks, I've found quite a lot mistakes. Wirh your fix i can now also >> put it together correctly. > > > Thanks, I've uploaded the changes and made a new single-language build > (that's still possible because I didn't make any changes on Adblock > Plus since 0.6.1 release). You had the access key N defined twice in > the subscriptions dialog, so I changed access key for "Abonnementnaam" > to B and for "Automatisch bijwerken" to T. Take a look and tell me > whether you agree to the changes. It will take a few hours again until > the mirrors update, if you have CVS installed you can download the > file already: > > cvs -d :pserver:guest@mozdev.org:/cvs login > cvs -z3 -d :pserver:guest@mozdev.org:/cvs co > adblockplus/downloads/adblockplus-0.6.1-nl-NL.xpi > > (the last two lines are actually one - I had to insert the line break, > otherwise the mail client would've done it) > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > Glad you look so close to it, I didn't notice (I almost never use acceskeys). Your changes look fine. Greetings, Paul From lhzhou at yeah.net Wed Feb 8 14:14:11 2006 From: lhzhou at yeah.net (Li-Hui Zhou) Date: Wed Feb 8 01:14:49 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. Message-ID: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> The one I met was this page: https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php which include http ads from http://english.jobchina.net that cannot be eliminated with AdBlockPlus. I wonder if there's already some kind of solution for this situation. -- Li-Hui Zhou From pirlouy at free.fr Wed Feb 8 10:20:15 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Wed Feb 8 04:13:58 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43E9B7CF.3020800@free.fr> Indeed, despite the filter "english.jobchina.net", 2 frames are displayed at https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Wed Feb 8 14:24:10 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Wed Feb 8 08:25:00 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43E9F0FA.8040402@uni-hiltrup.de> Li-Hui Zhou schrieb: > The one I met was this page: https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php > which include http ads from http://english.jobchina.net that cannot be > eliminated with AdBlockPlus. It does work for me. I just added english.jobchina.net to the blocklist and the whole iframe was removed. This was with Adblock+ 0.6.1 on Fx 1.5.0.1 both localized german. From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Wed Feb 8 14:32:06 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Wed Feb 8 08:32:55 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43E9F2D6.8000509@uni-hiltrup.de> Strange, like I wrote before, after creating the filter "english.jobchina.net" the whole iframe gets removed. But after reloading the site only the gif gets blocked while the iframe (with the text ad) remains untouched. From trev at gtchat.de Wed Feb 8 14:59:17 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Wed Feb 8 09:00:05 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43E9F935.1090808@gtchat.de> Li-Hui Zhou wrote: > The one I met was this page: https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php > which include http ads from http://english.jobchina.net that cannot be > eliminated with AdBlockPlus. By default there is a whitelisting filter @@https:// - maybe that's the reason? Unless it is that - I already noticed that ABP 0.6.1 doesn't always show blocked frames as such. Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Wed Feb 8 16:26:48 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Wed Feb 8 10:27:31 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43EA0DB8.5040101@gtchat.de> Li-Hui Zhou wrote: > The one I met was this page: https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php > which include http ads from http://english.jobchina.net that cannot be > eliminated with AdBlockPlus. Sorry, my previous answer was wrong - something is definitely wrong here... Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Wed Feb 8 16:40:21 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Wed Feb 8 10:41:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] AdBlockPlus wont work correctly with https page with http Ads. In-Reply-To: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> References: <20060208141120.1B20.LHZHOU@yeah.net> Message-ID: <43EA10E5.3040905@gtchat.de> Li-Hui Zhou wrote: > The one I met was this page: https://www.yehua.org/firefox/index.php > which include http ads from http://english.jobchina.net that cannot be > eliminated with AdBlockPlus. Found the problem - what is actually loading in this frame is https://www.yehua.org/firefox/topbanner.php and this one can be blocked. This page is redirected to english.jobchina.net - that's why ABP is showing the wrong address for the frame in the sidebar. Needs to be fixed... Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Thu Feb 9 01:47:24 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Wed Feb 8 19:48:17 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43EA911C.4030404@uni-hiltrup.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: > I'm reluctant adding more shortcuts as shortcuts are shared space Have you considered yet whether or not to add a shortcut to enable/disable adblock? I really think the shared space is not a problem as strg+shift is uncommon enough and also Adblock is one of the most popular extensions. Maybe you could remove the strg+shift+a shortcut if absolutely necessary. I don't think people will use this too often as normally you don't need the preferences every day, disabeling Adblock is more often necessary though (just my 2c of course). Especially with the new (nice thing btw) context menu in the statusbar. My wishlist still stands... (in order of importance to me) :) strg+shift+B = Elements strg+shift+E = Enable/Disable strg+shift+F = Tabs on Flash/Java strg+shift+A = Preferences (I know two of them are already there) Okay, that's all for now. :) From trev at gtchat.de Thu Feb 9 17:39:22 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Thu Feb 9 11:40:45 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43EA911C.4030404@uni-hiltrup.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43EA911C.4030404@uni-hiltrup.de> Message-ID: <43EB703A.5000304@gtchat.de> Florian Baur wrote: > as strg+shift is uncommon enough It isn't - most extensions use it (btw - "strg" is German, means "Steuerung", in English it is "ctrl" as "Control" ;) > and also Adblock is one of the most popular extensions. See http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_project.html#shortcuts > Maybe you could remove the strg+shift+a shortcut if absolutely > necessary. I don't think people will use this too often as normally you > don't need the preferences every day, disabeling Adblock is more often > necessary though (just my 2c of course). Well, it seems people do use it. And they are complaining that it conflicts with Web Developer extension. So: no, I didn't decide what to do with this yet. Wladimir From Calain80 at h3c.de Fri Feb 10 07:51:29 2006 From: Calain80 at h3c.de (Calain) Date: Fri Feb 10 01:53:40 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] some suggestions In-Reply-To: <43EB703A.5000304@gtchat.de> References: <43E2CF4D.5090000@uni-hiltrup.de> <43E35765.4070309@gtchat.de> <43EA911C.4030404@uni-hiltrup.de> <43EB703A.5000304@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43EC37F1.70509@h3c.de> Wladimir Palant schrieb: >> necessary. I don't think people will use this too often as normally you >> don't need the preferences every day, disabeling Adblock is more often >> necessary though (just my 2c of course). > Maybe you could remove the strg+shift+a shortcut if absolutely > > Well, it seems people do use it. And they are complaining that it > conflicts with Web Developer extension. So: no, I didn't decide what > to do with this yet. I also use ctrl+shift+a often. I don't think the conflict with web developer is critical, cause you can just assign a new letter to validate locale page in the options of web developer. E.g. I changed it to ctrl+shift+v. I event think that this fits better. ;-) Calain From mp3geek at gmail.com Fri Feb 10 21:40:29 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Fri Feb 10 03:41:30 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> Message-ID: very impressed with it, its fast, and the subscription service works nicely. Just a minor issue, the ability to sort in the sidebar and to on the urls in the sidebar would be really handy. On 2/7/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > Adblock Plus 0.6.1 has been released today > > Installation: > http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html (multilingual as well as > single-language builds) > > What's new: > * First multilingual release: 12 languages > * Filter subscriptions > * Detachable sidebar > * Toolbar icon > > Detailed changelog: > http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/changelog-0.6.1.html > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060210/64b86d1a/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 10 13:12:45 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 10 07:13:28 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> mp3geek wrote: > very impressed with it, its fast, and the subscription service works > nicely. Just a minor issue, the ability to sort in the sidebar and to > on the urls in the sidebar would be really handy. Both are already in the bug database and both on plan for 0.6.2 (the second