[Jslib] Re: signed scripts

[basic]

This should work, but I think there might be some issues. Probably wouldn't know 
about them until we try. I'd like to help out with this some time, but I guess 
we have more urgent things to do now...

basic

Pete Collins wrote:
> Wow, if that works, then all you need to do is write a simple installed 
> app that will set these prefs for the user.
> 
> I need to look at this, because we are looking into experimenting with 
> full remote apps served up from mozdev.
> 
> --pete
> 
> 
> basic wrote:
> 
>> see this thread on n.p.m.security
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=ffe286e8.0201111009.5312c38%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DXul,%2BXpCom,%2BSecurity,%2Band%2BA%2BMozilla%2BNewbie%26hl%3Den%26selm%3Dffe286e8.0201111009.5312c38%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D1 
>>
>>
>> or search for "Xul, XpCom, Security, and A Mozilla Newbie" on 
>> n.p.m.security or on groups.google.com
>>
>> basic
>>
>> Andy Edmonds wrote:
>>
>>>>> I have a very data-heavy Web application and I'd like to give users 
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>> option to
>>>
>>>>> store selected data in their filesystems.  So I'm mostly interested in
>>>>>
>>> File I/O
>>>
>>>>> parts.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> On a related note, I ran across a developer sidebar collection that took
>>> advantage of a pref's entry to grant chrome priveledges to the site 
>>> (?) or
>>> script (?), but seem to have lost.
>>>
>>> Anyone got a pointer?
>>>
>>> Thx. AE
>>>