suggestion as "context menu for the sidebar items"). Wladimir From pirlouy at free.fr Fri Feb 10 16:24:57 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Fri Feb 10 10:18:15 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Question about the menu Help > FAQ Message-ID: <43ECB049.8080907@free.fr> When we click on this menu, it will open http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq.html Could it be possible to open a link like http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq-fr.html for a french locale for example ? It's just a detail, but it would motivate myself to translate the FAQ. :-) From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 10 16:37:13 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 10 10:38:00 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Question about the menu Help > FAQ In-Reply-To: <43ECB049.8080907@free.fr> References: <43ECB049.8080907@free.fr> Message-ID: <43ECB329.4040101@gtchat.de> pirlouy wrote: > Could it be possible to open a link like > http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq-fr.html for a french locale for example ? Yes, all help links can be localized - see faq.url in settings.dtd. > It's just a detail, but it would motivate myself to translate the FAQ. :-) Have fun :) Wladimir From senorjoel at afw-trading.com Fri Feb 10 19:40:56 2006 From: senorjoel at afw-trading.com (Gabriel Morris) Date: Fri Feb 10 13:41:14 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide Message-ID: <000001c62e9b$11cb9100$0100007f@localhost> ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 46 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 33 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 46 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060210/72dbb17a/attachment.htm From pirlouy at free.fr Fri Feb 10 22:12:09 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Fri Feb 10 16:05:27 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Question about the menu Help > FAQ In-Reply-To: <43ECB329.4040101@gtchat.de> References: <43ECB049.8080907@free.fr> <43ECB329.4040101@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43ED01A9.1040309@free.fr> You agree to host it or you prefer not to be related with this ? From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 10 22:23:22 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 10 16:24:27 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Question about the menu Help > FAQ In-Reply-To: <43ED01A9.1040309@free.fr> References: <43ECB049.8080907@free.fr> <43ECB329.4040101@gtchat.de> <43ED01A9.1040309@free.fr> Message-ID: <43ED044A.5080805@gtchat.de> pirlouy wrote: > You agree to host it or you prefer not to be related with this ? I can host it. Will be a little trouble updating it (I don't think there is no such a thing as limited CVS access on MozDev) but ok. Wladimir From mp3geek at gmail.com Sat Feb 11 11:13:54 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Fri Feb 10 17:14:31 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> Message-ID: thanks :) Is it possible to add the adblock-plus icon (the same one in the naviagation toolbar) through the customise-toolbar options, so we can add the adblock-plus icon to the bookmark toolbar? On 2/11/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > mp3geek wrote: > > very impressed with it, its fast, and the subscription service works > > nicely. Just a minor issue, the ability to sort in the sidebar and to > > on the urls in the sidebar would be really handy. > > Both are already in the bug database and both on plan for 0.6.2 (the > second suggestion as "context menu for the sidebar items"). > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060211/fe39040c/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 10 23:26:09 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 10 17:26:53 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> mp3geek wrote: > Is it possible to add the adblock-plus icon (the same one in the > naviagation toolbar) through the customise-toolbar options, so we can > add the adblock-plus icon to the bookmark toolbar? How about trying it? Click "Customize" and drag the button to the toolbar where you want to have it. Wladimir From mp3geek at gmail.com Sat Feb 11 11:33:30 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Fri Feb 10 17:34:04 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> Message-ID: ah ok, I was expecting it to show up in the customise toolbar options On 2/11/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > mp3geek wrote: > > Is it possible to add the adblock-plus icon (the same one in the > > naviagation toolbar) through the customise-toolbar options, so we can > > add the adblock-plus icon to the bookmark toolbar? > > How about trying it? Click "Customize" and drag the button to the > toolbar where you want to have it. > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060211/f23993e6/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 10 23:44:36 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 10 17:45:25 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> mp3geek wrote: > ah ok, I was expecting it to show up in the customise toolbar options Customize palette doesn't show button that are already on some toolbar... From mp3geek at gmail.com Sat Feb 11 12:39:41 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Fri Feb 10 18:40:16 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> Message-ID: ok now we've sorted out the toolbar issue :) the adblock-icon is quite large, a few pixels too large (using the devel version of adblock-plus) http://mdew.orcon.net.nz/icon-to-large.jpg On 2/11/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > mp3geek wrote: > > ah ok, I was expecting it to show up in the customise toolbar options > > Customize palette doesn't show button that are already on some toolbar... > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060211/b7027bed/attachment.htm From jlenestour at imap.cc Sat Feb 11 09:11:40 2006 From: jlenestour at imap.cc (Julien Le Nestour) Date: Sat Feb 11 12:12:19 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Blocking flash banners stop working after creating new profiles Message-ID: <1139677900.30973.254133875@webmail.messagingengine.com> Hi, I ahve used for a long time, now, Adblock Plus, and it worked perfectly, blocking everything I wanted. However, I have created several other profiles for FF, allowing me top customize everything. Right after creating thos profiles, the flash banners reappeared on several websites and I have no longer the possibility to manually block them since there is no tab to do it. I have tried a lot of things and changes in the adblock options and settings, and unfortunately, I have not been able to restore its previous behaviour. Moreover, I installed the extension on all the profiles, hoping that it would solve the problems, but it didn't work either. Does anybody have a clue or pointer on how to solve this issue? Thanks a lot for your help and for the first extension I installed a long way back :-) Cheers, Julien -- Julien Le Nestour jlenestour@imap.cc -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 11 20:01:17 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 11 14:02:04 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43EE347D.5050805@gtchat.de> mp3geek wrote: > ok now we've sorted out the toolbar issue :) the adblock-icon is quite > large, a few pixels too large (using the devel version of adblock-plus) Same thing happens if you move e.g. the Home button to personal bookmarks. This issue can be solved if you check "Use small icons" in the Customize Toolbar window - it will change the size for every icon however. There is nothing special about the bookmarks toolbar that would indicate that you always have to use small icons with it. And I don't think that making an exception for this toolbar would be a good thing - somebody might have moved several of his icons to the bookmarks and then these icons would be large, not the ABP icon however. Wladimir From mp3geek at gmail.com Sun Feb 12 09:03:41 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Sat Feb 11 15:04:14 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43EE347D.5050805@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> <43EE347D.5050805@gtchat.de> Message-ID: that screeny is with "Use small icons" enabled On 2/12/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > mp3geek wrote: > > ok now we've sorted out the toolbar issue :) the adblock-icon is quite > > large, a few pixels too large (using the devel version of adblock-plus) > > Same thing happens if you move e.g. the Home button to personal > bookmarks. This issue can be solved if you check "Use small icons" in > the Customize Toolbar window - it will change the size for every icon > however. > > There is nothing special about the bookmarks toolbar that would indicate > that you always have to use small icons with it. And I don't think that > making an exception for this toolbar would be a good thing - somebody > might have moved several of his icons to the bookmarks and then these > icons would be large, not the ABP icon however. > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060212/19ad0113/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Sat Feb 11 22:23:16 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sat Feb 11 16:24:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> <43EE347D.5050805@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <43EE55C4.2010501@gtchat.de> mp3geek wrote: > that screeny is with "Use small icons" enabled That's strange, for me the bookmarks toolbar doesn't get stretched with "Use small icons". But now that you mention it - it really is the 16x16 icon, it should be small enough. For some reason you have 7 pixel both on top and bottom of the icon - I only have 3. Wladimir From mp3geek at gmail.com Sun Feb 12 10:51:05 2006 From: mp3geek at gmail.com (mp3geek) Date: Sat Feb 11 17:06:49 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1 released In-Reply-To: <43EE55C4.2010501@gtchat.de> References: <43E77568.1020909@gtchat.de> <43EC833D.40401@gtchat.de> <43ED1301.9080001@gtchat.de> <43ED1754.4060009@gtchat.de> <43EE347D.5050805@gtchat.de> <43EE55C4.2010501@gtchat.de> Message-ID: I reduced the size of the icon, which did make the padding smaller, but it did seem theres a lot of padding regardless of which size I reduced the icon too. On 2/12/06, Wladimir Palant wrote: > > mp3geek wrote: > > that screeny is with "Use small icons" enabled > > That's strange, for me the bookmarks toolbar doesn't get stretched with > "Use small icons". But now that you mention it - it really is the 16x16 > icon, it should be small enough. For some reason you have 7 pixel both > on top and bottom of the icon - I only have 3. > > Wladimir > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060212/f2a19a98/attachment.htm From denad at gmx.net Sat Feb 11 23:49:16 2006 From: denad at gmx.net (denad@gmx.net) Date: Sat Feb 11 17:50:15 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] A suggestion for the feature 'show hit count for filter' Message-ID: <14364.1139698156@www020.gmx.net> Hi, I'm waiting for the new feature 'show hit count for filter'. For this I have some ideas. First, I would be pleased, if it would give an option, which tests and counts all filters. Currently - according to FAQ - Adblock will only go through the list of filters until it finds one that matches. With the activated new option it would be possible to find all filters which may work but will never be chosen because an other filter matches first. With that possibility I could optimize the filter list. Second, I do not need the tooltip "Adblock plus ist aktiviert, klicken Sie hier, um ...." of the adblock icon. I would prefer, if tooltip says "Adblock plus blocks 12 items with 4 filters." And third, I hope you plan an overall statistic. So I can impress others with the info about the blocked links, pictures, scripts, .. and so on. Perhaps you can use one of my ideas. Regards, Dennis -- Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch? NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie From trev at gtchat.de Sun Feb 12 11:34:22 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sun Feb 12 05:35:08 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] A suggestion for the feature 'show hit count for filter' In-Reply-To: <14364.1139698156@www020.gmx.net> References: <14364.1139698156@www020.gmx.net> Message-ID: <43EF0F2E.3070508@gtchat.de> denad@gmx.net wrote: > Currently - according to FAQ - Adblock will only go through the list of > filters until it finds one that matches. > With the activated new option it would be possible to find all filters which > may work but will never be chosen because an other filter matches first. > With that possibility I could optimize the filter list. Well, you'll sort by hit count and look for anything with 0 hits... > Second, I do not need the tooltip "Adblock plus ist aktiviert, klicken Sie > hier, um ...." of the adblock icon. > I would prefer, if tooltip says "Adblock plus blocks 12 items with 4 > filters." That's planned, there is a bug on it. > And third, I hope you plan an overall statistic. So I can impress others > with the info about the blocked links, pictures, scripts, .. and so on. This actually wasn't planned... Wladimir From trev at gtchat.de Sun Feb 12 13:11:27 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Sun Feb 12 07:12:31 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Adblock Plus 0.6.1.1 released Message-ID: <43EF25EF.3020603@gtchat.de> Adblock Plus 0.6.1.1 has been released today. This is mainly a bugfix release. Installation: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/installation.html Major changes: * Fixed potential memory leaks * Fixed several frame-related issues * Number of supported languages is now 16 * Allowed blocking of background images via context menu Detailed changelog: http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/changelog-0.6.1.1.html From CarolynMcghee at allstartees.com Tue Feb 14 07:32:25 2006 From: CarolynMcghee at allstartees.com (Helen Miranda) Date: Mon Feb 13 23:20:44 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Microsoft Re: OEM Windows, Office XP, & Photoshop on s8le Now Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060214/89aaf51f/attachment.htm From poomthebest at hotmail.com Tue Feb 14 02:03:09 2006 From: poomthebest at hotmail.com (-PK-) Date: Tue Feb 14 06:04:09 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] GUI suggestions Message-ID: I am sure many people dislike one part of firefox. You can customize many parts of Firefox, but not in the options manu, chrome editting you go. While this may seem widely customizable to developers like you guys, I think that many people would find it hard or taking too much time to do these. I can do that, but I think Adblock Plus 0.6 would be better if some edits are made. By reading http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_customization.html, I found that the status bar icon customization is an area that Adblock Plus 0.5 beats 0.6 in. In Adblock 0.5, there are choices the user can choose for the status icon. I think that it would be better too if 0.6 decides to add that part in. Perhaps in the preferrences>options, there could be a new selection "Customize icon...", which will open a new window with lists of icons or even browse for icon customized by user if need be. (I found the "AD" icon in 0.5 exaclty what I want. I see you don't like the idea of having AD as the icon though, Palant.) Furthermore, why did you guys decide to discontinue the dragging icon in status bar? I am sure that is not hard. Although it is not used often, why remove it if it is possible and implemented? PS. First day using 0.6 here, kinda impressed by how much simpler it is. =D -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060214/7f627a2e/attachment.htm From pirlouy at free.fr Tue Feb 14 12:21:55 2006 From: pirlouy at free.fr (pirlouy) Date: Tue Feb 14 06:15:10 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] GUI suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F1BD53.6070406@free.fr> Do you see a lot of extension with an option which propose several icons ? Not sure no... If you don't like icon, you can use userchrome. If you find the manip of userchrome too difficult, then you change nothing. :-) For the statusbar, there is an extension which is more adapted: organised statusbar: https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&id=1759 -PK- a ?crit : > > I am sure many people dislike one part of firefox. You can customize > many parts of Firefox, but not in the options manu, chrome editting > you go. While this may seem widely customizable to developers like you > guys, I think that many people would find it hard or taking too much > time to do these. I can do that, but I think Adblock Plus 0.6 would be > better if some edits are made. > > > > By reading http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_customization.html, I > found that the status bar icon customization is an area that Adblock > Plus 0.5 beats 0.6 in. In Adblock 0.5, there are choices the user can > choose for the status icon. I think that it would be better too if 0.6 > decides to add that part in. Perhaps in the preferrences>options, > there could be a new selection "Customize icon...", which will open a > new window with lists of icons or even browse for icon customized by > user if need be. (I found the "AD" icon in 0.5 exaclty what I want. I > see you don't like the idea of having AD as the icon though, Palant.) > Furthermore, why did you guys decide to discontinue the dragging icon > in status bar? I am sure that is not hard. Although it is not used > often, why remove it if it is possible and implemented? > > > > PS. First day using 0.6 here, kinda impressed by how much simpler it > is. =D > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > AdblockPlus mailing list > AdblockPlus@mozdev.org > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/adblockplus > From trev at gtchat.de Tue Feb 14 12:19:22 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Tue Feb 14 06:20:01 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] GUI suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F1BCBA.9020309@gtchat.de> -PK- wrote: > By reading http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_customization.html, I found > that the status bar icon customization is an area that Adblock Plus 0.5 > beats 0.6 in. In Adblock 0.5, there are choices the user can choose for > the status icon. I think that it would be better too if 0.6 decides to > add that part in. Perhaps in the preferrences>options, there could be a > new selection "Customize icon...", which will open a new window with > lists of icons or even browse for icon customized by user if need be. Nope. See http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_project.html#options People who want to customize the icon usually are power users and can easily follow the instructions in http://adblockplus.mozdev.org/faq_customization.html. The others don't need it. Wladimir From colinting at 4lifequotes.com Tue Feb 14 16:29:59 2006 From: colinting at 4lifequotes.com (Wyatt Alexander) Date: Tue Feb 14 10:31:00 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide Message-ID: <000001c631a5$c4eeff80$0100007f@localhost> 1 2 Photo shop 9.0 3 XP 4 Acro bat 7 5 MX 2O04 6 Draw 12 7 Anti virus 2005 8 Server 9 10 Illustrator 11 Lst: $550.00 ur: $69.95 Sv: $480.05 ( 87%) ---------------- List: $200.00 Our: $49.95 You: $150.05 ( 75%) ---------------- V 9.0 Lis: $599.00 Or: $69.95 Sav: $529.05 ( 88%) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060214/1b53042b/attachment-0001.htm From stuff at phosphor-ink.com Thu Feb 16 21:51:36 2006 From: stuff at phosphor-ink.com (James Sheridan) Date: Thu Feb 16 21:52:08 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Feature suggestion Message-ID: <43F53A38.50105@phosphor-ink.com> I'd love if there was a way to not just filter out images, but also alter them. For example, strip out the akamai.net image trackers by having two parts to a filter: 1. The usual regex to indicate what you want to match 2. The text to replace it with eg. 1. http:\/\/\w+\.\w+\.akamai\.net\/\d+\/\d+\/\d+\/\d+\/ 2. http:// For links like http://a191.g.akamai.net/7/191/1560/5/images.mysite.mydomain/fred.gif you'd end up with http://images.mysite.mydomain/fred.gif Is this possible? -- James From trev at gtchat.de Fri Feb 17 17:45:22 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Fri Feb 17 11:46:49 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Feature suggestion In-Reply-To: <43F53A38.50105@phosphor-ink.com> References: <43F53A38.50105@phosphor-ink.com> Message-ID: <43F5FDA2.9030108@gtchat.de> James Sheridan wrote: > I'd love if there was a way to not just filter out images, but also > alter them. ... > Is this possible? No, that's not how content policies work - there is only a strict yes or no. Wladimir From spencerb77 at aol.com Sat Feb 18 09:24:58 2006 From: spencerb77 at aol.com (spencerb77) Date: Sat Feb 18 11:26:04 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Windows Meida Palyer Active-X Plug-in ? Message-ID: <43F74A5A.2070508@aol.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060218/d73a4c87/attachment.htm From security at chaseonline.chase.com Sun Feb 19 21:37:29 2006 From: security at chaseonline.chase.com (Chase Bank ) Date: Sun Feb 19 15:37:18 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Update your Account Message-ID: <1140381448.9156.cbf@chaseonline.chase.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060219/746a48f7/attachment.htm From KateConner at haruchanpapa.com Mon Feb 20 03:28:19 2006 From: KateConner at haruchanpapa.com (Sarah Doss) Date: Sun Feb 19 20:52:44 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Win XP 80 % Discount on All Adobe, Windows Titles at Helen's softdeals Message-ID: <2qHVjIbK43IWBWcABM2pWUb.8DB0Jgrg6NLQC@haruchanpapa.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060220/9020d285/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Mon Feb 20 13:27:52 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Mon Feb 20 07:28:46 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Windows Meida Palyer Active-X Plug-in ? In-Reply-To: <43F74A5A.2070508@aol.com> References: <43F74A5A.2070508@aol.com> Message-ID: <43F9B5C8.3010106@gtchat.de> spencerb77 wrote: > I have installed the WMP ActiveX plugin for FireFox 1.5.0.1. > Installation instructions warn about the need to disable 0BJ-TAB > when using Adblock (see note below). Should I do something similar > for Adblock Plus? Somebody asked already. I must say - I have no idea, you really should ask the people who wrote this warning. At the very least they should be able to give a testcase. In general: Adblock attaches data to the objects, that's the only reason I can think of why it causes this problem. Adblock Plus 0.6+ doesn't do this any more (it doesn't touch the objects at all), so it should fine - unless the problem is something else of course. Wladimir From tperla01 at yahoo.fr Tue Feb 21 16:16:23 2006 From: tperla01 at yahoo.fr (PERLA Tony) Date: Tue Feb 21 10:17:51 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Comment Message-ID: <20060221151623.74808.qmail@web26413.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> AdBlock Plus is not much of a help, as I notice that Yahoo has created a way to work around it. On the Yahoo email page, on the right, is typically an advert. It suffices to block the advert and re-download the page to find the same advert pop up. Meaning, Yahoo changes the address of the advert automatically in order to side track the adblock filter. I wouldn't know how to employ a wildcard to generalize the filter ... and I am not exactly a novice to HTML. If that can work, I suggest that you explain VERY PLAINLY how to do it. Or, offer a means for doing it automatically. Regards, --------------------------------- Nouveau : t?l?phonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! D?couvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.T?l?chargez la version beta. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/adblockplus/attachments/20060221/c4b6d101/attachment.htm From trev at gtchat.de Tue Feb 21 18:05:46 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Tue Feb 21 12:06:37 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Comment In-Reply-To: <20060221151623.74808.qmail@web26413.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20060221151623.74808.qmail@web26413.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <43FB486A.20208@gtchat.de> PERLA Tony wrote: > On the Yahoo email page, on the right, is typically an advert. It > suffices to block the advert and re-download the page to find the same > advert pop up. Meaning, Yahoo changes the address of the advert > automatically in order to side track the adblock filter. That's usually the case. And so far they aren't doing anything against Adblock (Plus), they simply want to show you different ads whenever you load a page. I use http://*.yimg.com/*.yimg.com/a/* - this seems to block all Yahoo ads. > I wouldn't know how to employ a wildcard to generalize the filter ... Well, you look at a few ad addresses: http://eur.a1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/a/eu/any/yahoomailgsp.gif http://eur.a1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/a/de/any/dkb/mailbutton25x251.gif ... Then you decide - what are the common parts in the ads? And you replace everything that can change by *. You have to be a little careful here: Yahoo uses similar addresses for ads and regular images, your shouldn't remove /a/ from your filter. Wladimir From fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de Wed Feb 22 13:42:48 2006 From: fbaur at uni-hiltrup.de (Florian Baur) Date: Wed Feb 22 07:43:41 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Comment In-Reply-To: <20060221151623.74808.qmail@web26413.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20060221151623.74808.qmail@web26413.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <43FC5C48.3070704@uni-hiltrup.de> Like Wladimir already wrote, the changing URL probably isn't there to stop Adblock but to show different ads. But as Adblock uses "regular expression" filters (search google for how to use that) you can easily create very powerful filter rules. That has nothing to do with HTML though. You needn't go through the hassle to create your own filters. Simply go here: www.pierceive.com and get the Filterset.G, this is a list of filters. It blocks almost all ads for me and gets updated constantly. From adblockplus at gmx.net Thu Feb 23 10:52:49 2006 From: adblockplus at gmx.net (Carsten Gaebler) Date: Thu Feb 23 04:53:47 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Disabled after installation Message-ID: <26577.1140688369@www069.gmx.net> Hi, I am using Mozilla 1.7.8 under Linux and installed AdBlock plus as root. However, when I run Mozilla as an ordinary user, it is disabled, i.e. the icon is greyed out and selecting "AdBlock plus" from the Tools menu doesn't do anything. Did I miss something? cg. -- DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert: GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl From trev at gtchat.de Thu Feb 23 13:26:16 2006 From: trev at gtchat.de (Wladimir Palant) Date: Thu Feb 23 07:27:03 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Disabled after installation In-Reply-To: <26577.1140688369@www069.gmx.net> References: <26577.1140688369@www069.gmx.net> Message-ID: <43FDA9E8.5000306@gtchat.de> Carsten Gaebler wrote: > I am using Mozilla 1.7.8 under Linux and installed AdBlock plus as root. > However, when I run Mozilla as an ordinary user, it is disabled, i.e. the > icon is greyed out and selecting "AdBlock plus" from the Tools menu doesn't > do anything. Did I miss something? http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13273 You need to chmod chrome/adblockplus.jar, components/nsAdblockPlus.js and defaults/preferences/adblockplus.js. Wladimir From adblockplus at gmx.net Thu Feb 23 13:37:54 2006 From: adblockplus at gmx.net (Carsten Gaebler) Date: Thu Feb 23 07:38:53 2006 Subject: [AdblockPlus] Disabled after installation References: <43FDA9E8.5000306@gtchat.de> Message-ID: <18960.1140698274@www054.gmx.net> > http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13273 > You need to chmod chrome/adblockplus.jar, components/nsAdblockPlus.js > and defaults/preferences/adblockplus.js. > > Wladimir That fixed it. Thanks! cg. -- 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++